In Vitro and In Vivo Biocompatibility Of ReOss® in Powder and Putty Configurations

Article This study evaluated comparatively two configurations (powder and putty) of a composite biomaterial based on PLGA (Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/nanoescale hydroxyapatite (ReOss®, Intra-Lock International) through microscopic morphology, in vitro cytotoxicity, biocompatibility and in vivo respo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brazilian dental journal 2018-03, Vol.29 (2), p.117-127
Hauptverfasser: Pintor, Andréa Vaz Braga, Resende, Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito, Neves, Adriana Terezinha Novelino, Alves, Gutemberg Gomes, Coelho, Paulo G., Granjeiro, José Mauro, Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 127
container_issue 2
container_start_page 117
container_title Brazilian dental journal
container_volume 29
creator Pintor, Andréa Vaz Braga
Resende, Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito
Neves, Adriana Terezinha Novelino
Alves, Gutemberg Gomes
Coelho, Paulo G.
Granjeiro, José Mauro
Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana
description Article This study evaluated comparatively two configurations (powder and putty) of a composite biomaterial based on PLGA (Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/nanoescale hydroxyapatite (ReOss®, Intra-Lock International) through microscopic morphology, in vitro cytotoxicity, biocompatibility and in vivo response as a bone substitute. SEM and EDS characterized the biomaterials before/after grafting. Cytocompatibility was assessed with murine pre-osteoblasts. Osteoconductivity and biocompatibility were evaluated in White New Zealand rabbits. Both configurations were implanted in the calvaria of eighteen animals in non-critical size defects, with blood clot as the control group. After 30, 60 and 90 days, the animals were euthanized and the fragments containing the biomaterials and controls were harvested. Bone blocks were embedded in paraffin (n=15) aiming at histological and histomorphometric analysis, and in resin (n=3) aiming at SEM and EDS. Before implantation, the putty configuration showed both a porous and a fibrous morphological phase. Powder revealed porous particles with variable granulometry. EDS showed calcium, carbon, and oxygen in putty configuration, while powder also showed phosphorus. After implantation EDS revealed calcium, carbon, and oxygen in both configurations. The materials were considered cytotoxic by the XTT test. Histological analysis showed new bone formation and no inflammatory reaction at implant sites. However, the histomorphometric analysis indicated that the amount of newly formed bone was not statistically different between experimental groups. Although both materials presented in vitro cytotoxicity, they were biocompatible and osteoconductive. The configuration of ReOss® affected morphological characteristics and the in vitro cytocompatibility but did not impact on the in vivo biological response, as measured by the present model. Resumo Este estudo avaliou comparativamente duas configurações (pó e massa) de um biomaterial composto com base de PLGA (Poli(láctico-co-glicólico)/hidroxiapatita em nanoescala (ReOss®, Intra-Lock International) através da morfologia microscópica, citotoxicidade in vitro, biocompatibilidade e resposta in vivo como substituto ósseo. MEV e EDS caracterizaram os biomateriais antes/após o enxerto. A citocompatibilidade foi avaliada em pré-osteoblastos murinos. A osteocondutividade e a biocompatibilidade foram avaliadas em coelhos Branco da Nova Zelândia. Ambas as configurações foram implantadas na calvária de de
doi_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6440201802017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1590_0103_6440201802017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1590_0103_6440201802017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2787-af83665ea1afa0eb554d40c5bced11764716c2bbc23f3a8a5650a95033cd1ab03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUNtKxDAUDKJgXf0Bn_ID1ZPm1j5q8bKw0MXba0nSRCK7zZJ0lf0pP8Ivs11F8OXMOZyZgRmEzglcEF7BJRCguWAMCiDlNOQBysZN5EwKOETZH-EYnaT0BiOH0SpDj_Mev_ghBqz6Du-P94CvfTBhvVGD137lhx1uHH6wTUpfn9j3eBk-Ohv3iuV2GN916J1_3cZREPp0io6cWiV79osz9Hx781Tf54vmbl5fLXJTyFLmypVUCG4VUU6B1ZyzjoHh2tiOECmYJMIUWpuCOqpKxQUHVXGg1HREaaAzVPz4mhhSita1m-jXKu5aAu1USzulbv_VQr8BuRtViw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Vitro and In Vivo Biocompatibility Of ReOss® in Powder and Putty Configurations</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Pintor, Andréa Vaz Braga ; Resende, Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito ; Neves, Adriana Terezinha Novelino ; Alves, Gutemberg Gomes ; Coelho, Paulo G. ; Granjeiro, José Mauro ; Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana</creator><creatorcontrib>Pintor, Andréa Vaz Braga ; Resende, Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito ; Neves, Adriana Terezinha Novelino ; Alves, Gutemberg Gomes ; Coelho, Paulo G. ; Granjeiro, José Mauro ; Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana</creatorcontrib><description>Article This study evaluated comparatively two configurations (powder and putty) of a composite biomaterial based on PLGA (Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/nanoescale hydroxyapatite (ReOss®, Intra-Lock International) through microscopic morphology, in vitro cytotoxicity, biocompatibility and in vivo response as a bone substitute. SEM and EDS characterized the biomaterials before/after grafting. Cytocompatibility was assessed with murine pre-osteoblasts. Osteoconductivity and biocompatibility were evaluated in White New Zealand rabbits. Both configurations were implanted in the calvaria of eighteen animals in non-critical size defects, with blood clot as the control group. After 30, 60 and 90 days, the animals were euthanized and the fragments containing the biomaterials and controls were harvested. Bone blocks were embedded in paraffin (n=15) aiming at histological and histomorphometric analysis, and in resin (n=3) aiming at SEM and EDS. Before implantation, the putty configuration showed both a porous and a fibrous morphological phase. Powder revealed porous particles with variable granulometry. EDS showed calcium, carbon, and oxygen in putty configuration, while powder also showed phosphorus. After implantation EDS revealed calcium, carbon, and oxygen in both configurations. The materials were considered cytotoxic by the XTT test. Histological analysis showed new bone formation and no inflammatory reaction at implant sites. However, the histomorphometric analysis indicated that the amount of newly formed bone was not statistically different between experimental groups. Although both materials presented in vitro cytotoxicity, they were biocompatible and osteoconductive. The configuration of ReOss® affected morphological characteristics and the in vitro cytocompatibility but did not impact on the in vivo biological response, as measured by the present model. Resumo Este estudo avaliou comparativamente duas configurações (pó e massa) de um biomaterial composto com base de PLGA (Poli(láctico-co-glicólico)/hidroxiapatita em nanoescala (ReOss®, Intra-Lock International) através da morfologia microscópica, citotoxicidade in vitro, biocompatibilidade e resposta in vivo como substituto ósseo. MEV e EDS caracterizaram os biomateriais antes/após o enxerto. A citocompatibilidade foi avaliada em pré-osteoblastos murinos. A osteocondutividade e a biocompatibilidade foram avaliadas em coelhos Branco da Nova Zelândia. Ambas as configurações foram implantadas na calvária de dezoito animais em defeitos não-críticos, com coágulo sanguíneo como grupo controle. Após 30, 60 e 90 dias, os animais foram eutanasiados e os fragmentos contendo os biomateriais e controles coletados. Blocos ósseos foram embebidos em parafina (n=15) destinados às análises histológica e histomorfométrica, e em resina (n=3) destinadas à MEV e EDS. Antes da implantação, a configuração massa mostrou ambas fases morfológicas porosa e fibrosa. O pó revelou partículas porosas com granulometria variável. EDS mostrou cálcio, carbono e oxigênio na configuração massa, enquanto o pó mostrou também fósforo. Após a implantação a EDS revelou cálcio, carbono e oxigênio em ambas configurações. Os materiais foram considerados citotóxicos pelo teste XTT. A análise histológica mostrou nova formação óssea e nenhuma reação inflamatória nos sítios de implante. Entretanto, a análise histomorfométrica indicou que a quantidade de osso neoformado não foi estatisticamente diferente entre os grupos experimentais. Embora ambos os materiais tenham apresentado citotoxicidade in vitro, foram biocompatíveis e osteocondutores. A configuração do ReOss® afetou as características morfológicas e a citocompatibilidade in vitro, porém não impactou a resposta biológica in vivo, como medido pelo presente modelo.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0103-6440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1806-4760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201802017</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Brazilian dental journal, 2018-03, Vol.29 (2), p.117-127</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2787-af83665ea1afa0eb554d40c5bced11764716c2bbc23f3a8a5650a95033cd1ab03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2787-af83665ea1afa0eb554d40c5bced11764716c2bbc23f3a8a5650a95033cd1ab03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pintor, Andréa Vaz Braga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resende, Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Adriana Terezinha Novelino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Gutemberg Gomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Paulo G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granjeiro, José Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana</creatorcontrib><title>In Vitro and In Vivo Biocompatibility Of ReOss® in Powder and Putty Configurations</title><title>Brazilian dental journal</title><description>Article This study evaluated comparatively two configurations (powder and putty) of a composite biomaterial based on PLGA (Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/nanoescale hydroxyapatite (ReOss®, Intra-Lock International) through microscopic morphology, in vitro cytotoxicity, biocompatibility and in vivo response as a bone substitute. SEM and EDS characterized the biomaterials before/after grafting. Cytocompatibility was assessed with murine pre-osteoblasts. Osteoconductivity and biocompatibility were evaluated in White New Zealand rabbits. Both configurations were implanted in the calvaria of eighteen animals in non-critical size defects, with blood clot as the control group. After 30, 60 and 90 days, the animals were euthanized and the fragments containing the biomaterials and controls were harvested. Bone blocks were embedded in paraffin (n=15) aiming at histological and histomorphometric analysis, and in resin (n=3) aiming at SEM and EDS. Before implantation, the putty configuration showed both a porous and a fibrous morphological phase. Powder revealed porous particles with variable granulometry. EDS showed calcium, carbon, and oxygen in putty configuration, while powder also showed phosphorus. After implantation EDS revealed calcium, carbon, and oxygen in both configurations. The materials were considered cytotoxic by the XTT test. Histological analysis showed new bone formation and no inflammatory reaction at implant sites. However, the histomorphometric analysis indicated that the amount of newly formed bone was not statistically different between experimental groups. Although both materials presented in vitro cytotoxicity, they were biocompatible and osteoconductive. The configuration of ReOss® affected morphological characteristics and the in vitro cytocompatibility but did not impact on the in vivo biological response, as measured by the present model. Resumo Este estudo avaliou comparativamente duas configurações (pó e massa) de um biomaterial composto com base de PLGA (Poli(láctico-co-glicólico)/hidroxiapatita em nanoescala (ReOss®, Intra-Lock International) através da morfologia microscópica, citotoxicidade in vitro, biocompatibilidade e resposta in vivo como substituto ósseo. MEV e EDS caracterizaram os biomateriais antes/após o enxerto. A citocompatibilidade foi avaliada em pré-osteoblastos murinos. A osteocondutividade e a biocompatibilidade foram avaliadas em coelhos Branco da Nova Zelândia. Ambas as configurações foram implantadas na calvária de dezoito animais em defeitos não-críticos, com coágulo sanguíneo como grupo controle. Após 30, 60 e 90 dias, os animais foram eutanasiados e os fragmentos contendo os biomateriais e controles coletados. Blocos ósseos foram embebidos em parafina (n=15) destinados às análises histológica e histomorfométrica, e em resina (n=3) destinadas à MEV e EDS. Antes da implantação, a configuração massa mostrou ambas fases morfológicas porosa e fibrosa. O pó revelou partículas porosas com granulometria variável. EDS mostrou cálcio, carbono e oxigênio na configuração massa, enquanto o pó mostrou também fósforo. Após a implantação a EDS revelou cálcio, carbono e oxigênio em ambas configurações. Os materiais foram considerados citotóxicos pelo teste XTT. A análise histológica mostrou nova formação óssea e nenhuma reação inflamatória nos sítios de implante. Entretanto, a análise histomorfométrica indicou que a quantidade de osso neoformado não foi estatisticamente diferente entre os grupos experimentais. Embora ambos os materiais tenham apresentado citotoxicidade in vitro, foram biocompatíveis e osteocondutores. A configuração do ReOss® afetou as características morfológicas e a citocompatibilidade in vitro, porém não impactou a resposta biológica in vivo, como medido pelo presente modelo.</description><issn>0103-6440</issn><issn>1806-4760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUNtKxDAUDKJgXf0Bn_ID1ZPm1j5q8bKw0MXba0nSRCK7zZJ0lf0pP8Ivs11F8OXMOZyZgRmEzglcEF7BJRCguWAMCiDlNOQBysZN5EwKOETZH-EYnaT0BiOH0SpDj_Mev_ghBqz6Du-P94CvfTBhvVGD137lhx1uHH6wTUpfn9j3eBk-Ohv3iuV2GN916J1_3cZREPp0io6cWiV79osz9Hx781Tf54vmbl5fLXJTyFLmypVUCG4VUU6B1ZyzjoHh2tiOECmYJMIUWpuCOqpKxQUHVXGg1HREaaAzVPz4mhhSita1m-jXKu5aAu1USzulbv_VQr8BuRtViw</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Pintor, Andréa Vaz Braga</creator><creator>Resende, Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito</creator><creator>Neves, Adriana Terezinha Novelino</creator><creator>Alves, Gutemberg Gomes</creator><creator>Coelho, Paulo G.</creator><creator>Granjeiro, José Mauro</creator><creator>Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>In Vitro and In Vivo Biocompatibility Of ReOss® in Powder and Putty Configurations</title><author>Pintor, Andréa Vaz Braga ; Resende, Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito ; Neves, Adriana Terezinha Novelino ; Alves, Gutemberg Gomes ; Coelho, Paulo G. ; Granjeiro, José Mauro ; Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2787-af83665ea1afa0eb554d40c5bced11764716c2bbc23f3a8a5650a95033cd1ab03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pintor, Andréa Vaz Braga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resende, Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Adriana Terezinha Novelino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Gutemberg Gomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Paulo G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granjeiro, José Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Brazilian dental journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pintor, Andréa Vaz Braga</au><au>Resende, Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito</au><au>Neves, Adriana Terezinha Novelino</au><au>Alves, Gutemberg Gomes</au><au>Coelho, Paulo G.</au><au>Granjeiro, José Mauro</au><au>Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Vitro and In Vivo Biocompatibility Of ReOss® in Powder and Putty Configurations</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian dental journal</jtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>127</epage><pages>117-127</pages><issn>0103-6440</issn><eissn>1806-4760</eissn><abstract>Article This study evaluated comparatively two configurations (powder and putty) of a composite biomaterial based on PLGA (Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/nanoescale hydroxyapatite (ReOss®, Intra-Lock International) through microscopic morphology, in vitro cytotoxicity, biocompatibility and in vivo response as a bone substitute. SEM and EDS characterized the biomaterials before/after grafting. Cytocompatibility was assessed with murine pre-osteoblasts. Osteoconductivity and biocompatibility were evaluated in White New Zealand rabbits. Both configurations were implanted in the calvaria of eighteen animals in non-critical size defects, with blood clot as the control group. After 30, 60 and 90 days, the animals were euthanized and the fragments containing the biomaterials and controls were harvested. Bone blocks were embedded in paraffin (n=15) aiming at histological and histomorphometric analysis, and in resin (n=3) aiming at SEM and EDS. Before implantation, the putty configuration showed both a porous and a fibrous morphological phase. Powder revealed porous particles with variable granulometry. EDS showed calcium, carbon, and oxygen in putty configuration, while powder also showed phosphorus. After implantation EDS revealed calcium, carbon, and oxygen in both configurations. The materials were considered cytotoxic by the XTT test. Histological analysis showed new bone formation and no inflammatory reaction at implant sites. However, the histomorphometric analysis indicated that the amount of newly formed bone was not statistically different between experimental groups. Although both materials presented in vitro cytotoxicity, they were biocompatible and osteoconductive. The configuration of ReOss® affected morphological characteristics and the in vitro cytocompatibility but did not impact on the in vivo biological response, as measured by the present model. Resumo Este estudo avaliou comparativamente duas configurações (pó e massa) de um biomaterial composto com base de PLGA (Poli(láctico-co-glicólico)/hidroxiapatita em nanoescala (ReOss®, Intra-Lock International) através da morfologia microscópica, citotoxicidade in vitro, biocompatibilidade e resposta in vivo como substituto ósseo. MEV e EDS caracterizaram os biomateriais antes/após o enxerto. A citocompatibilidade foi avaliada em pré-osteoblastos murinos. A osteocondutividade e a biocompatibilidade foram avaliadas em coelhos Branco da Nova Zelândia. Ambas as configurações foram implantadas na calvária de dezoito animais em defeitos não-críticos, com coágulo sanguíneo como grupo controle. Após 30, 60 e 90 dias, os animais foram eutanasiados e os fragmentos contendo os biomateriais e controles coletados. Blocos ósseos foram embebidos em parafina (n=15) destinados às análises histológica e histomorfométrica, e em resina (n=3) destinadas à MEV e EDS. Antes da implantação, a configuração massa mostrou ambas fases morfológicas porosa e fibrosa. O pó revelou partículas porosas com granulometria variável. EDS mostrou cálcio, carbono e oxigênio na configuração massa, enquanto o pó mostrou também fósforo. Após a implantação a EDS revelou cálcio, carbono e oxigênio em ambas configurações. Os materiais foram considerados citotóxicos pelo teste XTT. A análise histológica mostrou nova formação óssea e nenhuma reação inflamatória nos sítios de implante. Entretanto, a análise histomorfométrica indicou que a quantidade de osso neoformado não foi estatisticamente diferente entre os grupos experimentais. Embora ambos os materiais tenham apresentado citotoxicidade in vitro, foram biocompatíveis e osteocondutores. A configuração do ReOss® afetou as características morfológicas e a citocompatibilidade in vitro, porém não impactou a resposta biológica in vivo, como medido pelo presente modelo.</abstract><doi>10.1590/0103-6440201802017</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0103-6440
ispartof Brazilian dental journal, 2018-03, Vol.29 (2), p.117-127
issn 0103-6440
1806-4760
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1590_0103_6440201802017
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title In Vitro and In Vivo Biocompatibility Of ReOss® in Powder and Putty Configurations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A41%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Vitro%20and%20In%20Vivo%20Biocompatibility%20Of%20ReOss%C2%AE%20in%20Powder%20and%20Putty%20Configurations&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20dental%20journal&rft.au=Pintor,%20Andr%C3%A9a%20Vaz%20Braga&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=127&rft.pages=117-127&rft.issn=0103-6440&rft.eissn=1806-4760&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/0103-6440201802017&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1590_0103_6440201802017%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true