The Genre Apocalypse Reconsidered

The analysis of the genre apocalypse published in Semeia 14 (1979) relied on a classificatory approach, which identified core features of the genre, listed features that were typical but not necessary, and distinguished different types of apocalypses. The main difficulty encountered by such an appro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum 2016-01, Vol.20 (1), p.21-40
1. Verfasser: Collins, John J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 40
container_issue 1
container_start_page 21
container_title Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum
container_volume 20
creator Collins, John J.
description The analysis of the genre apocalypse published in Semeia 14 (1979) relied on a classificatory approach, which identified core features of the genre, listed features that were typical but not necessary, and distinguished different types of apocalypses. The main difficulty encountered by such an approach is that genres have fuzzy edges. Some works that fit the definition are atypical of the genre, while some that do not have much in common with it. The emergence of prototype theory as a method of analysis is helpful in this regard, and allows for a less rigid kind of classification, without lapsing into the indeterminacy of family resemblances. Genres are recognized on the basis of a few clear exemplars. Other works may resemble them to a greater or lesser extent.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/zac-2016-0001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>walterdegruyter_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1515_zac_2016_0001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1515_zac_2016_000120121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-4ee4de41ae8c65cb05b4e1996710a9ab285f6ec2cde02e911cf555812e87a0ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj0FLxDAQhYMoWFeP3usPiM6kTZp4WxZdhQVBVvAW0nSqu9S2JLvI-utNWY-e3jt8M7yPsWuEW5Qo736c5wJQcQDAE5ahQsGNwvdTloEpDTeywnN2EeM2EUWlTcZu1p-UL6kPlM_HwbvuMEbKX8kPfdw0FKi5ZGet6yJd_eWMvT0-rBdPfPWyfF7MV9wXQu94SVQ2VKIj7ZX0Nci6JDRGVQjOuFpo2SrywjcEggyib6WUGgXpygG5Ysb48a8PQ4yBWjuGzZcLB4tgJz-b_OzkZye_xN8f-W_X7Sg09BH2h1TsdtiHPi39_y4VgcUvwD1V1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Genre Apocalypse Reconsidered</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Collins, John J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Collins, John J.</creatorcontrib><description>The analysis of the genre apocalypse published in Semeia 14 (1979) relied on a classificatory approach, which identified core features of the genre, listed features that were typical but not necessary, and distinguished different types of apocalypses. The main difficulty encountered by such an approach is that genres have fuzzy edges. Some works that fit the definition are atypical of the genre, while some that do not have much in common with it. The emergence of prototype theory as a method of analysis is helpful in this regard, and allows for a less rigid kind of classification, without lapsing into the indeterminacy of family resemblances. Genres are recognized on the basis of a few clear exemplars. Other works may resemble them to a greater or lesser extent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0949-9571</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1612-961X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/zac-2016-0001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Apocalypse ; genre ; protoype</subject><ispartof>Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum, 2016-01, Vol.20 (1), p.21-40</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-4ee4de41ae8c65cb05b4e1996710a9ab285f6ec2cde02e911cf555812e87a0ea3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/zac-2016-0001/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/zac-2016-0001/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,66625,68409</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Collins, John J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Genre Apocalypse Reconsidered</title><title>Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum</title><description>The analysis of the genre apocalypse published in Semeia 14 (1979) relied on a classificatory approach, which identified core features of the genre, listed features that were typical but not necessary, and distinguished different types of apocalypses. The main difficulty encountered by such an approach is that genres have fuzzy edges. Some works that fit the definition are atypical of the genre, while some that do not have much in common with it. The emergence of prototype theory as a method of analysis is helpful in this regard, and allows for a less rigid kind of classification, without lapsing into the indeterminacy of family resemblances. Genres are recognized on the basis of a few clear exemplars. Other works may resemble them to a greater or lesser extent.</description><subject>Apocalypse</subject><subject>genre</subject><subject>protoype</subject><issn>0949-9571</issn><issn>1612-961X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptj0FLxDAQhYMoWFeP3usPiM6kTZp4WxZdhQVBVvAW0nSqu9S2JLvI-utNWY-e3jt8M7yPsWuEW5Qo736c5wJQcQDAE5ahQsGNwvdTloEpDTeywnN2EeM2EUWlTcZu1p-UL6kPlM_HwbvuMEbKX8kPfdw0FKi5ZGet6yJd_eWMvT0-rBdPfPWyfF7MV9wXQu94SVQ2VKIj7ZX0Nci6JDRGVQjOuFpo2SrywjcEggyib6WUGgXpygG5Ysb48a8PQ4yBWjuGzZcLB4tgJz-b_OzkZye_xN8f-W_X7Sg09BH2h1TsdtiHPi39_y4VgcUvwD1V1w</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Collins, John J.</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>The Genre Apocalypse Reconsidered</title><author>Collins, John J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-4ee4de41ae8c65cb05b4e1996710a9ab285f6ec2cde02e911cf555812e87a0ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Apocalypse</topic><topic>genre</topic><topic>protoype</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Collins, John J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Collins, John J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Genre Apocalypse Reconsidered</atitle><jtitle>Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>21-40</pages><issn>0949-9571</issn><eissn>1612-961X</eissn><abstract>The analysis of the genre apocalypse published in Semeia 14 (1979) relied on a classificatory approach, which identified core features of the genre, listed features that were typical but not necessary, and distinguished different types of apocalypses. The main difficulty encountered by such an approach is that genres have fuzzy edges. Some works that fit the definition are atypical of the genre, while some that do not have much in common with it. The emergence of prototype theory as a method of analysis is helpful in this regard, and allows for a less rigid kind of classification, without lapsing into the indeterminacy of family resemblances. Genres are recognized on the basis of a few clear exemplars. Other works may resemble them to a greater or lesser extent.</abstract><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/zac-2016-0001</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0949-9571
ispartof Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum, 2016-01, Vol.20 (1), p.21-40
issn 0949-9571
1612-961X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1515_zac_2016_0001
source De Gruyter journals
subjects Apocalypse
genre
protoype
title The Genre Apocalypse Reconsidered
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A56%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-walterdegruyter_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Genre%20Apocalypse%20Reconsidered&rft.jtitle=Zeitschrift%20f%C3%BCr%20antikes%20Christentum&rft.au=Collins,%20John%20J.&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=21-40&rft.issn=0949-9571&rft.eissn=1612-961X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/zac-2016-0001&rft_dat=%3Cwalterdegruyter_cross%3E10_1515_zac_2016_000120121%3C/walterdegruyter_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true