The Effect of a Blue Light Filtering Intraocular Lens on Macular Edema

This study sought to compare the effects of either a blue light-filtering intraocular lens (blue-filtering IOL) or an ultraviolet light-filtering intraocular lens (UV-filtering IOL) on the incidence of angiographic macular edema (ME) 3 and 12 months after implantation. A prospective randomized paral...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Showa University Journal of Medical Sciences 2011, Vol.23(2), pp.101-108
Hauptverfasser: UEDA, Toshihiko, TAGUCHI, Yoko, NAKANISHI-UEDA, Takako, TSUKAHARA, Masahiko, MOTOMIYA, Yukiko, KOIDE, Ryohei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 108
container_issue 2
container_start_page 101
container_title The Showa University Journal of Medical Sciences
container_volume 23
creator UEDA, Toshihiko
TAGUCHI, Yoko
NAKANISHI-UEDA, Takako
TSUKAHARA, Masahiko
MOTOMIYA, Yukiko
KOIDE, Ryohei
description This study sought to compare the effects of either a blue light-filtering intraocular lens (blue-filtering IOL) or an ultraviolet light-filtering intraocular lens (UV-filtering IOL) on the incidence of angiographic macular edema (ME) 3 and 12 months after implantation. A prospective randomized parallel clinical study was performed at Showa University Hospital. Forty-five cataract patients randomly received either a blue-filtering IOL (n = 21) or a UV-filtering IOL (n = 24), and macular leakage was evaluated by fluorescence angiography. At 3 months, ME was 24% in the blue- and 25% in the UV-filtering IOL group. At 12 months, ME was 5% in the blue- and 21% in the UV-filtering IOL group. The recovery rate in the blue-filtering IOL group was higher than in the UV-filtering IOL group at 12 months after surgery (P = 0.0457). These results suggested that an implanted blue-filtering IOL is more effective for recovery of ME than a UV-filtering IOL.
doi_str_mv 10.15369/sujms.23.101
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_15369_sujms_23_101</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>article_sujms_23_2_23_2_101_article_char_en</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3701-4e23e004f550243217730397e579f028f131c065f8fb923ae4b6229e2ab2fe623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMFOwzAMhiMEEtPYkXteoCN2mjY5jmmDSUVcxrlKg9N16lqUdAfenmpFmw-2bH-_Lf2MPYNYgpKZeYnn4ykuUS5BwB2bIWiVCJPpezYTBlSSSS0e2SLGoxgjNZBqPWPb_YH4xntyA-89t_y1PRMvmvow8G3TDhSarua7bgi2d-fWBl5QF3nf8Q879ZtvOtkn9uBtG2nxX-fsa7vZr9-T4vNtt14ViZO5gCQllDQ-90oJTCVCnkshTU4qN16g9iDBiUx57SuD0lJaZYiG0FboKUM5Z8l014U-xkC-_AnNyYbfEkR58aG8-FCiHCcw8quJP8bB1nSlbRga19INximNmuvOHWwoqZN_qelm3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of a Blue Light Filtering Intraocular Lens on Macular Edema</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><creator>UEDA, Toshihiko ; TAGUCHI, Yoko ; NAKANISHI-UEDA, Takako ; TSUKAHARA, Masahiko ; MOTOMIYA, Yukiko ; KOIDE, Ryohei</creator><creatorcontrib>UEDA, Toshihiko ; TAGUCHI, Yoko ; NAKANISHI-UEDA, Takako ; TSUKAHARA, Masahiko ; MOTOMIYA, Yukiko ; KOIDE, Ryohei</creatorcontrib><description>This study sought to compare the effects of either a blue light-filtering intraocular lens (blue-filtering IOL) or an ultraviolet light-filtering intraocular lens (UV-filtering IOL) on the incidence of angiographic macular edema (ME) 3 and 12 months after implantation. A prospective randomized parallel clinical study was performed at Showa University Hospital. Forty-five cataract patients randomly received either a blue-filtering IOL (n = 21) or a UV-filtering IOL (n = 24), and macular leakage was evaluated by fluorescence angiography. At 3 months, ME was 24% in the blue- and 25% in the UV-filtering IOL group. At 12 months, ME was 5% in the blue- and 21% in the UV-filtering IOL group. The recovery rate in the blue-filtering IOL group was higher than in the UV-filtering IOL group at 12 months after surgery (P = 0.0457). These results suggested that an implanted blue-filtering IOL is more effective for recovery of ME than a UV-filtering IOL.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0915-6380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2185-0968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15369/sujms.23.101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Showa University Society</publisher><subject>blue light ; cataract ; intraocular lens (IOL) ; macular edema ; ultraviolet</subject><ispartof>The Showa University Journal of Medical Sciences, 2011, Vol.23(2), pp.101-108</ispartof><rights>2011 The Showa University Society</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1877,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>UEDA, Toshihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAGUCHI, Yoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAKANISHI-UEDA, Takako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TSUKAHARA, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOTOMIYA, Yukiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOIDE, Ryohei</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of a Blue Light Filtering Intraocular Lens on Macular Edema</title><title>The Showa University Journal of Medical Sciences</title><addtitle>Showa Univ J Med Sci</addtitle><description>This study sought to compare the effects of either a blue light-filtering intraocular lens (blue-filtering IOL) or an ultraviolet light-filtering intraocular lens (UV-filtering IOL) on the incidence of angiographic macular edema (ME) 3 and 12 months after implantation. A prospective randomized parallel clinical study was performed at Showa University Hospital. Forty-five cataract patients randomly received either a blue-filtering IOL (n = 21) or a UV-filtering IOL (n = 24), and macular leakage was evaluated by fluorescence angiography. At 3 months, ME was 24% in the blue- and 25% in the UV-filtering IOL group. At 12 months, ME was 5% in the blue- and 21% in the UV-filtering IOL group. The recovery rate in the blue-filtering IOL group was higher than in the UV-filtering IOL group at 12 months after surgery (P = 0.0457). These results suggested that an implanted blue-filtering IOL is more effective for recovery of ME than a UV-filtering IOL.</description><subject>blue light</subject><subject>cataract</subject><subject>intraocular lens (IOL)</subject><subject>macular edema</subject><subject>ultraviolet</subject><issn>0915-6380</issn><issn>2185-0968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkMFOwzAMhiMEEtPYkXteoCN2mjY5jmmDSUVcxrlKg9N16lqUdAfenmpFmw-2bH-_Lf2MPYNYgpKZeYnn4ykuUS5BwB2bIWiVCJPpezYTBlSSSS0e2SLGoxgjNZBqPWPb_YH4xntyA-89t_y1PRMvmvow8G3TDhSarua7bgi2d-fWBl5QF3nf8Q879ZtvOtkn9uBtG2nxX-fsa7vZr9-T4vNtt14ViZO5gCQllDQ-90oJTCVCnkshTU4qN16g9iDBiUx57SuD0lJaZYiG0FboKUM5Z8l014U-xkC-_AnNyYbfEkR58aG8-FCiHCcw8quJP8bB1nSlbRga19INximNmuvOHWwoqZN_qelm3w</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>UEDA, Toshihiko</creator><creator>TAGUCHI, Yoko</creator><creator>NAKANISHI-UEDA, Takako</creator><creator>TSUKAHARA, Masahiko</creator><creator>MOTOMIYA, Yukiko</creator><creator>KOIDE, Ryohei</creator><general>The Showa University Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>The Effect of a Blue Light Filtering Intraocular Lens on Macular Edema</title><author>UEDA, Toshihiko ; TAGUCHI, Yoko ; NAKANISHI-UEDA, Takako ; TSUKAHARA, Masahiko ; MOTOMIYA, Yukiko ; KOIDE, Ryohei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3701-4e23e004f550243217730397e579f028f131c065f8fb923ae4b6229e2ab2fe623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>blue light</topic><topic>cataract</topic><topic>intraocular lens (IOL)</topic><topic>macular edema</topic><topic>ultraviolet</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>UEDA, Toshihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAGUCHI, Yoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAKANISHI-UEDA, Takako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TSUKAHARA, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOTOMIYA, Yukiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOIDE, Ryohei</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Showa University Journal of Medical Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>UEDA, Toshihiko</au><au>TAGUCHI, Yoko</au><au>NAKANISHI-UEDA, Takako</au><au>TSUKAHARA, Masahiko</au><au>MOTOMIYA, Yukiko</au><au>KOIDE, Ryohei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of a Blue Light Filtering Intraocular Lens on Macular Edema</atitle><jtitle>The Showa University Journal of Medical Sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Showa Univ J Med Sci</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>108</epage><pages>101-108</pages><issn>0915-6380</issn><eissn>2185-0968</eissn><abstract>This study sought to compare the effects of either a blue light-filtering intraocular lens (blue-filtering IOL) or an ultraviolet light-filtering intraocular lens (UV-filtering IOL) on the incidence of angiographic macular edema (ME) 3 and 12 months after implantation. A prospective randomized parallel clinical study was performed at Showa University Hospital. Forty-five cataract patients randomly received either a blue-filtering IOL (n = 21) or a UV-filtering IOL (n = 24), and macular leakage was evaluated by fluorescence angiography. At 3 months, ME was 24% in the blue- and 25% in the UV-filtering IOL group. At 12 months, ME was 5% in the blue- and 21% in the UV-filtering IOL group. The recovery rate in the blue-filtering IOL group was higher than in the UV-filtering IOL group at 12 months after surgery (P = 0.0457). These results suggested that an implanted blue-filtering IOL is more effective for recovery of ME than a UV-filtering IOL.</abstract><pub>The Showa University Society</pub><doi>10.15369/sujms.23.101</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0915-6380
ispartof The Showa University Journal of Medical Sciences, 2011, Vol.23(2), pp.101-108
issn 0915-6380
2185-0968
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_15369_sujms_23_101
source J-STAGE Free
subjects blue light
cataract
intraocular lens (IOL)
macular edema
ultraviolet
title The Effect of a Blue Light Filtering Intraocular Lens on Macular Edema
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A13%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20a%20Blue%20Light%20Filtering%20Intraocular%20Lens%20on%20Macular%20Edema&rft.jtitle=The%20Showa%20University%20Journal%20of%20Medical%20Sciences&rft.au=UEDA,%20Toshihiko&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=108&rft.pages=101-108&rft.issn=0915-6380&rft.eissn=2185-0968&rft_id=info:doi/10.15369/sujms.23.101&rft_dat=%3Cjstage_cross%3Earticle_sujms_23_2_23_2_101_article_char_en%3C/jstage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true