Radiation Exposure due to Local Fallout from Soviet Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing in Kazakhstan: Solid Cancer Mortality in the Semipalatinsk Historical Cohort, 1960–1999

Bauer, S., Gusev, B. I., Pivina, L. M., Apsalikov, K. N. and Grosche, B. Radiation Exposure due to Local Fallout from Soviet Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing in Kazakhstan: Solid Cancer Mortality in the Semipalatinsk Historical Cohort, 1960–1999. Radiat. Res. 164, 409–419 (2005). Little informati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiation research 2005-10, Vol.164 (4), p.409-419
Hauptverfasser: Bauer, Susanne, Gusev, Boris I., Pivina, Ludmila M., Apsalikov, Kazbek N., Grosche, Bernd
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 419
container_issue 4
container_start_page 409
container_title Radiation research
container_volume 164
creator Bauer, Susanne
Gusev, Boris I.
Pivina, Ludmila M.
Apsalikov, Kazbek N.
Grosche, Bernd
description Bauer, S., Gusev, B. I., Pivina, L. M., Apsalikov, K. N. and Grosche, B. Radiation Exposure due to Local Fallout from Soviet Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing in Kazakhstan: Solid Cancer Mortality in the Semipalatinsk Historical Cohort, 1960–1999. Radiat. Res. 164, 409–419 (2005). Little information is available on the health effects of exposures to fallout from Soviet nuclear weapons testing and on the combined external and internal environmental exposures that have resulted from these tests. This paper reports the first analysis of the Semipalatinsk historical cohort exposed in the vicinity of the Semipalatinsk nuclear test site, Kazakhstan. The cohort study, which includes 19,545 inhabitants of exposed and comparison villages of the Semipalatinsk region, was set up in the 1960s and comprises 582,750 person-years of follow-up between 1960 and 1999. Cumulative effective radiation dose estimates in this cohort range from 20 mSv to ∼4 Sv. Rates of mortality and cancer mortality in the exposed group substantially exceeded those of the comparison group. Dose–response analyses within the exposed group confirmed a significant trend with dose for all solid cancers (P < 0.0001) and for digestive and respiratory cancers (P = 0.0255 and P < 0.0001), whereas no consistent dose–response trend was found for all causes of death (P = 0.4296). Regarding specific cancer sites, a significant trend with dose was observed for lung cancer (P = 0.0001), stomach cancer (P = 0.0050), and female breast cancer (P = 0.0040) as well as for esophagus cancer in women (P = 0.0030). The excess relative risk per sievert for all solid cancers combined was 1.77 (1.35; 2.27) based on the total cohort data, yet a selection bias regarding the comparison group could not be entirely ruled out. The excess relative risk per sievert based on the cohort's exposed group was 0.81 (0.46; 1.33) for all solid cancers combined and thus still exceeds current risk estimates from the Life Span Study. Future epidemiological assessments based on this cohort will benefit from extension of follow-up and ongoing validation of dosimetric data.
doi_str_mv 10.1667/RR3423.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1667_RR3423_1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3581526</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3581526</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b399t-e47c0d7009f62380a051390867c72b9ffbc888ec42466b4b8eba0bb45be391a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFu1DAQhi0EoktB4gEQmhPiQIodO47dW7VqKWIBaVvEMbIdh3WbxJHtoLYn3oEn4ZV4ErxKBSdOo9H_zT8zP0LPCT4inNdvt1vKSnpEHqAVkVQUFcPsIVphTGlRV6I-QE9ivMK5J1w-RgeEE1HXjK7Qr61qnUrOj3B6M_k4BwvtbCF52HijejhTfe_nBF3wA1z4784mOEmDj9POBmfg02x6qwJ8tWryY4RLG5Mbv4Eb4YO6U9e7mNR4nCd718JajcYG-OhDUr1Lt3sq7Sxc2MFNqs93jPEazl1MPnvn7Wu_y-wbIJLj3z9-EinlU_SoU320z-7rIfpydnq5Pi82n9-9X59sCk2lTIVltcFtjbHseEkFVrgiVGLBa1OXWnadNkIIa1jJONdMC6sV1ppV2lJJlKSH6PXia4KPMdiumYIbVLhtCG72qTdL6g3J6MsFnWY92PYfeB9zBl4swNX-s786rQSpSp7lV4usnfej_f-iPyRKlQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiation Exposure due to Local Fallout from Soviet Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing in Kazakhstan: Solid Cancer Mortality in the Semipalatinsk Historical Cohort, 1960–1999</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Bauer, Susanne ; Gusev, Boris I. ; Pivina, Ludmila M. ; Apsalikov, Kazbek N. ; Grosche, Bernd</creator><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Susanne ; Gusev, Boris I. ; Pivina, Ludmila M. ; Apsalikov, Kazbek N. ; Grosche, Bernd</creatorcontrib><description>Bauer, S., Gusev, B. I., Pivina, L. M., Apsalikov, K. N. and Grosche, B. Radiation Exposure due to Local Fallout from Soviet Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing in Kazakhstan: Solid Cancer Mortality in the Semipalatinsk Historical Cohort, 1960–1999. Radiat. Res. 164, 409–419 (2005). Little information is available on the health effects of exposures to fallout from Soviet nuclear weapons testing and on the combined external and internal environmental exposures that have resulted from these tests. This paper reports the first analysis of the Semipalatinsk historical cohort exposed in the vicinity of the Semipalatinsk nuclear test site, Kazakhstan. The cohort study, which includes 19,545 inhabitants of exposed and comparison villages of the Semipalatinsk region, was set up in the 1960s and comprises 582,750 person-years of follow-up between 1960 and 1999. Cumulative effective radiation dose estimates in this cohort range from 20 mSv to ∼4 Sv. Rates of mortality and cancer mortality in the exposed group substantially exceeded those of the comparison group. Dose–response analyses within the exposed group confirmed a significant trend with dose for all solid cancers (P &lt; 0.0001) and for digestive and respiratory cancers (P = 0.0255 and P &lt; 0.0001), whereas no consistent dose–response trend was found for all causes of death (P = 0.4296). Regarding specific cancer sites, a significant trend with dose was observed for lung cancer (P = 0.0001), stomach cancer (P = 0.0050), and female breast cancer (P = 0.0040) as well as for esophagus cancer in women (P = 0.0030). The excess relative risk per sievert for all solid cancers combined was 1.77 (1.35; 2.27) based on the total cohort data, yet a selection bias regarding the comparison group could not be entirely ruled out. The excess relative risk per sievert based on the cohort's exposed group was 0.81 (0.46; 1.33) for all solid cancers combined and thus still exceeds current risk estimates from the Life Span Study. Future epidemiological assessments based on this cohort will benefit from extension of follow-up and ongoing validation of dosimetric data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-7587</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5404</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1667/RR3423.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16187743</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Radiation Research Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Cancer ; Causes of death ; Cohort Studies ; Dosage ; Dose response relationship ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Dosimetry ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Japan ; Kazakhstan - epidemiology ; Linear Energy Transfer ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - mortality ; Nuclear Warfare ; Radiation dosage ; Radiation dose response relationship ; Radioactive Fallout - adverse effects ; Radiometry ; Referents ; REGULAR ARTICLES ; Russia ; Time Factors ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Radiation research, 2005-10, Vol.164 (4), p.409-419</ispartof><rights>Radiation Research Society</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 The Radiation Research Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b399t-e47c0d7009f62380a051390867c72b9ffbc888ec42466b4b8eba0bb45be391a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b399t-e47c0d7009f62380a051390867c72b9ffbc888ec42466b4b8eba0bb45be391a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1667/RR3423.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3581526$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,26955,27901,27902,52338,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16187743$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gusev, Boris I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pivina, Ludmila M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apsalikov, Kazbek N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grosche, Bernd</creatorcontrib><title>Radiation Exposure due to Local Fallout from Soviet Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing in Kazakhstan: Solid Cancer Mortality in the Semipalatinsk Historical Cohort, 1960–1999</title><title>Radiation research</title><addtitle>Radiat Res</addtitle><description>Bauer, S., Gusev, B. I., Pivina, L. M., Apsalikov, K. N. and Grosche, B. Radiation Exposure due to Local Fallout from Soviet Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing in Kazakhstan: Solid Cancer Mortality in the Semipalatinsk Historical Cohort, 1960–1999. Radiat. Res. 164, 409–419 (2005). Little information is available on the health effects of exposures to fallout from Soviet nuclear weapons testing and on the combined external and internal environmental exposures that have resulted from these tests. This paper reports the first analysis of the Semipalatinsk historical cohort exposed in the vicinity of the Semipalatinsk nuclear test site, Kazakhstan. The cohort study, which includes 19,545 inhabitants of exposed and comparison villages of the Semipalatinsk region, was set up in the 1960s and comprises 582,750 person-years of follow-up between 1960 and 1999. Cumulative effective radiation dose estimates in this cohort range from 20 mSv to ∼4 Sv. Rates of mortality and cancer mortality in the exposed group substantially exceeded those of the comparison group. Dose–response analyses within the exposed group confirmed a significant trend with dose for all solid cancers (P &lt; 0.0001) and for digestive and respiratory cancers (P = 0.0255 and P &lt; 0.0001), whereas no consistent dose–response trend was found for all causes of death (P = 0.4296). Regarding specific cancer sites, a significant trend with dose was observed for lung cancer (P = 0.0001), stomach cancer (P = 0.0050), and female breast cancer (P = 0.0040) as well as for esophagus cancer in women (P = 0.0030). The excess relative risk per sievert for all solid cancers combined was 1.77 (1.35; 2.27) based on the total cohort data, yet a selection bias regarding the comparison group could not be entirely ruled out. The excess relative risk per sievert based on the cohort's exposed group was 0.81 (0.46; 1.33) for all solid cancers combined and thus still exceeds current risk estimates from the Life Span Study. Future epidemiological assessments based on this cohort will benefit from extension of follow-up and ongoing validation of dosimetric data.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Causes of death</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Dose response relationship</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Kazakhstan - epidemiology</subject><subject>Linear Energy Transfer</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - mortality</subject><subject>Nuclear Warfare</subject><subject>Radiation dosage</subject><subject>Radiation dose response relationship</subject><subject>Radioactive Fallout - adverse effects</subject><subject>Radiometry</subject><subject>Referents</subject><subject>REGULAR ARTICLES</subject><subject>Russia</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0033-7587</issn><issn>1938-5404</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFu1DAQhi0EoktB4gEQmhPiQIodO47dW7VqKWIBaVvEMbIdh3WbxJHtoLYn3oEn4ZV4ErxKBSdOo9H_zT8zP0LPCT4inNdvt1vKSnpEHqAVkVQUFcPsIVphTGlRV6I-QE9ivMK5J1w-RgeEE1HXjK7Qr61qnUrOj3B6M_k4BwvtbCF52HijejhTfe_nBF3wA1z4784mOEmDj9POBmfg02x6qwJ8tWryY4RLG5Mbv4Eb4YO6U9e7mNR4nCd718JajcYG-OhDUr1Lt3sq7Sxc2MFNqs93jPEazl1MPnvn7Wu_y-wbIJLj3z9-EinlU_SoU320z-7rIfpydnq5Pi82n9-9X59sCk2lTIVltcFtjbHseEkFVrgiVGLBa1OXWnadNkIIa1jJONdMC6sV1ppV2lJJlKSH6PXia4KPMdiumYIbVLhtCG72qTdL6g3J6MsFnWY92PYfeB9zBl4swNX-s786rQSpSp7lV4usnfej_f-iPyRKlQg</recordid><startdate>200510</startdate><enddate>200510</enddate><creator>Bauer, Susanne</creator><creator>Gusev, Boris I.</creator><creator>Pivina, Ludmila M.</creator><creator>Apsalikov, Kazbek N.</creator><creator>Grosche, Bernd</creator><general>Radiation Research Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200510</creationdate><title>Radiation Exposure due to Local Fallout from Soviet Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing in Kazakhstan: Solid Cancer Mortality in the Semipalatinsk Historical Cohort, 1960–1999</title><author>Bauer, Susanne ; Gusev, Boris I. ; Pivina, Ludmila M. ; Apsalikov, Kazbek N. ; Grosche, Bernd</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b399t-e47c0d7009f62380a051390867c72b9ffbc888ec42466b4b8eba0bb45be391a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Causes of death</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Dose response relationship</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Kazakhstan - epidemiology</topic><topic>Linear Energy Transfer</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - mortality</topic><topic>Nuclear Warfare</topic><topic>Radiation dosage</topic><topic>Radiation dose response relationship</topic><topic>Radioactive Fallout - adverse effects</topic><topic>Radiometry</topic><topic>Referents</topic><topic>REGULAR ARTICLES</topic><topic>Russia</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gusev, Boris I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pivina, Ludmila M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apsalikov, Kazbek N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grosche, Bernd</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Radiation research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bauer, Susanne</au><au>Gusev, Boris I.</au><au>Pivina, Ludmila M.</au><au>Apsalikov, Kazbek N.</au><au>Grosche, Bernd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiation Exposure due to Local Fallout from Soviet Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing in Kazakhstan: Solid Cancer Mortality in the Semipalatinsk Historical Cohort, 1960–1999</atitle><jtitle>Radiation research</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Res</addtitle><date>2005-10</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>164</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>409</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>409-419</pages><issn>0033-7587</issn><eissn>1938-5404</eissn><abstract>Bauer, S., Gusev, B. I., Pivina, L. M., Apsalikov, K. N. and Grosche, B. Radiation Exposure due to Local Fallout from Soviet Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing in Kazakhstan: Solid Cancer Mortality in the Semipalatinsk Historical Cohort, 1960–1999. Radiat. Res. 164, 409–419 (2005). Little information is available on the health effects of exposures to fallout from Soviet nuclear weapons testing and on the combined external and internal environmental exposures that have resulted from these tests. This paper reports the first analysis of the Semipalatinsk historical cohort exposed in the vicinity of the Semipalatinsk nuclear test site, Kazakhstan. The cohort study, which includes 19,545 inhabitants of exposed and comparison villages of the Semipalatinsk region, was set up in the 1960s and comprises 582,750 person-years of follow-up between 1960 and 1999. Cumulative effective radiation dose estimates in this cohort range from 20 mSv to ∼4 Sv. Rates of mortality and cancer mortality in the exposed group substantially exceeded those of the comparison group. Dose–response analyses within the exposed group confirmed a significant trend with dose for all solid cancers (P &lt; 0.0001) and for digestive and respiratory cancers (P = 0.0255 and P &lt; 0.0001), whereas no consistent dose–response trend was found for all causes of death (P = 0.4296). Regarding specific cancer sites, a significant trend with dose was observed for lung cancer (P = 0.0001), stomach cancer (P = 0.0050), and female breast cancer (P = 0.0040) as well as for esophagus cancer in women (P = 0.0030). The excess relative risk per sievert for all solid cancers combined was 1.77 (1.35; 2.27) based on the total cohort data, yet a selection bias regarding the comparison group could not be entirely ruled out. The excess relative risk per sievert based on the cohort's exposed group was 0.81 (0.46; 1.33) for all solid cancers combined and thus still exceeds current risk estimates from the Life Span Study. Future epidemiological assessments based on this cohort will benefit from extension of follow-up and ongoing validation of dosimetric data.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Radiation Research Society</pub><pmid>16187743</pmid><doi>10.1667/RR3423.1</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-7587
ispartof Radiation research, 2005-10, Vol.164 (4), p.409-419
issn 0033-7587
1938-5404
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1667_RR3423_1
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; BioOne Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Cancer
Causes of death
Cohort Studies
Dosage
Dose response relationship
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
Dosimetry
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Japan
Kazakhstan - epidemiology
Linear Energy Transfer
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - mortality
Nuclear Warfare
Radiation dosage
Radiation dose response relationship
Radioactive Fallout - adverse effects
Radiometry
Referents
REGULAR ARTICLES
Russia
Time Factors
Tumors
title Radiation Exposure due to Local Fallout from Soviet Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Testing in Kazakhstan: Solid Cancer Mortality in the Semipalatinsk Historical Cohort, 1960–1999
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A03%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiation%20Exposure%20due%20to%20Local%20Fallout%20from%20Soviet%20Atmospheric%20Nuclear%20Weapons%20Testing%20in%20Kazakhstan:%20Solid%20Cancer%20Mortality%20in%20the%20Semipalatinsk%20Historical%20Cohort,%201960%E2%80%931999&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20research&rft.au=Bauer,%20Susanne&rft.date=2005-10&rft.volume=164&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=409&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=409-419&rft.issn=0033-7587&rft.eissn=1938-5404&rft_id=info:doi/10.1667/RR3423.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3581526%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/16187743&rft_jstor_id=3581526&rfr_iscdi=true