The Genre Apocalypse Reconsidered
The analysis of the genre apocalypse published in Semeia 14 (1979) relied on a classificatory approach, which identified core features of the genre, listed features that were typical but not necessary, and distinguished different types of apocalypses. The main difficulty encountered by such an appro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum 2016-01, Vol.20 (1), p.21-40 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 40 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 21 |
container_title | Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Collins, John J. |
description | The analysis of the genre apocalypse published in Semeia 14 (1979) relied on a classificatory approach, which identified core features of the genre, listed features that were typical but not necessary, and distinguished different types of apocalypses. The main difficulty encountered by such an approach is that genres have fuzzy edges. Some works that fit the definition are atypical of the genre, while some that do not have much in common with it. The emergence of prototype theory as a method of analysis is helpful in this regard, and allows for a less rigid kind of classification, without lapsing into the indeterminacy of family resemblances. Genres are recognized on the basis of a few clear exemplars. Other works may resemble them to a greater or lesser extent. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/zac-2016-0001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>walterdegruyter_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1515_zac_2016_0001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1515_zac_2016_000120121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-4ee4de41ae8c65cb05b4e1996710a9ab285f6ec2cde02e911cf555812e87a0ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj0FLxDAQhYMoWFeP3usPiM6kTZp4WxZdhQVBVvAW0nSqu9S2JLvI-utNWY-e3jt8M7yPsWuEW5Qo736c5wJQcQDAE5ahQsGNwvdTloEpDTeywnN2EeM2EUWlTcZu1p-UL6kPlM_HwbvuMEbKX8kPfdw0FKi5ZGet6yJd_eWMvT0-rBdPfPWyfF7MV9wXQu94SVQ2VKIj7ZX0Nci6JDRGVQjOuFpo2SrywjcEggyib6WUGgXpygG5Ysb48a8PQ4yBWjuGzZcLB4tgJz-b_OzkZye_xN8f-W_X7Sg09BH2h1TsdtiHPi39_y4VgcUvwD1V1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Genre Apocalypse Reconsidered</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Collins, John J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Collins, John J.</creatorcontrib><description>The analysis of the genre apocalypse published in Semeia 14 (1979) relied on a classificatory approach, which identified core features of the genre, listed features that were typical but not necessary, and distinguished different types of apocalypses. The main difficulty encountered by such an approach is that genres have fuzzy edges. Some works that fit the definition are atypical of the genre, while some that do not have much in common with it. The emergence of prototype theory as a method of analysis is helpful in this regard, and allows for a less rigid kind of classification, without lapsing into the indeterminacy of family resemblances. Genres are recognized on the basis of a few clear exemplars. Other works may resemble them to a greater or lesser extent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0949-9571</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1612-961X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/zac-2016-0001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Apocalypse ; genre ; protoype</subject><ispartof>Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum, 2016-01, Vol.20 (1), p.21-40</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-4ee4de41ae8c65cb05b4e1996710a9ab285f6ec2cde02e911cf555812e87a0ea3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/zac-2016-0001/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/zac-2016-0001/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,66625,68409</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Collins, John J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Genre Apocalypse Reconsidered</title><title>Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum</title><description>The analysis of the genre apocalypse published in Semeia 14 (1979) relied on a classificatory approach, which identified core features of the genre, listed features that were typical but not necessary, and distinguished different types of apocalypses. The main difficulty encountered by such an approach is that genres have fuzzy edges. Some works that fit the definition are atypical of the genre, while some that do not have much in common with it. The emergence of prototype theory as a method of analysis is helpful in this regard, and allows for a less rigid kind of classification, without lapsing into the indeterminacy of family resemblances. Genres are recognized on the basis of a few clear exemplars. Other works may resemble them to a greater or lesser extent.</description><subject>Apocalypse</subject><subject>genre</subject><subject>protoype</subject><issn>0949-9571</issn><issn>1612-961X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptj0FLxDAQhYMoWFeP3usPiM6kTZp4WxZdhQVBVvAW0nSqu9S2JLvI-utNWY-e3jt8M7yPsWuEW5Qo736c5wJQcQDAE5ahQsGNwvdTloEpDTeywnN2EeM2EUWlTcZu1p-UL6kPlM_HwbvuMEbKX8kPfdw0FKi5ZGet6yJd_eWMvT0-rBdPfPWyfF7MV9wXQu94SVQ2VKIj7ZX0Nci6JDRGVQjOuFpo2SrywjcEggyib6WUGgXpygG5Ysb48a8PQ4yBWjuGzZcLB4tgJz-b_OzkZye_xN8f-W_X7Sg09BH2h1TsdtiHPi39_y4VgcUvwD1V1w</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Collins, John J.</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>The Genre Apocalypse Reconsidered</title><author>Collins, John J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-4ee4de41ae8c65cb05b4e1996710a9ab285f6ec2cde02e911cf555812e87a0ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Apocalypse</topic><topic>genre</topic><topic>protoype</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Collins, John J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Collins, John J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Genre Apocalypse Reconsidered</atitle><jtitle>Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>21-40</pages><issn>0949-9571</issn><eissn>1612-961X</eissn><abstract>The analysis of the genre apocalypse published in Semeia 14 (1979) relied on a classificatory approach, which identified core features of the genre, listed features that were typical but not necessary, and distinguished different types of apocalypses. The main difficulty encountered by such an approach is that genres have fuzzy edges. Some works that fit the definition are atypical of the genre, while some that do not have much in common with it. The emergence of prototype theory as a method of analysis is helpful in this regard, and allows for a less rigid kind of classification, without lapsing into the indeterminacy of family resemblances. Genres are recognized on the basis of a few clear exemplars. Other works may resemble them to a greater or lesser extent.</abstract><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/zac-2016-0001</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0949-9571 |
ispartof | Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum, 2016-01, Vol.20 (1), p.21-40 |
issn | 0949-9571 1612-961X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1515_zac_2016_0001 |
source | De Gruyter journals |
subjects | Apocalypse genre protoype |
title | The Genre Apocalypse Reconsidered |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A56%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-walterdegruyter_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Genre%20Apocalypse%20Reconsidered&rft.jtitle=Zeitschrift%20f%C3%BCr%20antikes%20Christentum&rft.au=Collins,%20John%20J.&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=21-40&rft.issn=0949-9571&rft.eissn=1612-961X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/zac-2016-0001&rft_dat=%3Cwalterdegruyter_cross%3E10_1515_zac_2016_000120121%3C/walterdegruyter_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |