Angiographic Patterns of Restenosis With 2nd Generation Drug-Eluting Stent: Comparative Analysis from a 10-Year Single-Center Experience
The angiographic features of restenosis contain prognostic information. However, restenosis patterns of the new generation drug-eluting stents (DES), everolimus-(EES) and resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) have not been described. A total of 210 consecutive patients with DES restenosis were en...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International Heart Journal 2015, Vol.56(1), pp.6-12 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 12 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 6 |
container_title | International Heart Journal |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Lee, Sahmin Yoon, Chang-Hwan Oh, Il-Young Suh, Jung-Won Cho, Young-Seok Cho, Goo-Yeong Chae, In-Ho Choi, Dong-Ju Youn, Tae-Jin |
description | The angiographic features of restenosis contain prognostic information. However, restenosis patterns of the new generation drug-eluting stents (DES), everolimus-(EES) and resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) have not been described. A total of 210 consecutive patients with DES restenosis were enrolled from 2003 to 2012. We analyzed 217 restenotic lesions after DES implantation, and compared the morphologic characteristics of the 2nd generation DES restenosis to those of restenosis with 2 first generation DES, sirolimus-(SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the different stent groups. The incidence of focal restenosis was significantly lower for PES than the other stents (49.5% versus 87.0%, 76.2%, and 82.1% for PES versus SES, EES, and ZES, respectively, P < 0.001). When considering the pattern of restenosis solely within the stent margins, a further clear distinction between PES and other stents was observed (40.0% versus 92.9%, 88.9%, and 81.2% in PES versus SES, EES, and ZES, respectively, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in restenosis patterns among SES, EES, and ZES. In multivariate analysis, PES implantation, hypertension, and age were associated with non-focal type of restenosis after DES implantation. After the introduction of EES and ZES into routine clinical practice in 2008, focal restenosis significantly increased from 63.9% to 76.7% and diffuse restenosis significantly decreased from 26.4% to 11.0% (P = 0.045). Focal restenosis was the most common pattern of restenosis in the new generation DES and the incidence of diffuse restenosis significantly decreased with the introduction of the 2nd generation DES. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1536/ihj.14-072 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1536_ihj_14_072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>25503656</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-ad082c1b2feb3e4924fcab293477f25da6f7a8de7f0d33b01364961efc06e3813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1PAjEQhhujEUQv_gDTs8liv7bL3iSIqCHR-BGPTbc7XUqgS9py8N-7AnKZmbzz5D08CF1TMqQ5l3dusRxSkZGCnaA-5aLMOCvL08PNuMx76CLGJSGC5qQ4Rz2W56SLZR-9jH3j2ibozcIZ_KZTguAjbi1-h5jAt9FF_O3SAjNf4xl4CDq51uOHsG2y6WqbnG_wR0emS3Rm9SrC1WEP0Nfj9HPylM1fZ8-T8TwzjPOU6ZqMmKEVs1BxECUT1uiKlVwUhWV5raUt9KiGwpKa84pQLkUpKVhDJPAR5QN0u-81oY0xgFWb4NY6_ChK1J8Q1QlRVKhOSAff7OHNtlpDfUT_DXTA_R5YxqQbOAI6JGdWsOvKpaK7ses8vsxCBwWe_wIdZXMv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Angiographic Patterns of Restenosis With 2nd Generation Drug-Eluting Stent: Comparative Analysis from a 10-Year Single-Center Experience</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Lee, Sahmin ; Yoon, Chang-Hwan ; Oh, Il-Young ; Suh, Jung-Won ; Cho, Young-Seok ; Cho, Goo-Yeong ; Chae, In-Ho ; Choi, Dong-Ju ; Youn, Tae-Jin</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sahmin ; Yoon, Chang-Hwan ; Oh, Il-Young ; Suh, Jung-Won ; Cho, Young-Seok ; Cho, Goo-Yeong ; Chae, In-Ho ; Choi, Dong-Ju ; Youn, Tae-Jin</creatorcontrib><description>The angiographic features of restenosis contain prognostic information. However, restenosis patterns of the new generation drug-eluting stents (DES), everolimus-(EES) and resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) have not been described. A total of 210 consecutive patients with DES restenosis were enrolled from 2003 to 2012. We analyzed 217 restenotic lesions after DES implantation, and compared the morphologic characteristics of the 2nd generation DES restenosis to those of restenosis with 2 first generation DES, sirolimus-(SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the different stent groups. The incidence of focal restenosis was significantly lower for PES than the other stents (49.5% versus 87.0%, 76.2%, and 82.1% for PES versus SES, EES, and ZES, respectively, P < 0.001). When considering the pattern of restenosis solely within the stent margins, a further clear distinction between PES and other stents was observed (40.0% versus 92.9%, 88.9%, and 81.2% in PES versus SES, EES, and ZES, respectively, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in restenosis patterns among SES, EES, and ZES. In multivariate analysis, PES implantation, hypertension, and age were associated with non-focal type of restenosis after DES implantation. After the introduction of EES and ZES into routine clinical practice in 2008, focal restenosis significantly increased from 63.9% to 76.7% and diffuse restenosis significantly decreased from 26.4% to 11.0% (P = 0.045). Focal restenosis was the most common pattern of restenosis in the new generation DES and the incidence of diffuse restenosis significantly decreased with the introduction of the 2nd generation DES.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1349-2365</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1349-3299</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1536/ihj.14-072</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25503656</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: International Heart Journal Association</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angiography ; Angioplasty ; Coronary ; Coronary Angiography - methods ; Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology ; Coronary Artery Disease - surgery ; Coronary Restenosis - diagnosis ; Coronary Restenosis - epidemiology ; Coronary Restenosis - etiology ; Coronary Vessels - pathology ; Coronary Vessels - physiopathology ; Drug-Eluting Stents - adverse effects ; Everolimus ; Female ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Incidence ; Intervention ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Paclitaxel - therapeutic use ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - instrumentation ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods ; Postoperative Complications - diagnosis ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Registries ; Republic of Korea ; Sirolimus - analogs & derivatives ; Sirolimus - therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Patency</subject><ispartof>International Heart Journal, 2015, Vol.56(1), pp.6-12</ispartof><rights>2015 by the International Heart Journal Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-ad082c1b2feb3e4924fcab293477f25da6f7a8de7f0d33b01364961efc06e3813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1877,4010,27904,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25503656$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sahmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Chang-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Il-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suh, Jung-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Young-Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Goo-Yeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chae, In-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Dong-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youn, Tae-Jin</creatorcontrib><title>Angiographic Patterns of Restenosis With 2nd Generation Drug-Eluting Stent: Comparative Analysis from a 10-Year Single-Center Experience</title><title>International Heart Journal</title><addtitle>Int. Heart J.</addtitle><description>The angiographic features of restenosis contain prognostic information. However, restenosis patterns of the new generation drug-eluting stents (DES), everolimus-(EES) and resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) have not been described. A total of 210 consecutive patients with DES restenosis were enrolled from 2003 to 2012. We analyzed 217 restenotic lesions after DES implantation, and compared the morphologic characteristics of the 2nd generation DES restenosis to those of restenosis with 2 first generation DES, sirolimus-(SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the different stent groups. The incidence of focal restenosis was significantly lower for PES than the other stents (49.5% versus 87.0%, 76.2%, and 82.1% for PES versus SES, EES, and ZES, respectively, P < 0.001). When considering the pattern of restenosis solely within the stent margins, a further clear distinction between PES and other stents was observed (40.0% versus 92.9%, 88.9%, and 81.2% in PES versus SES, EES, and ZES, respectively, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in restenosis patterns among SES, EES, and ZES. In multivariate analysis, PES implantation, hypertension, and age were associated with non-focal type of restenosis after DES implantation. After the introduction of EES and ZES into routine clinical practice in 2008, focal restenosis significantly increased from 63.9% to 76.7% and diffuse restenosis significantly decreased from 26.4% to 11.0% (P = 0.045). Focal restenosis was the most common pattern of restenosis in the new generation DES and the incidence of diffuse restenosis significantly decreased with the introduction of the 2nd generation DES.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angiography</subject><subject>Angioplasty</subject><subject>Coronary</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - surgery</subject><subject>Coronary Restenosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronary Restenosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Coronary Restenosis - etiology</subject><subject>Coronary Vessels - pathology</subject><subject>Coronary Vessels - physiopathology</subject><subject>Drug-Eluting Stents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Everolimus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Paclitaxel - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - instrumentation</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Republic of Korea</subject><subject>Sirolimus - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Sirolimus - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular Patency</subject><issn>1349-2365</issn><issn>1349-3299</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1PAjEQhhujEUQv_gDTs8liv7bL3iSIqCHR-BGPTbc7XUqgS9py8N-7AnKZmbzz5D08CF1TMqQ5l3dusRxSkZGCnaA-5aLMOCvL08PNuMx76CLGJSGC5qQ4Rz2W56SLZR-9jH3j2ibozcIZ_KZTguAjbi1-h5jAt9FF_O3SAjNf4xl4CDq51uOHsG2y6WqbnG_wR0emS3Rm9SrC1WEP0Nfj9HPylM1fZ8-T8TwzjPOU6ZqMmKEVs1BxECUT1uiKlVwUhWV5raUt9KiGwpKa84pQLkUpKVhDJPAR5QN0u-81oY0xgFWb4NY6_ChK1J8Q1QlRVKhOSAff7OHNtlpDfUT_DXTA_R5YxqQbOAI6JGdWsOvKpaK7ses8vsxCBwWe_wIdZXMv</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Lee, Sahmin</creator><creator>Yoon, Chang-Hwan</creator><creator>Oh, Il-Young</creator><creator>Suh, Jung-Won</creator><creator>Cho, Young-Seok</creator><creator>Cho, Goo-Yeong</creator><creator>Chae, In-Ho</creator><creator>Choi, Dong-Ju</creator><creator>Youn, Tae-Jin</creator><general>International Heart Journal Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>Angiographic Patterns of Restenosis With 2nd Generation Drug-Eluting Stent</title><author>Lee, Sahmin ; Yoon, Chang-Hwan ; Oh, Il-Young ; Suh, Jung-Won ; Cho, Young-Seok ; Cho, Goo-Yeong ; Chae, In-Ho ; Choi, Dong-Ju ; Youn, Tae-Jin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-ad082c1b2feb3e4924fcab293477f25da6f7a8de7f0d33b01364961efc06e3813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angiography</topic><topic>Angioplasty</topic><topic>Coronary</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - surgery</topic><topic>Coronary Restenosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronary Restenosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Coronary Restenosis - etiology</topic><topic>Coronary Vessels - pathology</topic><topic>Coronary Vessels - physiopathology</topic><topic>Drug-Eluting Stents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Everolimus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Paclitaxel - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - instrumentation</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Republic of Korea</topic><topic>Sirolimus - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Sirolimus - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular Patency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sahmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Chang-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Il-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suh, Jung-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Young-Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Goo-Yeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chae, In-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Dong-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youn, Tae-Jin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International Heart Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Sahmin</au><au>Yoon, Chang-Hwan</au><au>Oh, Il-Young</au><au>Suh, Jung-Won</au><au>Cho, Young-Seok</au><au>Cho, Goo-Yeong</au><au>Chae, In-Ho</au><au>Choi, Dong-Ju</au><au>Youn, Tae-Jin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Angiographic Patterns of Restenosis With 2nd Generation Drug-Eluting Stent: Comparative Analysis from a 10-Year Single-Center Experience</atitle><jtitle>International Heart Journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int. Heart J.</addtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>6</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>6-12</pages><issn>1349-2365</issn><eissn>1349-3299</eissn><abstract>The angiographic features of restenosis contain prognostic information. However, restenosis patterns of the new generation drug-eluting stents (DES), everolimus-(EES) and resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) have not been described. A total of 210 consecutive patients with DES restenosis were enrolled from 2003 to 2012. We analyzed 217 restenotic lesions after DES implantation, and compared the morphologic characteristics of the 2nd generation DES restenosis to those of restenosis with 2 first generation DES, sirolimus-(SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the different stent groups. The incidence of focal restenosis was significantly lower for PES than the other stents (49.5% versus 87.0%, 76.2%, and 82.1% for PES versus SES, EES, and ZES, respectively, P < 0.001). When considering the pattern of restenosis solely within the stent margins, a further clear distinction between PES and other stents was observed (40.0% versus 92.9%, 88.9%, and 81.2% in PES versus SES, EES, and ZES, respectively, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in restenosis patterns among SES, EES, and ZES. In multivariate analysis, PES implantation, hypertension, and age were associated with non-focal type of restenosis after DES implantation. After the introduction of EES and ZES into routine clinical practice in 2008, focal restenosis significantly increased from 63.9% to 76.7% and diffuse restenosis significantly decreased from 26.4% to 11.0% (P = 0.045). Focal restenosis was the most common pattern of restenosis in the new generation DES and the incidence of diffuse restenosis significantly decreased with the introduction of the 2nd generation DES.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>International Heart Journal Association</pub><pmid>25503656</pmid><doi>10.1536/ihj.14-072</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1349-2365 |
ispartof | International Heart Journal, 2015, Vol.56(1), pp.6-12 |
issn | 1349-2365 1349-3299 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1536_ihj_14_072 |
source | J-STAGE Free; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Aged Angiography Angioplasty Coronary Coronary Angiography - methods Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology Coronary Artery Disease - surgery Coronary Restenosis - diagnosis Coronary Restenosis - epidemiology Coronary Restenosis - etiology Coronary Vessels - pathology Coronary Vessels - physiopathology Drug-Eluting Stents - adverse effects Everolimus Female Humans Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use Incidence Intervention Male Middle Aged Paclitaxel - therapeutic use Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - instrumentation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods Postoperative Complications - diagnosis Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Registries Republic of Korea Sirolimus - analogs & derivatives Sirolimus - therapeutic use Treatment Outcome Vascular Patency |
title | Angiographic Patterns of Restenosis With 2nd Generation Drug-Eluting Stent: Comparative Analysis from a 10-Year Single-Center Experience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A16%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Angiographic%20Patterns%20of%20Restenosis%20With%202nd%20Generation%20Drug-Eluting%20Stent:%20Comparative%20Analysis%20from%20a%2010-Year%20Single-Center%20Experience&rft.jtitle=International%20Heart%20Journal&rft.au=Lee,%20Sahmin&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=6&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=6-12&rft.issn=1349-2365&rft.eissn=1349-3299&rft_id=info:doi/10.1536/ihj.14-072&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E25503656%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/25503656&rfr_iscdi=true |