Influence of sulfentrazone rate and application method on peanut weed control

Field studies were conducted in 2000 and 2001 in Plains, GA, to determine peanut and weed response to the residual herbicides sulfentrazone, imazapic, diclosulam, and flumioxazin. Herbicide treatments included sulfentrazone applied preemergence (PRE) or preplant incorporated (PPI) at 112, 168, 224,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed technology 2004-07, Vol.18 (3), p.619-625
Hauptverfasser: Grey, T.L, Bridges, D.C, Hancock, H.G, Davis, J.W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 625
container_issue 3
container_start_page 619
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 18
creator Grey, T.L
Bridges, D.C
Hancock, H.G
Davis, J.W
description Field studies were conducted in 2000 and 2001 in Plains, GA, to determine peanut and weed response to the residual herbicides sulfentrazone, imazapic, diclosulam, and flumioxazin. Herbicide treatments included sulfentrazone applied preemergence (PRE) or preplant incorporated (PPI) at 112, 168, 224, and 280 g ai/ha, imazapic postemergence (POST) at 71 g ai/ha, diclosulam PPI at 26 g ai/ha, and flumioxazin PRE at 88 g ai/ha. Peanut exhibited early-season injury from all herbicide treatments, ranging from 0 to 10% for sulfentrazone PPI or PRE, 10% for imazapic, 3 to 23% for flumioxazin, and 1 to 7% for diclosulam. Yields were similar for sulfentrazone PPI- or PRE-treated and flumioxazin-, imazapic-, and diclosulam-treated peanut. Yellow nutsedge control was 83% or greater with all rates of sulfentrazone PRE or PPI, 83 and 90% with diclosulam, and 96 and 99% with imazapic, respectively. Flumioxazin did not control yellow nutsedge or wild poinsettia. Tall morningglory control was 82% or greater with imazapic, diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PPI or PRE at 168 g/ha or higher. Florida beggarweed control was 88% or greater with diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PRE at 224 and 280 g/ha. Overall, peanut tolerance to sulfentrazone at 112 to 280 g/ha PPI and PRE was high and yield was equivalent to the currently registered peanut residual herbicides.
doi_str_mv 10.1614/WT-03-103R2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1614_WT_03_103R2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3989353</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3989353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-ebffef6498aedf75908f877d4bcb6fd8fb14d1a6d55b22b422422d2c1792f0ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LxDAQhoMouK6evArm4kmqk6RJ2qMsfsGKoLust5LmQ7t0m5J0Ef31RisKAzPwPO8cXoSOCVwQQfLL1SIDlhFgT3QHTQjnkFGZwy6aQFFCYvJlHx3EuAYgglKYoIf7zrVb22mLvcNx2zrbDUF9-s7ioAaLVWew6vu20WpofIc3dnjzBqert6rbDvjdWoO1TynfHqI9p9poj373FC1vrhezu2z-eHs_u5pnmkExZLZ2zjqRl4WyxkleQuEKKU1e61o4U7ia5IYoYTivKa1zStMYqoksqQOr2RSdj3918DEG66o-NBsVPioC1XcT1WpRAat-mkj22Wj3KmrVuqA63cT_iCh5LnKZvJPRW8fBhz_OyqJknCV8OmKnfKVeQ3qxfKZAGEDJBZWUfQGdh3IM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of sulfentrazone rate and application method on peanut weed control</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Grey, T.L ; Bridges, D.C ; Hancock, H.G ; Davis, J.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Grey, T.L ; Bridges, D.C ; Hancock, H.G ; Davis, J.W</creatorcontrib><description>Field studies were conducted in 2000 and 2001 in Plains, GA, to determine peanut and weed response to the residual herbicides sulfentrazone, imazapic, diclosulam, and flumioxazin. Herbicide treatments included sulfentrazone applied preemergence (PRE) or preplant incorporated (PPI) at 112, 168, 224, and 280 g ai/ha, imazapic postemergence (POST) at 71 g ai/ha, diclosulam PPI at 26 g ai/ha, and flumioxazin PRE at 88 g ai/ha. Peanut exhibited early-season injury from all herbicide treatments, ranging from 0 to 10% for sulfentrazone PPI or PRE, 10% for imazapic, 3 to 23% for flumioxazin, and 1 to 7% for diclosulam. Yields were similar for sulfentrazone PPI- or PRE-treated and flumioxazin-, imazapic-, and diclosulam-treated peanut. Yellow nutsedge control was 83% or greater with all rates of sulfentrazone PRE or PPI, 83 and 90% with diclosulam, and 96 and 99% with imazapic, respectively. Flumioxazin did not control yellow nutsedge or wild poinsettia. Tall morningglory control was 82% or greater with imazapic, diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PPI or PRE at 168 g/ha or higher. Florida beggarweed control was 88% or greater with diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PRE at 224 and 280 g/ha. Overall, peanut tolerance to sulfentrazone at 112 to 280 g/ha PPI and PRE was high and yield was equivalent to the currently registered peanut residual herbicides.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WT-03-103R2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WETEE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Agricultural soils ; Agrology ; Arachis hypogaea ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical control ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Herbicides ; Organic soils ; Parasitic plants. Weeds ; Peanuts ; pesticide application ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Sandy loam soils ; Soil organic matter ; Soil resources ; Soybeans ; sulfentrazone ; Weed control ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2004-07, Vol.18 (3), p.619-625</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-ebffef6498aedf75908f877d4bcb6fd8fb14d1a6d55b22b422422d2c1792f0ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-ebffef6498aedf75908f877d4bcb6fd8fb14d1a6d55b22b422422d2c1792f0ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3989353$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3989353$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27929,27930,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16954647$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grey, T.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridges, D.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, H.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, J.W</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of sulfentrazone rate and application method on peanut weed control</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Field studies were conducted in 2000 and 2001 in Plains, GA, to determine peanut and weed response to the residual herbicides sulfentrazone, imazapic, diclosulam, and flumioxazin. Herbicide treatments included sulfentrazone applied preemergence (PRE) or preplant incorporated (PPI) at 112, 168, 224, and 280 g ai/ha, imazapic postemergence (POST) at 71 g ai/ha, diclosulam PPI at 26 g ai/ha, and flumioxazin PRE at 88 g ai/ha. Peanut exhibited early-season injury from all herbicide treatments, ranging from 0 to 10% for sulfentrazone PPI or PRE, 10% for imazapic, 3 to 23% for flumioxazin, and 1 to 7% for diclosulam. Yields were similar for sulfentrazone PPI- or PRE-treated and flumioxazin-, imazapic-, and diclosulam-treated peanut. Yellow nutsedge control was 83% or greater with all rates of sulfentrazone PRE or PPI, 83 and 90% with diclosulam, and 96 and 99% with imazapic, respectively. Flumioxazin did not control yellow nutsedge or wild poinsettia. Tall morningglory control was 82% or greater with imazapic, diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PPI or PRE at 168 g/ha or higher. Florida beggarweed control was 88% or greater with diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PRE at 224 and 280 g/ha. Overall, peanut tolerance to sulfentrazone at 112 to 280 g/ha PPI and PRE was high and yield was equivalent to the currently registered peanut residual herbicides.</description><subject>Agricultural soils</subject><subject>Agrology</subject><subject>Arachis hypogaea</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical control</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Parasitic plants. Weeds</subject><subject>Peanuts</subject><subject>pesticide application</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Sandy loam soils</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>Soil resources</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>sulfentrazone</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1LxDAQhoMouK6evArm4kmqk6RJ2qMsfsGKoLust5LmQ7t0m5J0Ef31RisKAzPwPO8cXoSOCVwQQfLL1SIDlhFgT3QHTQjnkFGZwy6aQFFCYvJlHx3EuAYgglKYoIf7zrVb22mLvcNx2zrbDUF9-s7ioAaLVWew6vu20WpofIc3dnjzBqert6rbDvjdWoO1TynfHqI9p9poj373FC1vrhezu2z-eHs_u5pnmkExZLZ2zjqRl4WyxkleQuEKKU1e61o4U7ia5IYoYTivKa1zStMYqoksqQOr2RSdj3918DEG66o-NBsVPioC1XcT1WpRAat-mkj22Wj3KmrVuqA63cT_iCh5LnKZvJPRW8fBhz_OyqJknCV8OmKnfKVeQ3qxfKZAGEDJBZWUfQGdh3IM</recordid><startdate>20040701</startdate><enddate>20040701</enddate><creator>Grey, T.L</creator><creator>Bridges, D.C</creator><creator>Hancock, H.G</creator><creator>Davis, J.W</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040701</creationdate><title>Influence of sulfentrazone rate and application method on peanut weed control</title><author>Grey, T.L ; Bridges, D.C ; Hancock, H.G ; Davis, J.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-ebffef6498aedf75908f877d4bcb6fd8fb14d1a6d55b22b422422d2c1792f0ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Agricultural soils</topic><topic>Agrology</topic><topic>Arachis hypogaea</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical control</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Parasitic plants. Weeds</topic><topic>Peanuts</topic><topic>pesticide application</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Sandy loam soils</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>Soil resources</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>sulfentrazone</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grey, T.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridges, D.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, H.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, J.W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grey, T.L</au><au>Bridges, D.C</au><au>Hancock, H.G</au><au>Davis, J.W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of sulfentrazone rate and application method on peanut weed control</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>2004-07-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>619</spage><epage>625</epage><pages>619-625</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><coden>WETEE9</coden><abstract>Field studies were conducted in 2000 and 2001 in Plains, GA, to determine peanut and weed response to the residual herbicides sulfentrazone, imazapic, diclosulam, and flumioxazin. Herbicide treatments included sulfentrazone applied preemergence (PRE) or preplant incorporated (PPI) at 112, 168, 224, and 280 g ai/ha, imazapic postemergence (POST) at 71 g ai/ha, diclosulam PPI at 26 g ai/ha, and flumioxazin PRE at 88 g ai/ha. Peanut exhibited early-season injury from all herbicide treatments, ranging from 0 to 10% for sulfentrazone PPI or PRE, 10% for imazapic, 3 to 23% for flumioxazin, and 1 to 7% for diclosulam. Yields were similar for sulfentrazone PPI- or PRE-treated and flumioxazin-, imazapic-, and diclosulam-treated peanut. Yellow nutsedge control was 83% or greater with all rates of sulfentrazone PRE or PPI, 83 and 90% with diclosulam, and 96 and 99% with imazapic, respectively. Flumioxazin did not control yellow nutsedge or wild poinsettia. Tall morningglory control was 82% or greater with imazapic, diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PPI or PRE at 168 g/ha or higher. Florida beggarweed control was 88% or greater with diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone PRE at 224 and 280 g/ha. Overall, peanut tolerance to sulfentrazone at 112 to 280 g/ha PPI and PRE was high and yield was equivalent to the currently registered peanut residual herbicides.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/WT-03-103R2</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-037X
ispartof Weed technology, 2004-07, Vol.18 (3), p.619-625
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1614_WT_03_103R2
source BioOne Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Agricultural soils
Agrology
Arachis hypogaea
Biological and medical sciences
Chemical control
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Herbicides
Organic soils
Parasitic plants. Weeds
Peanuts
pesticide application
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
Sandy loam soils
Soil organic matter
Soil resources
Soybeans
sulfentrazone
Weed control
Weeds
title Influence of sulfentrazone rate and application method on peanut weed control
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T10%3A56%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20sulfentrazone%20rate%20and%20application%20method%20on%20peanut%20weed%20control&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Grey,%20T.L&rft.date=2004-07-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=619&rft.epage=625&rft.pages=619-625&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft.coden=WETEE9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WT-03-103R2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3989353%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3989353&rfr_iscdi=true