Trilemmas: Gorgias’ PTMO Between Zeno and Melissus

The present paper makes the following points. (1) The summary given in Sextus Emp. Math. VII is of much greater value than usually acknowledged, since it preserves several key elements of Gorgias’ communicational strategy. (2) A sketchy trilemma is available in the opening sentence of Philolaos (DK...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Peitho (Poznań) 2017-10 (1(8)), p.155-172
1. Verfasser: Rossetti, Livio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 172
container_issue 1(8)
container_start_page 155
container_title Peitho (Poznań)
container_volume
creator Rossetti, Livio
description The present paper makes the following points. (1) The summary given in Sextus Emp. Math. VII is of much greater value than usually acknowledged, since it preserves several key elements of Gorgias’ communicational strategy. (2) A sketchy trilemma is available in the opening sentence of Philolaos (DK 44B2) as well as in a passage of Plato’s Parmenides. This is evidence in favor of the hypothesis that the very first known trilemma was devised by Gorgias and not by Sextus himself or Aenesidemus. (3) Not unlike Zeno, Gorgias enjoyed to be neither serious nor joking, but remained somewhat halfway. This point is seldom acknowledged, though it is crucial in order to understand that he pretends to claim (e.g. that p), but his claims do not amount to any points of doctrine. (4) That he remains halfway should not prevent us from appreciating some of his ideas, but, at the same time, we should not expect full intellectual adhesion to what he tells us. Besides, something similar occurs in most of Plato’s dialogues. (5). Gorgias owes a lot to Melissus.
doi_str_mv 10.14746/peitho.2017.12222
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_14746_peitho_2017_12222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_14746_peitho_2017_12222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_14746_peitho_2017_122223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYJAyNNAzNDE3MdMvSM0sycjXMzIwNNczNAICJgZOIwMLI11zU2NLFiQ2BwNvcXGWgYGBoaGBqYGFKSeDSUhRZk5qbm5isZWCe35RemZi8aOGmQoBIb7-Ck6pJeWpqXkKUal5-QqJeSkKvqk5mcXFpcU8DKxpiTnFqbxQmpvByM01xNlDN7kov7i4KDUtvqAoMzexqDLe0CAe7MR4iBPjQU6MBzvRmCxNAKLZRms</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trilemmas: Gorgias’ PTMO Between Zeno and Melissus</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Rossetti, Livio</creator><creatorcontrib>Rossetti, Livio</creatorcontrib><description>The present paper makes the following points. (1) The summary given in Sextus Emp. Math. VII is of much greater value than usually acknowledged, since it preserves several key elements of Gorgias’ communicational strategy. (2) A sketchy trilemma is available in the opening sentence of Philolaos (DK 44B2) as well as in a passage of Plato’s Parmenides. This is evidence in favor of the hypothesis that the very first known trilemma was devised by Gorgias and not by Sextus himself or Aenesidemus. (3) Not unlike Zeno, Gorgias enjoyed to be neither serious nor joking, but remained somewhat halfway. This point is seldom acknowledged, though it is crucial in order to understand that he pretends to claim (e.g. that p), but his claims do not amount to any points of doctrine. (4) That he remains halfway should not prevent us from appreciating some of his ideas, but, at the same time, we should not expect full intellectual adhesion to what he tells us. Besides, something similar occurs in most of Plato’s dialogues. (5). Gorgias owes a lot to Melissus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2082-7539</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2082-7539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14746/peitho.2017.12222</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Peitho (Poznań), 2017-10 (1(8)), p.155-172</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rossetti, Livio</creatorcontrib><title>Trilemmas: Gorgias’ PTMO Between Zeno and Melissus</title><title>Peitho (Poznań)</title><description>The present paper makes the following points. (1) The summary given in Sextus Emp. Math. VII is of much greater value than usually acknowledged, since it preserves several key elements of Gorgias’ communicational strategy. (2) A sketchy trilemma is available in the opening sentence of Philolaos (DK 44B2) as well as in a passage of Plato’s Parmenides. This is evidence in favor of the hypothesis that the very first known trilemma was devised by Gorgias and not by Sextus himself or Aenesidemus. (3) Not unlike Zeno, Gorgias enjoyed to be neither serious nor joking, but remained somewhat halfway. This point is seldom acknowledged, though it is crucial in order to understand that he pretends to claim (e.g. that p), but his claims do not amount to any points of doctrine. (4) That he remains halfway should not prevent us from appreciating some of his ideas, but, at the same time, we should not expect full intellectual adhesion to what he tells us. Besides, something similar occurs in most of Plato’s dialogues. (5). Gorgias owes a lot to Melissus.</description><issn>2082-7539</issn><issn>2082-7539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYJAyNNAzNDE3MdMvSM0sycjXMzIwNNczNAICJgZOIwMLI11zU2NLFiQ2BwNvcXGWgYGBoaGBqYGFKSeDSUhRZk5qbm5isZWCe35RemZi8aOGmQoBIb7-Ck6pJeWpqXkKUal5-QqJeSkKvqk5mcXFpcU8DKxpiTnFqbxQmpvByM01xNlDN7kov7i4KDUtvqAoMzexqDLe0CAe7MR4iBPjQU6MBzvRmCxNAKLZRms</recordid><startdate>20171024</startdate><enddate>20171024</enddate><creator>Rossetti, Livio</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171024</creationdate><title>Trilemmas: Gorgias’ PTMO Between Zeno and Melissus</title><author>Rossetti, Livio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_14746_peitho_2017_122223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rossetti, Livio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Peitho (Poznań)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rossetti, Livio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trilemmas: Gorgias’ PTMO Between Zeno and Melissus</atitle><jtitle>Peitho (Poznań)</jtitle><date>2017-10-24</date><risdate>2017</risdate><issue>1(8)</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>155-172</pages><issn>2082-7539</issn><eissn>2082-7539</eissn><abstract>The present paper makes the following points. (1) The summary given in Sextus Emp. Math. VII is of much greater value than usually acknowledged, since it preserves several key elements of Gorgias’ communicational strategy. (2) A sketchy trilemma is available in the opening sentence of Philolaos (DK 44B2) as well as in a passage of Plato’s Parmenides. This is evidence in favor of the hypothesis that the very first known trilemma was devised by Gorgias and not by Sextus himself or Aenesidemus. (3) Not unlike Zeno, Gorgias enjoyed to be neither serious nor joking, but remained somewhat halfway. This point is seldom acknowledged, though it is crucial in order to understand that he pretends to claim (e.g. that p), but his claims do not amount to any points of doctrine. (4) That he remains halfway should not prevent us from appreciating some of his ideas, but, at the same time, we should not expect full intellectual adhesion to what he tells us. Besides, something similar occurs in most of Plato’s dialogues. (5). Gorgias owes a lot to Melissus.</abstract><doi>10.14746/peitho.2017.12222</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2082-7539
ispartof Peitho (Poznań), 2017-10 (1(8)), p.155-172
issn 2082-7539
2082-7539
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_14746_peitho_2017_12222
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Trilemmas: Gorgias’ PTMO Between Zeno and Melissus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T21%3A39%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trilemmas:%20Gorgias%E2%80%99%20PTMO%20Between%20Zeno%20and%20Melissus&rft.jtitle=Peitho%20(Poznan%CC%81)&rft.au=Rossetti,%20Livio&rft.date=2017-10-24&rft.issue=1(8)&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=155-172&rft.issn=2082-7539&rft.eissn=2082-7539&rft_id=info:doi/10.14746/peitho.2017.12222&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_14746_peitho_2017_12222%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true