Glutaraldehyde release from heat-polymerized acrylic resins after disinfection and chemical and mechanical polishing

This study evaluated the release of glutaraldehyde from heat-polymerized acrylic resins subjected to disinfection followed by chemical and mechanical polishing. Ninety disc-shaped specimens (15 x 4 mm), 30 per resin (Lucitone 550, QC-20 and Classico), were made and assigned to 2 groups according to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brazilian dental journal 2011, Vol.22 (6), p.490-496
Hauptverfasser: Orsi, Iara Augusta, Andrade, Vanessa Gomes, Bonato, Pierina Sueli, Raimundo, Lariça Barbosa, Herzog, Daniella Silva, Borie, Eduardo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 496
container_issue 6
container_start_page 490
container_title Brazilian dental journal
container_volume 22
creator Orsi, Iara Augusta
Andrade, Vanessa Gomes
Bonato, Pierina Sueli
Raimundo, Lariça Barbosa
Herzog, Daniella Silva
Borie, Eduardo
description This study evaluated the release of glutaraldehyde from heat-polymerized acrylic resins subjected to disinfection followed by chemical and mechanical polishing. Ninety disc-shaped specimens (15 x 4 mm), 30 per resin (Lucitone 550, QC-20 and Classico), were made and assigned to 2 groups according to the type of polishing. One side of each specimen was not polished and the other was either mechanically (n=45) or chemically (n=45) polished, and immersed in water at 50°C for 1 h to allow the release of intrinsic substances and then kept in distilled water for 7 days. The specimens were disinfected by immersion in 2% glutaraldehyde for 10 min. After this period, 3 specimens from each group were immersed in water for 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 min. For the 15-, 30-, 60-min immersions, 4 water exchanges were done at the end of period. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to detect and quantify the glutaraldehyde released after each period. Data were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons were done by Tukey’s and Scheffé’s tests (α=0.05). No glutaraldehyde release was observed from the specimens with chemical polishing at any of the immersion periods, while the mechanically polished specimens released glutaraldehyde. In the groups with water exchanges, Lucitone released more disinfectant in the 15-min period (0.040 μg/mL), Classico in the 30-min (0.021 μg/mL) and 60-min (0.018 μg/mL) periods, and QC-20 the same amount (-1.760 μg/mL) in all periods. In the groups without water exchanges, Lucitone released the highest amount of disinfectant (-1.370 μg/mL), differing significantly from QC-20 (0022 g/mL) and Classico (0019 g/mL), which were similar. The findings of this showed that chemically polished specimens from the 3 resin brands did not release glutaraldehyde after different periods of immersion, while glutaraldehyde release was observed from the mechanically polished specimens, especially from those made of Lucitone resin. Este estudo determinou a liberação de glutaraldeído de resinas acrílicas termopolimerizáveis submetidas a polimento químico e mecânico e desinfetadas. Noventa corpos-de-prova circulares (15 x 4 mm), 30 de cada tipo de resina (Lucitone, QC-20 e Clássico), foram confeccionados e divididos em 2 grupos referentes ao tipo de polimento. Um dos lados de cada corpo-de-prova não foi polido e o outro foi polido mecanicamente (n=45) ou quimicamente (n=45), e imersos em água aquecida a 50°C por 1 h para liberação
doi_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-64402011000600009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1590_S0103_64402011000600009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1590_S0103_64402011000600009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2609-e3d044b22c3d5839940bd65fd715d18d6e94f3860a4273172e9ae26b5e2c81be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-BvMHqpOPps1RFl2FBQ_quaTJxEbSdknqof566yoieBhmHublPTyEXDK4YqWG6ydgIAolJXBgDADUMqCPyOr3cfznPiVnOb_BEpZCr8i0je-TSSY67GaHNGFEk5H6NPa0QzMV-zHOPabwgY4am-YY7JLKYcjU-AkTdWEBj3YK40DN4KjtsA_WxAP0aDszHHBpCrkLw-s5OfEmZrz42Wvycnf7vLkvdo_bh83NrrBcgS5QOJCy5dwKV9ZCawmtU6V3FSsdq51CLb2oFRjJK8EqjtogV22J3NasRbEm1XevTWPOCX2zT6E3aW4YNF_ymoO85p888QnUZGRa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Glutaraldehyde release from heat-polymerized acrylic resins after disinfection and chemical and mechanical polishing</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Orsi, Iara Augusta ; Andrade, Vanessa Gomes ; Bonato, Pierina Sueli ; Raimundo, Lariça Barbosa ; Herzog, Daniella Silva ; Borie, Eduardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Orsi, Iara Augusta ; Andrade, Vanessa Gomes ; Bonato, Pierina Sueli ; Raimundo, Lariça Barbosa ; Herzog, Daniella Silva ; Borie, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the release of glutaraldehyde from heat-polymerized acrylic resins subjected to disinfection followed by chemical and mechanical polishing. Ninety disc-shaped specimens (15 x 4 mm), 30 per resin (Lucitone 550, QC-20 and Classico), were made and assigned to 2 groups according to the type of polishing. One side of each specimen was not polished and the other was either mechanically (n=45) or chemically (n=45) polished, and immersed in water at 50°C for 1 h to allow the release of intrinsic substances and then kept in distilled water for 7 days. The specimens were disinfected by immersion in 2% glutaraldehyde for 10 min. After this period, 3 specimens from each group were immersed in water for 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 min. For the 15-, 30-, 60-min immersions, 4 water exchanges were done at the end of period. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to detect and quantify the glutaraldehyde released after each period. Data were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons were done by Tukey’s and Scheffé’s tests (α=0.05). No glutaraldehyde release was observed from the specimens with chemical polishing at any of the immersion periods, while the mechanically polished specimens released glutaraldehyde. In the groups with water exchanges, Lucitone released more disinfectant in the 15-min period (0.040 μg/mL), Classico in the 30-min (0.021 μg/mL) and 60-min (0.018 μg/mL) periods, and QC-20 the same amount (-1.760 μg/mL) in all periods. In the groups without water exchanges, Lucitone released the highest amount of disinfectant (-1.370 μg/mL), differing significantly from QC-20 (0022 g/mL) and Classico (0019 g/mL), which were similar. The findings of this showed that chemically polished specimens from the 3 resin brands did not release glutaraldehyde after different periods of immersion, while glutaraldehyde release was observed from the mechanically polished specimens, especially from those made of Lucitone resin. Este estudo determinou a liberação de glutaraldeído de resinas acrílicas termopolimerizáveis submetidas a polimento químico e mecânico e desinfetadas. Noventa corpos-de-prova circulares (15 x 4 mm), 30 de cada tipo de resina (Lucitone, QC-20 e Clássico), foram confeccionados e divididos em 2 grupos referentes ao tipo de polimento. Um dos lados de cada corpo-de-prova não foi polido e o outro foi polido mecanicamente (n=45) ou quimicamente (n=45), e imersos em água aquecida a 50°C por 1 h para liberação de substâncias intrínsecas e mantidos em água destilada por 7 dias. A seguir era realizada a desinfecção por imersão em solução de glutaraldeído a 2% por 10 min. Decorrido este período, três corpos-de-prova de cada grupo eram imersos em água por 15, 30, 60, 120 e 240 min. Nos períodos de 15, 30 e 60 min foram realizadas até 4 trocas de água após cada período. As amostras eram analisadas por meio de cromatografia líquida de alta eficiência (HPLC) após cada período. Os dados foram analisados estatisticamente pela Análise de Variância e testes complementares de Tukey e Scheffé (α=0,05). Os corpos-de-prova com polimento químico, de todas as marcas comerciais de resina, não liberaram glutaraldeído em qualquer um dos períodos de imersão em água, enquanto os com polimento mecânico liberaram. Nos grupos com trocas de água, a resina Lucitone liberou maior quantidade de desinfetante nas trocas de 15 min (0,040 μg/mL), a resina Clássico nas de 30 (0,021 μg/mL) e 60 min (0,018 μg/mL) e a QC-20 liberou a mesma quantidade (-1,760 μg/mL), em todos os períodos de imersão em água. Nos grupos sem trocas de água, a resina Lucitone liberou maior quantidade de desinfetante (-1,370 μg/mL), sendo diferente estatisticamente das resinas QC-20 (0,022 μg/mL) e Clássico (0,019 μg/mL), que são similares. Pelos resultados conclui-se que corpos-de-prova polidos quimicamente, das três marcas comerciais de resina, não liberaram glutaraldeído após os diferentes períodos de imersão. Contudo, nos corpos-de-prova polidos mecanicamente houve liberação do desinfetante, com Lucitone liberando maior quantidade em relação às demais resinas estudadas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0103-6440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0103-6440</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/S0103-64402011000600009</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Brazilian dental journal, 2011, Vol.22 (6), p.490-496</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2609-e3d044b22c3d5839940bd65fd715d18d6e94f3860a4273172e9ae26b5e2c81be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2609-e3d044b22c3d5839940bd65fd715d18d6e94f3860a4273172e9ae26b5e2c81be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Orsi, Iara Augusta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Vanessa Gomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonato, Pierina Sueli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raimundo, Lariça Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herzog, Daniella Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borie, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><title>Glutaraldehyde release from heat-polymerized acrylic resins after disinfection and chemical and mechanical polishing</title><title>Brazilian dental journal</title><description>This study evaluated the release of glutaraldehyde from heat-polymerized acrylic resins subjected to disinfection followed by chemical and mechanical polishing. Ninety disc-shaped specimens (15 x 4 mm), 30 per resin (Lucitone 550, QC-20 and Classico), were made and assigned to 2 groups according to the type of polishing. One side of each specimen was not polished and the other was either mechanically (n=45) or chemically (n=45) polished, and immersed in water at 50°C for 1 h to allow the release of intrinsic substances and then kept in distilled water for 7 days. The specimens were disinfected by immersion in 2% glutaraldehyde for 10 min. After this period, 3 specimens from each group were immersed in water for 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 min. For the 15-, 30-, 60-min immersions, 4 water exchanges were done at the end of period. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to detect and quantify the glutaraldehyde released after each period. Data were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons were done by Tukey’s and Scheffé’s tests (α=0.05). No glutaraldehyde release was observed from the specimens with chemical polishing at any of the immersion periods, while the mechanically polished specimens released glutaraldehyde. In the groups with water exchanges, Lucitone released more disinfectant in the 15-min period (0.040 μg/mL), Classico in the 30-min (0.021 μg/mL) and 60-min (0.018 μg/mL) periods, and QC-20 the same amount (-1.760 μg/mL) in all periods. In the groups without water exchanges, Lucitone released the highest amount of disinfectant (-1.370 μg/mL), differing significantly from QC-20 (0022 g/mL) and Classico (0019 g/mL), which were similar. The findings of this showed that chemically polished specimens from the 3 resin brands did not release glutaraldehyde after different periods of immersion, while glutaraldehyde release was observed from the mechanically polished specimens, especially from those made of Lucitone resin. Este estudo determinou a liberação de glutaraldeído de resinas acrílicas termopolimerizáveis submetidas a polimento químico e mecânico e desinfetadas. Noventa corpos-de-prova circulares (15 x 4 mm), 30 de cada tipo de resina (Lucitone, QC-20 e Clássico), foram confeccionados e divididos em 2 grupos referentes ao tipo de polimento. Um dos lados de cada corpo-de-prova não foi polido e o outro foi polido mecanicamente (n=45) ou quimicamente (n=45), e imersos em água aquecida a 50°C por 1 h para liberação de substâncias intrínsecas e mantidos em água destilada por 7 dias. A seguir era realizada a desinfecção por imersão em solução de glutaraldeído a 2% por 10 min. Decorrido este período, três corpos-de-prova de cada grupo eram imersos em água por 15, 30, 60, 120 e 240 min. Nos períodos de 15, 30 e 60 min foram realizadas até 4 trocas de água após cada período. As amostras eram analisadas por meio de cromatografia líquida de alta eficiência (HPLC) após cada período. Os dados foram analisados estatisticamente pela Análise de Variância e testes complementares de Tukey e Scheffé (α=0,05). Os corpos-de-prova com polimento químico, de todas as marcas comerciais de resina, não liberaram glutaraldeído em qualquer um dos períodos de imersão em água, enquanto os com polimento mecânico liberaram. Nos grupos com trocas de água, a resina Lucitone liberou maior quantidade de desinfetante nas trocas de 15 min (0,040 μg/mL), a resina Clássico nas de 30 (0,021 μg/mL) e 60 min (0,018 μg/mL) e a QC-20 liberou a mesma quantidade (-1,760 μg/mL), em todos os períodos de imersão em água. Nos grupos sem trocas de água, a resina Lucitone liberou maior quantidade de desinfetante (-1,370 μg/mL), sendo diferente estatisticamente das resinas QC-20 (0,022 μg/mL) e Clássico (0,019 μg/mL), que são similares. Pelos resultados conclui-se que corpos-de-prova polidos quimicamente, das três marcas comerciais de resina, não liberaram glutaraldeído após os diferentes períodos de imersão. Contudo, nos corpos-de-prova polidos mecanicamente houve liberação do desinfetante, com Lucitone liberando maior quantidade em relação às demais resinas estudadas.</description><issn>0103-6440</issn><issn>0103-6440</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-BvMHqpOPps1RFl2FBQ_quaTJxEbSdknqof566yoieBhmHublPTyEXDK4YqWG6ydgIAolJXBgDADUMqCPyOr3cfznPiVnOb_BEpZCr8i0je-TSSY67GaHNGFEk5H6NPa0QzMV-zHOPabwgY4am-YY7JLKYcjU-AkTdWEBj3YK40DN4KjtsA_WxAP0aDszHHBpCrkLw-s5OfEmZrz42Wvycnf7vLkvdo_bh83NrrBcgS5QOJCy5dwKV9ZCawmtU6V3FSsdq51CLb2oFRjJK8EqjtogV22J3NasRbEm1XevTWPOCX2zT6E3aW4YNF_ymoO85p888QnUZGRa</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Orsi, Iara Augusta</creator><creator>Andrade, Vanessa Gomes</creator><creator>Bonato, Pierina Sueli</creator><creator>Raimundo, Lariça Barbosa</creator><creator>Herzog, Daniella Silva</creator><creator>Borie, Eduardo</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Glutaraldehyde release from heat-polymerized acrylic resins after disinfection and chemical and mechanical polishing</title><author>Orsi, Iara Augusta ; Andrade, Vanessa Gomes ; Bonato, Pierina Sueli ; Raimundo, Lariça Barbosa ; Herzog, Daniella Silva ; Borie, Eduardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2609-e3d044b22c3d5839940bd65fd715d18d6e94f3860a4273172e9ae26b5e2c81be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Orsi, Iara Augusta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Vanessa Gomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonato, Pierina Sueli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raimundo, Lariça Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herzog, Daniella Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borie, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Brazilian dental journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Orsi, Iara Augusta</au><au>Andrade, Vanessa Gomes</au><au>Bonato, Pierina Sueli</au><au>Raimundo, Lariça Barbosa</au><au>Herzog, Daniella Silva</au><au>Borie, Eduardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Glutaraldehyde release from heat-polymerized acrylic resins after disinfection and chemical and mechanical polishing</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian dental journal</jtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>490</spage><epage>496</epage><pages>490-496</pages><issn>0103-6440</issn><eissn>0103-6440</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated the release of glutaraldehyde from heat-polymerized acrylic resins subjected to disinfection followed by chemical and mechanical polishing. Ninety disc-shaped specimens (15 x 4 mm), 30 per resin (Lucitone 550, QC-20 and Classico), were made and assigned to 2 groups according to the type of polishing. One side of each specimen was not polished and the other was either mechanically (n=45) or chemically (n=45) polished, and immersed in water at 50°C for 1 h to allow the release of intrinsic substances and then kept in distilled water for 7 days. The specimens were disinfected by immersion in 2% glutaraldehyde for 10 min. After this period, 3 specimens from each group were immersed in water for 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 min. For the 15-, 30-, 60-min immersions, 4 water exchanges were done at the end of period. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to detect and quantify the glutaraldehyde released after each period. Data were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons were done by Tukey’s and Scheffé’s tests (α=0.05). No glutaraldehyde release was observed from the specimens with chemical polishing at any of the immersion periods, while the mechanically polished specimens released glutaraldehyde. In the groups with water exchanges, Lucitone released more disinfectant in the 15-min period (0.040 μg/mL), Classico in the 30-min (0.021 μg/mL) and 60-min (0.018 μg/mL) periods, and QC-20 the same amount (-1.760 μg/mL) in all periods. In the groups without water exchanges, Lucitone released the highest amount of disinfectant (-1.370 μg/mL), differing significantly from QC-20 (0022 g/mL) and Classico (0019 g/mL), which were similar. The findings of this showed that chemically polished specimens from the 3 resin brands did not release glutaraldehyde after different periods of immersion, while glutaraldehyde release was observed from the mechanically polished specimens, especially from those made of Lucitone resin. Este estudo determinou a liberação de glutaraldeído de resinas acrílicas termopolimerizáveis submetidas a polimento químico e mecânico e desinfetadas. Noventa corpos-de-prova circulares (15 x 4 mm), 30 de cada tipo de resina (Lucitone, QC-20 e Clássico), foram confeccionados e divididos em 2 grupos referentes ao tipo de polimento. Um dos lados de cada corpo-de-prova não foi polido e o outro foi polido mecanicamente (n=45) ou quimicamente (n=45), e imersos em água aquecida a 50°C por 1 h para liberação de substâncias intrínsecas e mantidos em água destilada por 7 dias. A seguir era realizada a desinfecção por imersão em solução de glutaraldeído a 2% por 10 min. Decorrido este período, três corpos-de-prova de cada grupo eram imersos em água por 15, 30, 60, 120 e 240 min. Nos períodos de 15, 30 e 60 min foram realizadas até 4 trocas de água após cada período. As amostras eram analisadas por meio de cromatografia líquida de alta eficiência (HPLC) após cada período. Os dados foram analisados estatisticamente pela Análise de Variância e testes complementares de Tukey e Scheffé (α=0,05). Os corpos-de-prova com polimento químico, de todas as marcas comerciais de resina, não liberaram glutaraldeído em qualquer um dos períodos de imersão em água, enquanto os com polimento mecânico liberaram. Nos grupos com trocas de água, a resina Lucitone liberou maior quantidade de desinfetante nas trocas de 15 min (0,040 μg/mL), a resina Clássico nas de 30 (0,021 μg/mL) e 60 min (0,018 μg/mL) e a QC-20 liberou a mesma quantidade (-1,760 μg/mL), em todos os períodos de imersão em água. Nos grupos sem trocas de água, a resina Lucitone liberou maior quantidade de desinfetante (-1,370 μg/mL), sendo diferente estatisticamente das resinas QC-20 (0,022 μg/mL) e Clássico (0,019 μg/mL), que são similares. Pelos resultados conclui-se que corpos-de-prova polidos quimicamente, das três marcas comerciais de resina, não liberaram glutaraldeído após os diferentes períodos de imersão. Contudo, nos corpos-de-prova polidos mecanicamente houve liberação do desinfetante, com Lucitone liberando maior quantidade em relação às demais resinas estudadas.</abstract><doi>10.1590/S0103-64402011000600009</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0103-6440
ispartof Brazilian dental journal, 2011, Vol.22 (6), p.490-496
issn 0103-6440
0103-6440
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1590_S0103_64402011000600009
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Glutaraldehyde release from heat-polymerized acrylic resins after disinfection and chemical and mechanical polishing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T12%3A36%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glutaraldehyde%20release%20from%20heat-polymerized%20acrylic%20resins%20after%20disinfection%20and%20chemical%20and%20mechanical%20polishing&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20dental%20journal&rft.au=Orsi,%20Iara%20Augusta&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=490&rft.epage=496&rft.pages=490-496&rft.issn=0103-6440&rft.eissn=0103-6440&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/S0103-64402011000600009&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1590_S0103_64402011000600009%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true