Different Treatment Modalities Using Dental Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis

The objective of this study was to compare the biomechanical behavior of peri-implant bone tissue and prosthetic components in two modalities of treatment for posterior region of the maxilla, using short implants or standard-length implants associated with bone graft in the maxillary sinus. Four 3D...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brazilian dental journal 2021-01, Vol.32 (1), p.34-41
Hauptverfasser: Bordin, Dimorvan, Castro, Mariane Boaventura de, Carvalho, Marco Aurélio de, Araujo, Anderson Macena de, Cury, Altair Antoninha Del Bel, Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 41
container_issue 1
container_start_page 34
container_title Brazilian dental journal
container_volume 32
creator Bordin, Dimorvan
Castro, Mariane Boaventura de
Carvalho, Marco Aurélio de
Araujo, Anderson Macena de
Cury, Altair Antoninha Del Bel
Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso
description The objective of this study was to compare the biomechanical behavior of peri-implant bone tissue and prosthetic components in two modalities of treatment for posterior region of the maxilla, using short implants or standard-length implants associated with bone graft in the maxillary sinus. Four 3D models of a crown supported by an implant fixed in the posterior maxilla were constructed. The type of implant: short implant (S) or standard-length implant with the presence of sinus graft (L) and type of crown retention: cemented (C) or screwed (S) were the study factors. The models were divided into SC- cemented crown on a short implant; SS- screwed crown on the short implant; LC- cemented crown on a standard-length implant after bone graft in the maxillary sinus and LS- crown screwed on a standard-length implant after bone graft in the maxillary sinus. An axial occlusal loading of 300 N was applied, divided into five points (60N each) corresponding to occlusal contact. The following analysis criteria were observed: Shear Stress, Maximum and Minimum Main Stress for bone tissue and von Mises Stress for the implant and prosthetic components. The use of standard-length implants reduced the shear stress in the cortical bone by 35.75% and the medullary bone by 51% when compared to short implants. The length of the implant did not affect the stress concentration in the crown, and the cement layer acted by reducing the stresses in the ceramic veneer and framework by 42%. Standard-implants associated with cemented crowns showed better biomechanical behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6440202103890
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1590_0103_6440202103890</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>33914000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3010-b8e95f3f84a984e1f66510e7e4760a8e176b8ea2e5bb411dfff63da19848e08d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwAhyQXyCwjh3X4Vb1Byq1gkN7jpxmTY2cpLKDRN8eh59KnHa0-ma0O4TcMrhnWQ4PwIAnUghIIY1S5XBGhkyBTMRYwjkZnoABuQrhHSIoeH5JBpznTADAkOxn1hj02HR041F3da_WbaWd7SwGug22eaOzuNWOLuuD000XqG1ot0f62oYOvW09XetP65x-pBO6sI3tkM4dfmdNGu2OwYZrcmG0C3jzO0dku5hvps_J6uVpOZ2skh2P5yalwjwz3CihcyWQGSkzBjjG_iWtkI1lRHSKWVkKxipjjOSVZhFWCKriI5L-5O58G4JHUxy8rbU_FgyKvraib6X4V1s03f2YDh9ljdXJ8tcT_wIfAmgn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different Treatment Modalities Using Dental Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Bordin, Dimorvan ; Castro, Mariane Boaventura de ; Carvalho, Marco Aurélio de ; Araujo, Anderson Macena de ; Cury, Altair Antoninha Del Bel ; Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso</creator><creatorcontrib>Bordin, Dimorvan ; Castro, Mariane Boaventura de ; Carvalho, Marco Aurélio de ; Araujo, Anderson Macena de ; Cury, Altair Antoninha Del Bel ; Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to compare the biomechanical behavior of peri-implant bone tissue and prosthetic components in two modalities of treatment for posterior region of the maxilla, using short implants or standard-length implants associated with bone graft in the maxillary sinus. Four 3D models of a crown supported by an implant fixed in the posterior maxilla were constructed. The type of implant: short implant (S) or standard-length implant with the presence of sinus graft (L) and type of crown retention: cemented (C) or screwed (S) were the study factors. The models were divided into SC- cemented crown on a short implant; SS- screwed crown on the short implant; LC- cemented crown on a standard-length implant after bone graft in the maxillary sinus and LS- crown screwed on a standard-length implant after bone graft in the maxillary sinus. An axial occlusal loading of 300 N was applied, divided into five points (60N each) corresponding to occlusal contact. The following analysis criteria were observed: Shear Stress, Maximum and Minimum Main Stress for bone tissue and von Mises Stress for the implant and prosthetic components. The use of standard-length implants reduced the shear stress in the cortical bone by 35.75% and the medullary bone by 51% when compared to short implants. The length of the implant did not affect the stress concentration in the crown, and the cement layer acted by reducing the stresses in the ceramic veneer and framework by 42%. Standard-implants associated with cemented crowns showed better biomechanical behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0103-6440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1806-4760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440202103890</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33914000</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil</publisher><subject>Crowns ; Dental Implants ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Finite Element Analysis ; Maxilla - surgery ; Stress, Mechanical</subject><ispartof>Brazilian dental journal, 2021-01, Vol.32 (1), p.34-41</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3010-b8e95f3f84a984e1f66510e7e4760a8e176b8ea2e5bb411dfff63da19848e08d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3010-b8e95f3f84a984e1f66510e7e4760a8e176b8ea2e5bb411dfff63da19848e08d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5123-5358 ; 0000-0002-4329-0437 ; 0000-0003-0142-3980 ; 0000-0002-4322-910X ; 0000-0001-7468-6568 ; 0000-0002-8466-9558</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33914000$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bordin, Dimorvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Mariane Boaventura de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Marco Aurélio de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Anderson Macena de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cury, Altair Antoninha Del Bel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso</creatorcontrib><title>Different Treatment Modalities Using Dental Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis</title><title>Brazilian dental journal</title><addtitle>Braz Dent J</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to compare the biomechanical behavior of peri-implant bone tissue and prosthetic components in two modalities of treatment for posterior region of the maxilla, using short implants or standard-length implants associated with bone graft in the maxillary sinus. Four 3D models of a crown supported by an implant fixed in the posterior maxilla were constructed. The type of implant: short implant (S) or standard-length implant with the presence of sinus graft (L) and type of crown retention: cemented (C) or screwed (S) were the study factors. The models were divided into SC- cemented crown on a short implant; SS- screwed crown on the short implant; LC- cemented crown on a standard-length implant after bone graft in the maxillary sinus and LS- crown screwed on a standard-length implant after bone graft in the maxillary sinus. An axial occlusal loading of 300 N was applied, divided into five points (60N each) corresponding to occlusal contact. The following analysis criteria were observed: Shear Stress, Maximum and Minimum Main Stress for bone tissue and von Mises Stress for the implant and prosthetic components. The use of standard-length implants reduced the shear stress in the cortical bone by 35.75% and the medullary bone by 51% when compared to short implants. The length of the implant did not affect the stress concentration in the crown, and the cement layer acted by reducing the stresses in the ceramic veneer and framework by 42%. Standard-implants associated with cemented crowns showed better biomechanical behavior.</description><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Maxilla - surgery</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><issn>0103-6440</issn><issn>1806-4760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwAhyQXyCwjh3X4Vb1Byq1gkN7jpxmTY2cpLKDRN8eh59KnHa0-ma0O4TcMrhnWQ4PwIAnUghIIY1S5XBGhkyBTMRYwjkZnoABuQrhHSIoeH5JBpznTADAkOxn1hj02HR041F3da_WbaWd7SwGug22eaOzuNWOLuuD000XqG1ot0f62oYOvW09XetP65x-pBO6sI3tkM4dfmdNGu2OwYZrcmG0C3jzO0dku5hvps_J6uVpOZ2skh2P5yalwjwz3CihcyWQGSkzBjjG_iWtkI1lRHSKWVkKxipjjOSVZhFWCKriI5L-5O58G4JHUxy8rbU_FgyKvraib6X4V1s03f2YDh9ljdXJ8tcT_wIfAmgn</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Bordin, Dimorvan</creator><creator>Castro, Mariane Boaventura de</creator><creator>Carvalho, Marco Aurélio de</creator><creator>Araujo, Anderson Macena de</creator><creator>Cury, Altair Antoninha Del Bel</creator><creator>Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5123-5358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4329-0437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0142-3980</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4322-910X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7468-6568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8466-9558</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Different Treatment Modalities Using Dental Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis</title><author>Bordin, Dimorvan ; Castro, Mariane Boaventura de ; Carvalho, Marco Aurélio de ; Araujo, Anderson Macena de ; Cury, Altair Antoninha Del Bel ; Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3010-b8e95f3f84a984e1f66510e7e4760a8e176b8ea2e5bb411dfff63da19848e08d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Maxilla - surgery</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bordin, Dimorvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Mariane Boaventura de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Marco Aurélio de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Anderson Macena de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cury, Altair Antoninha Del Bel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Brazilian dental journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bordin, Dimorvan</au><au>Castro, Mariane Boaventura de</au><au>Carvalho, Marco Aurélio de</au><au>Araujo, Anderson Macena de</au><au>Cury, Altair Antoninha Del Bel</au><au>Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different Treatment Modalities Using Dental Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian dental journal</jtitle><addtitle>Braz Dent J</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>34-41</pages><issn>0103-6440</issn><eissn>1806-4760</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to compare the biomechanical behavior of peri-implant bone tissue and prosthetic components in two modalities of treatment for posterior region of the maxilla, using short implants or standard-length implants associated with bone graft in the maxillary sinus. Four 3D models of a crown supported by an implant fixed in the posterior maxilla were constructed. The type of implant: short implant (S) or standard-length implant with the presence of sinus graft (L) and type of crown retention: cemented (C) or screwed (S) were the study factors. The models were divided into SC- cemented crown on a short implant; SS- screwed crown on the short implant; LC- cemented crown on a standard-length implant after bone graft in the maxillary sinus and LS- crown screwed on a standard-length implant after bone graft in the maxillary sinus. An axial occlusal loading of 300 N was applied, divided into five points (60N each) corresponding to occlusal contact. The following analysis criteria were observed: Shear Stress, Maximum and Minimum Main Stress for bone tissue and von Mises Stress for the implant and prosthetic components. The use of standard-length implants reduced the shear stress in the cortical bone by 35.75% and the medullary bone by 51% when compared to short implants. The length of the implant did not affect the stress concentration in the crown, and the cement layer acted by reducing the stresses in the ceramic veneer and framework by 42%. Standard-implants associated with cemented crowns showed better biomechanical behavior.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pmid>33914000</pmid><doi>10.1590/0103-6440202103890</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5123-5358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4329-0437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0142-3980</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4322-910X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7468-6568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8466-9558</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0103-6440
ispartof Brazilian dental journal, 2021-01, Vol.32 (1), p.34-41
issn 0103-6440
1806-4760
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1590_0103_6440202103890
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Crowns
Dental Implants
Dental Prosthesis Design
Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
Dental Stress Analysis
Finite Element Analysis
Maxilla - surgery
Stress, Mechanical
title Different Treatment Modalities Using Dental Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A28%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20Treatment%20Modalities%20Using%20Dental%20Implants%20in%20the%20Posterior%20Maxilla:%20A%20Finite%20Element%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20dental%20journal&rft.au=Bordin,%20Dimorvan&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=34-41&rft.issn=0103-6440&rft.eissn=1806-4760&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/0103-6440202103890&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E33914000%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33914000&rfr_iscdi=true