The Case of "Judith": A Neuropsychologist's Perspective

Executive Functioning (EF) deficits may be the most catastrophic form of brain injury, as they alter one’s personality and sense of self while impeding the ability to make use of rehabilitation, compensatory strategies, psychotherapy and social support. The injury itself can produce a loss of apprec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pragmatic case studies in psychotherapy 2015-03, Vol.11 (1), p.42-54
1. Verfasser: Webb, Nadia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 54
container_issue 1
container_start_page 42
container_title Pragmatic case studies in psychotherapy
container_volume 11
creator Webb, Nadia
description Executive Functioning (EF) deficits may be the most catastrophic form of brain injury, as they alter one’s personality and sense of self while impeding the ability to make use of rehabilitation, compensatory strategies, psychotherapy and social support. The injury itself can produce a loss of appreciation for the deficits, as well as depression, apathy and a lack of empathy. Although EF deficits can be nuanced, individuals with EF deficits are often presumed incapable of benefiting from higher order interventions. Ward and Hogan’s (2015) case study of Judith effectively contradicts this assumption. While this case does not offer traditional neuropsychological assessment results, it highlights how the value of such measures rests in their ecological validity. The years of psychotherapy and intervention that Judith underwent offer ample ecological data and an opportunity to comment on the neurobiological aspects of Judith’s injury and recovery beyond the assessment setting.  
doi_str_mv 10.14713/pcsp.v11i1.1886
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_14713_pcsp_v11i1_1886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_14713_pcsp_v11i1_1886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_14713_pcsp_v11i1_18863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdzj0LwjAUheEgCtaP3TF0cbLmmtYWNymKOIhD91BiaiOVhNy20H8vLQ7OTuddDjyErIAFEMbAt1aiDVoADQEkyX5EPIgivmGwC8c_PSUzxBdjPElY7JE4KxVNc1TUFNS_Ng9dl_6BHulNNc5Y7GRpKvPUWK-R3pVDq2StW7UgkyKvUC2_OyfsfMrSy0Y6g-hUIazT79x1ApgYgKIHigEoeiD_4_IB05pE1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Case of "Judith": A Neuropsychologist's Perspective</title><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Webb, Nadia</creator><creatorcontrib>Webb, Nadia</creatorcontrib><description>Executive Functioning (EF) deficits may be the most catastrophic form of brain injury, as they alter one’s personality and sense of self while impeding the ability to make use of rehabilitation, compensatory strategies, psychotherapy and social support. The injury itself can produce a loss of appreciation for the deficits, as well as depression, apathy and a lack of empathy. Although EF deficits can be nuanced, individuals with EF deficits are often presumed incapable of benefiting from higher order interventions. Ward and Hogan’s (2015) case study of Judith effectively contradicts this assumption. While this case does not offer traditional neuropsychological assessment results, it highlights how the value of such measures rests in their ecological validity. The years of psychotherapy and intervention that Judith underwent offer ample ecological data and an opportunity to comment on the neurobiological aspects of Judith’s injury and recovery beyond the assessment setting.  </description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-0124</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-0124</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14713/pcsp.v11i1.1886</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Pragmatic case studies in psychotherapy, 2015-03, Vol.11 (1), p.42-54</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Webb, Nadia</creatorcontrib><title>The Case of "Judith": A Neuropsychologist's Perspective</title><title>Pragmatic case studies in psychotherapy</title><description>Executive Functioning (EF) deficits may be the most catastrophic form of brain injury, as they alter one’s personality and sense of self while impeding the ability to make use of rehabilitation, compensatory strategies, psychotherapy and social support. The injury itself can produce a loss of appreciation for the deficits, as well as depression, apathy and a lack of empathy. Although EF deficits can be nuanced, individuals with EF deficits are often presumed incapable of benefiting from higher order interventions. Ward and Hogan’s (2015) case study of Judith effectively contradicts this assumption. While this case does not offer traditional neuropsychological assessment results, it highlights how the value of such measures rests in their ecological validity. The years of psychotherapy and intervention that Judith underwent offer ample ecological data and an opportunity to comment on the neurobiological aspects of Judith’s injury and recovery beyond the assessment setting.  </description><issn>1553-0124</issn><issn>1553-0124</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdzj0LwjAUheEgCtaP3TF0cbLmmtYWNymKOIhD91BiaiOVhNy20H8vLQ7OTuddDjyErIAFEMbAt1aiDVoADQEkyX5EPIgivmGwC8c_PSUzxBdjPElY7JE4KxVNc1TUFNS_Ng9dl_6BHulNNc5Y7GRpKvPUWK-R3pVDq2StW7UgkyKvUC2_OyfsfMrSy0Y6g-hUIazT79x1ApgYgKIHigEoeiD_4_IB05pE1Q</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Webb, Nadia</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>The Case of "Judith": A Neuropsychologist's Perspective</title><author>Webb, Nadia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_14713_pcsp_v11i1_18863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Webb, Nadia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Pragmatic case studies in psychotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Webb, Nadia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Case of "Judith": A Neuropsychologist's Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Pragmatic case studies in psychotherapy</jtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>42</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>42-54</pages><issn>1553-0124</issn><eissn>1553-0124</eissn><abstract>Executive Functioning (EF) deficits may be the most catastrophic form of brain injury, as they alter one’s personality and sense of self while impeding the ability to make use of rehabilitation, compensatory strategies, psychotherapy and social support. The injury itself can produce a loss of appreciation for the deficits, as well as depression, apathy and a lack of empathy. Although EF deficits can be nuanced, individuals with EF deficits are often presumed incapable of benefiting from higher order interventions. Ward and Hogan’s (2015) case study of Judith effectively contradicts this assumption. While this case does not offer traditional neuropsychological assessment results, it highlights how the value of such measures rests in their ecological validity. The years of psychotherapy and intervention that Judith underwent offer ample ecological data and an opportunity to comment on the neurobiological aspects of Judith’s injury and recovery beyond the assessment setting.  </abstract><doi>10.14713/pcsp.v11i1.1886</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1553-0124
ispartof Pragmatic case studies in psychotherapy, 2015-03, Vol.11 (1), p.42-54
issn 1553-0124
1553-0124
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_14713_pcsp_v11i1_1886
source EZB Free E-Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
title The Case of "Judith": A Neuropsychologist's Perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A42%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Case%20of%20%22Judith%22:%20A%20Neuropsychologist's%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Pragmatic%20case%20studies%20in%20psychotherapy&rft.au=Webb,%20Nadia&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=42&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=42-54&rft.issn=1553-0124&rft.eissn=1553-0124&rft_id=info:doi/10.14713/pcsp.v11i1.1886&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_14713_pcsp_v11i1_1886%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true