Consumers and Guaranteed Asset Protection (GAP Protection) on vehicle financing contracts: a first look
Guaranteed Asset Protection (GAP) shields purchasers from financial risks of losses exceeding insured collateral values if vehicles become total losses. Yet surprisingly little is known about the sales of this product or consumers’ attitudes toward it. In this study, we report the results of a repre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Finance and economics discussion series 2022 (2022-062), p.1-23 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Text Resource |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 23 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2022-062 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Finance and economics discussion series |
container_volume | |
creator | Durkin, Thomas A |
description | Guaranteed Asset Protection (GAP) shields purchasers from financial risks of losses exceeding insured collateral values if vehicles become total losses. Yet surprisingly little is known about the sales of this product or consumers’ attitudes toward it. In this study, we report the results of a representative national survey conducted by the Survey Research Center (SRC) of the University of Michigan. The SRC interviewed 1,206 individuals in the fall of 2020. This survey shows that consumers purchased GAP in about 39 percent of financed vehicle transactions. Consumers purchase GAP more often when there is a heightened financial risk: larger credit amounts, longer loan maturities, and lower income levels. More than 90 percent of GAP purchasers report that buying GAP is a good idea and that they would buy it again. Only about 1 percent of surveyed purchasers indicate dissatisfaction with their choice. A multivariate model of GAP purchase suggests that consumers’ financial situation and terms of the transaction are more important than risk aversion by itself. |
doi_str_mv | 10.17016/FEDS.2022.062 |
format | Text Resource |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_17016_FEDS_2022_062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2740364041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1322-7a19c82c2400d217736c3fe9a82d8e869b630ea727c53affbbea6fe92ab1fc123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEFLAzEQhYMoWKtXzwEvetiaTLZJ9lhqW4WCBfXgKWSzs7qlzdZkV_Dfm1pBT8PMvDfD-wi55GzEFePydj67exoBAxgxCUdkAEqqTOhCH5MBL4TMQI_zU3IW45oxSIN8QF6nrY_9FkOk1ld00dtgfYdY0UmM2NFVaDt0XdN6er2YrP71NzTNPvG9cRukdeOtd41_o671XbCui-fkpLabiBe_dUhe5rPn6X22fFw8TCfLzHEBkCnLC6fBQc5YBVwpIZ2osbAaKo1aFqUUDK0C5cbC1nVZopVpD7bkteMghuTqcHcX2o8eY2fWbR98emlA5SylZDlPqtFB5UIbY8Da7EKzteHLcGZ-8Jk9PrPHZxK-ZKAHA6ZETfyT6yQZs0Jo8Q1HMWzr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>text_resource</recordtype><pqid>2740364041</pqid></control><display><type>text_resource</type><title>Consumers and Guaranteed Asset Protection (GAP Protection) on vehicle financing contracts: a first look</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Durkin, Thomas A</creator><creatorcontrib>Durkin, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><description>Guaranteed Asset Protection (GAP) shields purchasers from financial risks of losses exceeding insured collateral values if vehicles become total losses. Yet surprisingly little is known about the sales of this product or consumers’ attitudes toward it. In this study, we report the results of a representative national survey conducted by the Survey Research Center (SRC) of the University of Michigan. The SRC interviewed 1,206 individuals in the fall of 2020. This survey shows that consumers purchased GAP in about 39 percent of financed vehicle transactions. Consumers purchase GAP more often when there is a heightened financial risk: larger credit amounts, longer loan maturities, and lower income levels. More than 90 percent of GAP purchasers report that buying GAP is a good idea and that they would buy it again. Only about 1 percent of surveyed purchasers indicate dissatisfaction with their choice. A multivariate model of GAP purchase suggests that consumers’ financial situation and terms of the transaction are more important than risk aversion by itself.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1936-2854</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2767-3898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17016/FEDS.2022.062</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, D.C: Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs, Federal Reserve Board</publisher><ispartof>Finance and economics discussion series, 2022 (2022-062), p.1-23</ispartof><tpages>23</tpages><format>23</format><rights>2022. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://research.stlouisfed.org/research_terms.html .</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Durkin, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><title>Consumers and Guaranteed Asset Protection (GAP Protection) on vehicle financing contracts: a first look</title><title>Finance and economics discussion series</title><description>Guaranteed Asset Protection (GAP) shields purchasers from financial risks of losses exceeding insured collateral values if vehicles become total losses. Yet surprisingly little is known about the sales of this product or consumers’ attitudes toward it. In this study, we report the results of a representative national survey conducted by the Survey Research Center (SRC) of the University of Michigan. The SRC interviewed 1,206 individuals in the fall of 2020. This survey shows that consumers purchased GAP in about 39 percent of financed vehicle transactions. Consumers purchase GAP more often when there is a heightened financial risk: larger credit amounts, longer loan maturities, and lower income levels. More than 90 percent of GAP purchasers report that buying GAP is a good idea and that they would buy it again. Only about 1 percent of surveyed purchasers indicate dissatisfaction with their choice. A multivariate model of GAP purchase suggests that consumers’ financial situation and terms of the transaction are more important than risk aversion by itself.</description><issn>1936-2854</issn><issn>2767-3898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>text_resource</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>text_resource</recordtype><sourceid>AAFGM</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>ADZZV</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AGAJT</sourceid><sourceid>AQTIP</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>PQCXX</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEFLAzEQhYMoWKtXzwEvetiaTLZJ9lhqW4WCBfXgKWSzs7qlzdZkV_Dfm1pBT8PMvDfD-wi55GzEFePydj67exoBAxgxCUdkAEqqTOhCH5MBL4TMQI_zU3IW45oxSIN8QF6nrY_9FkOk1ld00dtgfYdY0UmM2NFVaDt0XdN6er2YrP71NzTNPvG9cRukdeOtd41_o671XbCui-fkpLabiBe_dUhe5rPn6X22fFw8TCfLzHEBkCnLC6fBQc5YBVwpIZ2osbAaKo1aFqUUDK0C5cbC1nVZopVpD7bkteMghuTqcHcX2o8eY2fWbR98emlA5SylZDlPqtFB5UIbY8Da7EKzteHLcGZ-8Jk9PrPHZxK-ZKAHA6ZETfyT6yQZs0Jo8Q1HMWzr</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Durkin, Thomas A</creator><general>Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs, Federal Reserve Board</general><general>Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>AAFGM</scope><scope>ABLUL</scope><scope>ABPUF</scope><scope>ABSSA</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>ACIOU</scope><scope>ADZZV</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AGAJT</scope><scope>AGSBL</scope><scope>AJNOY</scope><scope>AQTIP</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BOUDT</scope><scope>CBHQV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQCXX</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Consumers and Guaranteed Asset Protection (GAP Protection) on vehicle financing contracts</title><author>Durkin, Thomas A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1322-7a19c82c2400d217736c3fe9a82d8e869b630ea727c53affbbea6fe92ab1fc123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>text_resources</rsrctype><prefilter>text_resources</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Durkin, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Durkin, Thomas A</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Consumers and Guaranteed Asset Protection (GAP Protection) on vehicle financing contracts: a first look</atitle><jtitle>Finance and economics discussion series</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><issue>2022-062</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>1-23</pages><issn>1936-2854</issn><eissn>2767-3898</eissn><abstract>Guaranteed Asset Protection (GAP) shields purchasers from financial risks of losses exceeding insured collateral values if vehicles become total losses. Yet surprisingly little is known about the sales of this product or consumers’ attitudes toward it. In this study, we report the results of a representative national survey conducted by the Survey Research Center (SRC) of the University of Michigan. The SRC interviewed 1,206 individuals in the fall of 2020. This survey shows that consumers purchased GAP in about 39 percent of financed vehicle transactions. Consumers purchase GAP more often when there is a heightened financial risk: larger credit amounts, longer loan maturities, and lower income levels. More than 90 percent of GAP purchasers report that buying GAP is a good idea and that they would buy it again. Only about 1 percent of surveyed purchasers indicate dissatisfaction with their choice. A multivariate model of GAP purchase suggests that consumers’ financial situation and terms of the transaction are more important than risk aversion by itself.</abstract><cop>Washington, D.C</cop><pub>Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs, Federal Reserve Board</pub><doi>10.17016/FEDS.2022.062</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1936-2854 |
ispartof | Finance and economics discussion series, 2022 (2022-062), p.1-23 |
issn | 1936-2854 2767-3898 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_17016_FEDS_2022_062 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
title | Consumers and Guaranteed Asset Protection (GAP Protection) on vehicle financing contracts: a first look |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A57%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Consumers%20and%20Guaranteed%20Asset%20Protection%20(GAP%20Protection)%20on%20vehicle%20financing%20contracts:%20a%20first%20look&rft.jtitle=Finance%20and%20economics%20discussion%20series&rft.au=Durkin,%20Thomas%20A&rft.date=2022-09&rft.issue=2022-062&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=1-23&rft.issn=1936-2854&rft.eissn=2767-3898&rft_id=info:doi/10.17016/FEDS.2022.062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2740364041%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2740364041&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |