Integrating disturbance and colonization during rehabilitation of invasive weed-dominated grasslands

Developing ecological principles applicable to invasive plant management is central to implementing sustainable strategies. We tested portions of a potentially useful successional-based management framework to further our understanding of the relationship between disturbance and colonization during...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed science 2005-05, Vol.53 (3), p.307-314
Hauptverfasser: Sheley, Roger L., Jacobs, James S., Svejcar, Tony J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 314
container_issue 3
container_start_page 307
container_title Weed science
container_volume 53
creator Sheley, Roger L.
Jacobs, James S.
Svejcar, Tony J.
description Developing ecological principles applicable to invasive plant management is central to implementing sustainable strategies. We tested portions of a potentially useful successional-based management framework to further our understanding of the relationship between disturbance and colonization during revegetation of invasive weed-dominated grasslands. We hypothesized (1) intermediate wheatgrass density and biomass would be greatest at highest seeding rates, (2) control and tillage procedures that increase the availability of safe sites would increase wheatgrass abundance, and (3) spotted knapweed density and biomass would be lowest in treatments with highest wheatgrass density and biomass. Treatments included three disturbance levels: (1) no disturbance, (2) application of glyphosate, and (3) fall tillage. Colonization treatments were seeding intermediate wheatgrass of 0, 500, 2,500, and 12,500 seeds m−2. Treatments were factorially applied in a randomized complete-block design with four replications at each of two sites located in Montana. Density and biomass of intermediate wheatgrass and spotted knapweed were sampled in 1997 and 2001. At both sites, seeding 2,500 or 12,500 seed m−2 increased wheatgrass density over that of the nonseeded control in 1997. The highest seeding rate produced almost three times as many wheatgrass plants as 2,500 seeds m−2 that year. By 2001, only the highest seeding rate produced wheatgrass densities greater than that of the nonseeded control at Bozeman. Seeding rates higher than 500 seeds m−2 yielded greater wheatgrass biomass than the nonseeded control with or without either tillage or glyphosate. At the highest seeding rate, tillage or glyphosate doubled intermediate wheatgrass biomass compared with no disturbance. Spotted knapweed generally had lower biomass where intermediate wheatgrass density and biomass was highest. One approach to rehabilitation is to design disturbances that favor desired species and then use high seeding rates that overwhelm the pool of available propagules and occupy a high percentage of safe sites. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; intermediate wheatgrass, Elytriga intermedia (Host) Nevski; spotted knapweed, Centaurea maculosa Lam.
doi_str_mv 10.1614/WS-04-152R2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1614_WS_04_152R2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1614_WS_04_152R2</cupid><jstor_id>4047007</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4047007</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b350t-6995596b5f2830b60313edb88aae81c4b963d916f51a8c3acf7298c389bbe0d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKsnr4J7FYlONpvs5ijFj0JBsJYeQ7LJ1pQ2kWRb0b_erVu86WmGeT_ezDyEzgncEE6K2_kUQ4EJy1_yAzQgjAHOSyYO0QCgoJiUBTtGJyktAQjPiRggM_atXUTVOr_IjEvtJmrla5spb7I6rIJ3X50YfGY2ccdE-6a0W7m2n4Ymc36rktva7MNag01YO69aa7LONaVV55NO0VGjVsme7esQzR7uX0dPePL8OB7dTbCmDFrMhWBMcM2avKKgOVBCrdFVpZStSF1owakRhDeMqKqmqm7KXHRNJbS2YDgdouvet44hpWgb-R7dWsVPSUDuApLzqYRC_gTU0Rc9vUxtiL9oAUUJUHbyZS83Kki1iC7J2TQHQoEAMJ6LjsD7dWqtozMLK5dhE3334h8Lr3peuxC8_fe4b03-iVI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating disturbance and colonization during rehabilitation of invasive weed-dominated grasslands</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Sheley, Roger L. ; Jacobs, James S. ; Svejcar, Tony J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sheley, Roger L. ; Jacobs, James S. ; Svejcar, Tony J.</creatorcontrib><description>Developing ecological principles applicable to invasive plant management is central to implementing sustainable strategies. We tested portions of a potentially useful successional-based management framework to further our understanding of the relationship between disturbance and colonization during revegetation of invasive weed-dominated grasslands. We hypothesized (1) intermediate wheatgrass density and biomass would be greatest at highest seeding rates, (2) control and tillage procedures that increase the availability of safe sites would increase wheatgrass abundance, and (3) spotted knapweed density and biomass would be lowest in treatments with highest wheatgrass density and biomass. Treatments included three disturbance levels: (1) no disturbance, (2) application of glyphosate, and (3) fall tillage. Colonization treatments were seeding intermediate wheatgrass of 0, 500, 2,500, and 12,500 seeds m−2. Treatments were factorially applied in a randomized complete-block design with four replications at each of two sites located in Montana. Density and biomass of intermediate wheatgrass and spotted knapweed were sampled in 1997 and 2001. At both sites, seeding 2,500 or 12,500 seed m−2 increased wheatgrass density over that of the nonseeded control in 1997. The highest seeding rate produced almost three times as many wheatgrass plants as 2,500 seeds m−2 that year. By 2001, only the highest seeding rate produced wheatgrass densities greater than that of the nonseeded control at Bozeman. Seeding rates higher than 500 seeds m−2 yielded greater wheatgrass biomass than the nonseeded control with or without either tillage or glyphosate. At the highest seeding rate, tillage or glyphosate doubled intermediate wheatgrass biomass compared with no disturbance. Spotted knapweed generally had lower biomass where intermediate wheatgrass density and biomass was highest. One approach to rehabilitation is to design disturbances that favor desired species and then use high seeding rates that overwhelm the pool of available propagules and occupy a high percentage of safe sites. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; intermediate wheatgrass, Elytriga intermedia (Host) Nevski; spotted knapweed, Centaurea maculosa Lam.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WS-04-152R2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis of variance ; application rate ; Biomass ; Centaurea stoebe subsp. stoebe ; Ecological invasion ; ecological restoration ; Ecological succession ; glyphosate ; grasslands ; Invasive plant management ; Invasive species ; P values ; plant communities ; Plants ; range management ; restoration ; Seeding ; Seeds ; species diversity ; successional management ; Thinopyrum intermedium subsp. intermedium ; Tillage ; weed control ; WEED MANAGEMENT ; weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed science, 2005-05, Vol.53 (3), p.307-314</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright © Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b350t-6995596b5f2830b60313edb88aae81c4b963d916f51a8c3acf7298c389bbe0d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b350t-6995596b5f2830b60313edb88aae81c4b963d916f51a8c3acf7298c389bbe0d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1614/WS-04-152R2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4047007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,26977,27923,27924,52362,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sheley, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svejcar, Tony J.</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating disturbance and colonization during rehabilitation of invasive weed-dominated grasslands</title><title>Weed science</title><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><description>Developing ecological principles applicable to invasive plant management is central to implementing sustainable strategies. We tested portions of a potentially useful successional-based management framework to further our understanding of the relationship between disturbance and colonization during revegetation of invasive weed-dominated grasslands. We hypothesized (1) intermediate wheatgrass density and biomass would be greatest at highest seeding rates, (2) control and tillage procedures that increase the availability of safe sites would increase wheatgrass abundance, and (3) spotted knapweed density and biomass would be lowest in treatments with highest wheatgrass density and biomass. Treatments included three disturbance levels: (1) no disturbance, (2) application of glyphosate, and (3) fall tillage. Colonization treatments were seeding intermediate wheatgrass of 0, 500, 2,500, and 12,500 seeds m−2. Treatments were factorially applied in a randomized complete-block design with four replications at each of two sites located in Montana. Density and biomass of intermediate wheatgrass and spotted knapweed were sampled in 1997 and 2001. At both sites, seeding 2,500 or 12,500 seed m−2 increased wheatgrass density over that of the nonseeded control in 1997. The highest seeding rate produced almost three times as many wheatgrass plants as 2,500 seeds m−2 that year. By 2001, only the highest seeding rate produced wheatgrass densities greater than that of the nonseeded control at Bozeman. Seeding rates higher than 500 seeds m−2 yielded greater wheatgrass biomass than the nonseeded control with or without either tillage or glyphosate. At the highest seeding rate, tillage or glyphosate doubled intermediate wheatgrass biomass compared with no disturbance. Spotted knapweed generally had lower biomass where intermediate wheatgrass density and biomass was highest. One approach to rehabilitation is to design disturbances that favor desired species and then use high seeding rates that overwhelm the pool of available propagules and occupy a high percentage of safe sites. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; intermediate wheatgrass, Elytriga intermedia (Host) Nevski; spotted knapweed, Centaurea maculosa Lam.</description><subject>Analysis of variance</subject><subject>application rate</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Centaurea stoebe subsp. stoebe</subject><subject>Ecological invasion</subject><subject>ecological restoration</subject><subject>Ecological succession</subject><subject>glyphosate</subject><subject>grasslands</subject><subject>Invasive plant management</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>P values</subject><subject>plant communities</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>range management</subject><subject>restoration</subject><subject>Seeding</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>successional management</subject><subject>Thinopyrum intermedium subsp. intermedium</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>weed control</subject><subject>WEED MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>weeds</subject><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKsnr4J7FYlONpvs5ijFj0JBsJYeQ7LJ1pQ2kWRb0b_erVu86WmGeT_ezDyEzgncEE6K2_kUQ4EJy1_yAzQgjAHOSyYO0QCgoJiUBTtGJyktAQjPiRggM_atXUTVOr_IjEvtJmrla5spb7I6rIJ3X50YfGY2ccdE-6a0W7m2n4Ymc36rktva7MNag01YO69aa7LONaVV55NO0VGjVsme7esQzR7uX0dPePL8OB7dTbCmDFrMhWBMcM2avKKgOVBCrdFVpZStSF1owakRhDeMqKqmqm7KXHRNJbS2YDgdouvet44hpWgb-R7dWsVPSUDuApLzqYRC_gTU0Rc9vUxtiL9oAUUJUHbyZS83Kki1iC7J2TQHQoEAMJ6LjsD7dWqtozMLK5dhE3334h8Lr3peuxC8_fe4b03-iVI</recordid><startdate>20050501</startdate><enddate>20050501</enddate><creator>Sheley, Roger L.</creator><creator>Jacobs, James S.</creator><creator>Svejcar, Tony J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050501</creationdate><title>Integrating disturbance and colonization during rehabilitation of invasive weed-dominated grasslands</title><author>Sheley, Roger L. ; Jacobs, James S. ; Svejcar, Tony J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b350t-6995596b5f2830b60313edb88aae81c4b963d916f51a8c3acf7298c389bbe0d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Analysis of variance</topic><topic>application rate</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Centaurea stoebe subsp. stoebe</topic><topic>Ecological invasion</topic><topic>ecological restoration</topic><topic>Ecological succession</topic><topic>glyphosate</topic><topic>grasslands</topic><topic>Invasive plant management</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>P values</topic><topic>plant communities</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>range management</topic><topic>restoration</topic><topic>Seeding</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>successional management</topic><topic>Thinopyrum intermedium subsp. intermedium</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>weed control</topic><topic>WEED MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sheley, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svejcar, Tony J.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sheley, Roger L.</au><au>Jacobs, James S.</au><au>Svejcar, Tony J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating disturbance and colonization during rehabilitation of invasive weed-dominated grasslands</atitle><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><date>2005-05-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>314</epage><pages>307-314</pages><issn>0043-1745</issn><eissn>1550-2759</eissn><abstract>Developing ecological principles applicable to invasive plant management is central to implementing sustainable strategies. We tested portions of a potentially useful successional-based management framework to further our understanding of the relationship between disturbance and colonization during revegetation of invasive weed-dominated grasslands. We hypothesized (1) intermediate wheatgrass density and biomass would be greatest at highest seeding rates, (2) control and tillage procedures that increase the availability of safe sites would increase wheatgrass abundance, and (3) spotted knapweed density and biomass would be lowest in treatments with highest wheatgrass density and biomass. Treatments included three disturbance levels: (1) no disturbance, (2) application of glyphosate, and (3) fall tillage. Colonization treatments were seeding intermediate wheatgrass of 0, 500, 2,500, and 12,500 seeds m−2. Treatments were factorially applied in a randomized complete-block design with four replications at each of two sites located in Montana. Density and biomass of intermediate wheatgrass and spotted knapweed were sampled in 1997 and 2001. At both sites, seeding 2,500 or 12,500 seed m−2 increased wheatgrass density over that of the nonseeded control in 1997. The highest seeding rate produced almost three times as many wheatgrass plants as 2,500 seeds m−2 that year. By 2001, only the highest seeding rate produced wheatgrass densities greater than that of the nonseeded control at Bozeman. Seeding rates higher than 500 seeds m−2 yielded greater wheatgrass biomass than the nonseeded control with or without either tillage or glyphosate. At the highest seeding rate, tillage or glyphosate doubled intermediate wheatgrass biomass compared with no disturbance. Spotted knapweed generally had lower biomass where intermediate wheatgrass density and biomass was highest. One approach to rehabilitation is to design disturbances that favor desired species and then use high seeding rates that overwhelm the pool of available propagules and occupy a high percentage of safe sites. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; intermediate wheatgrass, Elytriga intermedia (Host) Nevski; spotted knapweed, Centaurea maculosa Lam.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1614/WS-04-152R2</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1745
ispartof Weed science, 2005-05, Vol.53 (3), p.307-314
issn 0043-1745
1550-2759
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1614_WS_04_152R2
source BioOne Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Analysis of variance
application rate
Biomass
Centaurea stoebe subsp. stoebe
Ecological invasion
ecological restoration
Ecological succession
glyphosate
grasslands
Invasive plant management
Invasive species
P values
plant communities
Plants
range management
restoration
Seeding
Seeds
species diversity
successional management
Thinopyrum intermedium subsp. intermedium
Tillage
weed control
WEED MANAGEMENT
weeds
title Integrating disturbance and colonization during rehabilitation of invasive weed-dominated grasslands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A44%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20disturbance%20and%20colonization%20during%20rehabilitation%20of%20invasive%20weed-dominated%20grasslands&rft.jtitle=Weed%20science&rft.au=Sheley,%20Roger%20L.&rft.date=2005-05-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=314&rft.pages=307-314&rft.issn=0043-1745&rft.eissn=1550-2759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WS-04-152R2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E4047007%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1614_WS_04_152R2&rft_jstor_id=4047007&rfr_iscdi=true