Comparison of plasma methionine response to 3 rumen-protected methionine products in lactating Holstein dairy cows

The primary aim of this work was to compare the plasma Met response to supplementation with 3 rumen-protected Met products. Secondary aims were to evaluate how time of sampling affected results and how pooling of samples may have affected results. Ten multiparous Holstein cows (280 ± 73 DIM) were us...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied Animal Science 2022-04, Vol.38 (2), p.110-117
Hauptverfasser: Smith, M., Cronin, S., Mateos, J., Martinez del Olmo, D., Valdez, F., Gressley, T.F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 117
container_issue 2
container_start_page 110
container_title Applied Animal Science
container_volume 38
creator Smith, M.
Cronin, S.
Mateos, J.
Martinez del Olmo, D.
Valdez, F.
Gressley, T.F.
description The primary aim of this work was to compare the plasma Met response to supplementation with 3 rumen-protected Met products. Secondary aims were to evaluate how time of sampling affected results and how pooling of samples may have affected results. Ten multiparous Holstein cows (280 ± 73 DIM) were used in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design with 7-d experimental periods. Cows were fed every 8 h, and treatments consisted of supplementation of 12 g/d (4 g/feeding) of 1 of 3 rumen-protected Met (RPM) products. The products evaluated were the newly developed RPM-K and 2 existing products, RPM-S and RPM-M, with known differences in bioavailability. During d 5 to 7 of each period, blood samples were collected at 2, 4, 6, and 8 h after the morning feeding for plasma free AA analysis. Plasma Met data were analyzed using the full data set as well as mean values from individual cows for each day or each period. Plasma Met was not different between RPM-S and RPM-K (32.7 vs. 33.0 μM, respectively; P = 0.79), and both were greater than RPM-M (30.1 μM; P ≤ 0.001). Plasma Met was affected by time of sampling (P = 0.001), due to reduced plasma Met at 4 h (30.2 μM) than at 2, 6, and 8 h (31.9–33.0 μM). Using the daily and period mean values of plasma Met, differences observed in the full model were maintained when daily means were evaluated, but period means resulted in only a tendency for a treatment effect. Bioavailability of RPM-K was similar to RPM-S and greater than RPM-M. Pooling samples by day within cow would have likely yielded similar results.
doi_str_mv 10.15232/aas.2021-02226
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_15232_aas_2021_02226</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2590286522000155</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2590286522000155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-351a81fff694c3f2b6532a61ee99299f98f69b4b146a2a227828c566c69a7ad23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EElXpzOo_kNY-J248ogooUiUWmK2rY4NRYke2C-q_JxSGLkx3enfv9O4j5JazJW9AwAoxL4EBrxgAyAsyg0axClrZXJ7112SR8wdjDFpWt6BmJG3iMGLyOQYaHR17zAPSwZZ3H4MPliabxxiypSVSQdNhsKEaUyzWFNudL05idzAlUx9oj6Zg8eGNbmOfi52kDn06UhO_8g25cthnu_irc_L6cP-y2Va758enzd2uMkJAqUTDseXOOalqIxzsZSMAJbdWKVDKqXaa7Os9ryUCAqxbaE0jpZEK19iBmJPV712TYs7JOj0mP2A6as70iZqeqOkfavpEbXKoX4edYn16m3Q23gZjO5-mf3UX_b_eb5lydTM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of plasma methionine response to 3 rumen-protected methionine products in lactating Holstein dairy cows</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Smith, M. ; Cronin, S. ; Mateos, J. ; Martinez del Olmo, D. ; Valdez, F. ; Gressley, T.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, M. ; Cronin, S. ; Mateos, J. ; Martinez del Olmo, D. ; Valdez, F. ; Gressley, T.F.</creatorcontrib><description>The primary aim of this work was to compare the plasma Met response to supplementation with 3 rumen-protected Met products. Secondary aims were to evaluate how time of sampling affected results and how pooling of samples may have affected results. Ten multiparous Holstein cows (280 ± 73 DIM) were used in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design with 7-d experimental periods. Cows were fed every 8 h, and treatments consisted of supplementation of 12 g/d (4 g/feeding) of 1 of 3 rumen-protected Met (RPM) products. The products evaluated were the newly developed RPM-K and 2 existing products, RPM-S and RPM-M, with known differences in bioavailability. During d 5 to 7 of each period, blood samples were collected at 2, 4, 6, and 8 h after the morning feeding for plasma free AA analysis. Plasma Met data were analyzed using the full data set as well as mean values from individual cows for each day or each period. Plasma Met was not different between RPM-S and RPM-K (32.7 vs. 33.0 μM, respectively; P = 0.79), and both were greater than RPM-M (30.1 μM; P ≤ 0.001). Plasma Met was affected by time of sampling (P = 0.001), due to reduced plasma Met at 4 h (30.2 μM) than at 2, 6, and 8 h (31.9–33.0 μM). Using the daily and period mean values of plasma Met, differences observed in the full model were maintained when daily means were evaluated, but period means resulted in only a tendency for a treatment effect. Bioavailability of RPM-K was similar to RPM-S and greater than RPM-M. Pooling samples by day within cow would have likely yielded similar results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2590-2865</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2590-2865</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15232/aas.2021-02226</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>amino acid ; blood ; pooling ; protein</subject><ispartof>Applied Animal Science, 2022-04, Vol.38 (2), p.110-117</ispartof><rights>2022 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-351a81fff694c3f2b6532a61ee99299f98f69b4b146a2a227828c566c69a7ad23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-351a81fff694c3f2b6532a61ee99299f98f69b4b146a2a227828c566c69a7ad23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6509-3004</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronin, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateos, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez del Olmo, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdez, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gressley, T.F.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of plasma methionine response to 3 rumen-protected methionine products in lactating Holstein dairy cows</title><title>Applied Animal Science</title><description>The primary aim of this work was to compare the plasma Met response to supplementation with 3 rumen-protected Met products. Secondary aims were to evaluate how time of sampling affected results and how pooling of samples may have affected results. Ten multiparous Holstein cows (280 ± 73 DIM) were used in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design with 7-d experimental periods. Cows were fed every 8 h, and treatments consisted of supplementation of 12 g/d (4 g/feeding) of 1 of 3 rumen-protected Met (RPM) products. The products evaluated were the newly developed RPM-K and 2 existing products, RPM-S and RPM-M, with known differences in bioavailability. During d 5 to 7 of each period, blood samples were collected at 2, 4, 6, and 8 h after the morning feeding for plasma free AA analysis. Plasma Met data were analyzed using the full data set as well as mean values from individual cows for each day or each period. Plasma Met was not different between RPM-S and RPM-K (32.7 vs. 33.0 μM, respectively; P = 0.79), and both were greater than RPM-M (30.1 μM; P ≤ 0.001). Plasma Met was affected by time of sampling (P = 0.001), due to reduced plasma Met at 4 h (30.2 μM) than at 2, 6, and 8 h (31.9–33.0 μM). Using the daily and period mean values of plasma Met, differences observed in the full model were maintained when daily means were evaluated, but period means resulted in only a tendency for a treatment effect. Bioavailability of RPM-K was similar to RPM-S and greater than RPM-M. Pooling samples by day within cow would have likely yielded similar results.</description><subject>amino acid</subject><subject>blood</subject><subject>pooling</subject><subject>protein</subject><issn>2590-2865</issn><issn>2590-2865</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EElXpzOo_kNY-J248ogooUiUWmK2rY4NRYke2C-q_JxSGLkx3enfv9O4j5JazJW9AwAoxL4EBrxgAyAsyg0axClrZXJ7112SR8wdjDFpWt6BmJG3iMGLyOQYaHR17zAPSwZZ3H4MPliabxxiypSVSQdNhsKEaUyzWFNudL05idzAlUx9oj6Zg8eGNbmOfi52kDn06UhO_8g25cthnu_irc_L6cP-y2Va758enzd2uMkJAqUTDseXOOalqIxzsZSMAJbdWKVDKqXaa7Os9ryUCAqxbaE0jpZEK19iBmJPV712TYs7JOj0mP2A6as70iZqeqOkfavpEbXKoX4edYn16m3Q23gZjO5-mf3UX_b_eb5lydTM</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Smith, M.</creator><creator>Cronin, S.</creator><creator>Mateos, J.</creator><creator>Martinez del Olmo, D.</creator><creator>Valdez, F.</creator><creator>Gressley, T.F.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6509-3004</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Comparison of plasma methionine response to 3 rumen-protected methionine products in lactating Holstein dairy cows</title><author>Smith, M. ; Cronin, S. ; Mateos, J. ; Martinez del Olmo, D. ; Valdez, F. ; Gressley, T.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-351a81fff694c3f2b6532a61ee99299f98f69b4b146a2a227828c566c69a7ad23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>amino acid</topic><topic>blood</topic><topic>pooling</topic><topic>protein</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronin, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateos, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez del Olmo, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdez, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gressley, T.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Applied Animal Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, M.</au><au>Cronin, S.</au><au>Mateos, J.</au><au>Martinez del Olmo, D.</au><au>Valdez, F.</au><au>Gressley, T.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of plasma methionine response to 3 rumen-protected methionine products in lactating Holstein dairy cows</atitle><jtitle>Applied Animal Science</jtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>110</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>110-117</pages><issn>2590-2865</issn><eissn>2590-2865</eissn><abstract>The primary aim of this work was to compare the plasma Met response to supplementation with 3 rumen-protected Met products. Secondary aims were to evaluate how time of sampling affected results and how pooling of samples may have affected results. Ten multiparous Holstein cows (280 ± 73 DIM) were used in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design with 7-d experimental periods. Cows were fed every 8 h, and treatments consisted of supplementation of 12 g/d (4 g/feeding) of 1 of 3 rumen-protected Met (RPM) products. The products evaluated were the newly developed RPM-K and 2 existing products, RPM-S and RPM-M, with known differences in bioavailability. During d 5 to 7 of each period, blood samples were collected at 2, 4, 6, and 8 h after the morning feeding for plasma free AA analysis. Plasma Met data were analyzed using the full data set as well as mean values from individual cows for each day or each period. Plasma Met was not different between RPM-S and RPM-K (32.7 vs. 33.0 μM, respectively; P = 0.79), and both were greater than RPM-M (30.1 μM; P ≤ 0.001). Plasma Met was affected by time of sampling (P = 0.001), due to reduced plasma Met at 4 h (30.2 μM) than at 2, 6, and 8 h (31.9–33.0 μM). Using the daily and period mean values of plasma Met, differences observed in the full model were maintained when daily means were evaluated, but period means resulted in only a tendency for a treatment effect. Bioavailability of RPM-K was similar to RPM-S and greater than RPM-M. Pooling samples by day within cow would have likely yielded similar results.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.15232/aas.2021-02226</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6509-3004</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2590-2865
ispartof Applied Animal Science, 2022-04, Vol.38 (2), p.110-117
issn 2590-2865
2590-2865
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_15232_aas_2021_02226
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects amino acid
blood
pooling
protein
title Comparison of plasma methionine response to 3 rumen-protected methionine products in lactating Holstein dairy cows
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T21%3A25%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20plasma%20methionine%20response%20to%203%20rumen-protected%20methionine%20products%20in%20lactating%20Holstein%20dairy%20cows&rft.jtitle=Applied%20Animal%20Science&rft.au=Smith,%20M.&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=110&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=110-117&rft.issn=2590-2865&rft.eissn=2590-2865&rft_id=info:doi/10.15232/aas.2021-02226&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES2590286522000155%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S2590286522000155&rfr_iscdi=true