Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cell Lines

Mothersill, C., Seymour, R. J. and Seymour, C. B. Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cells. Radiat. Res. 161, 256–263 (2004). One of the current hypotheses concerning the role of bystander effects in biological systems is that they are protective because they terminate division in cells with coll...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiation research 2004-03, Vol.161 (3), p.256-263
Hauptverfasser: Mothersill, Carmel, Seymour, Rebecca J., Seymour, C. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 263
container_issue 3
container_start_page 256
container_title Radiation research
container_volume 161
creator Mothersill, Carmel
Seymour, Rebecca J.
Seymour, C. B.
description Mothersill, C., Seymour, R. J. and Seymour, C. B. Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cells. Radiat. Res. 161, 256–263 (2004). One of the current hypotheses concerning the role of bystander effects in biological systems is that they are protective because they terminate division in cells with collateral or possibly pre-existing DNA damage that is not properly repaired. Following the logic of this hypothesis led us to consider that cell lines that are repair deficient should have larger than usual bystander effects. To test this, several different “repair- deficient” cell lines were used for bystander experiments. Response was monitored by determining the cloning efficiency or, in the case of non-adherent cell lines, the cell number. The results show that the repair-deficient human cell lines and surviving progeny produced moderate to severe bystander- induced death effects in either autologous cells or a reporter cell line. Normal “repair-proficient” lines, which were matched as far as possible, have very much less severe or absent bystander-inducible effects on cloning efficiency. Cells of hamster cell lines derived from CHO-K1 cells did not produce similar severe effects. The results suggest that repair- deficient human cell lines, irrespective of the actual repair defect, may respond to the occurrence of DNA damage in the population by removing large numbers of cells from the proliferating pool.
doi_str_mv 10.1667/RR3136
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1667_RR3136</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3581027</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3581027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b391t-91bb1a3d86b543a1a6b42a1d9bd4287dc1aa5688e757c2b1de8b707d71fd9e8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j01LxDAQQIMobl31F4j0IN6imSbNx1HX9QMWhEXPJWmmkGW3LUk97L-30kVPnobhPWZ4hFwCuwMp1f16zYHLI5KB4ZqWgoljkjHGOVWlVjNyltKGjTtIc0pmIIwuhDYZYY_7NNjWY8yXTYP1kPLQ5mvsbYj0CZtQB2yHfIHbbb4KLaZzctLYbcKLw5yTz-flx-KVrt5f3hYPK-q4gYEacA4s91q6UnALVjpRWPDGeVFo5WuwtpRaoypVXTjwqJ1iyitovEFt-ZzcTnfr2KUUsan6GHY27itg1U9yNSWP4vUk9l9uh_5POzSOwtUkbNLQxV_OSw2sUCO-mbALXdfif2--AUWeZIc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cell Lines</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Mothersill, Carmel ; Seymour, Rebecca J. ; Seymour, C. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mothersill, Carmel ; Seymour, Rebecca J. ; Seymour, C. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Mothersill, C., Seymour, R. J. and Seymour, C. B. Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cells. Radiat. Res. 161, 256–263 (2004). One of the current hypotheses concerning the role of bystander effects in biological systems is that they are protective because they terminate division in cells with collateral or possibly pre-existing DNA damage that is not properly repaired. Following the logic of this hypothesis led us to consider that cell lines that are repair deficient should have larger than usual bystander effects. To test this, several different “repair- deficient” cell lines were used for bystander experiments. Response was monitored by determining the cloning efficiency or, in the case of non-adherent cell lines, the cell number. The results show that the repair-deficient human cell lines and surviving progeny produced moderate to severe bystander- induced death effects in either autologous cells or a reporter cell line. Normal “repair-proficient” lines, which were matched as far as possible, have very much less severe or absent bystander-inducible effects on cloning efficiency. Cells of hamster cell lines derived from CHO-K1 cells did not produce similar severe effects. The results suggest that repair- deficient human cell lines, irrespective of the actual repair defect, may respond to the occurrence of DNA damage in the population by removing large numbers of cells from the proliferating pool.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-7587</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5404</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1667/RR3136</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14982489</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Radiation Research Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Apoptosis ; Bystander Effect - radiation effects ; Cell Line - pathology ; Cell Line - radiation effects ; Cell lines ; Cell Survival - radiation effects ; CHO Cells ; Cricetinae ; Cricetulus ; Cultured cells ; DNA - radiation effects ; DNA Damage ; DNA Repair ; Dosage ; Dose response relationship ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Epithelial cells ; Flasks ; Humans ; Mutation ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Tolerance ; REGULAR ARTICLES ; Species Specificity ; Stem cells</subject><ispartof>Radiation research, 2004-03, Vol.161 (3), p.256-263</ispartof><rights>Radiation Research Society</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 The Radiation Research Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b391t-91bb1a3d86b543a1a6b42a1d9bd4287dc1aa5688e757c2b1de8b707d71fd9e8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b391t-91bb1a3d86b543a1a6b42a1d9bd4287dc1aa5688e757c2b1de8b707d71fd9e8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1667/RR3136$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3581027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,26955,27901,27902,52338,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14982489$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mothersill, Carmel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seymour, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seymour, C. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cell Lines</title><title>Radiation research</title><addtitle>Radiat Res</addtitle><description>Mothersill, C., Seymour, R. J. and Seymour, C. B. Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cells. Radiat. Res. 161, 256–263 (2004). One of the current hypotheses concerning the role of bystander effects in biological systems is that they are protective because they terminate division in cells with collateral or possibly pre-existing DNA damage that is not properly repaired. Following the logic of this hypothesis led us to consider that cell lines that are repair deficient should have larger than usual bystander effects. To test this, several different “repair- deficient” cell lines were used for bystander experiments. Response was monitored by determining the cloning efficiency or, in the case of non-adherent cell lines, the cell number. The results show that the repair-deficient human cell lines and surviving progeny produced moderate to severe bystander- induced death effects in either autologous cells or a reporter cell line. Normal “repair-proficient” lines, which were matched as far as possible, have very much less severe or absent bystander-inducible effects on cloning efficiency. Cells of hamster cell lines derived from CHO-K1 cells did not produce similar severe effects. The results suggest that repair- deficient human cell lines, irrespective of the actual repair defect, may respond to the occurrence of DNA damage in the population by removing large numbers of cells from the proliferating pool.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Bystander Effect - radiation effects</subject><subject>Cell Line - pathology</subject><subject>Cell Line - radiation effects</subject><subject>Cell lines</subject><subject>Cell Survival - radiation effects</subject><subject>CHO Cells</subject><subject>Cricetinae</subject><subject>Cricetulus</subject><subject>Cultured cells</subject><subject>DNA - radiation effects</subject><subject>DNA Damage</subject><subject>DNA Repair</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Dose response relationship</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Epithelial cells</subject><subject>Flasks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Tolerance</subject><subject>REGULAR ARTICLES</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><issn>0033-7587</issn><issn>1938-5404</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1j01LxDAQQIMobl31F4j0IN6imSbNx1HX9QMWhEXPJWmmkGW3LUk97L-30kVPnobhPWZ4hFwCuwMp1f16zYHLI5KB4ZqWgoljkjHGOVWlVjNyltKGjTtIc0pmIIwuhDYZYY_7NNjWY8yXTYP1kPLQ5mvsbYj0CZtQB2yHfIHbbb4KLaZzctLYbcKLw5yTz-flx-KVrt5f3hYPK-q4gYEacA4s91q6UnALVjpRWPDGeVFo5WuwtpRaoypVXTjwqJ1iyitovEFt-ZzcTnfr2KUUsan6GHY27itg1U9yNSWP4vUk9l9uh_5POzSOwtUkbNLQxV_OSw2sUCO-mbALXdfif2--AUWeZIc</recordid><startdate>200403</startdate><enddate>200403</enddate><creator>Mothersill, Carmel</creator><creator>Seymour, Rebecca J.</creator><creator>Seymour, C. B.</creator><general>Radiation Research Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200403</creationdate><title>Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cell Lines</title><author>Mothersill, Carmel ; Seymour, Rebecca J. ; Seymour, C. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b391t-91bb1a3d86b543a1a6b42a1d9bd4287dc1aa5688e757c2b1de8b707d71fd9e8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Bystander Effect - radiation effects</topic><topic>Cell Line - pathology</topic><topic>Cell Line - radiation effects</topic><topic>Cell lines</topic><topic>Cell Survival - radiation effects</topic><topic>CHO Cells</topic><topic>Cricetinae</topic><topic>Cricetulus</topic><topic>Cultured cells</topic><topic>DNA - radiation effects</topic><topic>DNA Damage</topic><topic>DNA Repair</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Dose response relationship</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Epithelial cells</topic><topic>Flasks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Tolerance</topic><topic>REGULAR ARTICLES</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mothersill, Carmel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seymour, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seymour, C. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Radiation research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mothersill, Carmel</au><au>Seymour, Rebecca J.</au><au>Seymour, C. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cell Lines</atitle><jtitle>Radiation research</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Res</addtitle><date>2004-03</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>256</spage><epage>263</epage><pages>256-263</pages><issn>0033-7587</issn><eissn>1938-5404</eissn><abstract>Mothersill, C., Seymour, R. J. and Seymour, C. B. Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cells. Radiat. Res. 161, 256–263 (2004). One of the current hypotheses concerning the role of bystander effects in biological systems is that they are protective because they terminate division in cells with collateral or possibly pre-existing DNA damage that is not properly repaired. Following the logic of this hypothesis led us to consider that cell lines that are repair deficient should have larger than usual bystander effects. To test this, several different “repair- deficient” cell lines were used for bystander experiments. Response was monitored by determining the cloning efficiency or, in the case of non-adherent cell lines, the cell number. The results show that the repair-deficient human cell lines and surviving progeny produced moderate to severe bystander- induced death effects in either autologous cells or a reporter cell line. Normal “repair-proficient” lines, which were matched as far as possible, have very much less severe or absent bystander-inducible effects on cloning efficiency. Cells of hamster cell lines derived from CHO-K1 cells did not produce similar severe effects. The results suggest that repair- deficient human cell lines, irrespective of the actual repair defect, may respond to the occurrence of DNA damage in the population by removing large numbers of cells from the proliferating pool.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Radiation Research Society</pub><pmid>14982489</pmid><doi>10.1667/RR3136</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-7587
ispartof Radiation research, 2004-03, Vol.161 (3), p.256-263
issn 0033-7587
1938-5404
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1667_RR3136
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; BioOne Complete
subjects Animals
Apoptosis
Bystander Effect - radiation effects
Cell Line - pathology
Cell Line - radiation effects
Cell lines
Cell Survival - radiation effects
CHO Cells
Cricetinae
Cricetulus
Cultured cells
DNA - radiation effects
DNA Damage
DNA Repair
Dosage
Dose response relationship
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
Epithelial cells
Flasks
Humans
Mutation
Radiation Dosage
Radiation Tolerance
REGULAR ARTICLES
Species Specificity
Stem cells
title Bystander Effects in Repair-Deficient Cell Lines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A12%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bystander%20Effects%20in%20Repair-Deficient%20Cell%20Lines&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20research&rft.au=Mothersill,%20Carmel&rft.date=2004-03&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=256&rft.epage=263&rft.pages=256-263&rft.issn=0033-7587&rft.eissn=1938-5404&rft_id=info:doi/10.1667/RR3136&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3581027%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/14982489&rft_jstor_id=3581027&rfr_iscdi=true