Hedge Fund Treasury Trading and Funding Fragility: Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis
Hedge fund gross U.S. Treasury (UST) exposures doubled from 2018 to February 2020 to $2.4 trillion, primarily driven by relative value arbitrage trading and supported by corresponding increases in repo borrowing. In March 2020, amid unprecedented UST market turmoil, the average UST trading hedge fun...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Finance and economics discussion series 2021-06, Vol.2021 (37), p.1-68 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 68 |
---|---|
container_issue | 37 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Finance and economics discussion series |
container_volume | 2021 |
creator | Kruttli, Mathias S. Monin, Phillip J. Petrasek, Lubomir Watugala, Sumudu W. |
description | Hedge fund gross U.S. Treasury (UST) exposures doubled from 2018 to February 2020 to $2.4 trillion, primarily driven by relative value arbitrage trading and supported by corresponding increases in repo borrowing. In March 2020, amid unprecedented UST market turmoil, the average UST trading hedge fund had a return of -7% and reduced its UST exposure by close to 20%, despite relatively unchanged bilateral repo volumes and haircuts. Analyzing hedge fund-creditor borrowing data, we find the large, more regulated dealers provided disproportionately more funding during the crisis than other creditors. Overall, the step back in hedge fund UST activity was primarily driven by fund-specific liquidity management rather than dealer regulatory constraints. Hedge funds exited the turmoil with 20% higher cash holdings and smaller, more liquid portfolios, despite low contemporaneous outflows. This precautionary flight to cash was more pronounced among funds exposed to greater redemption risk through shorter share restrictions. Hedge funds predominantly trading the cash-futures basis faced greater margin pressure and reduced UST exposures and repo borrowing the most. After the market turmoil subsided following Fed intervention, hedge fund returns recovered quickly, but UST exposures did not revert to pre-shock levels over the subsequent months. |
doi_str_mv | 10.17016/FEDS.2021.038 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_17016_feds_2021_038</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2586020698</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1918-d928cb1df4f56832e9eeaca0af8d8b73dd31830ec2c8678ea7b8538f2c3de9493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtXzwHPu-ZjPybeZNu1hUIPVq9LmkzqlrZbk67Q_97UCl49zePNezPwI-Ses5SXjBeP9Xj0mgomeMokXJCBKIsykaDgkgy4kkUiIM-uyU0Ia8ZENLIBWUzQrpDW_c7ShUcden-MQtt2t6I6mqfNSdder9pNezg-0fFXa3FnkDrfbenhA2k1f5-OEq5o5dvQhlty5fQm4N3vHJK3eryoJsls_jKtnmeJ4YpDYpUAs-TWZS4vQApUiNpoph1YWJbSWslBMjTCQFEC6nIJuQQnjLSoMiWH5OF8d--7zx7DoVl3vd_Fl43IoWCCFQpiKj2njO9C8OiavW-32h8bzpofco1DGyuRXBPJ_adwQv1X-AauO26i</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2586020698</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hedge Fund Treasury Trading and Funding Fragility: Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Kruttli, Mathias S. ; Monin, Phillip J. ; Petrasek, Lubomir ; Watugala, Sumudu W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kruttli, Mathias S. ; Monin, Phillip J. ; Petrasek, Lubomir ; Watugala, Sumudu W.</creatorcontrib><description>Hedge fund gross U.S. Treasury (UST) exposures doubled from 2018 to February 2020 to $2.4 trillion, primarily driven by relative value arbitrage trading and supported by corresponding increases in repo borrowing. In March 2020, amid unprecedented UST market turmoil, the average UST trading hedge fund had a return of -7% and reduced its UST exposure by close to 20%, despite relatively unchanged bilateral repo volumes and haircuts. Analyzing hedge fund-creditor borrowing data, we find the large, more regulated dealers provided disproportionately more funding during the crisis than other creditors. Overall, the step back in hedge fund UST activity was primarily driven by fund-specific liquidity management rather than dealer regulatory constraints. Hedge funds exited the turmoil with 20% higher cash holdings and smaller, more liquid portfolios, despite low contemporaneous outflows. This precautionary flight to cash was more pronounced among funds exposed to greater redemption risk through shorter share restrictions. Hedge funds predominantly trading the cash-futures basis faced greater margin pressure and reduced UST exposures and repo borrowing the most. After the market turmoil subsided following Fed intervention, hedge fund returns recovered quickly, but UST exposures did not revert to pre-shock levels over the subsequent months.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1936-2854</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2767-3898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17016/FEDS.2021.038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Louis: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</publisher><subject>Hedge funds</subject><ispartof>Finance and economics discussion series, 2021-06, Vol.2021 (37), p.1-68</ispartof><rights>2021. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://research.stlouisfed.org/research_terms.html .</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1918-d928cb1df4f56832e9eeaca0af8d8b73dd31830ec2c8678ea7b8538f2c3de9493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1918-d928cb1df4f56832e9eeaca0af8d8b73dd31830ec2c8678ea7b8538f2c3de9493</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8798-2745</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kruttli, Mathias S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monin, Phillip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrasek, Lubomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watugala, Sumudu W.</creatorcontrib><title>Hedge Fund Treasury Trading and Funding Fragility: Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis</title><title>Finance and economics discussion series</title><description>Hedge fund gross U.S. Treasury (UST) exposures doubled from 2018 to February 2020 to $2.4 trillion, primarily driven by relative value arbitrage trading and supported by corresponding increases in repo borrowing. In March 2020, amid unprecedented UST market turmoil, the average UST trading hedge fund had a return of -7% and reduced its UST exposure by close to 20%, despite relatively unchanged bilateral repo volumes and haircuts. Analyzing hedge fund-creditor borrowing data, we find the large, more regulated dealers provided disproportionately more funding during the crisis than other creditors. Overall, the step back in hedge fund UST activity was primarily driven by fund-specific liquidity management rather than dealer regulatory constraints. Hedge funds exited the turmoil with 20% higher cash holdings and smaller, more liquid portfolios, despite low contemporaneous outflows. This precautionary flight to cash was more pronounced among funds exposed to greater redemption risk through shorter share restrictions. Hedge funds predominantly trading the cash-futures basis faced greater margin pressure and reduced UST exposures and repo borrowing the most. After the market turmoil subsided following Fed intervention, hedge fund returns recovered quickly, but UST exposures did not revert to pre-shock levels over the subsequent months.</description><subject>Hedge funds</subject><issn>1936-2854</issn><issn>2767-3898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AAFGM</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>ADZZV</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AGAJT</sourceid><sourceid>AQTIP</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>PQCXX</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtXzwHPu-ZjPybeZNu1hUIPVq9LmkzqlrZbk67Q_97UCl49zePNezPwI-Ses5SXjBeP9Xj0mgomeMokXJCBKIsykaDgkgy4kkUiIM-uyU0Ia8ZENLIBWUzQrpDW_c7ShUcden-MQtt2t6I6mqfNSdder9pNezg-0fFXa3FnkDrfbenhA2k1f5-OEq5o5dvQhlty5fQm4N3vHJK3eryoJsls_jKtnmeJ4YpDYpUAs-TWZS4vQApUiNpoph1YWJbSWslBMjTCQFEC6nIJuQQnjLSoMiWH5OF8d--7zx7DoVl3vd_Fl43IoWCCFQpiKj2njO9C8OiavW-32h8bzpofco1DGyuRXBPJ_adwQv1X-AauO26i</recordid><startdate>20210623</startdate><enddate>20210623</enddate><creator>Kruttli, Mathias S.</creator><creator>Monin, Phillip J.</creator><creator>Petrasek, Lubomir</creator><creator>Watugala, Sumudu W.</creator><general>Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>AAFGM</scope><scope>ABLUL</scope><scope>ABPUF</scope><scope>ABSSA</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>ACIOU</scope><scope>ADZZV</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AGAJT</scope><scope>AGSBL</scope><scope>AJNOY</scope><scope>AQTIP</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BOUDT</scope><scope>CBHQV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQCXX</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8798-2745</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210623</creationdate><title>Hedge Fund Treasury Trading and Funding Fragility: Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis</title><author>Kruttli, Mathias S. ; Monin, Phillip J. ; Petrasek, Lubomir ; Watugala, Sumudu W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1918-d928cb1df4f56832e9eeaca0af8d8b73dd31830ec2c8678ea7b8538f2c3de9493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Hedge funds</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kruttli, Mathias S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monin, Phillip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrasek, Lubomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watugala, Sumudu W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Finance and economics discussion series</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kruttli, Mathias S.</au><au>Monin, Phillip J.</au><au>Petrasek, Lubomir</au><au>Watugala, Sumudu W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hedge Fund Treasury Trading and Funding Fragility: Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis</atitle><jtitle>Finance and economics discussion series</jtitle><date>2021-06-23</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>2021</volume><issue>37</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>1-68</pages><issn>1936-2854</issn><eissn>2767-3898</eissn><abstract>Hedge fund gross U.S. Treasury (UST) exposures doubled from 2018 to February 2020 to $2.4 trillion, primarily driven by relative value arbitrage trading and supported by corresponding increases in repo borrowing. In March 2020, amid unprecedented UST market turmoil, the average UST trading hedge fund had a return of -7% and reduced its UST exposure by close to 20%, despite relatively unchanged bilateral repo volumes and haircuts. Analyzing hedge fund-creditor borrowing data, we find the large, more regulated dealers provided disproportionately more funding during the crisis than other creditors. Overall, the step back in hedge fund UST activity was primarily driven by fund-specific liquidity management rather than dealer regulatory constraints. Hedge funds exited the turmoil with 20% higher cash holdings and smaller, more liquid portfolios, despite low contemporaneous outflows. This precautionary flight to cash was more pronounced among funds exposed to greater redemption risk through shorter share restrictions. Hedge funds predominantly trading the cash-futures basis faced greater margin pressure and reduced UST exposures and repo borrowing the most. After the market turmoil subsided following Fed intervention, hedge fund returns recovered quickly, but UST exposures did not revert to pre-shock levels over the subsequent months.</abstract><cop>St. Louis</cop><pub>Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</pub><doi>10.17016/FEDS.2021.038</doi><tpages>68</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8798-2745</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1936-2854 |
ispartof | Finance and economics discussion series, 2021-06, Vol.2021 (37), p.1-68 |
issn | 1936-2854 2767-3898 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_17016_feds_2021_038 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Hedge funds |
title | Hedge Fund Treasury Trading and Funding Fragility: Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T17%3A48%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hedge%20Fund%20Treasury%20Trading%20and%20Funding%20Fragility:%20Evidence%20from%20the%20COVID-19%20Crisis&rft.jtitle=Finance%20and%20economics%20discussion%20series&rft.au=Kruttli,%20Mathias%20S.&rft.date=2021-06-23&rft.volume=2021&rft.issue=37&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=1-68&rft.issn=1936-2854&rft.eissn=2767-3898&rft_id=info:doi/10.17016/FEDS.2021.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2586020698%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2586020698&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |