Pilot Study of ADL Score in Paraplegia with Spinal Cord Injury

Evaluation of disorders constitutes an important part of work in rehabilitation medicine. But all of the objective evaluation methods for quantifying ADL have both advantages and disadvantages, and they are often difficult to use. Evaluation and judgment of ADL should be carried out in terms of move...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Physical Therapy Science 2000, Vol.12(1), pp.7-11
Hauptverfasser: Suyama, Tetsuo, Takahashi, Kuniyasu, Shibuta, Hideo, Hirabayashi, Shigeru, Imaizumi, Hiroshi, Takakura, Inokuchi, Kouichi, Ogawa, Aya, Tamura, Takahashi, Yoshie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 11
container_issue 1
container_start_page 7
container_title Journal of Physical Therapy Science
container_volume 12
creator Suyama, Tetsuo
Takahashi, Kuniyasu
Shibuta, Hideo
Hirabayashi, Shigeru
Imaizumi, Hiroshi
Takakura
Inokuchi, Kouichi
Ogawa, Aya
Tamura
Takahashi, Yoshie
description Evaluation of disorders constitutes an important part of work in rehabilitation medicine. But all of the objective evaluation methods for quantifying ADL have both advantages and disadvantages, and they are often difficult to use. Evaluation and judgment of ADL should be carried out in terms of movements simplified as much as possible. An ADL Score Study Group, consisting of medical co-workers, has been organized, and they have proposed a tentative plan for patients with paraplegia due to spinal cord injury. Method; ADL items were limited to 10, with sub-items limited to two to three per item, to simplify the ADL score as much as possible. The evaluation was carried out in accordance with the followings; 0 point, requiring full assistance, 1 point, partial assistance, 2 points, possible to do activities with insufficient perfectness, 3 points, possible to do activities independently, with a maximum of 99 points. Subjects were 35 patients with complete paralysis due to spinal cord injury. Thirty four persons were males and one was female. Results; Evaluation scores were 81 points for Group A (Spinal cord injury T1-7), 85 points for Group B (Spinal cord injury T8-L1), 95 points for Group C (Spinal cord injury L2 or lower). It was demonstrated that the evaluation of two items, reach and walking, was sufficient for independent patients with paraplegia due to spinal cord injury.
doi_str_mv 10.1589/jpts.12.7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_12_7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>article_jpts_12_1_12_1_7_article_char_en</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1907-6aa8f8d02af0169b358c36fa5891cd55e269be4fa2dd24eb304c9d2f724855503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j8tqwzAQRUVpoWnaRf9A2y7sSrJlyZtAcF8BQwNp12KiRyLj2kZyKPn7JqR4MxfmHoY5CD1SklIuy-dmGGNKWSqu0IxRKRJesOIazUhJecKZFLfoLsaGECZILmdosfZtP-LNeDBH3Du8fKnxRvfBYt_hNQQYWrvzgH_9uMebwXfQ4qoPBq-65hCO9-jGQRvtw3_O0ffb61f1kdSf76tqWSealkQkBYB00hAGjtCi3GZc6qxwcPqYasO5ZaelzR0wY1hutxnJdWmYEyyXnHOSzdHT5a4OfYzBOjUE_wPhqChRZ3F1FleUKXFiFxe2iSPs7ERCGL1u7UTSyxBTofcQlO2yPzsaYdM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pilot Study of ADL Score in Paraplegia with Spinal Cord Injury</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Suyama, Tetsuo ; Takahashi, Kuniyasu ; Shibuta, Hideo ; Hirabayashi, Shigeru ; Imaizumi, Hiroshi ; Takakura ; Inokuchi, Kouichi ; Ogawa, Aya ; Tamura ; Takahashi, Yoshie</creator><creatorcontrib>Suyama, Tetsuo ; Takahashi, Kuniyasu ; Shibuta, Hideo ; Hirabayashi, Shigeru ; Imaizumi, Hiroshi ; Takakura ; Inokuchi, Kouichi ; Ogawa, Aya ; Tamura ; Takahashi, Yoshie</creatorcontrib><description>Evaluation of disorders constitutes an important part of work in rehabilitation medicine. But all of the objective evaluation methods for quantifying ADL have both advantages and disadvantages, and they are often difficult to use. Evaluation and judgment of ADL should be carried out in terms of movements simplified as much as possible. An ADL Score Study Group, consisting of medical co-workers, has been organized, and they have proposed a tentative plan for patients with paraplegia due to spinal cord injury. Method; ADL items were limited to 10, with sub-items limited to two to three per item, to simplify the ADL score as much as possible. The evaluation was carried out in accordance with the followings; 0 point, requiring full assistance, 1 point, partial assistance, 2 points, possible to do activities with insufficient perfectness, 3 points, possible to do activities independently, with a maximum of 99 points. Subjects were 35 patients with complete paralysis due to spinal cord injury. Thirty four persons were males and one was female. Results; Evaluation scores were 81 points for Group A (Spinal cord injury T1-7), 85 points for Group B (Spinal cord injury T8-L1), 95 points for Group C (Spinal cord injury L2 or lower). It was demonstrated that the evaluation of two items, reach and walking, was sufficient for independent patients with paraplegia due to spinal cord injury.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0915-5287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2187-5626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1589/jpts.12.7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Society of Physical Therapy Science</publisher><subject>ADL score ; Paraplegia ; Spinal cord injury</subject><ispartof>Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 2000, Vol.12(1), pp.7-11</ispartof><rights>2000 by the Society of Physical Therapy Science</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1907-6aa8f8d02af0169b358c36fa5891cd55e269be4fa2dd24eb304c9d2f724855503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1881,4022,27922,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suyama, Tetsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Kuniyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shibuta, Hideo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirabayashi, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imaizumi, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takakura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inokuchi, Kouichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Aya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Yoshie</creatorcontrib><title>Pilot Study of ADL Score in Paraplegia with Spinal Cord Injury</title><title>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</title><addtitle>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</addtitle><description>Evaluation of disorders constitutes an important part of work in rehabilitation medicine. But all of the objective evaluation methods for quantifying ADL have both advantages and disadvantages, and they are often difficult to use. Evaluation and judgment of ADL should be carried out in terms of movements simplified as much as possible. An ADL Score Study Group, consisting of medical co-workers, has been organized, and they have proposed a tentative plan for patients with paraplegia due to spinal cord injury. Method; ADL items were limited to 10, with sub-items limited to two to three per item, to simplify the ADL score as much as possible. The evaluation was carried out in accordance with the followings; 0 point, requiring full assistance, 1 point, partial assistance, 2 points, possible to do activities with insufficient perfectness, 3 points, possible to do activities independently, with a maximum of 99 points. Subjects were 35 patients with complete paralysis due to spinal cord injury. Thirty four persons were males and one was female. Results; Evaluation scores were 81 points for Group A (Spinal cord injury T1-7), 85 points for Group B (Spinal cord injury T8-L1), 95 points for Group C (Spinal cord injury L2 or lower). It was demonstrated that the evaluation of two items, reach and walking, was sufficient for independent patients with paraplegia due to spinal cord injury.</description><subject>ADL score</subject><subject>Paraplegia</subject><subject>Spinal cord injury</subject><issn>0915-5287</issn><issn>2187-5626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j8tqwzAQRUVpoWnaRf9A2y7sSrJlyZtAcF8BQwNp12KiRyLj2kZyKPn7JqR4MxfmHoY5CD1SklIuy-dmGGNKWSqu0IxRKRJesOIazUhJecKZFLfoLsaGECZILmdosfZtP-LNeDBH3Du8fKnxRvfBYt_hNQQYWrvzgH_9uMebwXfQ4qoPBq-65hCO9-jGQRvtw3_O0ffb61f1kdSf76tqWSealkQkBYB00hAGjtCi3GZc6qxwcPqYasO5ZaelzR0wY1hutxnJdWmYEyyXnHOSzdHT5a4OfYzBOjUE_wPhqChRZ3F1FleUKXFiFxe2iSPs7ERCGL1u7UTSyxBTofcQlO2yPzsaYdM</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Suyama, Tetsuo</creator><creator>Takahashi, Kuniyasu</creator><creator>Shibuta, Hideo</creator><creator>Hirabayashi, Shigeru</creator><creator>Imaizumi, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Takakura</creator><creator>Inokuchi, Kouichi</creator><creator>Ogawa, Aya</creator><creator>Tamura</creator><creator>Takahashi, Yoshie</creator><general>The Society of Physical Therapy Science</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Pilot Study of ADL Score in Paraplegia with Spinal Cord Injury</title><author>Suyama, Tetsuo ; Takahashi, Kuniyasu ; Shibuta, Hideo ; Hirabayashi, Shigeru ; Imaizumi, Hiroshi ; Takakura ; Inokuchi, Kouichi ; Ogawa, Aya ; Tamura ; Takahashi, Yoshie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1907-6aa8f8d02af0169b358c36fa5891cd55e269be4fa2dd24eb304c9d2f724855503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>ADL score</topic><topic>Paraplegia</topic><topic>Spinal cord injury</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suyama, Tetsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Kuniyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shibuta, Hideo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirabayashi, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imaizumi, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takakura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inokuchi, Kouichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Aya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Yoshie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suyama, Tetsuo</au><au>Takahashi, Kuniyasu</au><au>Shibuta, Hideo</au><au>Hirabayashi, Shigeru</au><au>Imaizumi, Hiroshi</au><au>Takakura</au><au>Inokuchi, Kouichi</au><au>Ogawa, Aya</au><au>Tamura</au><au>Takahashi, Yoshie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pilot Study of ADL Score in Paraplegia with Spinal Cord Injury</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</addtitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>7-11</pages><issn>0915-5287</issn><eissn>2187-5626</eissn><abstract>Evaluation of disorders constitutes an important part of work in rehabilitation medicine. But all of the objective evaluation methods for quantifying ADL have both advantages and disadvantages, and they are often difficult to use. Evaluation and judgment of ADL should be carried out in terms of movements simplified as much as possible. An ADL Score Study Group, consisting of medical co-workers, has been organized, and they have proposed a tentative plan for patients with paraplegia due to spinal cord injury. Method; ADL items were limited to 10, with sub-items limited to two to three per item, to simplify the ADL score as much as possible. The evaluation was carried out in accordance with the followings; 0 point, requiring full assistance, 1 point, partial assistance, 2 points, possible to do activities with insufficient perfectness, 3 points, possible to do activities independently, with a maximum of 99 points. Subjects were 35 patients with complete paralysis due to spinal cord injury. Thirty four persons were males and one was female. Results; Evaluation scores were 81 points for Group A (Spinal cord injury T1-7), 85 points for Group B (Spinal cord injury T8-L1), 95 points for Group C (Spinal cord injury L2 or lower). It was demonstrated that the evaluation of two items, reach and walking, was sufficient for independent patients with paraplegia due to spinal cord injury.</abstract><pub>The Society of Physical Therapy Science</pub><doi>10.1589/jpts.12.7</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0915-5287
ispartof Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 2000, Vol.12(1), pp.7-11
issn 0915-5287
2187-5626
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_12_7
source J-STAGE Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects ADL score
Paraplegia
Spinal cord injury
title Pilot Study of ADL Score in Paraplegia with Spinal Cord Injury
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T09%3A53%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pilot%20Study%20of%20ADL%20Score%20in%20Paraplegia%20with%20Spinal%20Cord%20Injury&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Physical%20Therapy%20Science&rft.au=Suyama,%20Tetsuo&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=7-11&rft.issn=0915-5287&rft.eissn=2187-5626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1589/jpts.12.7&rft_dat=%3Cjstage_cross%3Earticle_jpts_12_1_12_1_7_article_char_en%3C/jstage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true