Say on What’s Next?

There are several initiatives aimed at getting listed companies to involve their shareholders more in ESG issues. Calls for mandatory advisory voting on (the implementation of) (parts of) ESG strategy and/or policy by the general meeting should not be heeded, according to the authors. We discuss thi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European company and financial law review 2023-12, Vol.20 (4), p.745-758
Hauptverfasser: van Olffen, M., Breukink, E.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 758
container_issue 4
container_start_page 745
container_title European company and financial law review
container_volume 20
creator van Olffen, M.
Breukink, E.J.
description There are several initiatives aimed at getting listed companies to involve their shareholders more in ESG issues. Calls for mandatory advisory voting on (the implementation of) (parts of) ESG strategy and/or policy by the general meeting should not be heeded, according to the authors. We discuss this topic in a Dutch context. It is better to leave it to the management board, under the supervision of the supervisory board, to assess on a case-by-case basis whether it is in the company’s interest to have the general meeting vote on (part of) the ESG strategy or policy (or its implementation). Shareholders who are entitled to put items on the agenda cannot force an advisory vote on (a part of) the ESG strategy or ESG policy (or its implementation). In principle, however, they can have the aforementioned topics put on the agenda for discussion. Questions on ESG topics can be asked at the meeting. The scope for asking questions and the obligation to respond these questions partly depend on the agenda.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/ecfr-2023-0028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>walterdegruyter_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1515_ecfr_2023_0028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1515_ecfr_2023_0028204745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-bba4d381c5997524376a8862aff3f19d4c71c542b13989a2fe47f76e4c25647f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j8tKAzEUQIMoWKtLXc8PpCY3bxBEii8oulBxGTKZRC21I8kUnZ2_4e_5JWZocdfVPXA5l3sQOqFkQgUVp8HHhIEAw4SA3kEjKinDIITc_Weu99FBznNCmCbGjNDxg-urdlk9v7ru9_snV3fhqzs_RHvRLXI42swxerq6fJze4Nn99e30YoY9aNXhuna8YZp6YYwSwJmSTmsJLkYWqWm4V2XHoabMaOMgBq6ikoF7ELIgG6PJ-q5Pbc4pRPuR3t5d6i0ldoiyQ5QdouwQVYSztfDpFl1ITXhJq76AnbertCyvbhGBcMUF-wMPmlIS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Say on What’s Next?</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>van Olffen, M. ; Breukink, E.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>van Olffen, M. ; Breukink, E.J.</creatorcontrib><description>There are several initiatives aimed at getting listed companies to involve their shareholders more in ESG issues. Calls for mandatory advisory voting on (the implementation of) (parts of) ESG strategy and/or policy by the general meeting should not be heeded, according to the authors. We discuss this topic in a Dutch context. It is better to leave it to the management board, under the supervision of the supervisory board, to assess on a case-by-case basis whether it is in the company’s interest to have the general meeting vote on (part of) the ESG strategy or policy (or its implementation). Shareholders who are entitled to put items on the agenda cannot force an advisory vote on (a part of) the ESG strategy or ESG policy (or its implementation). In principle, however, they can have the aforementioned topics put on the agenda for discussion. Questions on ESG topics can be asked at the meeting. The scope for asking questions and the obligation to respond these questions partly depend on the agenda.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1613-2548</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-2556</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2023-0028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher><ispartof>European company and financial law review, 2023-12, Vol.20 (4), p.745-758</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ecfr-2023-0028/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ecfr-2023-0028/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,66497,68281</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Olffen, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breukink, E.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Say on What’s Next?</title><title>European company and financial law review</title><description>There are several initiatives aimed at getting listed companies to involve their shareholders more in ESG issues. Calls for mandatory advisory voting on (the implementation of) (parts of) ESG strategy and/or policy by the general meeting should not be heeded, according to the authors. We discuss this topic in a Dutch context. It is better to leave it to the management board, under the supervision of the supervisory board, to assess on a case-by-case basis whether it is in the company’s interest to have the general meeting vote on (part of) the ESG strategy or policy (or its implementation). Shareholders who are entitled to put items on the agenda cannot force an advisory vote on (a part of) the ESG strategy or ESG policy (or its implementation). In principle, however, they can have the aforementioned topics put on the agenda for discussion. Questions on ESG topics can be asked at the meeting. The scope for asking questions and the obligation to respond these questions partly depend on the agenda.</description><issn>1613-2548</issn><issn>1613-2556</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j8tKAzEUQIMoWKtLXc8PpCY3bxBEii8oulBxGTKZRC21I8kUnZ2_4e_5JWZocdfVPXA5l3sQOqFkQgUVp8HHhIEAw4SA3kEjKinDIITc_Weu99FBznNCmCbGjNDxg-urdlk9v7ru9_snV3fhqzs_RHvRLXI42swxerq6fJze4Nn99e30YoY9aNXhuna8YZp6YYwSwJmSTmsJLkYWqWm4V2XHoabMaOMgBq6ikoF7ELIgG6PJ-q5Pbc4pRPuR3t5d6i0ldoiyQ5QdouwQVYSztfDpFl1ITXhJq76AnbertCyvbhGBcMUF-wMPmlIS</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>van Olffen, M.</creator><creator>Breukink, E.J.</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Say on What’s Next?</title><author>van Olffen, M. ; Breukink, E.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-bba4d381c5997524376a8862aff3f19d4c71c542b13989a2fe47f76e4c25647f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Olffen, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breukink, E.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European company and financial law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Olffen, M.</au><au>Breukink, E.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Say on What’s Next?</atitle><jtitle>European company and financial law review</jtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>745</spage><epage>758</epage><pages>745-758</pages><issn>1613-2548</issn><eissn>1613-2556</eissn><abstract>There are several initiatives aimed at getting listed companies to involve their shareholders more in ESG issues. Calls for mandatory advisory voting on (the implementation of) (parts of) ESG strategy and/or policy by the general meeting should not be heeded, according to the authors. We discuss this topic in a Dutch context. It is better to leave it to the management board, under the supervision of the supervisory board, to assess on a case-by-case basis whether it is in the company’s interest to have the general meeting vote on (part of) the ESG strategy or policy (or its implementation). Shareholders who are entitled to put items on the agenda cannot force an advisory vote on (a part of) the ESG strategy or ESG policy (or its implementation). In principle, however, they can have the aforementioned topics put on the agenda for discussion. Questions on ESG topics can be asked at the meeting. The scope for asking questions and the obligation to respond these questions partly depend on the agenda.</abstract><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/ecfr-2023-0028</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1613-2548
ispartof European company and financial law review, 2023-12, Vol.20 (4), p.745-758
issn 1613-2548
1613-2556
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1515_ecfr_2023_0028
source De Gruyter journals
title Say on What’s Next?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T18%3A40%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-walterdegruyter_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Say%20on%20What%E2%80%99s%20Next?&rft.jtitle=European%20company%20and%20financial%20law%20review&rft.au=van%20Olffen,%20M.&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=745&rft.epage=758&rft.pages=745-758&rft.issn=1613-2548&rft.eissn=1613-2556&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/ecfr-2023-0028&rft_dat=%3Cwalterdegruyter_cross%3E10_1515_ecfr_2023_0028204745%3C/walterdegruyter_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true