Critical Weed-Free Period for ‘Beauregard’ Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas)1

Studies were initiated at two different planting dates and conducted at two different locations in 2001 to determine the critical weed-free period for certain populations of weeds in organically produced ‘Beauregard’ sweetpotato. Naturally occurring weed populations were used, and they included sick...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed technology 2003-10, Vol.17 (4), p.686-695
Hauptverfasser: SEEM, JESSICA E, CREAMER, NANCY G, MONKS, DAVID W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 695
container_issue 4
container_start_page 686
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 17
creator SEEM, JESSICA E
CREAMER, NANCY G
MONKS, DAVID W
description Studies were initiated at two different planting dates and conducted at two different locations in 2001 to determine the critical weed-free period for certain populations of weeds in organically produced ‘Beauregard’ sweetpotato. Naturally occurring weed populations were used, and they included sicklepod, redroot pigweed, and yellow nutsedge. Treatments included allowing weeds to grow for 2, 4, 6, or 8 wk after transplanting (WAT) sweetpotato before weed removal and maintaining the sweetpotato weed-free for 2, 4, 6, or 8 WAT. Weedy and weed-free checks were also included in the study. These treatments were used to determine the length of time weeds can compete with sweetpotato without reducing yield and the length of time sweetpotato must grow before yield is no longer affected by newly emerging weeds. Yield of number one grade sweetpotato roots best fit a quadratic plateau curve for the grow-back treatments and a logistic curve for the removal treatments. Yields in weed-free plots of sweetpotato were higher at the early planting date, whereas yields in plots of weedy sweetpotato were higher at the late planting date. Weed biomass was lower in the grow-back treatments at the late planting date. Data indicate that sweetpotato may gain a competitive advantage over weeds when planted at a later date. At both planting dates, a critical weed-free period of 2 to 6 WAT was observed. Nomenclature: Redroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. #3 AMARE; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby # CASOB; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES; sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. ‘Beauregard’. Additional index words: Competition, interference, organic production, Brachiaria platyphylla, Eleusine indica, Mollugo verticillata, Sida spinosa, BRAPP, ELEIN, MOLVE, SIDSP. Abbreviations: WAT, weeks after transplanting.
doi_str_mv 10.1614/WT02-089
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>bioone_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1614_WT02_089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>bioone_primary_10_1614_WT02_089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1039-36487fc1319896fc9417e38245cd6b8108df99961df99f045d7f6beb53b472d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKxDAYhIMoWFfBR8hJ1kP0T5OmzVEXVxdWFFxZbyVp_khl15S0It72MfT19klsWa-ehhk-BmYIOeVwwRWXl8sFpAwKvUcSnmXA0lzCPkn6BBiI_OWQHLXtGwBXaQoJuZ_Euqsrs6JLRMemEZE-YqyDoz5Eut18X6P5iPhqottufujTJ2LXhM50gY5nTVgHNNSa3pv2nB-TA29WLZ786Yg8T28Wkzs2f7idTa7mzHIQmgkli9xXXHBdaOUrLXmOokhlVjllCw6F81prxQfxIDOXe2XRZsLKPHUgRmS8661iaNuIvmxivTbxq-RQDjeUww1lP7pHz3aorUN4x__BX46SXBw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical Weed-Free Period for ‘Beauregard’ Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas)1</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>SEEM, JESSICA E ; CREAMER, NANCY G ; MONKS, DAVID W</creator><creatorcontrib>SEEM, JESSICA E ; CREAMER, NANCY G ; MONKS, DAVID W</creatorcontrib><description>Studies were initiated at two different planting dates and conducted at two different locations in 2001 to determine the critical weed-free period for certain populations of weeds in organically produced ‘Beauregard’ sweetpotato. Naturally occurring weed populations were used, and they included sicklepod, redroot pigweed, and yellow nutsedge. Treatments included allowing weeds to grow for 2, 4, 6, or 8 wk after transplanting (WAT) sweetpotato before weed removal and maintaining the sweetpotato weed-free for 2, 4, 6, or 8 WAT. Weedy and weed-free checks were also included in the study. These treatments were used to determine the length of time weeds can compete with sweetpotato without reducing yield and the length of time sweetpotato must grow before yield is no longer affected by newly emerging weeds. Yield of number one grade sweetpotato roots best fit a quadratic plateau curve for the grow-back treatments and a logistic curve for the removal treatments. Yields in weed-free plots of sweetpotato were higher at the early planting date, whereas yields in plots of weedy sweetpotato were higher at the late planting date. Weed biomass was lower in the grow-back treatments at the late planting date. Data indicate that sweetpotato may gain a competitive advantage over weeds when planted at a later date. At both planting dates, a critical weed-free period of 2 to 6 WAT was observed. Nomenclature: Redroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. #3 AMARE; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby # CASOB; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES; sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. ‘Beauregard’. Additional index words: Competition, interference, organic production, Brachiaria platyphylla, Eleusine indica, Mollugo verticillata, Sida spinosa, BRAPP, ELEIN, MOLVE, SIDSP. Abbreviations: WAT, weeks after transplanting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WT02-089</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Weed technology, 2003-10, Vol.17 (4), p.686-695</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1039-36487fc1319896fc9417e38245cd6b8108df99961df99f045d7f6beb53b472d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1039-36487fc1319896fc9417e38245cd6b8108df99961df99f045d7f6beb53b472d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1614/WT02-089$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,26978,27924,27925,52363</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SEEM, JESSICA E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CREAMER, NANCY G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MONKS, DAVID W</creatorcontrib><title>Critical Weed-Free Period for ‘Beauregard’ Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas)1</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Studies were initiated at two different planting dates and conducted at two different locations in 2001 to determine the critical weed-free period for certain populations of weeds in organically produced ‘Beauregard’ sweetpotato. Naturally occurring weed populations were used, and they included sicklepod, redroot pigweed, and yellow nutsedge. Treatments included allowing weeds to grow for 2, 4, 6, or 8 wk after transplanting (WAT) sweetpotato before weed removal and maintaining the sweetpotato weed-free for 2, 4, 6, or 8 WAT. Weedy and weed-free checks were also included in the study. These treatments were used to determine the length of time weeds can compete with sweetpotato without reducing yield and the length of time sweetpotato must grow before yield is no longer affected by newly emerging weeds. Yield of number one grade sweetpotato roots best fit a quadratic plateau curve for the grow-back treatments and a logistic curve for the removal treatments. Yields in weed-free plots of sweetpotato were higher at the early planting date, whereas yields in plots of weedy sweetpotato were higher at the late planting date. Weed biomass was lower in the grow-back treatments at the late planting date. Data indicate that sweetpotato may gain a competitive advantage over weeds when planted at a later date. At both planting dates, a critical weed-free period of 2 to 6 WAT was observed. Nomenclature: Redroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. #3 AMARE; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby # CASOB; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES; sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. ‘Beauregard’. Additional index words: Competition, interference, organic production, Brachiaria platyphylla, Eleusine indica, Mollugo verticillata, Sida spinosa, BRAPP, ELEIN, MOLVE, SIDSP. Abbreviations: WAT, weeks after transplanting.</description><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFKxDAYhIMoWFfBR8hJ1kP0T5OmzVEXVxdWFFxZbyVp_khl15S0It72MfT19klsWa-ehhk-BmYIOeVwwRWXl8sFpAwKvUcSnmXA0lzCPkn6BBiI_OWQHLXtGwBXaQoJuZ_Euqsrs6JLRMemEZE-YqyDoz5Eut18X6P5iPhqottufujTJ2LXhM50gY5nTVgHNNSa3pv2nB-TA29WLZ786Yg8T28Wkzs2f7idTa7mzHIQmgkli9xXXHBdaOUrLXmOokhlVjllCw6F81prxQfxIDOXe2XRZsLKPHUgRmS8661iaNuIvmxivTbxq-RQDjeUww1lP7pHz3aorUN4x__BX46SXBw</recordid><startdate>200310</startdate><enddate>200310</enddate><creator>SEEM, JESSICA E</creator><creator>CREAMER, NANCY G</creator><creator>MONKS, DAVID W</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200310</creationdate><title>Critical Weed-Free Period for ‘Beauregard’ Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas)1</title><author>SEEM, JESSICA E ; CREAMER, NANCY G ; MONKS, DAVID W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1039-36487fc1319896fc9417e38245cd6b8108df99961df99f045d7f6beb53b472d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SEEM, JESSICA E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CREAMER, NANCY G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MONKS, DAVID W</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SEEM, JESSICA E</au><au>CREAMER, NANCY G</au><au>MONKS, DAVID W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Critical Weed-Free Period for ‘Beauregard’ Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas)1</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>2003-10</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>686</spage><epage>695</epage><pages>686-695</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Studies were initiated at two different planting dates and conducted at two different locations in 2001 to determine the critical weed-free period for certain populations of weeds in organically produced ‘Beauregard’ sweetpotato. Naturally occurring weed populations were used, and they included sicklepod, redroot pigweed, and yellow nutsedge. Treatments included allowing weeds to grow for 2, 4, 6, or 8 wk after transplanting (WAT) sweetpotato before weed removal and maintaining the sweetpotato weed-free for 2, 4, 6, or 8 WAT. Weedy and weed-free checks were also included in the study. These treatments were used to determine the length of time weeds can compete with sweetpotato without reducing yield and the length of time sweetpotato must grow before yield is no longer affected by newly emerging weeds. Yield of number one grade sweetpotato roots best fit a quadratic plateau curve for the grow-back treatments and a logistic curve for the removal treatments. Yields in weed-free plots of sweetpotato were higher at the early planting date, whereas yields in plots of weedy sweetpotato were higher at the late planting date. Weed biomass was lower in the grow-back treatments at the late planting date. Data indicate that sweetpotato may gain a competitive advantage over weeds when planted at a later date. At both planting dates, a critical weed-free period of 2 to 6 WAT was observed. Nomenclature: Redroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. #3 AMARE; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby # CASOB; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES; sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. ‘Beauregard’. Additional index words: Competition, interference, organic production, Brachiaria platyphylla, Eleusine indica, Mollugo verticillata, Sida spinosa, BRAPP, ELEIN, MOLVE, SIDSP. Abbreviations: WAT, weeks after transplanting.</abstract><doi>10.1614/WT02-089</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-037X
ispartof Weed technology, 2003-10, Vol.17 (4), p.686-695
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1614_WT02_089
source BioOne Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
title Critical Weed-Free Period for ‘Beauregard’ Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas)1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A54%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-bioone_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20Weed-Free%20Period%20for%20%E2%80%98Beauregard%E2%80%99%20Sweetpotato%20(Ipomoea%20batatas)1&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=SEEM,%20JESSICA%20E&rft.date=2003-10&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=686&rft.epage=695&rft.pages=686-695&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WT02-089&rft_dat=%3Cbioone_cross%3Ebioone_primary_10_1614_WT02_089%3C/bioone_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true