Optimization of electrohydraulic forming process parameters using the response surface methodology

This work’s main objective is to determine the optimum process parameters in the electrohydraulic forming (EHF) of austenitic stainless steel AISI 304 of 0.25 mm thickness for macro and micro shape. A truncated cone with grooves in the apex is considered as macro-micro shape. The response surface me...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materialprüfung 2021-06, Vol.63 (6), p.571-580
Hauptverfasser: Arun Prasath, Balasubramanian, Ganesh, Pasupathy, Shanmuga Sundaram, Karibeeran
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 580
container_issue 6
container_start_page 571
container_title Materialprüfung
container_volume 63
creator Arun Prasath, Balasubramanian
Ganesh, Pasupathy
Shanmuga Sundaram, Karibeeran
description This work’s main objective is to determine the optimum process parameters in the electrohydraulic forming (EHF) of austenitic stainless steel AISI 304 of 0.25 mm thickness for macro and micro shape. A truncated cone with grooves in the apex is considered as macro-micro shape. The response surface methodology (RSM) was developed for process variables such as voltage and standoff distance to determine the optimum parameters. To validate the model, confirmation experiments have been conducted, i. e. for the optimum value of voltage (V) = 8.935 kV and standoff distance (SOD) = 40.60 mm, and from the experiments the forming depth predicted is 9.221 mm and depth from the experiments is 9.5 mm. The percentage deviation from the predicted and experimental forming depth is 3.025 %, an acceptable range of less than 5 % for the surface roughness, the predicted value is 0.2598 microns, and the experimentally measured value is 0.268. The percentage deviation is 3.156 % between the predicted and experimental values, an acceptable range of less than 5 %. This shows that the model is suitable for predicting both responses. The validation experiments also found that the sheet fills one of the grooves and partially fills the other, which shows the capability of the electrohydraulic forming process. Confirmation experiments have been conducted.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/mt-2020-0096
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>walterdegruyter_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1515_mt_2020_0096</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1515_mt_2020_0096636571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-36bb0f33cf147e40f1e9ac83046229ede384421ca0692b0138a81b35339b0f803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9KxDAQh4MouK7efIA8gNFJ0mRbb7L4Dxb2oueSppPdLm1TkhSpT2-LHj3NwHy_YeYj5JbDPVdcPXSJCRDAAAp9RlaCF4rlaiPOyQpAKKYkwCW5ivEEoJUQekWq_ZCarvk2qfE99Y5iizYFf5zqYMa2sdT50DX9gQ7BW4yRDiaYDhOGSMe4DNIRacA4-D4ijWNwxiKdiaOvfesP0zW5cKaNePNX1-Tz5flj-8Z2-9f37dOOWZHrxKSuKnBSWsezDWbgOBbG5hIyLUSBNco8ywS3BnQhKuAyNzmvpJKymHM5yDW5-91rg48xoCuH0HQmTCWHcvFTdqlc_JSLnxl__MW_TDt_U-MhjNPclCc_hn4-9N-YllptuPwBTmttxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization of electrohydraulic forming process parameters using the response surface methodology</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Arun Prasath, Balasubramanian ; Ganesh, Pasupathy ; Shanmuga Sundaram, Karibeeran</creator><creatorcontrib>Arun Prasath, Balasubramanian ; Ganesh, Pasupathy ; Shanmuga Sundaram, Karibeeran</creatorcontrib><description>This work’s main objective is to determine the optimum process parameters in the electrohydraulic forming (EHF) of austenitic stainless steel AISI 304 of 0.25 mm thickness for macro and micro shape. A truncated cone with grooves in the apex is considered as macro-micro shape. The response surface methodology (RSM) was developed for process variables such as voltage and standoff distance to determine the optimum parameters. To validate the model, confirmation experiments have been conducted, i. e. for the optimum value of voltage (V) = 8.935 kV and standoff distance (SOD) = 40.60 mm, and from the experiments the forming depth predicted is 9.221 mm and depth from the experiments is 9.5 mm. The percentage deviation from the predicted and experimental forming depth is 3.025 %, an acceptable range of less than 5 % for the surface roughness, the predicted value is 0.2598 microns, and the experimentally measured value is 0.268. The percentage deviation is 3.156 % between the predicted and experimental values, an acceptable range of less than 5 %. This shows that the model is suitable for predicting both responses. The validation experiments also found that the sheet fills one of the grooves and partially fills the other, which shows the capability of the electrohydraulic forming process. Confirmation experiments have been conducted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-5300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2195-8572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/mt-2020-0096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Electrohydraulic forming ; macro-micro shape ; RSM ; stainless steel</subject><ispartof>Materialprüfung, 2021-06, Vol.63 (6), p.571-580</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-36bb0f33cf147e40f1e9ac83046229ede384421ca0692b0138a81b35339b0f803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-36bb0f33cf147e40f1e9ac83046229ede384421ca0692b0138a81b35339b0f803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mt-2020-0096/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mt-2020-0096/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,66725,68509</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arun Prasath, Balasubramanian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganesh, Pasupathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanmuga Sundaram, Karibeeran</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization of electrohydraulic forming process parameters using the response surface methodology</title><title>Materialprüfung</title><description>This work’s main objective is to determine the optimum process parameters in the electrohydraulic forming (EHF) of austenitic stainless steel AISI 304 of 0.25 mm thickness for macro and micro shape. A truncated cone with grooves in the apex is considered as macro-micro shape. The response surface methodology (RSM) was developed for process variables such as voltage and standoff distance to determine the optimum parameters. To validate the model, confirmation experiments have been conducted, i. e. for the optimum value of voltage (V) = 8.935 kV and standoff distance (SOD) = 40.60 mm, and from the experiments the forming depth predicted is 9.221 mm and depth from the experiments is 9.5 mm. The percentage deviation from the predicted and experimental forming depth is 3.025 %, an acceptable range of less than 5 % for the surface roughness, the predicted value is 0.2598 microns, and the experimentally measured value is 0.268. The percentage deviation is 3.156 % between the predicted and experimental values, an acceptable range of less than 5 %. This shows that the model is suitable for predicting both responses. The validation experiments also found that the sheet fills one of the grooves and partially fills the other, which shows the capability of the electrohydraulic forming process. Confirmation experiments have been conducted.</description><subject>Electrohydraulic forming</subject><subject>macro-micro shape</subject><subject>RSM</subject><subject>stainless steel</subject><issn>0025-5300</issn><issn>2195-8572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM9KxDAQh4MouK7efIA8gNFJ0mRbb7L4Dxb2oueSppPdLm1TkhSpT2-LHj3NwHy_YeYj5JbDPVdcPXSJCRDAAAp9RlaCF4rlaiPOyQpAKKYkwCW5ivEEoJUQekWq_ZCarvk2qfE99Y5iizYFf5zqYMa2sdT50DX9gQ7BW4yRDiaYDhOGSMe4DNIRacA4-D4ijWNwxiKdiaOvfesP0zW5cKaNePNX1-Tz5flj-8Z2-9f37dOOWZHrxKSuKnBSWsezDWbgOBbG5hIyLUSBNco8ywS3BnQhKuAyNzmvpJKymHM5yDW5-91rg48xoCuH0HQmTCWHcvFTdqlc_JSLnxl__MW_TDt_U-MhjNPclCc_hn4-9N-YllptuPwBTmttxQ</recordid><startdate>20210630</startdate><enddate>20210630</enddate><creator>Arun Prasath, Balasubramanian</creator><creator>Ganesh, Pasupathy</creator><creator>Shanmuga Sundaram, Karibeeran</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210630</creationdate><title>Optimization of electrohydraulic forming process parameters using the response surface methodology</title><author>Arun Prasath, Balasubramanian ; Ganesh, Pasupathy ; Shanmuga Sundaram, Karibeeran</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-36bb0f33cf147e40f1e9ac83046229ede384421ca0692b0138a81b35339b0f803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Electrohydraulic forming</topic><topic>macro-micro shape</topic><topic>RSM</topic><topic>stainless steel</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arun Prasath, Balasubramanian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganesh, Pasupathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanmuga Sundaram, Karibeeran</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Materialprüfung</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arun Prasath, Balasubramanian</au><au>Ganesh, Pasupathy</au><au>Shanmuga Sundaram, Karibeeran</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization of electrohydraulic forming process parameters using the response surface methodology</atitle><jtitle>Materialprüfung</jtitle><date>2021-06-30</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>571</spage><epage>580</epage><pages>571-580</pages><issn>0025-5300</issn><eissn>2195-8572</eissn><abstract>This work’s main objective is to determine the optimum process parameters in the electrohydraulic forming (EHF) of austenitic stainless steel AISI 304 of 0.25 mm thickness for macro and micro shape. A truncated cone with grooves in the apex is considered as macro-micro shape. The response surface methodology (RSM) was developed for process variables such as voltage and standoff distance to determine the optimum parameters. To validate the model, confirmation experiments have been conducted, i. e. for the optimum value of voltage (V) = 8.935 kV and standoff distance (SOD) = 40.60 mm, and from the experiments the forming depth predicted is 9.221 mm and depth from the experiments is 9.5 mm. The percentage deviation from the predicted and experimental forming depth is 3.025 %, an acceptable range of less than 5 % for the surface roughness, the predicted value is 0.2598 microns, and the experimentally measured value is 0.268. The percentage deviation is 3.156 % between the predicted and experimental values, an acceptable range of less than 5 %. This shows that the model is suitable for predicting both responses. The validation experiments also found that the sheet fills one of the grooves and partially fills the other, which shows the capability of the electrohydraulic forming process. Confirmation experiments have been conducted.</abstract><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/mt-2020-0096</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-5300
ispartof Materialprüfung, 2021-06, Vol.63 (6), p.571-580
issn 0025-5300
2195-8572
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1515_mt_2020_0096
source De Gruyter journals
subjects Electrohydraulic forming
macro-micro shape
RSM
stainless steel
title Optimization of electrohydraulic forming process parameters using the response surface methodology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T22%3A59%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-walterdegruyter_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20of%20electrohydraulic%20forming%20process%20parameters%20using%20the%20response%20surface%20methodology&rft.jtitle=Materialpr%C3%BCfung&rft.au=Arun%20Prasath,%20Balasubramanian&rft.date=2021-06-30&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=571&rft.epage=580&rft.pages=571-580&rft.issn=0025-5300&rft.eissn=2195-8572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/mt-2020-0096&rft_dat=%3Cwalterdegruyter_cross%3E10_1515_mt_2020_0096636571%3C/walterdegruyter_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true