Methodological aspects of synphytoindication analysis of topological differentiation of biotopes

The advantages and disadvantages of some most common methods of quantitative analysis used in processing of synphytoindication data were analyzed. These methods enabled reflection of important ecological characteristics of plant communities and assessment of the nature of their topological and regio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ukrajinʹskyj botanic̆nyj z̆urnal 2023-04, Vol.80 (1), p.64-83
Hauptverfasser: Didukh, Ya.P., Vasheniak, Yu.A., Kuzemko, A.A., Rosenblit, Yu.V., Chusova, O.O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 83
container_issue 1
container_start_page 64
container_title Ukrajinʹskyj botanic̆nyj z̆urnal
container_volume 80
creator Didukh, Ya.P.
Vasheniak, Yu.A.
Kuzemko, A.A.
Rosenblit, Yu.V.
Chusova, O.O.
description The advantages and disadvantages of some most common methods of quantitative analysis used in processing of synphytoindication data were analyzed. These methods enabled reflection of important ecological characteristics of plant communities and assessment of the nature of their topological and regional differentiation characterizing α-, β-, γ-diversity. We also examined current debatable issues regarding the use of scales of ecological indicator values and methods of their correct comparison based on bringing to a single "denominator". The visual aspects of the gradient analysis used in assessment of topological differentiation of habitats based on the establishment of various types (vector, combinative and complex) of ecological and coenotic profiles are considered. We focused our attention on the application of optimal models of ordination methods (detrended correspondence analysis – DCA, non-metric multidimensional scaling – NMDS). The use of cluster analysis reflected in various methods of dendrogram constructing was evaluated. The analysis of the above methods allows us to evaluate the efficiency of their use in various aspects of synphytoindication techniques. This allows us to use such data for forecasting and modeling biocoenoses changes and development, for assessment and classification of biotopes, landscape structure (ecomer), zoning (ecochor), as well as for evaluation of the resistance of vegetation to the influence of external factors. The methods and approaches of mathematics and cybernetics are expected to be more widely used in geobotany in the future, since many pressing ecological issues related to non-linear development, emergent changes in the ecosystems properties and search for critical thresholds cannot be solved in a traditional way.
doi_str_mv 10.15407/ukrbotj80.01.064
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_15407_ukrbotj80_01_064</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_15407_ukrbotj80_01_064</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c854-d1baab4da9fa61aa959b7840e500da5502fc0bdabe666443c0dace01a0d82af63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpB7DLD6TMJLbrLFHFSypi030Yv6hLiKPYLPL3RC3qaqR77p3FYeweYY2Cw-bh93vUMR8VrAHXIPkVW1QcRamUhGu2gHpTlRyr-patUjoCQNUgNqpZsM93lw_Rxi5-BUNdQWlwJqci-iJN_XCYcgy9nVEOsS-op25K4YRzHC4rG7x3o-tzOPdmrEOcGy7dsRtPXXKr_7tk--en_fa13H28vG0fd6VRgpcWNZHmlhpPEoka0eiN4uAEgCUhoPIGtCXtpJSc12ZOjQMksKoiL-slw_NbM8aURufbYQw_NE4tQnuS1F4ktYDtLKn-A80zYHc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methodological aspects of synphytoindication analysis of topological differentiation of biotopes</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Didukh, Ya.P. ; Vasheniak, Yu.A. ; Kuzemko, A.A. ; Rosenblit, Yu.V. ; Chusova, O.O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Didukh, Ya.P. ; Vasheniak, Yu.A. ; Kuzemko, A.A. ; Rosenblit, Yu.V. ; Chusova, O.O. ; M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine</creatorcontrib><description>The advantages and disadvantages of some most common methods of quantitative analysis used in processing of synphytoindication data were analyzed. These methods enabled reflection of important ecological characteristics of plant communities and assessment of the nature of their topological and regional differentiation characterizing α-, β-, γ-diversity. We also examined current debatable issues regarding the use of scales of ecological indicator values and methods of their correct comparison based on bringing to a single "denominator". The visual aspects of the gradient analysis used in assessment of topological differentiation of habitats based on the establishment of various types (vector, combinative and complex) of ecological and coenotic profiles are considered. We focused our attention on the application of optimal models of ordination methods (detrended correspondence analysis – DCA, non-metric multidimensional scaling – NMDS). The use of cluster analysis reflected in various methods of dendrogram constructing was evaluated. The analysis of the above methods allows us to evaluate the efficiency of their use in various aspects of synphytoindication techniques. This allows us to use such data for forecasting and modeling biocoenoses changes and development, for assessment and classification of biotopes, landscape structure (ecomer), zoning (ecochor), as well as for evaluation of the resistance of vegetation to the influence of external factors. The methods and approaches of mathematics and cybernetics are expected to be more widely used in geobotany in the future, since many pressing ecological issues related to non-linear development, emergent changes in the ecosystems properties and search for critical thresholds cannot be solved in a traditional way.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0372-4123</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2415-8860</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15407/ukrbotj80.01.064</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Ukrajinʹskyj botanic̆nyj z̆urnal, 2023-04, Vol.80 (1), p.64-83</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c854-d1baab4da9fa61aa959b7840e500da5502fc0bdabe666443c0dace01a0d82af63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8081-9918 ; 0000-0002-8516-3823 ; 0000-0002-9425-2756 ; 0000-0003-1020-3007 ; 0000-0002-5661-3944</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Didukh, Ya.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasheniak, Yu.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuzemko, A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenblit, Yu.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chusova, O.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine</creatorcontrib><title>Methodological aspects of synphytoindication analysis of topological differentiation of biotopes</title><title>Ukrajinʹskyj botanic̆nyj z̆urnal</title><description>The advantages and disadvantages of some most common methods of quantitative analysis used in processing of synphytoindication data were analyzed. These methods enabled reflection of important ecological characteristics of plant communities and assessment of the nature of their topological and regional differentiation characterizing α-, β-, γ-diversity. We also examined current debatable issues regarding the use of scales of ecological indicator values and methods of their correct comparison based on bringing to a single "denominator". The visual aspects of the gradient analysis used in assessment of topological differentiation of habitats based on the establishment of various types (vector, combinative and complex) of ecological and coenotic profiles are considered. We focused our attention on the application of optimal models of ordination methods (detrended correspondence analysis – DCA, non-metric multidimensional scaling – NMDS). The use of cluster analysis reflected in various methods of dendrogram constructing was evaluated. The analysis of the above methods allows us to evaluate the efficiency of their use in various aspects of synphytoindication techniques. This allows us to use such data for forecasting and modeling biocoenoses changes and development, for assessment and classification of biotopes, landscape structure (ecomer), zoning (ecochor), as well as for evaluation of the resistance of vegetation to the influence of external factors. The methods and approaches of mathematics and cybernetics are expected to be more widely used in geobotany in the future, since many pressing ecological issues related to non-linear development, emergent changes in the ecosystems properties and search for critical thresholds cannot be solved in a traditional way.</description><issn>0372-4123</issn><issn>2415-8860</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpB7DLD6TMJLbrLFHFSypi030Yv6hLiKPYLPL3RC3qaqR77p3FYeweYY2Cw-bh93vUMR8VrAHXIPkVW1QcRamUhGu2gHpTlRyr-patUjoCQNUgNqpZsM93lw_Rxi5-BUNdQWlwJqci-iJN_XCYcgy9nVEOsS-op25K4YRzHC4rG7x3o-tzOPdmrEOcGy7dsRtPXXKr_7tk--en_fa13H28vG0fd6VRgpcWNZHmlhpPEoka0eiN4uAEgCUhoPIGtCXtpJSc12ZOjQMksKoiL-slw_NbM8aURufbYQw_NE4tQnuS1F4ktYDtLKn-A80zYHc</recordid><startdate>20230415</startdate><enddate>20230415</enddate><creator>Didukh, Ya.P.</creator><creator>Vasheniak, Yu.A.</creator><creator>Kuzemko, A.A.</creator><creator>Rosenblit, Yu.V.</creator><creator>Chusova, O.O.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8081-9918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8516-3823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9425-2756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1020-3007</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5661-3944</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230415</creationdate><title>Methodological aspects of synphytoindication analysis of topological differentiation of biotopes</title><author>Didukh, Ya.P. ; Vasheniak, Yu.A. ; Kuzemko, A.A. ; Rosenblit, Yu.V. ; Chusova, O.O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c854-d1baab4da9fa61aa959b7840e500da5502fc0bdabe666443c0dace01a0d82af63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Didukh, Ya.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasheniak, Yu.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuzemko, A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenblit, Yu.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chusova, O.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Ukrajinʹskyj botanic̆nyj z̆urnal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Didukh, Ya.P.</au><au>Vasheniak, Yu.A.</au><au>Kuzemko, A.A.</au><au>Rosenblit, Yu.V.</au><au>Chusova, O.O.</au><aucorp>M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methodological aspects of synphytoindication analysis of topological differentiation of biotopes</atitle><jtitle>Ukrajinʹskyj botanic̆nyj z̆urnal</jtitle><date>2023-04-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>64</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>64-83</pages><issn>0372-4123</issn><eissn>2415-8860</eissn><abstract>The advantages and disadvantages of some most common methods of quantitative analysis used in processing of synphytoindication data were analyzed. These methods enabled reflection of important ecological characteristics of plant communities and assessment of the nature of their topological and regional differentiation characterizing α-, β-, γ-diversity. We also examined current debatable issues regarding the use of scales of ecological indicator values and methods of their correct comparison based on bringing to a single "denominator". The visual aspects of the gradient analysis used in assessment of topological differentiation of habitats based on the establishment of various types (vector, combinative and complex) of ecological and coenotic profiles are considered. We focused our attention on the application of optimal models of ordination methods (detrended correspondence analysis – DCA, non-metric multidimensional scaling – NMDS). The use of cluster analysis reflected in various methods of dendrogram constructing was evaluated. The analysis of the above methods allows us to evaluate the efficiency of their use in various aspects of synphytoindication techniques. This allows us to use such data for forecasting and modeling biocoenoses changes and development, for assessment and classification of biotopes, landscape structure (ecomer), zoning (ecochor), as well as for evaluation of the resistance of vegetation to the influence of external factors. The methods and approaches of mathematics and cybernetics are expected to be more widely used in geobotany in the future, since many pressing ecological issues related to non-linear development, emergent changes in the ecosystems properties and search for critical thresholds cannot be solved in a traditional way.</abstract><doi>10.15407/ukrbotj80.01.064</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8081-9918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8516-3823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9425-2756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1020-3007</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5661-3944</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0372-4123
ispartof Ukrajinʹskyj botanic̆nyj z̆urnal, 2023-04, Vol.80 (1), p.64-83
issn 0372-4123
2415-8860
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_15407_ukrbotj80_01_064
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
title Methodological aspects of synphytoindication analysis of topological differentiation of biotopes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A47%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methodological%20aspects%20of%20synphytoindication%20analysis%20of%20topological%20differentiation%20of%20biotopes&rft.jtitle=Ukrajin%CA%B9skyj%20botanic%CC%86nyj%20z%CC%86urnal&rft.au=Didukh,%20Ya.P.&rft.aucorp=M.G.%20Kholodny%20Institute%20of%20Botany,%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20of%20Ukraine&rft.date=2023-04-15&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=64-83&rft.issn=0372-4123&rft.eissn=2415-8860&rft_id=info:doi/10.15407/ukrbotj80.01.064&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_15407_ukrbotj80_01_064%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true