Is the time right for in vitro neurotoxicity testing using human iPSC-derived neurons?

Current neurotoxicity testing heavily relies on expensive, time consuming and ethically debated in vivo animal experiments that are unsuitable for screening large number of chemicals. Consequently, there is a clear need for (high-throughput) in vitro test strategies, preferably using human cells as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation alternatives to animal experimentation, 2016, Vol.33 (3), p.261
Hauptverfasser: Tukker, Anke M, de Groot, Martje W G D M, Wijnolts, Fiona M J, Kasteel, Emma E J, Hondebrink, Laura, Westerink, Remco H S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 261
container_title ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation
container_volume 33
creator Tukker, Anke M
de Groot, Martje W G D M
Wijnolts, Fiona M J
Kasteel, Emma E J
Hondebrink, Laura
Westerink, Remco H S
description Current neurotoxicity testing heavily relies on expensive, time consuming and ethically debated in vivo animal experiments that are unsuitable for screening large number of chemicals. Consequently, there is a clear need for (high-throughput) in vitro test strategies, preferably using human cells as this increases relevance and eliminates the need for interspecies translation. However, human stem cell-derived neurons used to date are not well characterised, require prolonged differentiation and are potentially subject to batch-to-batch variation, ethical concerns and country-specific legislations. Recently, a number of human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neurons became commercially available that may circumvent these concerns. We therefore used immunofluorescent stainings to demonstrate that human iPSC-derived neurons from various suppliers form mixed neuronal cultures, consisting of different types of (excitatory and inhibitory) neurons. Using multi-well microelectrode array (mwMEA) recordings, we demonstrate that these human iPSC-derived cultures develop spontaneous neuronal activity over time, which can be modulated by different physiological, toxicological and pharmacological compounds. Additional single cell calcium imaging illustrates the presence of functional GABA, glutamate, and acetylcholine receptors as well as voltage-gated calcium channels. While human iPSC-derived neuronal cultures appear not yet suitable to fully replace the rat primary cortical model, our data indicate that these rapidly differentiating, commercially available human iPSC-derived neuronal cultures are already suitable for in vitro prioritisation and effect screening studies. Further characterisation and toxicological validation is now required to facilitate acceptance and large-scale implementation of these animal-free, physiologically-relevant human iPSC-based modelsfor future neurotoxicity testing.
doi_str_mv 10.14573/altex.1510091
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_14573_altex_1510091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27010910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-999dc9353eb6b3786861d1a165a9848026184cbe560c3a4c4d20d3c1357a8b383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LAzEQhoMottRePUr-wNbMZpNNTiJFa6Gg4AfelmyStpHubkmypf33rt0qzmFmDu8zDA9C10AmkLGc3qpNtPsJMCBEwhkaguAiYZJ_nv_bB2gcwhfpipMU8vQSDdKcQEeQIfqYBxzXFkdXWezdah3xsvHY1Xjnom9wbVvfxGbvtIsHHG2Irl7hNvz0dVupGruX12lirHc7a_p4He6u0MVSbYIdn-YIvT8-vE2fksXzbD69XySaUh4TKaXRkjJqS17SvPuYgwEFnCkpMkFSDiLTpWWcaKoynZmUGKqBslyJkgo6QpP-rvZNCN4ui613lfKHAkhxdFQcHRUnRx1w0wPbtqys-Yv_GqHfOs9i2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the time right for in vitro neurotoxicity testing using human iPSC-derived neurons?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Tukker, Anke M ; de Groot, Martje W G D M ; Wijnolts, Fiona M J ; Kasteel, Emma E J ; Hondebrink, Laura ; Westerink, Remco H S</creator><creatorcontrib>Tukker, Anke M ; de Groot, Martje W G D M ; Wijnolts, Fiona M J ; Kasteel, Emma E J ; Hondebrink, Laura ; Westerink, Remco H S</creatorcontrib><description>Current neurotoxicity testing heavily relies on expensive, time consuming and ethically debated in vivo animal experiments that are unsuitable for screening large number of chemicals. Consequently, there is a clear need for (high-throughput) in vitro test strategies, preferably using human cells as this increases relevance and eliminates the need for interspecies translation. However, human stem cell-derived neurons used to date are not well characterised, require prolonged differentiation and are potentially subject to batch-to-batch variation, ethical concerns and country-specific legislations. Recently, a number of human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neurons became commercially available that may circumvent these concerns. We therefore used immunofluorescent stainings to demonstrate that human iPSC-derived neurons from various suppliers form mixed neuronal cultures, consisting of different types of (excitatory and inhibitory) neurons. Using multi-well microelectrode array (mwMEA) recordings, we demonstrate that these human iPSC-derived cultures develop spontaneous neuronal activity over time, which can be modulated by different physiological, toxicological and pharmacological compounds. Additional single cell calcium imaging illustrates the presence of functional GABA, glutamate, and acetylcholine receptors as well as voltage-gated calcium channels. While human iPSC-derived neuronal cultures appear not yet suitable to fully replace the rat primary cortical model, our data indicate that these rapidly differentiating, commercially available human iPSC-derived neuronal cultures are already suitable for in vitro prioritisation and effect screening studies. Further characterisation and toxicological validation is now required to facilitate acceptance and large-scale implementation of these animal-free, physiologically-relevant human iPSC-based modelsfor future neurotoxicity testing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1868-596X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1868-596X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14573/altex.1510091</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27010910</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cell Differentiation ; Cells, Cultured ; Coculture Techniques ; Electrophysiological Phenomena ; Fluoroimmunoassay ; Gene Expression Regulation - physiology ; Humans ; Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells - cytology ; Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells - physiology ; Ion Channels - physiology ; Neurons - cytology ; Neurons - physiology ; Rats ; Receptors, Neurotransmitter - genetics ; Receptors, Neurotransmitter - metabolism ; Staining and Labeling ; Toxicity Tests - methods</subject><ispartof>ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation, 2016, Vol.33 (3), p.261</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-999dc9353eb6b3786861d1a165a9848026184cbe560c3a4c4d20d3c1357a8b383</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27010910$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tukker, Anke M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Groot, Martje W G D M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijnolts, Fiona M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasteel, Emma E J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hondebrink, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westerink, Remco H S</creatorcontrib><title>Is the time right for in vitro neurotoxicity testing using human iPSC-derived neurons?</title><title>ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation</title><addtitle>ALTEX</addtitle><description>Current neurotoxicity testing heavily relies on expensive, time consuming and ethically debated in vivo animal experiments that are unsuitable for screening large number of chemicals. Consequently, there is a clear need for (high-throughput) in vitro test strategies, preferably using human cells as this increases relevance and eliminates the need for interspecies translation. However, human stem cell-derived neurons used to date are not well characterised, require prolonged differentiation and are potentially subject to batch-to-batch variation, ethical concerns and country-specific legislations. Recently, a number of human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neurons became commercially available that may circumvent these concerns. We therefore used immunofluorescent stainings to demonstrate that human iPSC-derived neurons from various suppliers form mixed neuronal cultures, consisting of different types of (excitatory and inhibitory) neurons. Using multi-well microelectrode array (mwMEA) recordings, we demonstrate that these human iPSC-derived cultures develop spontaneous neuronal activity over time, which can be modulated by different physiological, toxicological and pharmacological compounds. Additional single cell calcium imaging illustrates the presence of functional GABA, glutamate, and acetylcholine receptors as well as voltage-gated calcium channels. While human iPSC-derived neuronal cultures appear not yet suitable to fully replace the rat primary cortical model, our data indicate that these rapidly differentiating, commercially available human iPSC-derived neuronal cultures are already suitable for in vitro prioritisation and effect screening studies. Further characterisation and toxicological validation is now required to facilitate acceptance and large-scale implementation of these animal-free, physiologically-relevant human iPSC-based modelsfor future neurotoxicity testing.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cell Differentiation</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Coculture Techniques</subject><subject>Electrophysiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Fluoroimmunoassay</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Ion Channels - physiology</subject><subject>Neurons - cytology</subject><subject>Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Receptors, Neurotransmitter - genetics</subject><subject>Receptors, Neurotransmitter - metabolism</subject><subject>Staining and Labeling</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests - methods</subject><issn>1868-596X</issn><issn>1868-596X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1LAzEQhoMottRePUr-wNbMZpNNTiJFa6Gg4AfelmyStpHubkmypf33rt0qzmFmDu8zDA9C10AmkLGc3qpNtPsJMCBEwhkaguAiYZJ_nv_bB2gcwhfpipMU8vQSDdKcQEeQIfqYBxzXFkdXWezdah3xsvHY1Xjnom9wbVvfxGbvtIsHHG2Irl7hNvz0dVupGruX12lirHc7a_p4He6u0MVSbYIdn-YIvT8-vE2fksXzbD69XySaUh4TKaXRkjJqS17SvPuYgwEFnCkpMkFSDiLTpWWcaKoynZmUGKqBslyJkgo6QpP-rvZNCN4ui613lfKHAkhxdFQcHRUnRx1w0wPbtqys-Yv_GqHfOs9i2g</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Tukker, Anke M</creator><creator>de Groot, Martje W G D M</creator><creator>Wijnolts, Fiona M J</creator><creator>Kasteel, Emma E J</creator><creator>Hondebrink, Laura</creator><creator>Westerink, Remco H S</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Is the time right for in vitro neurotoxicity testing using human iPSC-derived neurons?</title><author>Tukker, Anke M ; de Groot, Martje W G D M ; Wijnolts, Fiona M J ; Kasteel, Emma E J ; Hondebrink, Laura ; Westerink, Remco H S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-999dc9353eb6b3786861d1a165a9848026184cbe560c3a4c4d20d3c1357a8b383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cell Differentiation</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Coculture Techniques</topic><topic>Electrophysiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Fluoroimmunoassay</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Ion Channels - physiology</topic><topic>Neurons - cytology</topic><topic>Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Receptors, Neurotransmitter - genetics</topic><topic>Receptors, Neurotransmitter - metabolism</topic><topic>Staining and Labeling</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tukker, Anke M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Groot, Martje W G D M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijnolts, Fiona M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasteel, Emma E J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hondebrink, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westerink, Remco H S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tukker, Anke M</au><au>de Groot, Martje W G D M</au><au>Wijnolts, Fiona M J</au><au>Kasteel, Emma E J</au><au>Hondebrink, Laura</au><au>Westerink, Remco H S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the time right for in vitro neurotoxicity testing using human iPSC-derived neurons?</atitle><jtitle>ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation</jtitle><addtitle>ALTEX</addtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>261</spage><pages>261-</pages><issn>1868-596X</issn><eissn>1868-596X</eissn><abstract>Current neurotoxicity testing heavily relies on expensive, time consuming and ethically debated in vivo animal experiments that are unsuitable for screening large number of chemicals. Consequently, there is a clear need for (high-throughput) in vitro test strategies, preferably using human cells as this increases relevance and eliminates the need for interspecies translation. However, human stem cell-derived neurons used to date are not well characterised, require prolonged differentiation and are potentially subject to batch-to-batch variation, ethical concerns and country-specific legislations. Recently, a number of human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neurons became commercially available that may circumvent these concerns. We therefore used immunofluorescent stainings to demonstrate that human iPSC-derived neurons from various suppliers form mixed neuronal cultures, consisting of different types of (excitatory and inhibitory) neurons. Using multi-well microelectrode array (mwMEA) recordings, we demonstrate that these human iPSC-derived cultures develop spontaneous neuronal activity over time, which can be modulated by different physiological, toxicological and pharmacological compounds. Additional single cell calcium imaging illustrates the presence of functional GABA, glutamate, and acetylcholine receptors as well as voltage-gated calcium channels. While human iPSC-derived neuronal cultures appear not yet suitable to fully replace the rat primary cortical model, our data indicate that these rapidly differentiating, commercially available human iPSC-derived neuronal cultures are already suitable for in vitro prioritisation and effect screening studies. Further characterisation and toxicological validation is now required to facilitate acceptance and large-scale implementation of these animal-free, physiologically-relevant human iPSC-based modelsfor future neurotoxicity testing.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>27010910</pmid><doi>10.14573/altex.1510091</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1868-596X
ispartof ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation, 2016, Vol.33 (3), p.261
issn 1868-596X
1868-596X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_14573_altex_1510091
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animals
Cell Differentiation
Cells, Cultured
Coculture Techniques
Electrophysiological Phenomena
Fluoroimmunoassay
Gene Expression Regulation - physiology
Humans
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells - cytology
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells - physiology
Ion Channels - physiology
Neurons - cytology
Neurons - physiology
Rats
Receptors, Neurotransmitter - genetics
Receptors, Neurotransmitter - metabolism
Staining and Labeling
Toxicity Tests - methods
title Is the time right for in vitro neurotoxicity testing using human iPSC-derived neurons?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T15%3A16%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20time%20right%20for%20in%20vitro%20neurotoxicity%20testing%20using%20human%20iPSC-derived%20neurons?&rft.jtitle=ALTEX,%20alternatives%20to%20animal%20experimentation&rft.au=Tukker,%20Anke%20M&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=261&rft.pages=261-&rft.issn=1868-596X&rft.eissn=1868-596X&rft_id=info:doi/10.14573/altex.1510091&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E27010910%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/27010910&rfr_iscdi=true