Eurobonds: Three Lessons from China’s “Debt Centralization/Decentralization” Experience

Eurobonds, dubbed as Coronabonds in the context of the current coronavirus crisis, are being hotly debated among the euro area member states amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The debate is in many ways a retread of the euro area sovereign debt crisis of 2011–2012. As China’s “debt centralization/decentral...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Economists' voice 2021-12, Vol.18 (1), p.67-80
1. Verfasser: An, Zhiyong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 80
container_issue 1
container_start_page 67
container_title The Economists' voice
container_volume 18
creator An, Zhiyong
description Eurobonds, dubbed as Coronabonds in the context of the current coronavirus crisis, are being hotly debated among the euro area member states amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The debate is in many ways a retread of the euro area sovereign debt crisis of 2011–2012. As China’s “debt centralization/decentralization” experience is comparable with the introduction of Eurobonds in the European Union (EU) in terms of institutional mechanism design, we review our previous series of studies of China’s “debt centralization/decentralization” experience to shed some light on the Eurobonds debate. We obtain three key lessons. First, the introduction of Eurobonds in EU is likely to soften the budget constraint of the governments of the euro area member states. Second, it is also likely to strengthen the moral hazard incentives of the governments of the euro area member states to intentionally overstate their budget problems. Finally, the magnitudes of the moral hazard effects generated by the introduction of Eurobonds in EU are likely larger than their respective counterparts in China.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/ev-2020-0020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>walterdegruyter_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1515_ev_2020_0020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1515_ev_2020_002018167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-f4de5548173ee8f248830d7f6ecb8275ed99ed056eeae9bf1be1971472a49ff83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMtKAzEUhoMoWKs7HyAP4NhcJk3GnUzrBQpu6lJCZubETmmTkkyrddXXEPTl-iROqaCCm3N-Dh8_nA-hc0ouqaCiB6uEEUYS0o4D1KFC8IQrzg5_5WN0EuOUEE6Z4B30NFwGX3hXxSs8ngQAPIIYvYvYBj_H-aR2Zrt5j3i7-RhA0eAcXBPMrH4zTe1dbwDln8N284mHrwsINbgSTtGRNbMIZ9-7ix5vhuP8Lhk93N7n16Ok5Jw1iU0rECJVVHIAZVmqFCeVtH0oC8WkgCrLoCKiD2AgKywtgGaSppKZNLNW8S662PeWwccYwOpFqOcmrDUleqdGw0rv1OidmhbHexxK7-r4A0ulUkFavkWyPfJiZg2ECp7Dct0GPfXL4Npf_m2mivYl_wKbNXhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eurobonds: Three Lessons from China’s “Debt Centralization/Decentralization” Experience</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>An, Zhiyong</creator><creatorcontrib>An, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><description>Eurobonds, dubbed as Coronabonds in the context of the current coronavirus crisis, are being hotly debated among the euro area member states amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The debate is in many ways a retread of the euro area sovereign debt crisis of 2011–2012. As China’s “debt centralization/decentralization” experience is comparable with the introduction of Eurobonds in the European Union (EU) in terms of institutional mechanism design, we review our previous series of studies of China’s “debt centralization/decentralization” experience to shed some light on the Eurobonds debate. We obtain three key lessons. First, the introduction of Eurobonds in EU is likely to soften the budget constraint of the governments of the euro area member states. Second, it is also likely to strengthen the moral hazard incentives of the governments of the euro area member states to intentionally overstate their budget problems. Finally, the magnitudes of the moral hazard effects generated by the introduction of Eurobonds in EU are likely larger than their respective counterparts in China.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-3832</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-3832</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/ev-2020-0020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Coronabonds ; COVID-19 pandemic ; Eurobonds</subject><ispartof>The Economists' voice, 2021-12, Vol.18 (1), p.67-80</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-f4de5548173ee8f248830d7f6ecb8275ed99ed056eeae9bf1be1971472a49ff83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ev-2020-0020/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ev-2020-0020/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,66503,68287</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>An, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><title>Eurobonds: Three Lessons from China’s “Debt Centralization/Decentralization” Experience</title><title>The Economists' voice</title><description>Eurobonds, dubbed as Coronabonds in the context of the current coronavirus crisis, are being hotly debated among the euro area member states amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The debate is in many ways a retread of the euro area sovereign debt crisis of 2011–2012. As China’s “debt centralization/decentralization” experience is comparable with the introduction of Eurobonds in the European Union (EU) in terms of institutional mechanism design, we review our previous series of studies of China’s “debt centralization/decentralization” experience to shed some light on the Eurobonds debate. We obtain three key lessons. First, the introduction of Eurobonds in EU is likely to soften the budget constraint of the governments of the euro area member states. Second, it is also likely to strengthen the moral hazard incentives of the governments of the euro area member states to intentionally overstate their budget problems. Finally, the magnitudes of the moral hazard effects generated by the introduction of Eurobonds in EU are likely larger than their respective counterparts in China.</description><subject>Coronabonds</subject><subject>COVID-19 pandemic</subject><subject>Eurobonds</subject><issn>1553-3832</issn><issn>1553-3832</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkMtKAzEUhoMoWKs7HyAP4NhcJk3GnUzrBQpu6lJCZubETmmTkkyrddXXEPTl-iROqaCCm3N-Dh8_nA-hc0ouqaCiB6uEEUYS0o4D1KFC8IQrzg5_5WN0EuOUEE6Z4B30NFwGX3hXxSs8ngQAPIIYvYvYBj_H-aR2Zrt5j3i7-RhA0eAcXBPMrH4zTe1dbwDln8N284mHrwsINbgSTtGRNbMIZ9-7ix5vhuP8Lhk93N7n16Ok5Jw1iU0rECJVVHIAZVmqFCeVtH0oC8WkgCrLoCKiD2AgKywtgGaSppKZNLNW8S662PeWwccYwOpFqOcmrDUleqdGw0rv1OidmhbHexxK7-r4A0ulUkFavkWyPfJiZg2ECp7Dct0GPfXL4Npf_m2mivYl_wKbNXhQ</recordid><startdate>20211231</startdate><enddate>20211231</enddate><creator>An, Zhiyong</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211231</creationdate><title>Eurobonds: Three Lessons from China’s “Debt Centralization/Decentralization” Experience</title><author>An, Zhiyong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-f4de5548173ee8f248830d7f6ecb8275ed99ed056eeae9bf1be1971472a49ff83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Coronabonds</topic><topic>COVID-19 pandemic</topic><topic>Eurobonds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>An, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Economists' voice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>An, Zhiyong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eurobonds: Three Lessons from China’s “Debt Centralization/Decentralization” Experience</atitle><jtitle>The Economists' voice</jtitle><date>2021-12-31</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>67-80</pages><issn>1553-3832</issn><eissn>1553-3832</eissn><abstract>Eurobonds, dubbed as Coronabonds in the context of the current coronavirus crisis, are being hotly debated among the euro area member states amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The debate is in many ways a retread of the euro area sovereign debt crisis of 2011–2012. As China’s “debt centralization/decentralization” experience is comparable with the introduction of Eurobonds in the European Union (EU) in terms of institutional mechanism design, we review our previous series of studies of China’s “debt centralization/decentralization” experience to shed some light on the Eurobonds debate. We obtain three key lessons. First, the introduction of Eurobonds in EU is likely to soften the budget constraint of the governments of the euro area member states. Second, it is also likely to strengthen the moral hazard incentives of the governments of the euro area member states to intentionally overstate their budget problems. Finally, the magnitudes of the moral hazard effects generated by the introduction of Eurobonds in EU are likely larger than their respective counterparts in China.</abstract><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/ev-2020-0020</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1553-3832
ispartof The Economists' voice, 2021-12, Vol.18 (1), p.67-80
issn 1553-3832
1553-3832
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1515_ev_2020_0020
source De Gruyter journals
subjects Coronabonds
COVID-19 pandemic
Eurobonds
title Eurobonds: Three Lessons from China’s “Debt Centralization/Decentralization” Experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T20%3A33%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-walterdegruyter_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eurobonds:%20Three%20Lessons%20from%20China%E2%80%99s%20%E2%80%9CDebt%20Centralization/Decentralization%E2%80%9D%20Experience&rft.jtitle=The%20Economists'%20voice&rft.au=An,%20Zhiyong&rft.date=2021-12-31&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=67-80&rft.issn=1553-3832&rft.eissn=1553-3832&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/ev-2020-0020&rft_dat=%3Cwalterdegruyter_cross%3E10_1515_ev_2020_002018167%3C/walterdegruyter_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true