A controlled trial comparing two doses of cyclosporine in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids

It is unknown whether the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone after renal transplantation (RTx) allows for a reduced dose of CsA, to minimize the incidence of CsA-related side effects and to reduce costs. Therefore, 313 renal allograft recipients were randomi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2001-08, Vol.12 (8), p.1750-1757
Hauptverfasser: DE SEVAUX, Ruud G. L, SMAK GREGOOR, Peter J. H, HENE, Ronald J, HOITSMA, Andries J, VOS, Pieter, WEIMAR, Willem, VAN GELDER, Teun, HILBRANDS, Lukas B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1757
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1750
container_title Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
container_volume 12
creator DE SEVAUX, Ruud G. L
SMAK GREGOOR, Peter J. H
HENE, Ronald J
HOITSMA, Andries J
VOS, Pieter
WEIMAR, Willem
VAN GELDER, Teun
HILBRANDS, Lukas B
description It is unknown whether the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone after renal transplantation (RTx) allows for a reduced dose of CsA, to minimize the incidence of CsA-related side effects and to reduce costs. Therefore, 313 renal allograft recipients were randomized for treatment with MMF (1000 mg twice a day), prednisone, and either conventional- or low-dose CsA during the first 3 mo after RTx. The target trough levels were 300 and 150 ng/ml, respectively, during the first 3 mo and 150 ng/ml in both groups thereafter. A total of 313 patients were included: 161 patients received a conventional dose and 152 received a low dose of CsA. During the first 6 mo after RTx, graft failure or patient death occurred in 19 of 161 patients (12%) in the conventional-dose group and in 11 of 152 patients (7%) in the low-dose group (not significant). Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 36 of 161 patients (22%) in the conventional-dose group and in 29 of 152 patients (19%) in the low-dose group (not significant). The incidence of delayed graft function was similar in both groups (31 of 161 [19%] versus 28 of 152 [18%]; not significant). Serum creatinine did not differ between the conventional- and the low-dose groups: 151 +/- 56 micromol/L versus 142 +/- 49 micromol/L at 3 mo and 141 +/- 60 micromol/L versus 136 +/- 49 micromol/L at 6 mo. There were no differences between the groups regarding BP, lipid metabolism, and infectious complications. In the low-dose group, an estimated $500 per patient was saved on the costs of CsA. In conclusion, the addition of MMF to CsA and prednisone after RTx allows the use of a lower-than-conventional dose of CsA, without increasing the risk of rejection.
doi_str_mv 10.1681/ASN.V1281750
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1681_ASN_V1281750</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11461949</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-604dc08bc64befd83fb35e423b864b01b068c51f61adf0dba8a7fe589e0c5f5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkDtPwzAURi0EoqWwMSMPjKTY9SPOWFW8pAoGHmvk-EFdJXZku6r670nVIpju1XfP_YYDwDVGU8wFvp-_v06_8EzgkqETMMaMkIJQhk6HHVFecF6SEbhIaY0QZrOyPAcjjCnHFa3GIM-hCj7H0LZGwxydbIeg62V0_hvmbYA6JJNgsFDtVBtSH4aLgc7v_9Ybr7ILHm5dXsFup0K_Mj60MhvYBWuya6H0ekBjdiqkbGJwOl2CMyvbZK6OcwI-Hx8-Fs_F8u3pZTFfFoowmguOqFZINIrTxlgtiG0IM3RGGjEkCDeIC8Ww5Vhqi3QjhSytYaIySDHLLJmAu0OviiGlaGzdR9fJuKsxqvfy6kFe_StvwG8OeL9pOqP_4KOtAbg9AjIp2doovXLpX6moREnID5tmetY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A controlled trial comparing two doses of cyclosporine in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>DE SEVAUX, Ruud G. L ; SMAK GREGOOR, Peter J. H ; HENE, Ronald J ; HOITSMA, Andries J ; VOS, Pieter ; WEIMAR, Willem ; VAN GELDER, Teun ; HILBRANDS, Lukas B</creator><creatorcontrib>DE SEVAUX, Ruud G. L ; SMAK GREGOOR, Peter J. H ; HENE, Ronald J ; HOITSMA, Andries J ; VOS, Pieter ; WEIMAR, Willem ; VAN GELDER, Teun ; HILBRANDS, Lukas B</creatorcontrib><description>It is unknown whether the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone after renal transplantation (RTx) allows for a reduced dose of CsA, to minimize the incidence of CsA-related side effects and to reduce costs. Therefore, 313 renal allograft recipients were randomized for treatment with MMF (1000 mg twice a day), prednisone, and either conventional- or low-dose CsA during the first 3 mo after RTx. The target trough levels were 300 and 150 ng/ml, respectively, during the first 3 mo and 150 ng/ml in both groups thereafter. A total of 313 patients were included: 161 patients received a conventional dose and 152 received a low dose of CsA. During the first 6 mo after RTx, graft failure or patient death occurred in 19 of 161 patients (12%) in the conventional-dose group and in 11 of 152 patients (7%) in the low-dose group (not significant). Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 36 of 161 patients (22%) in the conventional-dose group and in 29 of 152 patients (19%) in the low-dose group (not significant). The incidence of delayed graft function was similar in both groups (31 of 161 [19%] versus 28 of 152 [18%]; not significant). Serum creatinine did not differ between the conventional- and the low-dose groups: 151 +/- 56 micromol/L versus 142 +/- 49 micromol/L at 3 mo and 141 +/- 60 micromol/L versus 136 +/- 49 micromol/L at 6 mo. There were no differences between the groups regarding BP, lipid metabolism, and infectious complications. In the low-dose group, an estimated $500 per patient was saved on the costs of CsA. In conclusion, the addition of MMF to CsA and prednisone after RTx allows the use of a lower-than-conventional dose of CsA, without increasing the risk of rejection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1046-6673</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-3450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V1281750</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11461949</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASNEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adrenal Cortex Hormones - therapeutic use ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Blood Pressure ; Cyclosporine - administration &amp; dosage ; Cyclosporine - blood ; Cyclosporine - economics ; Cyclosporine - therapeutic use ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug Costs ; Female ; Graft Rejection - epidemiology ; Graft Rejection - pathology ; Humans ; Immunomodulators ; Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Immunosuppressive Agents - blood ; Immunosuppressive Agents - economics ; Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Incidence ; Kidney - physiopathology ; Kidney Transplantation - mortality ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mycophenolic Acid - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Mycophenolic Acid - therapeutic use ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Safety ; Treatment Failure</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2001-08, Vol.12 (8), p.1750-1757</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-604dc08bc64befd83fb35e423b864b01b068c51f61adf0dba8a7fe589e0c5f5f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1089873$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11461949$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DE SEVAUX, Ruud G. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMAK GREGOOR, Peter J. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HENE, Ronald J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOITSMA, Andries J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VOS, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEIMAR, Willem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN GELDER, Teun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HILBRANDS, Lukas B</creatorcontrib><title>A controlled trial comparing two doses of cyclosporine in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids</title><title>Journal of the American Society of Nephrology</title><addtitle>J Am Soc Nephrol</addtitle><description>It is unknown whether the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone after renal transplantation (RTx) allows for a reduced dose of CsA, to minimize the incidence of CsA-related side effects and to reduce costs. Therefore, 313 renal allograft recipients were randomized for treatment with MMF (1000 mg twice a day), prednisone, and either conventional- or low-dose CsA during the first 3 mo after RTx. The target trough levels were 300 and 150 ng/ml, respectively, during the first 3 mo and 150 ng/ml in both groups thereafter. A total of 313 patients were included: 161 patients received a conventional dose and 152 received a low dose of CsA. During the first 6 mo after RTx, graft failure or patient death occurred in 19 of 161 patients (12%) in the conventional-dose group and in 11 of 152 patients (7%) in the low-dose group (not significant). Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 36 of 161 patients (22%) in the conventional-dose group and in 29 of 152 patients (19%) in the low-dose group (not significant). The incidence of delayed graft function was similar in both groups (31 of 161 [19%] versus 28 of 152 [18%]; not significant). Serum creatinine did not differ between the conventional- and the low-dose groups: 151 +/- 56 micromol/L versus 142 +/- 49 micromol/L at 3 mo and 141 +/- 60 micromol/L versus 136 +/- 49 micromol/L at 6 mo. There were no differences between the groups regarding BP, lipid metabolism, and infectious complications. In the low-dose group, an estimated $500 per patient was saved on the costs of CsA. In conclusion, the addition of MMF to CsA and prednisone after RTx allows the use of a lower-than-conventional dose of CsA, without increasing the risk of rejection.</description><subject>Adrenal Cortex Hormones - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Cyclosporine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Cyclosporine - blood</subject><subject>Cyclosporine - economics</subject><subject>Cyclosporine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drug Costs</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunomodulators</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - blood</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - economics</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Kidney - physiopathology</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - mortality</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mycophenolic Acid - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Mycophenolic Acid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><issn>1046-6673</issn><issn>1533-3450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkDtPwzAURi0EoqWwMSMPjKTY9SPOWFW8pAoGHmvk-EFdJXZku6r670nVIpju1XfP_YYDwDVGU8wFvp-_v06_8EzgkqETMMaMkIJQhk6HHVFecF6SEbhIaY0QZrOyPAcjjCnHFa3GIM-hCj7H0LZGwxydbIeg62V0_hvmbYA6JJNgsFDtVBtSH4aLgc7v_9Ybr7ILHm5dXsFup0K_Mj60MhvYBWuya6H0ekBjdiqkbGJwOl2CMyvbZK6OcwI-Hx8-Fs_F8u3pZTFfFoowmguOqFZINIrTxlgtiG0IM3RGGjEkCDeIC8Ww5Vhqi3QjhSytYaIySDHLLJmAu0OviiGlaGzdR9fJuKsxqvfy6kFe_StvwG8OeL9pOqP_4KOtAbg9AjIp2doovXLpX6moREnID5tmetY</recordid><startdate>20010801</startdate><enddate>20010801</enddate><creator>DE SEVAUX, Ruud G. L</creator><creator>SMAK GREGOOR, Peter J. H</creator><creator>HENE, Ronald J</creator><creator>HOITSMA, Andries J</creator><creator>VOS, Pieter</creator><creator>WEIMAR, Willem</creator><creator>VAN GELDER, Teun</creator><creator>HILBRANDS, Lukas B</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010801</creationdate><title>A controlled trial comparing two doses of cyclosporine in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids</title><author>DE SEVAUX, Ruud G. L ; SMAK GREGOOR, Peter J. H ; HENE, Ronald J ; HOITSMA, Andries J ; VOS, Pieter ; WEIMAR, Willem ; VAN GELDER, Teun ; HILBRANDS, Lukas B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-604dc08bc64befd83fb35e423b864b01b068c51f61adf0dba8a7fe589e0c5f5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adrenal Cortex Hormones - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Cyclosporine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Cyclosporine - blood</topic><topic>Cyclosporine - economics</topic><topic>Cyclosporine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drug Costs</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunomodulators</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - blood</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - economics</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Kidney - physiopathology</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - mortality</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mycophenolic Acid - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Mycophenolic Acid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DE SEVAUX, Ruud G. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMAK GREGOOR, Peter J. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HENE, Ronald J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOITSMA, Andries J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VOS, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEIMAR, Willem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN GELDER, Teun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HILBRANDS, Lukas B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Society of Nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DE SEVAUX, Ruud G. L</au><au>SMAK GREGOOR, Peter J. H</au><au>HENE, Ronald J</au><au>HOITSMA, Andries J</au><au>VOS, Pieter</au><au>WEIMAR, Willem</au><au>VAN GELDER, Teun</au><au>HILBRANDS, Lukas B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A controlled trial comparing two doses of cyclosporine in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Society of Nephrology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Soc Nephrol</addtitle><date>2001-08-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1750</spage><epage>1757</epage><pages>1750-1757</pages><issn>1046-6673</issn><eissn>1533-3450</eissn><coden>JASNEU</coden><abstract>It is unknown whether the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone after renal transplantation (RTx) allows for a reduced dose of CsA, to minimize the incidence of CsA-related side effects and to reduce costs. Therefore, 313 renal allograft recipients were randomized for treatment with MMF (1000 mg twice a day), prednisone, and either conventional- or low-dose CsA during the first 3 mo after RTx. The target trough levels were 300 and 150 ng/ml, respectively, during the first 3 mo and 150 ng/ml in both groups thereafter. A total of 313 patients were included: 161 patients received a conventional dose and 152 received a low dose of CsA. During the first 6 mo after RTx, graft failure or patient death occurred in 19 of 161 patients (12%) in the conventional-dose group and in 11 of 152 patients (7%) in the low-dose group (not significant). Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 36 of 161 patients (22%) in the conventional-dose group and in 29 of 152 patients (19%) in the low-dose group (not significant). The incidence of delayed graft function was similar in both groups (31 of 161 [19%] versus 28 of 152 [18%]; not significant). Serum creatinine did not differ between the conventional- and the low-dose groups: 151 +/- 56 micromol/L versus 142 +/- 49 micromol/L at 3 mo and 141 +/- 60 micromol/L versus 136 +/- 49 micromol/L at 6 mo. There were no differences between the groups regarding BP, lipid metabolism, and infectious complications. In the low-dose group, an estimated $500 per patient was saved on the costs of CsA. In conclusion, the addition of MMF to CsA and prednisone after RTx allows the use of a lower-than-conventional dose of CsA, without increasing the risk of rejection.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>11461949</pmid><doi>10.1681/ASN.V1281750</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1046-6673
ispartof Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2001-08, Vol.12 (8), p.1750-1757
issn 1046-6673
1533-3450
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1681_ASN_V1281750
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adrenal Cortex Hormones - therapeutic use
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy
Blood Pressure
Cyclosporine - administration & dosage
Cyclosporine - blood
Cyclosporine - economics
Cyclosporine - therapeutic use
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug Costs
Female
Graft Rejection - epidemiology
Graft Rejection - pathology
Humans
Immunomodulators
Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage
Immunosuppressive Agents - blood
Immunosuppressive Agents - economics
Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use
Incidence
Kidney - physiopathology
Kidney Transplantation - mortality
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Mycophenolic Acid - analogs & derivatives
Mycophenolic Acid - therapeutic use
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Safety
Treatment Failure
title A controlled trial comparing two doses of cyclosporine in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T21%3A50%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20controlled%20trial%20comparing%20two%20doses%20of%20cyclosporine%20in%20conjunction%20with%20mycophenolate%20mofetil%20and%20corticosteroids&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Society%20of%20Nephrology&rft.au=DE%20SEVAUX,%20Ruud%20G.%20L&rft.date=2001-08-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1750&rft.epage=1757&rft.pages=1750-1757&rft.issn=1046-6673&rft.eissn=1533-3450&rft.coden=JASNEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1681/ASN.V1281750&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E11461949%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/11461949&rfr_iscdi=true