Evaluation of enamel roughness after the removal of brackets bonded with different materials: In vivo study

Abstract The aims of this in vivo study were to evaluate the effect of bonding with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and to assess enamel surface roughness before and after the removal of brackets bonded with composite or RMGIC from the maxillary central incisors. Fifteen orthodontic pati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brazilian dental journal 2021-09, Vol.32 (5), p.34-40
Hauptverfasser: Caixeta, Rodrigo Vieira, Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt, Lopes, Murilo Baena, Paloco, Eloisa Aparecida Carlesse, Faria-Júnior, Élcio Mário, Contreras, Edwin Fernando Ruiz, Gonini-Júnior, Alcides, Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 40
container_issue 5
container_start_page 34
container_title Brazilian dental journal
container_volume 32
creator Caixeta, Rodrigo Vieira
Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt
Lopes, Murilo Baena
Paloco, Eloisa Aparecida Carlesse
Faria-Júnior, Élcio Mário
Contreras, Edwin Fernando Ruiz
Gonini-Júnior, Alcides
Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil
description Abstract The aims of this in vivo study were to evaluate the effect of bonding with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and to assess enamel surface roughness before and after the removal of brackets bonded with composite or RMGIC from the maxillary central incisors. Fifteen orthodontic patients were selected for the study. For each patient, the teeth were rinsed and dried, and brackets were bonded with composite (Transbond XT) and RMGIC (Vitremer Core Buildup/Restorative). At the conclusion of orthodontic treatment, their brackets were removed. Dental replicas were made of epoxy resin in initial conditions (before bonded) and after polishing with an aluminum oxide disc system. Adhesive remnant index (ARI) and surface roughness was measured on the dental replicas and data were evaluated statistically by Mann-Whitney and paired t-test, respectively. No bracket debonding occurred during patients’ treatment periods. It was verified that the ARI values of the two maxillary central incisors were similar (p = 0.665). For both bonding materials, the ARI value of 3 was predominant. After polishing, surface roughness was similar in the composite and RMGIC groups (0.245 μm and 0.248 μm, respectively; p = 0.07). In both groups, enamel surface roughness values were significantly lower after polishing compared with the initial condition (p < 0.001). RMGIC promoted efficiency in cementing brackets without fail during treatment; the choice of composite or RMGIC materials was not a factor that influenced the roughness of the enamel surface, however, polishing led to smoother surfaces than those found at the beginning of the treatment. Resumo Os objetivos deste estudo in vivo foram avaliar o efeito da colagem com cimento de ionômero de vidro modificado por resina (CIVMR) e a rugosidade da superfície do esmalte antes e após a remoção dos braquetes colados com compósito ou CIVMR em incisivos centrais superiores. Quinze pacientes ortodônticos foram selecionados para o estudo. Para cada paciente, os dentes foram lavados e secos, e os braquetes colados com compósito (Transbond XT) e CIVMR (Vitremer Core Buildup / Restorative). Ao término do tratamento ortodôntico, os braquetes foram removidos. As réplicas dentais foram confeccionadas em resina epóxica nas condições iniciais (antes da colagem) e após o polimento com sistema de discos de óxido de alumínio. O índice de remanescente adesivo (IRA) e a rugosidade da superfície foram mensurados nas réplicas dentais e os dados
doi_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6440202104399
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1590_0103_6440202104399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1590_0103_6440202104399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2789-c967a7bd5885f0872d1ba48b7b53e439e6de3a267f946807e57bb270518fdc9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4CovMHqTmcmPOynVFgpudD0kkxs7tjORJFPp2ztFEVxdOHzncPkIuWVwx2oN98CgLERVAQfOoCq1PiMzpkAUlRRwTmZ_wCW5SukDJnCiZmS3PJj9aHIXBho8xcH0uKcxjO_bAVOixmeMNG-RRuzDxJ4oG027w5yoDYNDR7-6vKWu8x4jDpn2Zup0Zp8e6Hqgh-4QaMqjO16TCz-lePN75-Ttafm6WBWbl-f14nFTtFwqXbRaSCOtq5WqPSjJHbOmUlbausTpaRQOS8OF9LoSCiTW0louoWbKu1a35Zzwn902hpQi-uYzdr2Jx4ZBc9LVnGw0_3SV3_nMXnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of enamel roughness after the removal of brackets bonded with different materials: In vivo study</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Caixeta, Rodrigo Vieira ; Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt ; Lopes, Murilo Baena ; Paloco, Eloisa Aparecida Carlesse ; Faria-Júnior, Élcio Mário ; Contreras, Edwin Fernando Ruiz ; Gonini-Júnior, Alcides ; Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil</creator><creatorcontrib>Caixeta, Rodrigo Vieira ; Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt ; Lopes, Murilo Baena ; Paloco, Eloisa Aparecida Carlesse ; Faria-Júnior, Élcio Mário ; Contreras, Edwin Fernando Ruiz ; Gonini-Júnior, Alcides ; Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The aims of this in vivo study were to evaluate the effect of bonding with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and to assess enamel surface roughness before and after the removal of brackets bonded with composite or RMGIC from the maxillary central incisors. Fifteen orthodontic patients were selected for the study. For each patient, the teeth were rinsed and dried, and brackets were bonded with composite (Transbond XT) and RMGIC (Vitremer Core Buildup/Restorative). At the conclusion of orthodontic treatment, their brackets were removed. Dental replicas were made of epoxy resin in initial conditions (before bonded) and after polishing with an aluminum oxide disc system. Adhesive remnant index (ARI) and surface roughness was measured on the dental replicas and data were evaluated statistically by Mann-Whitney and paired t-test, respectively. No bracket debonding occurred during patients’ treatment periods. It was verified that the ARI values of the two maxillary central incisors were similar (p = 0.665). For both bonding materials, the ARI value of 3 was predominant. After polishing, surface roughness was similar in the composite and RMGIC groups (0.245 μm and 0.248 μm, respectively; p = 0.07). In both groups, enamel surface roughness values were significantly lower after polishing compared with the initial condition (p &lt; 0.001). RMGIC promoted efficiency in cementing brackets without fail during treatment; the choice of composite or RMGIC materials was not a factor that influenced the roughness of the enamel surface, however, polishing led to smoother surfaces than those found at the beginning of the treatment. Resumo Os objetivos deste estudo in vivo foram avaliar o efeito da colagem com cimento de ionômero de vidro modificado por resina (CIVMR) e a rugosidade da superfície do esmalte antes e após a remoção dos braquetes colados com compósito ou CIVMR em incisivos centrais superiores. Quinze pacientes ortodônticos foram selecionados para o estudo. Para cada paciente, os dentes foram lavados e secos, e os braquetes colados com compósito (Transbond XT) e CIVMR (Vitremer Core Buildup / Restorative). Ao término do tratamento ortodôntico, os braquetes foram removidos. As réplicas dentais foram confeccionadas em resina epóxica nas condições iniciais (antes da colagem) e após o polimento com sistema de discos de óxido de alumínio. O índice de remanescente adesivo (IRA) e a rugosidade da superfície foram mensurados nas réplicas dentais e os dados foram avaliados estatisticamente por Mann-Whitney e teste t pareado, respectivamente. Não ocorreu descolagem de braquetes durante os períodos de tratamento dos pacientes. Verificou-se que os valores do IRA dos dois incisivos centrais superiores foram semelhantes (p = 0,665). Para ambos os materiais de colagem, o valor de IRA predominante foi 3. Após o polimento, a rugosidade da superfície do esmalte foi semelhante nos grupos compósito (0,245 μm) e CIVMR (0,248 μm) (p = 0,07). Em ambos os grupos, os valores de rugosidade da superfície do esmalte foram significativamente menores após o polimento em comparação com a condição inicial (p &lt;0,001). CIVMR promoveu eficiência na colagem de braquetes sem falhas durante o tratamento; a escolha dos materiais compósito ou CIVMR não foi um fator que influenciou na rugosidade da superfície do esmalte, porém, o polimento levou a superfícies mais lisas do que as encontradas no início do tratamento.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0103-6440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1806-4760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440202104399</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Brazilian dental journal, 2021-09, Vol.32 (5), p.34-40</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2789-c967a7bd5885f0872d1ba48b7b53e439e6de3a267f946807e57bb270518fdc9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2789-c967a7bd5885f0872d1ba48b7b53e439e6de3a267f946807e57bb270518fdc9c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4888-1823 ; 0000-0002-1625-3120 ; 0000-0001-6198-7695 ; 0000-0003-3055-5093 ; 0000-0002-7915-3207 ; 0000-0002-7812-3700 ; 0000-0002-8215-9749 ; 0000-0002-8371-5073</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caixeta, Rodrigo Vieira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Murilo Baena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paloco, Eloisa Aparecida Carlesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faria-Júnior, Élcio Mário</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contreras, Edwin Fernando Ruiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonini-Júnior, Alcides</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of enamel roughness after the removal of brackets bonded with different materials: In vivo study</title><title>Brazilian dental journal</title><description>Abstract The aims of this in vivo study were to evaluate the effect of bonding with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and to assess enamel surface roughness before and after the removal of brackets bonded with composite or RMGIC from the maxillary central incisors. Fifteen orthodontic patients were selected for the study. For each patient, the teeth were rinsed and dried, and brackets were bonded with composite (Transbond XT) and RMGIC (Vitremer Core Buildup/Restorative). At the conclusion of orthodontic treatment, their brackets were removed. Dental replicas were made of epoxy resin in initial conditions (before bonded) and after polishing with an aluminum oxide disc system. Adhesive remnant index (ARI) and surface roughness was measured on the dental replicas and data were evaluated statistically by Mann-Whitney and paired t-test, respectively. No bracket debonding occurred during patients’ treatment periods. It was verified that the ARI values of the two maxillary central incisors were similar (p = 0.665). For both bonding materials, the ARI value of 3 was predominant. After polishing, surface roughness was similar in the composite and RMGIC groups (0.245 μm and 0.248 μm, respectively; p = 0.07). In both groups, enamel surface roughness values were significantly lower after polishing compared with the initial condition (p &lt; 0.001). RMGIC promoted efficiency in cementing brackets without fail during treatment; the choice of composite or RMGIC materials was not a factor that influenced the roughness of the enamel surface, however, polishing led to smoother surfaces than those found at the beginning of the treatment. Resumo Os objetivos deste estudo in vivo foram avaliar o efeito da colagem com cimento de ionômero de vidro modificado por resina (CIVMR) e a rugosidade da superfície do esmalte antes e após a remoção dos braquetes colados com compósito ou CIVMR em incisivos centrais superiores. Quinze pacientes ortodônticos foram selecionados para o estudo. Para cada paciente, os dentes foram lavados e secos, e os braquetes colados com compósito (Transbond XT) e CIVMR (Vitremer Core Buildup / Restorative). Ao término do tratamento ortodôntico, os braquetes foram removidos. As réplicas dentais foram confeccionadas em resina epóxica nas condições iniciais (antes da colagem) e após o polimento com sistema de discos de óxido de alumínio. O índice de remanescente adesivo (IRA) e a rugosidade da superfície foram mensurados nas réplicas dentais e os dados foram avaliados estatisticamente por Mann-Whitney e teste t pareado, respectivamente. Não ocorreu descolagem de braquetes durante os períodos de tratamento dos pacientes. Verificou-se que os valores do IRA dos dois incisivos centrais superiores foram semelhantes (p = 0,665). Para ambos os materiais de colagem, o valor de IRA predominante foi 3. Após o polimento, a rugosidade da superfície do esmalte foi semelhante nos grupos compósito (0,245 μm) e CIVMR (0,248 μm) (p = 0,07). Em ambos os grupos, os valores de rugosidade da superfície do esmalte foram significativamente menores após o polimento em comparação com a condição inicial (p &lt;0,001). CIVMR promoveu eficiência na colagem de braquetes sem falhas durante o tratamento; a escolha dos materiais compósito ou CIVMR não foi um fator que influenciou na rugosidade da superfície do esmalte, porém, o polimento levou a superfícies mais lisas do que as encontradas no início do tratamento.</description><issn>0103-6440</issn><issn>1806-4760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4CovMHqTmcmPOynVFgpudD0kkxs7tjORJFPp2ztFEVxdOHzncPkIuWVwx2oN98CgLERVAQfOoCq1PiMzpkAUlRRwTmZ_wCW5SukDJnCiZmS3PJj9aHIXBho8xcH0uKcxjO_bAVOixmeMNG-RRuzDxJ4oG027w5yoDYNDR7-6vKWu8x4jDpn2Zup0Zp8e6Hqgh-4QaMqjO16TCz-lePN75-Ttafm6WBWbl-f14nFTtFwqXbRaSCOtq5WqPSjJHbOmUlbausTpaRQOS8OF9LoSCiTW0louoWbKu1a35Zzwn902hpQi-uYzdr2Jx4ZBc9LVnGw0_3SV3_nMXnQ</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Caixeta, Rodrigo Vieira</creator><creator>Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt</creator><creator>Lopes, Murilo Baena</creator><creator>Paloco, Eloisa Aparecida Carlesse</creator><creator>Faria-Júnior, Élcio Mário</creator><creator>Contreras, Edwin Fernando Ruiz</creator><creator>Gonini-Júnior, Alcides</creator><creator>Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4888-1823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-3120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6198-7695</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-5093</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7915-3207</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7812-3700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8215-9749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8371-5073</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Evaluation of enamel roughness after the removal of brackets bonded with different materials: In vivo study</title><author>Caixeta, Rodrigo Vieira ; Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt ; Lopes, Murilo Baena ; Paloco, Eloisa Aparecida Carlesse ; Faria-Júnior, Élcio Mário ; Contreras, Edwin Fernando Ruiz ; Gonini-Júnior, Alcides ; Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2789-c967a7bd5885f0872d1ba48b7b53e439e6de3a267f946807e57bb270518fdc9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caixeta, Rodrigo Vieira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Murilo Baena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paloco, Eloisa Aparecida Carlesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faria-Júnior, Élcio Mário</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contreras, Edwin Fernando Ruiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonini-Júnior, Alcides</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Brazilian dental journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caixeta, Rodrigo Vieira</au><au>Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt</au><au>Lopes, Murilo Baena</au><au>Paloco, Eloisa Aparecida Carlesse</au><au>Faria-Júnior, Élcio Mário</au><au>Contreras, Edwin Fernando Ruiz</au><au>Gonini-Júnior, Alcides</au><au>Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of enamel roughness after the removal of brackets bonded with different materials: In vivo study</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian dental journal</jtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>34-40</pages><issn>0103-6440</issn><eissn>1806-4760</eissn><abstract>Abstract The aims of this in vivo study were to evaluate the effect of bonding with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and to assess enamel surface roughness before and after the removal of brackets bonded with composite or RMGIC from the maxillary central incisors. Fifteen orthodontic patients were selected for the study. For each patient, the teeth were rinsed and dried, and brackets were bonded with composite (Transbond XT) and RMGIC (Vitremer Core Buildup/Restorative). At the conclusion of orthodontic treatment, their brackets were removed. Dental replicas were made of epoxy resin in initial conditions (before bonded) and after polishing with an aluminum oxide disc system. Adhesive remnant index (ARI) and surface roughness was measured on the dental replicas and data were evaluated statistically by Mann-Whitney and paired t-test, respectively. No bracket debonding occurred during patients’ treatment periods. It was verified that the ARI values of the two maxillary central incisors were similar (p = 0.665). For both bonding materials, the ARI value of 3 was predominant. After polishing, surface roughness was similar in the composite and RMGIC groups (0.245 μm and 0.248 μm, respectively; p = 0.07). In both groups, enamel surface roughness values were significantly lower after polishing compared with the initial condition (p &lt; 0.001). RMGIC promoted efficiency in cementing brackets without fail during treatment; the choice of composite or RMGIC materials was not a factor that influenced the roughness of the enamel surface, however, polishing led to smoother surfaces than those found at the beginning of the treatment. Resumo Os objetivos deste estudo in vivo foram avaliar o efeito da colagem com cimento de ionômero de vidro modificado por resina (CIVMR) e a rugosidade da superfície do esmalte antes e após a remoção dos braquetes colados com compósito ou CIVMR em incisivos centrais superiores. Quinze pacientes ortodônticos foram selecionados para o estudo. Para cada paciente, os dentes foram lavados e secos, e os braquetes colados com compósito (Transbond XT) e CIVMR (Vitremer Core Buildup / Restorative). Ao término do tratamento ortodôntico, os braquetes foram removidos. As réplicas dentais foram confeccionadas em resina epóxica nas condições iniciais (antes da colagem) e após o polimento com sistema de discos de óxido de alumínio. O índice de remanescente adesivo (IRA) e a rugosidade da superfície foram mensurados nas réplicas dentais e os dados foram avaliados estatisticamente por Mann-Whitney e teste t pareado, respectivamente. Não ocorreu descolagem de braquetes durante os períodos de tratamento dos pacientes. Verificou-se que os valores do IRA dos dois incisivos centrais superiores foram semelhantes (p = 0,665). Para ambos os materiais de colagem, o valor de IRA predominante foi 3. Após o polimento, a rugosidade da superfície do esmalte foi semelhante nos grupos compósito (0,245 μm) e CIVMR (0,248 μm) (p = 0,07). Em ambos os grupos, os valores de rugosidade da superfície do esmalte foram significativamente menores após o polimento em comparação com a condição inicial (p &lt;0,001). CIVMR promoveu eficiência na colagem de braquetes sem falhas durante o tratamento; a escolha dos materiais compósito ou CIVMR não foi um fator que influenciou na rugosidade da superfície do esmalte, porém, o polimento levou a superfícies mais lisas do que as encontradas no início do tratamento.</abstract><doi>10.1590/0103-6440202104399</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4888-1823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-3120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6198-7695</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-5093</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7915-3207</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7812-3700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8215-9749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8371-5073</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0103-6440
ispartof Brazilian dental journal, 2021-09, Vol.32 (5), p.34-40
issn 0103-6440
1806-4760
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1590_0103_6440202104399
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Evaluation of enamel roughness after the removal of brackets bonded with different materials: In vivo study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A39%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20enamel%20roughness%20after%20the%20removal%20of%20brackets%20bonded%20with%20different%20materials:%20In%20vivo%20study&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20dental%20journal&rft.au=Caixeta,%20Rodrigo%20Vieira&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=34-40&rft.issn=0103-6440&rft.eissn=1806-4760&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/0103-6440202104399&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1590_0103_6440202104399%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true