PRESENT STATUS OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF IONIZING RADIATIONS AND THE HEALTH OF PARTICIPATING WORKERS IN OUR INDUSTRIAL CIRCLE (REPORT 1)

Three hundred and seventy four industrial enterprises listed in the Department of Labor as handling ionizing radiations were investigated by means of questionnaires. Answers were received from 229 radiation handling works, involving 1, 742 workers. Number of sources were 824, among which x-ray equip...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sangyo Igaku 1964/01/20, Vol.6(1), pp.754-765
Hauptverfasser: OHIRA, Masahiko, MOCHIZUKI, Yoshio, KURODA, Takeshi, NAKATANI, Tohru, KISHI, Yoko, AOYAMA, Hideyasu, ANDO, Norio, KO, Itsuo, FUJII, Yoshio, YOSHIOKA, Shinichi, FURUICHI, Keiji, MURAKAMI, Isao, TAMAKI, Takeshi, ASANO, Nobuhiro, OKAMOTO, Toshio, KAWAHARA, Hiroshi, ITANO, Taketora, AOYAMA, Yoshitaka, MIZUTA, Masaomi, MARUYA, Hiroshi, NAKAMURA, Fumio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:jpn
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 765
container_issue 1
container_start_page 754
container_title Sangyo Igaku
container_volume 6
creator OHIRA, Masahiko
MOCHIZUKI, Yoshio
KURODA, Takeshi
NAKATANI, Tohru
KISHI, Yoko
AOYAMA, Hideyasu
ANDO, Norio
KO, Itsuo
FUJII, Yoshio
YOSHIOKA, Shinichi
FURUICHI, Keiji
MURAKAMI, Isao
TAMAKI, Takeshi
ASANO, Nobuhiro
OKAMOTO, Toshio
KAWAHARA, Hiroshi
ITANO, Taketora
AOYAMA, Yoshitaka
MIZUTA, Masaomi
MARUYA, Hiroshi
NAKAMURA, Fumio
description Three hundred and seventy four industrial enterprises listed in the Department of Labor as handling ionizing radiations were investigated by means of questionnaires. Answers were received from 229 radiation handling works, involving 1, 742 workers. Number of sources were 824, among which x-ray equipments for nondestructive inspection was ranking at the top and radioactive substances, industrial gamma ray apparata, x-ray diffraction apparata, accelerators, nuclear reactors were following in the given order. According to industrial classification, the order was transportation machine makers (mainly shipbuilding), electric equipment makers, chemical industry, steel and nonsteel metal industry. Characterisitics could be admitted to their radiation sources by the sorts of enterprises. Exposure doses were investigated in those participating in one kind of radiation sources. Calculating for a year, the doses were:below (and including) 10 mrem 53.5%, under 500 mrem 33.9%, under 1000 mrem 8.3%, under 5000 mrem 3.9% and above 5000 mrem 0.4%. The measurement was taken by way of film badge method. It seldom exceeded the exposure doses given by the recommendation of ICRP. Pocket dosimeter showed almost the same, only having a tendency to show a slightly higher amount of dose compared with film badge method. Exposure dose took the order of industrial x-ray, industrial gamma ray, medical x-ray and medical gamma ray. In the scale of enterprises, there was a tendency that the exposure dose was larger in small industries.
doi_str_mv 10.1539/joh1959.6.754
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1539_joh1959_6_754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>article_joh1959_6_1_6_1_754_article_char_en</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c153n-afa2bdb88adc0e96f1a3f2257d08cd3396a215eedf7597b6c613e2857c192c243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1qwkAUhYfSQsW67H6W7SJ2fkwyWU5jNEODkcmEQjdhnEyqYrUkbvoAfe9OVKSLy4Fzv3vgHgAeMRpjn0Yv28MaR340DsahP7kBA8wY9jBF5BYMEJqEHmZhdA9GXbdZIUQIoWzCBuB3KZMiWShYKK7KAuYzqNIETkWhpHgtlcgXvedEfIjFHEo-Fbx3C8gX0xObJjxTaU8tuVQiFksHOPQ9l2-JLKBwCaV0Mi37UJ7BWMg4S-CTTJa5VBA_P4C7Ru86O7roEJSzRMWpl-VzEfPMM-7HvacbTVb1ijFdG2SjoMGaNoT4YY2YqSmNAk2wb23dhH4UrgITYGoJ80ODI2LIhA6Bd8417aHrWttU3-3mS7c_FUZVX2N1qbEKKlej4_mZ33ZH_WmvtG6PG7Oz_2h8Gndz3Zm1biu7p3-SW3L8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>PRESENT STATUS OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF IONIZING RADIATIONS AND THE HEALTH OF PARTICIPATING WORKERS IN OUR INDUSTRIAL CIRCLE (REPORT 1)</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>OHIRA, Masahiko ; MOCHIZUKI, Yoshio ; KURODA, Takeshi ; NAKATANI, Tohru ; KISHI, Yoko ; AOYAMA, Hideyasu ; ANDO, Norio ; KO, Itsuo ; FUJII, Yoshio ; YOSHIOKA, Shinichi ; FURUICHI, Keiji ; MURAKAMI, Isao ; TAMAKI, Takeshi ; ASANO, Nobuhiro ; OKAMOTO, Toshio ; KAWAHARA, Hiroshi ; ITANO, Taketora ; AOYAMA, Yoshitaka ; MIZUTA, Masaomi ; MARUYA, Hiroshi ; NAKAMURA, Fumio</creator><creatorcontrib>OHIRA, Masahiko ; MOCHIZUKI, Yoshio ; KURODA, Takeshi ; NAKATANI, Tohru ; KISHI, Yoko ; AOYAMA, Hideyasu ; ANDO, Norio ; KO, Itsuo ; FUJII, Yoshio ; YOSHIOKA, Shinichi ; FURUICHI, Keiji ; MURAKAMI, Isao ; TAMAKI, Takeshi ; ASANO, Nobuhiro ; OKAMOTO, Toshio ; KAWAHARA, Hiroshi ; ITANO, Taketora ; AOYAMA, Yoshitaka ; MIZUTA, Masaomi ; MARUYA, Hiroshi ; NAKAMURA, Fumio</creatorcontrib><description>Three hundred and seventy four industrial enterprises listed in the Department of Labor as handling ionizing radiations were investigated by means of questionnaires. Answers were received from 229 radiation handling works, involving 1, 742 workers. Number of sources were 824, among which x-ray equipments for nondestructive inspection was ranking at the top and radioactive substances, industrial gamma ray apparata, x-ray diffraction apparata, accelerators, nuclear reactors were following in the given order. According to industrial classification, the order was transportation machine makers (mainly shipbuilding), electric equipment makers, chemical industry, steel and nonsteel metal industry. Characterisitics could be admitted to their radiation sources by the sorts of enterprises. Exposure doses were investigated in those participating in one kind of radiation sources. Calculating for a year, the doses were:below (and including) 10 mrem 53.5%, under 500 mrem 33.9%, under 1000 mrem 8.3%, under 5000 mrem 3.9% and above 5000 mrem 0.4%. The measurement was taken by way of film badge method. It seldom exceeded the exposure doses given by the recommendation of ICRP. Pocket dosimeter showed almost the same, only having a tendency to show a slightly higher amount of dose compared with film badge method. Exposure dose took the order of industrial x-ray, industrial gamma ray, medical x-ray and medical gamma ray. In the scale of enterprises, there was a tendency that the exposure dose was larger in small industries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-1879</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1881-1302</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1539/joh1959.6.754</identifier><language>jpn</language><publisher>Japan Society for Occupational Health</publisher><ispartof>Sangyo Igaku, 1964/01/20, Vol.6(1), pp.754-765</ispartof><rights>Japan Society for Occupational Health</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1883,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>OHIRA, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOCHIZUKI, Yoshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KURODA, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAKATANI, Tohru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KISHI, Yoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AOYAMA, Hideyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANDO, Norio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KO, Itsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUJII, Yoshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOSHIOKA, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FURUICHI, Keiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURAKAMI, Isao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAMAKI, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ASANO, Nobuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OKAMOTO, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAWAHARA, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ITANO, Taketora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AOYAMA, Yoshitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIZUTA, Masaomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARUYA, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAKAMURA, Fumio</creatorcontrib><title>PRESENT STATUS OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF IONIZING RADIATIONS AND THE HEALTH OF PARTICIPATING WORKERS IN OUR INDUSTRIAL CIRCLE (REPORT 1)</title><title>Sangyo Igaku</title><addtitle>Sangyo Igaku</addtitle><description>Three hundred and seventy four industrial enterprises listed in the Department of Labor as handling ionizing radiations were investigated by means of questionnaires. Answers were received from 229 radiation handling works, involving 1, 742 workers. Number of sources were 824, among which x-ray equipments for nondestructive inspection was ranking at the top and radioactive substances, industrial gamma ray apparata, x-ray diffraction apparata, accelerators, nuclear reactors were following in the given order. According to industrial classification, the order was transportation machine makers (mainly shipbuilding), electric equipment makers, chemical industry, steel and nonsteel metal industry. Characterisitics could be admitted to their radiation sources by the sorts of enterprises. Exposure doses were investigated in those participating in one kind of radiation sources. Calculating for a year, the doses were:below (and including) 10 mrem 53.5%, under 500 mrem 33.9%, under 1000 mrem 8.3%, under 5000 mrem 3.9% and above 5000 mrem 0.4%. The measurement was taken by way of film badge method. It seldom exceeded the exposure doses given by the recommendation of ICRP. Pocket dosimeter showed almost the same, only having a tendency to show a slightly higher amount of dose compared with film badge method. Exposure dose took the order of industrial x-ray, industrial gamma ray, medical x-ray and medical gamma ray. In the scale of enterprises, there was a tendency that the exposure dose was larger in small industries.</description><issn>0047-1879</issn><issn>1881-1302</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1964</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkM1qwkAUhYfSQsW67H6W7SJ2fkwyWU5jNEODkcmEQjdhnEyqYrUkbvoAfe9OVKSLy4Fzv3vgHgAeMRpjn0Yv28MaR340DsahP7kBA8wY9jBF5BYMEJqEHmZhdA9GXbdZIUQIoWzCBuB3KZMiWShYKK7KAuYzqNIETkWhpHgtlcgXvedEfIjFHEo-Fbx3C8gX0xObJjxTaU8tuVQiFksHOPQ9l2-JLKBwCaV0Mi37UJ7BWMg4S-CTTJa5VBA_P4C7Ru86O7roEJSzRMWpl-VzEfPMM-7HvacbTVb1ijFdG2SjoMGaNoT4YY2YqSmNAk2wb23dhH4UrgITYGoJ80ODI2LIhA6Bd8417aHrWttU3-3mS7c_FUZVX2N1qbEKKlej4_mZ33ZH_WmvtG6PG7Oz_2h8Gndz3Zm1biu7p3-SW3L8</recordid><startdate>1964</startdate><enddate>1964</enddate><creator>OHIRA, Masahiko</creator><creator>MOCHIZUKI, Yoshio</creator><creator>KURODA, Takeshi</creator><creator>NAKATANI, Tohru</creator><creator>KISHI, Yoko</creator><creator>AOYAMA, Hideyasu</creator><creator>ANDO, Norio</creator><creator>KO, Itsuo</creator><creator>FUJII, Yoshio</creator><creator>YOSHIOKA, Shinichi</creator><creator>FURUICHI, Keiji</creator><creator>MURAKAMI, Isao</creator><creator>TAMAKI, Takeshi</creator><creator>ASANO, Nobuhiro</creator><creator>OKAMOTO, Toshio</creator><creator>KAWAHARA, Hiroshi</creator><creator>ITANO, Taketora</creator><creator>AOYAMA, Yoshitaka</creator><creator>MIZUTA, Masaomi</creator><creator>MARUYA, Hiroshi</creator><creator>NAKAMURA, Fumio</creator><general>Japan Society for Occupational Health</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1964</creationdate><title>PRESENT STATUS OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF IONIZING RADIATIONS AND THE HEALTH OF PARTICIPATING WORKERS IN OUR INDUSTRIAL CIRCLE (REPORT 1)</title><author>OHIRA, Masahiko ; MOCHIZUKI, Yoshio ; KURODA, Takeshi ; NAKATANI, Tohru ; KISHI, Yoko ; AOYAMA, Hideyasu ; ANDO, Norio ; KO, Itsuo ; FUJII, Yoshio ; YOSHIOKA, Shinichi ; FURUICHI, Keiji ; MURAKAMI, Isao ; TAMAKI, Takeshi ; ASANO, Nobuhiro ; OKAMOTO, Toshio ; KAWAHARA, Hiroshi ; ITANO, Taketora ; AOYAMA, Yoshitaka ; MIZUTA, Masaomi ; MARUYA, Hiroshi ; NAKAMURA, Fumio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c153n-afa2bdb88adc0e96f1a3f2257d08cd3396a215eedf7597b6c613e2857c192c243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>jpn</language><creationdate>1964</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>OHIRA, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOCHIZUKI, Yoshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KURODA, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAKATANI, Tohru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KISHI, Yoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AOYAMA, Hideyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANDO, Norio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KO, Itsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUJII, Yoshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOSHIOKA, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FURUICHI, Keiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURAKAMI, Isao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAMAKI, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ASANO, Nobuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OKAMOTO, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAWAHARA, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ITANO, Taketora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AOYAMA, Yoshitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIZUTA, Masaomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARUYA, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAKAMURA, Fumio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Sangyo Igaku</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>OHIRA, Masahiko</au><au>MOCHIZUKI, Yoshio</au><au>KURODA, Takeshi</au><au>NAKATANI, Tohru</au><au>KISHI, Yoko</au><au>AOYAMA, Hideyasu</au><au>ANDO, Norio</au><au>KO, Itsuo</au><au>FUJII, Yoshio</au><au>YOSHIOKA, Shinichi</au><au>FURUICHI, Keiji</au><au>MURAKAMI, Isao</au><au>TAMAKI, Takeshi</au><au>ASANO, Nobuhiro</au><au>OKAMOTO, Toshio</au><au>KAWAHARA, Hiroshi</au><au>ITANO, Taketora</au><au>AOYAMA, Yoshitaka</au><au>MIZUTA, Masaomi</au><au>MARUYA, Hiroshi</au><au>NAKAMURA, Fumio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PRESENT STATUS OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF IONIZING RADIATIONS AND THE HEALTH OF PARTICIPATING WORKERS IN OUR INDUSTRIAL CIRCLE (REPORT 1)</atitle><jtitle>Sangyo Igaku</jtitle><addtitle>Sangyo Igaku</addtitle><date>1964</date><risdate>1964</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>754</spage><epage>765</epage><pages>754-765</pages><issn>0047-1879</issn><eissn>1881-1302</eissn><abstract>Three hundred and seventy four industrial enterprises listed in the Department of Labor as handling ionizing radiations were investigated by means of questionnaires. Answers were received from 229 radiation handling works, involving 1, 742 workers. Number of sources were 824, among which x-ray equipments for nondestructive inspection was ranking at the top and radioactive substances, industrial gamma ray apparata, x-ray diffraction apparata, accelerators, nuclear reactors were following in the given order. According to industrial classification, the order was transportation machine makers (mainly shipbuilding), electric equipment makers, chemical industry, steel and nonsteel metal industry. Characterisitics could be admitted to their radiation sources by the sorts of enterprises. Exposure doses were investigated in those participating in one kind of radiation sources. Calculating for a year, the doses were:below (and including) 10 mrem 53.5%, under 500 mrem 33.9%, under 1000 mrem 8.3%, under 5000 mrem 3.9% and above 5000 mrem 0.4%. The measurement was taken by way of film badge method. It seldom exceeded the exposure doses given by the recommendation of ICRP. Pocket dosimeter showed almost the same, only having a tendency to show a slightly higher amount of dose compared with film badge method. Exposure dose took the order of industrial x-ray, industrial gamma ray, medical x-ray and medical gamma ray. In the scale of enterprises, there was a tendency that the exposure dose was larger in small industries.</abstract><pub>Japan Society for Occupational Health</pub><doi>10.1539/joh1959.6.754</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-1879
ispartof Sangyo Igaku, 1964/01/20, Vol.6(1), pp.754-765
issn 0047-1879
1881-1302
language jpn
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1539_joh1959_6_754
source J-STAGE Free; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title PRESENT STATUS OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF IONIZING RADIATIONS AND THE HEALTH OF PARTICIPATING WORKERS IN OUR INDUSTRIAL CIRCLE (REPORT 1)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T11%3A30%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PRESENT%20STATUS%20OF%20THE%20DISTRIBUTION%20OF%20IONIZING%20RADIATIONS%20AND%20THE%20HEALTH%20OF%20PARTICIPATING%20WORKERS%20IN%20OUR%20INDUSTRIAL%20CIRCLE%20(REPORT%201)&rft.jtitle=Sangyo%20Igaku&rft.au=OHIRA,%20Masahiko&rft.date=1964&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=754&rft.epage=765&rft.pages=754-765&rft.issn=0047-1879&rft.eissn=1881-1302&rft_id=info:doi/10.1539/joh1959.6.754&rft_dat=%3Cjstage_cross%3Earticle_joh1959_6_1_6_1_754_article_char_en%3C/jstage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true