Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cell Lines
Mothersill, C., Seymour, R. J. and Seymour, C. B. Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cells. Radiat. Res. 161, 256–263 (2004). One of the current hypotheses concerning the role of bystander effects in biological systems is that they are protective because they terminate division in cells with coll...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiation research 2004-03, Vol.161 (3), p.256-263 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 263 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 256 |
container_title | Radiation research |
container_volume | 161 |
creator | Mothersill, Carmel Seymour, Rebecca J. Seymour, C. B. |
description | Mothersill, C., Seymour, R. J. and Seymour, C. B. Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cells. Radiat. Res. 161, 256–263 (2004). One of the current hypotheses concerning the role of bystander effects in biological systems is that they are protective because they terminate division in cells with collateral or possibly pre-existing DNA damage that is not properly repaired. Following the logic of this hypothesis led us to consider that cell lines that are repair deficient should have larger than usual bystander effects. To test this, several different “repair- deficient” cell lines were used for bystander experiments. Response was monitored by determining the cloning efficiency or, in the case of non-adherent cell lines, the cell number. The results show that the repair-deficient human cell lines and surviving progeny produced moderate to severe bystander- induced death effects in either autologous cells or a reporter cell line. Normal “repair-proficient” lines, which were matched as far as possible, have very much less severe or absent bystander-inducible effects on cloning efficiency. Cells of hamster cell lines derived from CHO-K1 cells did not produce similar severe effects. The results suggest that repair- deficient human cell lines, irrespective of the actual repair defect, may respond to the occurrence of DNA damage in the population by removing large numbers of cells from the proliferating pool. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1667/RR3136 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1667_RR3136</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3581027</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3581027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b391t-91bb1a3d86b543a1a6b42a1d9bd4287dc1aa5688e757c2b1de8b707d71fd9e8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j01LxDAQQIMobl31F4j0IN6imSbNx1HX9QMWhEXPJWmmkGW3LUk97L-30kVPnobhPWZ4hFwCuwMp1f16zYHLI5KB4ZqWgoljkjHGOVWlVjNyltKGjTtIc0pmIIwuhDYZYY_7NNjWY8yXTYP1kPLQ5mvsbYj0CZtQB2yHfIHbbb4KLaZzctLYbcKLw5yTz-flx-KVrt5f3hYPK-q4gYEacA4s91q6UnALVjpRWPDGeVFo5WuwtpRaoypVXTjwqJ1iyitovEFt-ZzcTnfr2KUUsan6GHY27itg1U9yNSWP4vUk9l9uh_5POzSOwtUkbNLQxV_OSw2sUCO-mbALXdfif2--AUWeZIc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cell Lines</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Mothersill, Carmel ; Seymour, Rebecca J. ; Seymour, C. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mothersill, Carmel ; Seymour, Rebecca J. ; Seymour, C. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Mothersill, C., Seymour, R. J. and Seymour, C. B. Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cells. Radiat. Res. 161, 256–263 (2004). One of the current hypotheses concerning the role of bystander effects in biological systems is that they are protective because they terminate division in cells with collateral or possibly pre-existing DNA damage that is not properly repaired. Following the logic of this hypothesis led us to consider that cell lines that are repair deficient should have larger than usual bystander effects. To test this, several different “repair- deficient” cell lines were used for bystander experiments. Response was monitored by determining the cloning efficiency or, in the case of non-adherent cell lines, the cell number. The results show that the repair-deficient human cell lines and surviving progeny produced moderate to severe bystander- induced death effects in either autologous cells or a reporter cell line. Normal “repair-proficient” lines, which were matched as far as possible, have very much less severe or absent bystander-inducible effects on cloning efficiency. Cells of hamster cell lines derived from CHO-K1 cells did not produce similar severe effects. The results suggest that repair- deficient human cell lines, irrespective of the actual repair defect, may respond to the occurrence of DNA damage in the population by removing large numbers of cells from the proliferating pool.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-7587</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5404</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1667/RR3136</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14982489</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Radiation Research Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Apoptosis ; Bystander Effect - radiation effects ; Cell Line - pathology ; Cell Line - radiation effects ; Cell lines ; Cell Survival - radiation effects ; CHO Cells ; Cricetinae ; Cricetulus ; Cultured cells ; DNA - radiation effects ; DNA Damage ; DNA Repair ; Dosage ; Dose response relationship ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Epithelial cells ; Flasks ; Humans ; Mutation ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Tolerance ; REGULAR ARTICLES ; Species Specificity ; Stem cells</subject><ispartof>Radiation research, 2004-03, Vol.161 (3), p.256-263</ispartof><rights>Radiation Research Society</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 The Radiation Research Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b391t-91bb1a3d86b543a1a6b42a1d9bd4287dc1aa5688e757c2b1de8b707d71fd9e8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b391t-91bb1a3d86b543a1a6b42a1d9bd4287dc1aa5688e757c2b1de8b707d71fd9e8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1667/RR3136$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3581027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,26955,27901,27902,52338,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14982489$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mothersill, Carmel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seymour, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seymour, C. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cell Lines</title><title>Radiation research</title><addtitle>Radiat Res</addtitle><description>Mothersill, C., Seymour, R. J. and Seymour, C. B. Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cells. Radiat. Res. 161, 256–263 (2004). One of the current hypotheses concerning the role of bystander effects in biological systems is that they are protective because they terminate division in cells with collateral or possibly pre-existing DNA damage that is not properly repaired. Following the logic of this hypothesis led us to consider that cell lines that are repair deficient should have larger than usual bystander effects. To test this, several different “repair- deficient” cell lines were used for bystander experiments. Response was monitored by determining the cloning efficiency or, in the case of non-adherent cell lines, the cell number. The results show that the repair-deficient human cell lines and surviving progeny produced moderate to severe bystander- induced death effects in either autologous cells or a reporter cell line. Normal “repair-proficient” lines, which were matched as far as possible, have very much less severe or absent bystander-inducible effects on cloning efficiency. Cells of hamster cell lines derived from CHO-K1 cells did not produce similar severe effects. The results suggest that repair- deficient human cell lines, irrespective of the actual repair defect, may respond to the occurrence of DNA damage in the population by removing large numbers of cells from the proliferating pool.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Bystander Effect - radiation effects</subject><subject>Cell Line - pathology</subject><subject>Cell Line - radiation effects</subject><subject>Cell lines</subject><subject>Cell Survival - radiation effects</subject><subject>CHO Cells</subject><subject>Cricetinae</subject><subject>Cricetulus</subject><subject>Cultured cells</subject><subject>DNA - radiation effects</subject><subject>DNA Damage</subject><subject>DNA Repair</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Dose response relationship</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Epithelial cells</subject><subject>Flasks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Tolerance</subject><subject>REGULAR ARTICLES</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><issn>0033-7587</issn><issn>1938-5404</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1j01LxDAQQIMobl31F4j0IN6imSbNx1HX9QMWhEXPJWmmkGW3LUk97L-30kVPnobhPWZ4hFwCuwMp1f16zYHLI5KB4ZqWgoljkjHGOVWlVjNyltKGjTtIc0pmIIwuhDYZYY_7NNjWY8yXTYP1kPLQ5mvsbYj0CZtQB2yHfIHbbb4KLaZzctLYbcKLw5yTz-flx-KVrt5f3hYPK-q4gYEacA4s91q6UnALVjpRWPDGeVFo5WuwtpRaoypVXTjwqJ1iyitovEFt-ZzcTnfr2KUUsan6GHY27itg1U9yNSWP4vUk9l9uh_5POzSOwtUkbNLQxV_OSw2sUCO-mbALXdfif2--AUWeZIc</recordid><startdate>200403</startdate><enddate>200403</enddate><creator>Mothersill, Carmel</creator><creator>Seymour, Rebecca J.</creator><creator>Seymour, C. B.</creator><general>Radiation Research Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200403</creationdate><title>Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cell Lines</title><author>Mothersill, Carmel ; Seymour, Rebecca J. ; Seymour, C. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b391t-91bb1a3d86b543a1a6b42a1d9bd4287dc1aa5688e757c2b1de8b707d71fd9e8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Bystander Effect - radiation effects</topic><topic>Cell Line - pathology</topic><topic>Cell Line - radiation effects</topic><topic>Cell lines</topic><topic>Cell Survival - radiation effects</topic><topic>CHO Cells</topic><topic>Cricetinae</topic><topic>Cricetulus</topic><topic>Cultured cells</topic><topic>DNA - radiation effects</topic><topic>DNA Damage</topic><topic>DNA Repair</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Dose response relationship</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Epithelial cells</topic><topic>Flasks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Tolerance</topic><topic>REGULAR ARTICLES</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mothersill, Carmel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seymour, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seymour, C. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Radiation research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mothersill, Carmel</au><au>Seymour, Rebecca J.</au><au>Seymour, C. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cell Lines</atitle><jtitle>Radiation research</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Res</addtitle><date>2004-03</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>256</spage><epage>263</epage><pages>256-263</pages><issn>0033-7587</issn><eissn>1938-5404</eissn><abstract>Mothersill, C., Seymour, R. J. and Seymour, C. B. Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cells. Radiat. Res. 161, 256–263 (2004). One of the current hypotheses concerning the role of bystander effects in biological systems is that they are protective because they terminate division in cells with collateral or possibly pre-existing DNA damage that is not properly repaired. Following the logic of this hypothesis led us to consider that cell lines that are repair deficient should have larger than usual bystander effects. To test this, several different “repair- deficient” cell lines were used for bystander experiments. Response was monitored by determining the cloning efficiency or, in the case of non-adherent cell lines, the cell number. The results show that the repair-deficient human cell lines and surviving progeny produced moderate to severe bystander- induced death effects in either autologous cells or a reporter cell line. Normal “repair-proficient” lines, which were matched as far as possible, have very much less severe or absent bystander-inducible effects on cloning efficiency. Cells of hamster cell lines derived from CHO-K1 cells did not produce similar severe effects. The results suggest that repair- deficient human cell lines, irrespective of the actual repair defect, may respond to the occurrence of DNA damage in the population by removing large numbers of cells from the proliferating pool.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Radiation Research Society</pub><pmid>14982489</pmid><doi>10.1667/RR3136</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-7587 |
ispartof | Radiation research, 2004-03, Vol.161 (3), p.256-263 |
issn | 0033-7587 1938-5404 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1667_RR3136 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; BioOne Complete |
subjects | Animals Apoptosis Bystander Effect - radiation effects Cell Line - pathology Cell Line - radiation effects Cell lines Cell Survival - radiation effects CHO Cells Cricetinae Cricetulus Cultured cells DNA - radiation effects DNA Damage DNA Repair Dosage Dose response relationship Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation Epithelial cells Flasks Humans Mutation Radiation Dosage Radiation Tolerance REGULAR ARTICLES Species Specificity Stem cells |
title | Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cell Lines |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A12%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bystander%20Effects%20in%20Repair-Deficient%20Cell%20Lines&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20research&rft.au=Mothersill,%20Carmel&rft.date=2004-03&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=256&rft.epage=263&rft.pages=256-263&rft.issn=0033-7587&rft.eissn=1938-5404&rft_id=info:doi/10.1667/RR3136&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3581027%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/14982489&rft_jstor_id=3581027&rfr_iscdi=true |