Misturas em tanque com glyphosate para o controle de trapoeraba, erva-de-touro e capim-carrapicho em soja RR

O uso de misturas de glyphosate, em tanque, para manejo de espécies de plantas daninhas de difícil controle tem sido prática comum entre os agricultores brasileiros. Desta forma, este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a eficácia e seletividade de misturas, em tanque, de herbicidas com glyphosate p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista Ceres 2011-02, Vol.58 (1), p.35-42
Hauptverfasser: Maciel, Cleber Daniel de Goes, Poletine, Juliana Parisotto, Amstalden, Saulo Leme, Gazziero, Dionísio Luis Piza, Raimondi, Michel Alex, Lima, Gesley Ramos Guimarães, Oliveira Neto, Antônio Mendes de, Guerra, Naiara, Justiniano, Wagner
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1
container_start_page 35
container_title Revista Ceres
container_volume 58
creator Maciel, Cleber Daniel de Goes
Poletine, Juliana Parisotto
Amstalden, Saulo Leme
Gazziero, Dionísio Luis Piza
Raimondi, Michel Alex
Lima, Gesley Ramos Guimarães
Oliveira Neto, Antônio Mendes de
Guerra, Naiara
Justiniano, Wagner
description O uso de misturas de glyphosate, em tanque, para manejo de espécies de plantas daninhas de difícil controle tem sido prática comum entre os agricultores brasileiros. Desta forma, este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a eficácia e seletividade de misturas, em tanque, de herbicidas com glyphosate para o controle de trapoeraba (Commelina benghalensis L.), erva-de-touro (Tridax procumbens L.) e capim-carrapicho (Cenchrus echinatus L.) na cultura da soja RR®. O experimento foi conduzido em Maracaí, São Paulo, no período de novembro de 2006 a março de 2007, utilizando-se o cultivar CD-214RR® e delineamento experimental de blocos ao acaso, com 21 tratamentos e quatro repetições. Os tratamentos foram constituídos da aplicação de: glyphosate (180; 360; 540 e 720 g ha-1); glyphosate em sequencial (180/360; 360/360 e 540/360 g ha-1); glyphosate + chlorimuron-ethyl 360+10; 540+10; 360+5/ 360+5 g ha-1); glyphosate + lactofen (360+120; 540+120; 360+60/ 360+60 g ha-1); glyphosate + cloransulam-methyl (360+30; 540+30; 360+16,9/ 360+12,9 g ha-1); glyphosate + carfentrazone (360+4 g ha-1); glyphosate + imazethapyr (360+50 g ha-1); glyphosate + imazethapyr (177,8+30 g ha-1) e testemunhas capinada e sem capina. Apesar da similaridade de produtividade de grãos entre os tratamentos com glyphosate isolado e sequencial, nas doses 540, 720 e 540/ 360 g ha-1, as misturas em tanque com chlorimuron-ethyl, cloransulam-methyl, lactofen e imazethapyr favoreceram o controle de espécies de plantas daninhas tolerantes ao glyphosate como C. benghalensis e T. procumbens. Although the use of glyphosate tank mixtures for managing weed species of difficult control is prohibited by the Brazilian legislation, it has been a common practice among farmers. This work aimed to evaluate the efficiency and selectivity of herbicide tank mixtures using glyphosate to control Commelina benghalensis L., Tridax procumbens L. and Cenchrus echinatus L. in soybean crop RR®. A field experiment was conducted in the Municipality of Maracai, São Paulo State, between November, 2006 and March 2007, using the genotype CD-214RR® in a complete randomized block design with 21 treatments and four replications. The treatments consisted of the following applications: glyphosate (180; 360; 540 and 720 g ha-1); glyphosate in sequence (180/360; 360/360 and 540/360 g ha-1); glyphosate + chlorimuron-ethyl 360+10; 540+10 and 360+5/ 360+5 g ha-1); glyphosate + lactofen (360+120; 540+120 and 360+60/ 360+60 g ha-1); glyphosate + c
doi_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-737X2011000100006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1590_S0034_737X2011000100006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1590_S0034_737X2011000100006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1026-57b3b96e8de9846906501fd6bf4f3758a16dc6d6b7b66a13e2fc90e08e349ce93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkN1KxDAQhYMouKz7DOYBjE6aNmkuZfEPVoRVwbsyTadul3ZTk67g29uqiODFMH_nnIuPsVMJ5zKzcPEIoFJhlHlJQEoAmAr0AZv9Pg7_zMdsEeN2kmTGykTPWHvfxGEfMHLq-IC7tz1x5zv-2n70Gx9xIN5jQO7H624IviVeER8C9p4ClnjGKbyjqEgMfh88H93YN51wGEZN4zZ-Co5-i3y9PmFHNbaRFj99zp6vr56Wt2L1cHO3vFwJJyHRIjOlKq2mvCKbp9qCzkDWlS7rtFYmy1HqyulxN6XWKBUltbNAkJNKrSOr5sx857rgYwxUF31oOgwfhYRi4lZ8cSv-cVOfZD9hWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Misturas em tanque com glyphosate para o controle de trapoeraba, erva-de-touro e capim-carrapicho em soja RR</title><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Maciel, Cleber Daniel de Goes ; Poletine, Juliana Parisotto ; Amstalden, Saulo Leme ; Gazziero, Dionísio Luis Piza ; Raimondi, Michel Alex ; Lima, Gesley Ramos Guimarães ; Oliveira Neto, Antônio Mendes de ; Guerra, Naiara ; Justiniano, Wagner</creator><creatorcontrib>Maciel, Cleber Daniel de Goes ; Poletine, Juliana Parisotto ; Amstalden, Saulo Leme ; Gazziero, Dionísio Luis Piza ; Raimondi, Michel Alex ; Lima, Gesley Ramos Guimarães ; Oliveira Neto, Antônio Mendes de ; Guerra, Naiara ; Justiniano, Wagner</creatorcontrib><description>O uso de misturas de glyphosate, em tanque, para manejo de espécies de plantas daninhas de difícil controle tem sido prática comum entre os agricultores brasileiros. Desta forma, este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a eficácia e seletividade de misturas, em tanque, de herbicidas com glyphosate para o controle de trapoeraba (Commelina benghalensis L.), erva-de-touro (Tridax procumbens L.) e capim-carrapicho (Cenchrus echinatus L.) na cultura da soja RR®. O experimento foi conduzido em Maracaí, São Paulo, no período de novembro de 2006 a março de 2007, utilizando-se o cultivar CD-214RR® e delineamento experimental de blocos ao acaso, com 21 tratamentos e quatro repetições. Os tratamentos foram constituídos da aplicação de: glyphosate (180; 360; 540 e 720 g ha-1); glyphosate em sequencial (180/360; 360/360 e 540/360 g ha-1); glyphosate + chlorimuron-ethyl 360+10; 540+10; 360+5/ 360+5 g ha-1); glyphosate + lactofen (360+120; 540+120; 360+60/ 360+60 g ha-1); glyphosate + cloransulam-methyl (360+30; 540+30; 360+16,9/ 360+12,9 g ha-1); glyphosate + carfentrazone (360+4 g ha-1); glyphosate + imazethapyr (360+50 g ha-1); glyphosate + imazethapyr (177,8+30 g ha-1) e testemunhas capinada e sem capina. Apesar da similaridade de produtividade de grãos entre os tratamentos com glyphosate isolado e sequencial, nas doses 540, 720 e 540/ 360 g ha-1, as misturas em tanque com chlorimuron-ethyl, cloransulam-methyl, lactofen e imazethapyr favoreceram o controle de espécies de plantas daninhas tolerantes ao glyphosate como C. benghalensis e T. procumbens. Although the use of glyphosate tank mixtures for managing weed species of difficult control is prohibited by the Brazilian legislation, it has been a common practice among farmers. This work aimed to evaluate the efficiency and selectivity of herbicide tank mixtures using glyphosate to control Commelina benghalensis L., Tridax procumbens L. and Cenchrus echinatus L. in soybean crop RR®. A field experiment was conducted in the Municipality of Maracai, São Paulo State, between November, 2006 and March 2007, using the genotype CD-214RR® in a complete randomized block design with 21 treatments and four replications. The treatments consisted of the following applications: glyphosate (180; 360; 540 and 720 g ha-1); glyphosate in sequence (180/360; 360/360 and 540/360 g ha-1); glyphosate + chlorimuron-ethyl 360+10; 540+10 and 360+5/ 360+5 g ha-1); glyphosate + lactofen (360+120; 540+120 and 360+60/ 360+60 g ha-1); glyphosate + cloransulam-methyl (360+30; 540+30 and 360+16,9/ 360+12,9 g ha-1); glyphosate + carfentrazone (360+4 g ha-1); glyphosate + imazethapyr (360+50 g ha-1); glyphosate + imazethapyr (177.8+30 g ha-1) and controls with and without weeding. Despite the similarity in grain yield between treatments with glyphosate alone and sequentially at doses 540, 720 and 540 / 360 g ha-1, the tank mixtures with chlorimuron-ethyl, cloransulam-methyl, lactofen and imazethapyr favored control of weed species tolerant to glyphosate such as C. benghalensis and T. procumbens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-737X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0034-737X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/S0034-737X2011000100006</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Revista Ceres, 2011-02, Vol.58 (1), p.35-42</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1026-57b3b96e8de9846906501fd6bf4f3758a16dc6d6b7b66a13e2fc90e08e349ce93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1026-57b3b96e8de9846906501fd6bf4f3758a16dc6d6b7b66a13e2fc90e08e349ce93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maciel, Cleber Daniel de Goes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poletine, Juliana Parisotto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amstalden, Saulo Leme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazziero, Dionísio Luis Piza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raimondi, Michel Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Gesley Ramos Guimarães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira Neto, Antônio Mendes de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Naiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Justiniano, Wagner</creatorcontrib><title>Misturas em tanque com glyphosate para o controle de trapoeraba, erva-de-touro e capim-carrapicho em soja RR</title><title>Revista Ceres</title><description>O uso de misturas de glyphosate, em tanque, para manejo de espécies de plantas daninhas de difícil controle tem sido prática comum entre os agricultores brasileiros. Desta forma, este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a eficácia e seletividade de misturas, em tanque, de herbicidas com glyphosate para o controle de trapoeraba (Commelina benghalensis L.), erva-de-touro (Tridax procumbens L.) e capim-carrapicho (Cenchrus echinatus L.) na cultura da soja RR®. O experimento foi conduzido em Maracaí, São Paulo, no período de novembro de 2006 a março de 2007, utilizando-se o cultivar CD-214RR® e delineamento experimental de blocos ao acaso, com 21 tratamentos e quatro repetições. Os tratamentos foram constituídos da aplicação de: glyphosate (180; 360; 540 e 720 g ha-1); glyphosate em sequencial (180/360; 360/360 e 540/360 g ha-1); glyphosate + chlorimuron-ethyl 360+10; 540+10; 360+5/ 360+5 g ha-1); glyphosate + lactofen (360+120; 540+120; 360+60/ 360+60 g ha-1); glyphosate + cloransulam-methyl (360+30; 540+30; 360+16,9/ 360+12,9 g ha-1); glyphosate + carfentrazone (360+4 g ha-1); glyphosate + imazethapyr (360+50 g ha-1); glyphosate + imazethapyr (177,8+30 g ha-1) e testemunhas capinada e sem capina. Apesar da similaridade de produtividade de grãos entre os tratamentos com glyphosate isolado e sequencial, nas doses 540, 720 e 540/ 360 g ha-1, as misturas em tanque com chlorimuron-ethyl, cloransulam-methyl, lactofen e imazethapyr favoreceram o controle de espécies de plantas daninhas tolerantes ao glyphosate como C. benghalensis e T. procumbens. Although the use of glyphosate tank mixtures for managing weed species of difficult control is prohibited by the Brazilian legislation, it has been a common practice among farmers. This work aimed to evaluate the efficiency and selectivity of herbicide tank mixtures using glyphosate to control Commelina benghalensis L., Tridax procumbens L. and Cenchrus echinatus L. in soybean crop RR®. A field experiment was conducted in the Municipality of Maracai, São Paulo State, between November, 2006 and March 2007, using the genotype CD-214RR® in a complete randomized block design with 21 treatments and four replications. The treatments consisted of the following applications: glyphosate (180; 360; 540 and 720 g ha-1); glyphosate in sequence (180/360; 360/360 and 540/360 g ha-1); glyphosate + chlorimuron-ethyl 360+10; 540+10 and 360+5/ 360+5 g ha-1); glyphosate + lactofen (360+120; 540+120 and 360+60/ 360+60 g ha-1); glyphosate + cloransulam-methyl (360+30; 540+30 and 360+16,9/ 360+12,9 g ha-1); glyphosate + carfentrazone (360+4 g ha-1); glyphosate + imazethapyr (360+50 g ha-1); glyphosate + imazethapyr (177.8+30 g ha-1) and controls with and without weeding. Despite the similarity in grain yield between treatments with glyphosate alone and sequentially at doses 540, 720 and 540 / 360 g ha-1, the tank mixtures with chlorimuron-ethyl, cloransulam-methyl, lactofen and imazethapyr favored control of weed species tolerant to glyphosate such as C. benghalensis and T. procumbens.</description><issn>0034-737X</issn><issn>0034-737X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkN1KxDAQhYMouKz7DOYBjE6aNmkuZfEPVoRVwbsyTadul3ZTk67g29uqiODFMH_nnIuPsVMJ5zKzcPEIoFJhlHlJQEoAmAr0AZv9Pg7_zMdsEeN2kmTGykTPWHvfxGEfMHLq-IC7tz1x5zv-2n70Gx9xIN5jQO7H624IviVeER8C9p4ClnjGKbyjqEgMfh88H93YN51wGEZN4zZ-Co5-i3y9PmFHNbaRFj99zp6vr56Wt2L1cHO3vFwJJyHRIjOlKq2mvCKbp9qCzkDWlS7rtFYmy1HqyulxN6XWKBUltbNAkJNKrSOr5sx857rgYwxUF31oOgwfhYRi4lZ8cSv-cVOfZD9hWQ</recordid><startdate>201102</startdate><enddate>201102</enddate><creator>Maciel, Cleber Daniel de Goes</creator><creator>Poletine, Juliana Parisotto</creator><creator>Amstalden, Saulo Leme</creator><creator>Gazziero, Dionísio Luis Piza</creator><creator>Raimondi, Michel Alex</creator><creator>Lima, Gesley Ramos Guimarães</creator><creator>Oliveira Neto, Antônio Mendes de</creator><creator>Guerra, Naiara</creator><creator>Justiniano, Wagner</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201102</creationdate><title>Misturas em tanque com glyphosate para o controle de trapoeraba, erva-de-touro e capim-carrapicho em soja RR</title><author>Maciel, Cleber Daniel de Goes ; Poletine, Juliana Parisotto ; Amstalden, Saulo Leme ; Gazziero, Dionísio Luis Piza ; Raimondi, Michel Alex ; Lima, Gesley Ramos Guimarães ; Oliveira Neto, Antônio Mendes de ; Guerra, Naiara ; Justiniano, Wagner</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1026-57b3b96e8de9846906501fd6bf4f3758a16dc6d6b7b66a13e2fc90e08e349ce93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maciel, Cleber Daniel de Goes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poletine, Juliana Parisotto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amstalden, Saulo Leme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazziero, Dionísio Luis Piza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raimondi, Michel Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Gesley Ramos Guimarães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira Neto, Antônio Mendes de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Naiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Justiniano, Wagner</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Revista Ceres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maciel, Cleber Daniel de Goes</au><au>Poletine, Juliana Parisotto</au><au>Amstalden, Saulo Leme</au><au>Gazziero, Dionísio Luis Piza</au><au>Raimondi, Michel Alex</au><au>Lima, Gesley Ramos Guimarães</au><au>Oliveira Neto, Antônio Mendes de</au><au>Guerra, Naiara</au><au>Justiniano, Wagner</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Misturas em tanque com glyphosate para o controle de trapoeraba, erva-de-touro e capim-carrapicho em soja RR</atitle><jtitle>Revista Ceres</jtitle><date>2011-02</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>35-42</pages><issn>0034-737X</issn><eissn>0034-737X</eissn><abstract>O uso de misturas de glyphosate, em tanque, para manejo de espécies de plantas daninhas de difícil controle tem sido prática comum entre os agricultores brasileiros. Desta forma, este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a eficácia e seletividade de misturas, em tanque, de herbicidas com glyphosate para o controle de trapoeraba (Commelina benghalensis L.), erva-de-touro (Tridax procumbens L.) e capim-carrapicho (Cenchrus echinatus L.) na cultura da soja RR®. O experimento foi conduzido em Maracaí, São Paulo, no período de novembro de 2006 a março de 2007, utilizando-se o cultivar CD-214RR® e delineamento experimental de blocos ao acaso, com 21 tratamentos e quatro repetições. Os tratamentos foram constituídos da aplicação de: glyphosate (180; 360; 540 e 720 g ha-1); glyphosate em sequencial (180/360; 360/360 e 540/360 g ha-1); glyphosate + chlorimuron-ethyl 360+10; 540+10; 360+5/ 360+5 g ha-1); glyphosate + lactofen (360+120; 540+120; 360+60/ 360+60 g ha-1); glyphosate + cloransulam-methyl (360+30; 540+30; 360+16,9/ 360+12,9 g ha-1); glyphosate + carfentrazone (360+4 g ha-1); glyphosate + imazethapyr (360+50 g ha-1); glyphosate + imazethapyr (177,8+30 g ha-1) e testemunhas capinada e sem capina. Apesar da similaridade de produtividade de grãos entre os tratamentos com glyphosate isolado e sequencial, nas doses 540, 720 e 540/ 360 g ha-1, as misturas em tanque com chlorimuron-ethyl, cloransulam-methyl, lactofen e imazethapyr favoreceram o controle de espécies de plantas daninhas tolerantes ao glyphosate como C. benghalensis e T. procumbens. Although the use of glyphosate tank mixtures for managing weed species of difficult control is prohibited by the Brazilian legislation, it has been a common practice among farmers. This work aimed to evaluate the efficiency and selectivity of herbicide tank mixtures using glyphosate to control Commelina benghalensis L., Tridax procumbens L. and Cenchrus echinatus L. in soybean crop RR®. A field experiment was conducted in the Municipality of Maracai, São Paulo State, between November, 2006 and March 2007, using the genotype CD-214RR® in a complete randomized block design with 21 treatments and four replications. The treatments consisted of the following applications: glyphosate (180; 360; 540 and 720 g ha-1); glyphosate in sequence (180/360; 360/360 and 540/360 g ha-1); glyphosate + chlorimuron-ethyl 360+10; 540+10 and 360+5/ 360+5 g ha-1); glyphosate + lactofen (360+120; 540+120 and 360+60/ 360+60 g ha-1); glyphosate + cloransulam-methyl (360+30; 540+30 and 360+16,9/ 360+12,9 g ha-1); glyphosate + carfentrazone (360+4 g ha-1); glyphosate + imazethapyr (360+50 g ha-1); glyphosate + imazethapyr (177.8+30 g ha-1) and controls with and without weeding. Despite the similarity in grain yield between treatments with glyphosate alone and sequentially at doses 540, 720 and 540 / 360 g ha-1, the tank mixtures with chlorimuron-ethyl, cloransulam-methyl, lactofen and imazethapyr favored control of weed species tolerant to glyphosate such as C. benghalensis and T. procumbens.</abstract><doi>10.1590/S0034-737X2011000100006</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-737X
ispartof Revista Ceres, 2011-02, Vol.58 (1), p.35-42
issn 0034-737X
0034-737X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1590_S0034_737X2011000100006
source Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Misturas em tanque com glyphosate para o controle de trapoeraba, erva-de-touro e capim-carrapicho em soja RR
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T07%3A14%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Misturas%20em%20tanque%20com%20glyphosate%20para%20o%20controle%20de%20trapoeraba,%20erva-de-touro%20e%20capim-carrapicho%20em%20soja%20RR&rft.jtitle=Revista%20Ceres&rft.au=Maciel,%20Cleber%20Daniel%20de%20Goes&rft.date=2011-02&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=35-42&rft.issn=0034-737X&rft.eissn=0034-737X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/S0034-737X2011000100006&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1590_S0034_737X2011000100006%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true