Influence of sulfentrazone rate and application method on peanut weed control
Field studies were conducted in 2000 and 2001 in Plains, GA, to determine peanut and weed response to the residual herbicides sulfentrazone, imazapic, diclosulam, and flumioxazin. Herbicide treatments included sulfentrazone applied preemergence (PRE) or preplant incorporated (PPI) at 112, 168, 224,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Weed technology 2004-07, Vol.18 (3), p.619-625 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 625 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 619 |
container_title | Weed technology |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Grey, T.L Bridges, D.C Hancock, H.G Davis, J.W |
description | Field studies were conducted in 2000 and 2001 in Plains, GA, to determine peanut and weed response to the residual herbicides sulfentrazone, imazapic, diclosulam, and flumioxazin. Herbicide treatments included sulfentrazone applied preemergence (PRE) or preplant incorporated (PPI) at 112, 168, 224, and 280 g ai/ha, imazapic postemergence (POST) at 71 g ai/ha, diclosulam PPI at 26 g ai/ha, and flumioxazin PRE at 88 g ai/ha. Peanut exhibited early-season injury from all herbicide treatments, ranging from 0 to 10% for sulfentrazone PPI or PRE, 10% for imazapic, 3 to 23% for flumioxazin, and 1 to 7% for diclosulam. Yields were similar for sulfentrazone PPI- or PRE-treated and flumioxazin-, imazapic-, and diclosulam-treated peanut. Yellow nutsedge control was 83% or greater with all rates of sulfentrazone PRE or PPI, 83 and 90% with diclosulam, and 96 and 99% with imazapic, respectively. Flumioxazin did not control yellow nutsedge or wild poinsettia. Tall morningglory control was 82% or greater with imazapic, diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PPI or PRE at 168 g/ha or higher. Florida beggarweed control was 88% or greater with diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PRE at 224 and 280 g/ha. Overall, peanut tolerance to sulfentrazone at 112 to 280 g/ha PPI and PRE was high and yield was equivalent to the currently registered peanut residual herbicides. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1614/WT-03-103R2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1614_WT_03_103R2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3989353</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3989353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-ebffef6498aedf75908f877d4bcb6fd8fb14d1a6d55b22b422422d2c1792f0ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LxDAQhoMouK6evArm4kmqk6RJ2qMsfsGKoLust5LmQ7t0m5J0Ef31RisKAzPwPO8cXoSOCVwQQfLL1SIDlhFgT3QHTQjnkFGZwy6aQFFCYvJlHx3EuAYgglKYoIf7zrVb22mLvcNx2zrbDUF9-s7ioAaLVWew6vu20WpofIc3dnjzBqert6rbDvjdWoO1TynfHqI9p9poj373FC1vrhezu2z-eHs_u5pnmkExZLZ2zjqRl4WyxkleQuEKKU1e61o4U7ia5IYoYTivKa1zStMYqoksqQOr2RSdj3918DEG66o-NBsVPioC1XcT1WpRAat-mkj22Wj3KmrVuqA63cT_iCh5LnKZvJPRW8fBhz_OyqJknCV8OmKnfKVeQ3qxfKZAGEDJBZWUfQGdh3IM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of sulfentrazone rate and application method on peanut weed control</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Grey, T.L ; Bridges, D.C ; Hancock, H.G ; Davis, J.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Grey, T.L ; Bridges, D.C ; Hancock, H.G ; Davis, J.W</creatorcontrib><description>Field studies were conducted in 2000 and 2001 in Plains, GA, to determine peanut and weed response to the residual herbicides sulfentrazone, imazapic, diclosulam, and flumioxazin. Herbicide treatments included sulfentrazone applied preemergence (PRE) or preplant incorporated (PPI) at 112, 168, 224, and 280 g ai/ha, imazapic postemergence (POST) at 71 g ai/ha, diclosulam PPI at 26 g ai/ha, and flumioxazin PRE at 88 g ai/ha. Peanut exhibited early-season injury from all herbicide treatments, ranging from 0 to 10% for sulfentrazone PPI or PRE, 10% for imazapic, 3 to 23% for flumioxazin, and 1 to 7% for diclosulam. Yields were similar for sulfentrazone PPI- or PRE-treated and flumioxazin-, imazapic-, and diclosulam-treated peanut. Yellow nutsedge control was 83% or greater with all rates of sulfentrazone PRE or PPI, 83 and 90% with diclosulam, and 96 and 99% with imazapic, respectively. Flumioxazin did not control yellow nutsedge or wild poinsettia. Tall morningglory control was 82% or greater with imazapic, diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PPI or PRE at 168 g/ha or higher. Florida beggarweed control was 88% or greater with diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PRE at 224 and 280 g/ha. Overall, peanut tolerance to sulfentrazone at 112 to 280 g/ha PPI and PRE was high and yield was equivalent to the currently registered peanut residual herbicides.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WT-03-103R2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WETEE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Agricultural soils ; Agrology ; Arachis hypogaea ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical control ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Herbicides ; Organic soils ; Parasitic plants. Weeds ; Peanuts ; pesticide application ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Sandy loam soils ; Soil organic matter ; Soil resources ; Soybeans ; sulfentrazone ; Weed control ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2004-07, Vol.18 (3), p.619-625</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-ebffef6498aedf75908f877d4bcb6fd8fb14d1a6d55b22b422422d2c1792f0ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-ebffef6498aedf75908f877d4bcb6fd8fb14d1a6d55b22b422422d2c1792f0ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3989353$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3989353$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27929,27930,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16954647$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grey, T.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridges, D.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, H.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, J.W</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of sulfentrazone rate and application method on peanut weed control</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Field studies were conducted in 2000 and 2001 in Plains, GA, to determine peanut and weed response to the residual herbicides sulfentrazone, imazapic, diclosulam, and flumioxazin. Herbicide treatments included sulfentrazone applied preemergence (PRE) or preplant incorporated (PPI) at 112, 168, 224, and 280 g ai/ha, imazapic postemergence (POST) at 71 g ai/ha, diclosulam PPI at 26 g ai/ha, and flumioxazin PRE at 88 g ai/ha. Peanut exhibited early-season injury from all herbicide treatments, ranging from 0 to 10% for sulfentrazone PPI or PRE, 10% for imazapic, 3 to 23% for flumioxazin, and 1 to 7% for diclosulam. Yields were similar for sulfentrazone PPI- or PRE-treated and flumioxazin-, imazapic-, and diclosulam-treated peanut. Yellow nutsedge control was 83% or greater with all rates of sulfentrazone PRE or PPI, 83 and 90% with diclosulam, and 96 and 99% with imazapic, respectively. Flumioxazin did not control yellow nutsedge or wild poinsettia. Tall morningglory control was 82% or greater with imazapic, diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PPI or PRE at 168 g/ha or higher. Florida beggarweed control was 88% or greater with diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PRE at 224 and 280 g/ha. Overall, peanut tolerance to sulfentrazone at 112 to 280 g/ha PPI and PRE was high and yield was equivalent to the currently registered peanut residual herbicides.</description><subject>Agricultural soils</subject><subject>Agrology</subject><subject>Arachis hypogaea</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical control</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Parasitic plants. Weeds</subject><subject>Peanuts</subject><subject>pesticide application</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Sandy loam soils</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>Soil resources</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>sulfentrazone</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1LxDAQhoMouK6evArm4kmqk6RJ2qMsfsGKoLust5LmQ7t0m5J0Ef31RisKAzPwPO8cXoSOCVwQQfLL1SIDlhFgT3QHTQjnkFGZwy6aQFFCYvJlHx3EuAYgglKYoIf7zrVb22mLvcNx2zrbDUF9-s7ioAaLVWew6vu20WpofIc3dnjzBqert6rbDvjdWoO1TynfHqI9p9poj373FC1vrhezu2z-eHs_u5pnmkExZLZ2zjqRl4WyxkleQuEKKU1e61o4U7ia5IYoYTivKa1zStMYqoksqQOr2RSdj3918DEG66o-NBsVPioC1XcT1WpRAat-mkj22Wj3KmrVuqA63cT_iCh5LnKZvJPRW8fBhz_OyqJknCV8OmKnfKVeQ3qxfKZAGEDJBZWUfQGdh3IM</recordid><startdate>20040701</startdate><enddate>20040701</enddate><creator>Grey, T.L</creator><creator>Bridges, D.C</creator><creator>Hancock, H.G</creator><creator>Davis, J.W</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040701</creationdate><title>Influence of sulfentrazone rate and application method on peanut weed control</title><author>Grey, T.L ; Bridges, D.C ; Hancock, H.G ; Davis, J.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-ebffef6498aedf75908f877d4bcb6fd8fb14d1a6d55b22b422422d2c1792f0ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Agricultural soils</topic><topic>Agrology</topic><topic>Arachis hypogaea</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical control</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Parasitic plants. Weeds</topic><topic>Peanuts</topic><topic>pesticide application</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Sandy loam soils</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>Soil resources</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>sulfentrazone</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grey, T.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridges, D.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, H.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, J.W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grey, T.L</au><au>Bridges, D.C</au><au>Hancock, H.G</au><au>Davis, J.W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of sulfentrazone rate and application method on peanut weed control</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>2004-07-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>619</spage><epage>625</epage><pages>619-625</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><coden>WETEE9</coden><abstract>Field studies were conducted in 2000 and 2001 in Plains, GA, to determine peanut and weed response to the residual herbicides sulfentrazone, imazapic, diclosulam, and flumioxazin. Herbicide treatments included sulfentrazone applied preemergence (PRE) or preplant incorporated (PPI) at 112, 168, 224, and 280 g ai/ha, imazapic postemergence (POST) at 71 g ai/ha, diclosulam PPI at 26 g ai/ha, and flumioxazin PRE at 88 g ai/ha. Peanut exhibited early-season injury from all herbicide treatments, ranging from 0 to 10% for sulfentrazone PPI or PRE, 10% for imazapic, 3 to 23% for flumioxazin, and 1 to 7% for diclosulam. Yields were similar for sulfentrazone PPI- or PRE-treated and flumioxazin-, imazapic-, and diclosulam-treated peanut. Yellow nutsedge control was 83% or greater with all rates of sulfentrazone PRE or PPI, 83 and 90% with diclosulam, and 96 and 99% with imazapic, respectively. Flumioxazin did not control yellow nutsedge or wild poinsettia. Tall morningglory control was 82% or greater with imazapic, diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PPI or PRE at 168 g/ha or higher. Florida beggarweed control was 88% or greater with diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PRE at 224 and 280 g/ha. Overall, peanut tolerance to sulfentrazone at 112 to 280 g/ha PPI and PRE was high and yield was equivalent to the currently registered peanut residual herbicides.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/WT-03-103R2</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
ispartof | Weed technology, 2004-07, Vol.18 (3), p.619-625 |
issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1614_WT_03_103R2 |
source | BioOne Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Agricultural soils Agrology Arachis hypogaea Biological and medical sciences Chemical control Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Herbicides Organic soils Parasitic plants. Weeds Peanuts pesticide application Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection Sandy loam soils Soil organic matter Soil resources Soybeans sulfentrazone Weed control Weeds |
title | Influence of sulfentrazone rate and application method on peanut weed control |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T10%3A56%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20sulfentrazone%20rate%20and%20application%20method%20on%20peanut%20weed%20control&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Grey,%20T.L&rft.date=2004-07-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=619&rft.epage=625&rft.pages=619-625&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft.coden=WETEE9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WT-03-103R2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3989353%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3989353&rfr_iscdi=true |