Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty: An analysis of statements and policies

The European Union (EU) has, with increasing frequency, outlined an intention to strengthen its "digital sovereignty" as a basis for safeguarding European values in the digital age. Yet, uncertainty remains as to how the term should be defined, undermining efforts to assess the success of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Internet policy review 2021-01, Vol.10 (3), p.1-28
Hauptverfasser: Roberts, Huw, Cowls, Josh, Morley, Jessica, Taddeo, Mariarosaria, Floridi, Luciano
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 28
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1
container_title Internet policy review
container_volume 10
creator Roberts, Huw
Cowls, Josh
Morley, Jessica
Taddeo, Mariarosaria
Floridi, Luciano
description The European Union (EU) has, with increasing frequency, outlined an intention to strengthen its "digital sovereignty" as a basis for safeguarding European values in the digital age. Yet, uncertainty remains as to how the term should be defined, undermining efforts to assess the success of the EU's digital sovereignty agenda. The task of this paper is to reduce this uncertainty by i) analysing how digital sovereignty has been discussed by EU institutional actors and placing this in a wider conceptual framework, ii) mapping specific policy areas and measures that EU institutional actors cite as important for strengthening digital sovereignty, iii) assessing the effectiveness of current policy measures at strengthening digital sovereignty, and iv) proposing policy solutions that go above and beyond current measures and address existing gaps. To do this, we introduce a conceptual understanding of digital sovereignty and then empirically ground this within the specific EU context via an analysis of a corpus of 180 EU webpages that have mentioned the term "digital sovereignty" within the past year. We find that existing policies, in particular those pertaining to data governance, help to achieve some of the EU's specific aims in regard to digital sovereignty, such as conditioning outward data flows, but they are more limited concerning other aims, like advancing the EU's competitiveness and regulating the private sector. This is problematic insofar as it constrains the EU's ability to safeguard and promote its values. The policy solutions we propose represent steps towards the further strengthening of the EU's digital sovereignty and firmer protection of EU values.
doi_str_mv 10.14763/2021.3.1575
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>econis_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_14763_2021_3_1575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>245338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-753d32c2069a097a5428a770ed2fad4e6ce374046381751a9a44c314ef02f6c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtLw0AUhQdRsNTu3ArzA0yd9yTuSqkPKLhQlxIuk5s4kiZlZlrJvze1gro6l8N3z-Ij5JKzOVfWyBvBBJ_LOddWn5CJ4IXNjLX69M99TmYxfjDG-PigjJmQt2eosdlBqHzX0NUu9FuEju6h3WGknz6908o3PkFLY7_HgL7p0nBLFx2FDtoh-kj7msYECTfYpTjWFd32rXce4wU5q6GNOPvJKXm9W70sH7L10_3jcrHOnNQiZVbLSgonmCmAFRa0EjlYy7ASNVQKjUNpFVNG5txqDgUo5SRXWDNRGyfllFwfd13oYwxYl9vgNxCGkrPy2055sFPK8mBnxOkRR9d3Pv7CoyKdszznI3L1DzlETH0ohdJS5vILEPtrvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty: An analysis of statements and policies</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Roberts, Huw ; Cowls, Josh ; Morley, Jessica ; Taddeo, Mariarosaria ; Floridi, Luciano</creator><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Huw ; Cowls, Josh ; Morley, Jessica ; Taddeo, Mariarosaria ; Floridi, Luciano</creatorcontrib><description>The European Union (EU) has, with increasing frequency, outlined an intention to strengthen its "digital sovereignty" as a basis for safeguarding European values in the digital age. Yet, uncertainty remains as to how the term should be defined, undermining efforts to assess the success of the EU's digital sovereignty agenda. The task of this paper is to reduce this uncertainty by i) analysing how digital sovereignty has been discussed by EU institutional actors and placing this in a wider conceptual framework, ii) mapping specific policy areas and measures that EU institutional actors cite as important for strengthening digital sovereignty, iii) assessing the effectiveness of current policy measures at strengthening digital sovereignty, and iv) proposing policy solutions that go above and beyond current measures and address existing gaps. To do this, we introduce a conceptual understanding of digital sovereignty and then empirically ground this within the specific EU context via an analysis of a corpus of 180 EU webpages that have mentioned the term "digital sovereignty" within the past year. We find that existing policies, in particular those pertaining to data governance, help to achieve some of the EU's specific aims in regard to digital sovereignty, such as conditioning outward data flows, but they are more limited concerning other aims, like advancing the EU's competitiveness and regulating the private sector. This is problematic insofar as it constrains the EU's ability to safeguard and promote its values. The policy solutions we propose represent steps towards the further strengthening of the EU's digital sovereignty and firmer protection of EU values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2197-6775</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2197-6775</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14763/2021.3.1575</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society</publisher><subject>Data governance ; Digital sovereignty ; EU values ; GDPR ; Legitimacy</subject><ispartof>Internet policy review, 2021-01, Vol.10 (3), p.1-28</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-753d32c2069a097a5428a770ed2fad4e6ce374046381751a9a44c314ef02f6c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-753d32c2069a097a5428a770ed2fad4e6ce374046381751a9a44c314ef02f6c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Huw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowls, Josh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morley, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taddeo, Mariarosaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Floridi, Luciano</creatorcontrib><title>Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty: An analysis of statements and policies</title><title>Internet policy review</title><description>The European Union (EU) has, with increasing frequency, outlined an intention to strengthen its "digital sovereignty" as a basis for safeguarding European values in the digital age. Yet, uncertainty remains as to how the term should be defined, undermining efforts to assess the success of the EU's digital sovereignty agenda. The task of this paper is to reduce this uncertainty by i) analysing how digital sovereignty has been discussed by EU institutional actors and placing this in a wider conceptual framework, ii) mapping specific policy areas and measures that EU institutional actors cite as important for strengthening digital sovereignty, iii) assessing the effectiveness of current policy measures at strengthening digital sovereignty, and iv) proposing policy solutions that go above and beyond current measures and address existing gaps. To do this, we introduce a conceptual understanding of digital sovereignty and then empirically ground this within the specific EU context via an analysis of a corpus of 180 EU webpages that have mentioned the term "digital sovereignty" within the past year. We find that existing policies, in particular those pertaining to data governance, help to achieve some of the EU's specific aims in regard to digital sovereignty, such as conditioning outward data flows, but they are more limited concerning other aims, like advancing the EU's competitiveness and regulating the private sector. This is problematic insofar as it constrains the EU's ability to safeguard and promote its values. The policy solutions we propose represent steps towards the further strengthening of the EU's digital sovereignty and firmer protection of EU values.</description><subject>Data governance</subject><subject>Digital sovereignty</subject><subject>EU values</subject><subject>GDPR</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><issn>2197-6775</issn><issn>2197-6775</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkEtLw0AUhQdRsNTu3ArzA0yd9yTuSqkPKLhQlxIuk5s4kiZlZlrJvze1gro6l8N3z-Ij5JKzOVfWyBvBBJ_LOddWn5CJ4IXNjLX69M99TmYxfjDG-PigjJmQt2eosdlBqHzX0NUu9FuEju6h3WGknz6908o3PkFLY7_HgL7p0nBLFx2FDtoh-kj7msYECTfYpTjWFd32rXce4wU5q6GNOPvJKXm9W70sH7L10_3jcrHOnNQiZVbLSgonmCmAFRa0EjlYy7ASNVQKjUNpFVNG5txqDgUo5SRXWDNRGyfllFwfd13oYwxYl9vgNxCGkrPy2055sFPK8mBnxOkRR9d3Pv7CoyKdszznI3L1DzlETH0ohdJS5vILEPtrvA</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Roberts, Huw</creator><creator>Cowls, Josh</creator><creator>Morley, Jessica</creator><creator>Taddeo, Mariarosaria</creator><creator>Floridi, Luciano</creator><general>Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society</general><scope>OT2</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty: An analysis of statements and policies</title><author>Roberts, Huw ; Cowls, Josh ; Morley, Jessica ; Taddeo, Mariarosaria ; Floridi, Luciano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-753d32c2069a097a5428a770ed2fad4e6ce374046381751a9a44c314ef02f6c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Data governance</topic><topic>Digital sovereignty</topic><topic>EU values</topic><topic>GDPR</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Huw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowls, Josh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morley, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taddeo, Mariarosaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Floridi, Luciano</creatorcontrib><collection>EconStor</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Internet policy review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roberts, Huw</au><au>Cowls, Josh</au><au>Morley, Jessica</au><au>Taddeo, Mariarosaria</au><au>Floridi, Luciano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty: An analysis of statements and policies</atitle><jtitle>Internet policy review</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>1-28</pages><issn>2197-6775</issn><eissn>2197-6775</eissn><abstract>The European Union (EU) has, with increasing frequency, outlined an intention to strengthen its "digital sovereignty" as a basis for safeguarding European values in the digital age. Yet, uncertainty remains as to how the term should be defined, undermining efforts to assess the success of the EU's digital sovereignty agenda. The task of this paper is to reduce this uncertainty by i) analysing how digital sovereignty has been discussed by EU institutional actors and placing this in a wider conceptual framework, ii) mapping specific policy areas and measures that EU institutional actors cite as important for strengthening digital sovereignty, iii) assessing the effectiveness of current policy measures at strengthening digital sovereignty, and iv) proposing policy solutions that go above and beyond current measures and address existing gaps. To do this, we introduce a conceptual understanding of digital sovereignty and then empirically ground this within the specific EU context via an analysis of a corpus of 180 EU webpages that have mentioned the term "digital sovereignty" within the past year. We find that existing policies, in particular those pertaining to data governance, help to achieve some of the EU's specific aims in regard to digital sovereignty, such as conditioning outward data flows, but they are more limited concerning other aims, like advancing the EU's competitiveness and regulating the private sector. This is problematic insofar as it constrains the EU's ability to safeguard and promote its values. The policy solutions we propose represent steps towards the further strengthening of the EU's digital sovereignty and firmer protection of EU values.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society</pub><doi>10.14763/2021.3.1575</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2197-6775
ispartof Internet policy review, 2021-01, Vol.10 (3), p.1-28
issn 2197-6775
2197-6775
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_14763_2021_3_1575
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Data governance
Digital sovereignty
EU values
GDPR
Legitimacy
title Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty: An analysis of statements and policies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A41%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-econis_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safeguarding%20European%20values%20with%20digital%20sovereignty:%20An%20analysis%20of%20statements%20and%20policies&rft.jtitle=Internet%20policy%20review&rft.au=Roberts,%20Huw&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=1-28&rft.issn=2197-6775&rft.eissn=2197-6775&rft_id=info:doi/10.14763/2021.3.1575&rft_dat=%3Ceconis_cross%3E245338%3C/econis_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true