Analyzing (and comparing) policy mobilities in federal education systems: Potentials of a topological lens

This contribution takes up and discusses topology as a relational approach to better understand and empirically trace policy mobilities in federal education systems. While topology echoes other relational approaches in its simultaneous focus on ongoing change and the “making” of stabilized forms (e....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Education policy analysis archives 2023-01, Vol.31
Hauptverfasser: Hartong, Sigrid, Urbas, Christopher
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Education policy analysis archives
container_volume 31
creator Hartong, Sigrid
Urbas, Christopher
description This contribution takes up and discusses topology as a relational approach to better understand and empirically trace policy mobilities in federal education systems. While topology echoes other relational approaches in its simultaneous focus on ongoing change and the “making” of stabilized forms (e.g., policy scales), it also brings attention to facets of policy mobility research that other approaches have, at least so far, considered to a much lesser extent. Such facets include the systematic integration of a temporal dimension (e.g., rhythms of scale- or policy-making) as well as the consideration of digital/data space-times. Equally, topology reminds us that policy itself is increasingly becoming topological—that is to say, policy-making is increasingly ruled by movement spaces, logics of connectedness, and capacities for change, instead of formal authority, position, or transmission. Integrating these different dimensions into a heuristic framework, we illuminate what we see differently when applying a topological lens to policy mobility analysis in federal education systems, using the example of German education policies since the 2000s, particularly transformations induced by the ongoing pandemic, as a case study.
doi_str_mv 10.14507/epaa.31.7316
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_14507_epaa_31_7316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_14507_epaa_31_7316</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-59b87bca17bb924e167d01b769406ec88229a4b8fee0293b089e3de3f14df7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkD1PwzAYhC0EEqUwsnuEIcFfiRO2quJLqgRD98h2XleuEjuyzRB-PSkwMN2d7nTDg9AtJSUVFZEPMClVclpKTusztKKkbgrGBT3_5y_RVUpHQhgRlVyh48arYf5y_oDvlO-xCeOk4hLv8RQGZ2Y8Bu0Glx0k7Dy20ENUA4b-06jsgsdpThnG9Ig_QgafnRoSDhYrnMPyEA7OLPMBfLpGF3Yp4eZP12j__LTfvha795e37WZXGMZlLqpWN1IbRaXWLRNAa9kTqmXdClKDaRrGWiV0YwEIa7kmTQu8B26p6K0EvkbF762JIaUItpuiG1WcO0q6H07diVPHaXfixL8BGixd7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analyzing (and comparing) policy mobilities in federal education systems: Potentials of a topological lens</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Hartong, Sigrid ; Urbas, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Hartong, Sigrid ; Urbas, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>This contribution takes up and discusses topology as a relational approach to better understand and empirically trace policy mobilities in federal education systems. While topology echoes other relational approaches in its simultaneous focus on ongoing change and the “making” of stabilized forms (e.g., policy scales), it also brings attention to facets of policy mobility research that other approaches have, at least so far, considered to a much lesser extent. Such facets include the systematic integration of a temporal dimension (e.g., rhythms of scale- or policy-making) as well as the consideration of digital/data space-times. Equally, topology reminds us that policy itself is increasingly becoming topological—that is to say, policy-making is increasingly ruled by movement spaces, logics of connectedness, and capacities for change, instead of formal authority, position, or transmission. Integrating these different dimensions into a heuristic framework, we illuminate what we see differently when applying a topological lens to policy mobility analysis in federal education systems, using the example of German education policies since the 2000s, particularly transformations induced by the ongoing pandemic, as a case study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-2341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1068-2341</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14507/epaa.31.7316</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Education policy analysis archives, 2023-01, Vol.31</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-59b87bca17bb924e167d01b769406ec88229a4b8fee0293b089e3de3f14df7e3</citedby><orcidid>0009-0007-8424-8263 ; 0000-0002-8618-4837</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hartong, Sigrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbas, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Analyzing (and comparing) policy mobilities in federal education systems: Potentials of a topological lens</title><title>Education policy analysis archives</title><description>This contribution takes up and discusses topology as a relational approach to better understand and empirically trace policy mobilities in federal education systems. While topology echoes other relational approaches in its simultaneous focus on ongoing change and the “making” of stabilized forms (e.g., policy scales), it also brings attention to facets of policy mobility research that other approaches have, at least so far, considered to a much lesser extent. Such facets include the systematic integration of a temporal dimension (e.g., rhythms of scale- or policy-making) as well as the consideration of digital/data space-times. Equally, topology reminds us that policy itself is increasingly becoming topological—that is to say, policy-making is increasingly ruled by movement spaces, logics of connectedness, and capacities for change, instead of formal authority, position, or transmission. Integrating these different dimensions into a heuristic framework, we illuminate what we see differently when applying a topological lens to policy mobility analysis in federal education systems, using the example of German education policies since the 2000s, particularly transformations induced by the ongoing pandemic, as a case study.</description><issn>1068-2341</issn><issn>1068-2341</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkD1PwzAYhC0EEqUwsnuEIcFfiRO2quJLqgRD98h2XleuEjuyzRB-PSkwMN2d7nTDg9AtJSUVFZEPMClVclpKTusztKKkbgrGBT3_5y_RVUpHQhgRlVyh48arYf5y_oDvlO-xCeOk4hLv8RQGZ2Y8Bu0Glx0k7Dy20ENUA4b-06jsgsdpThnG9Ig_QgafnRoSDhYrnMPyEA7OLPMBfLpGF3Yp4eZP12j__LTfvha795e37WZXGMZlLqpWN1IbRaXWLRNAa9kTqmXdClKDaRrGWiV0YwEIa7kmTQu8B26p6K0EvkbF762JIaUItpuiG1WcO0q6H07diVPHaXfixL8BGixd7Q</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Hartong, Sigrid</creator><creator>Urbas, Christopher</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8424-8263</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8618-4837</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Analyzing (and comparing) policy mobilities in federal education systems: Potentials of a topological lens</title><author>Hartong, Sigrid ; Urbas, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-59b87bca17bb924e167d01b769406ec88229a4b8fee0293b089e3de3f14df7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hartong, Sigrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbas, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Education policy analysis archives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hartong, Sigrid</au><au>Urbas, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analyzing (and comparing) policy mobilities in federal education systems: Potentials of a topological lens</atitle><jtitle>Education policy analysis archives</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>31</volume><issn>1068-2341</issn><eissn>1068-2341</eissn><abstract>This contribution takes up and discusses topology as a relational approach to better understand and empirically trace policy mobilities in federal education systems. While topology echoes other relational approaches in its simultaneous focus on ongoing change and the “making” of stabilized forms (e.g., policy scales), it also brings attention to facets of policy mobility research that other approaches have, at least so far, considered to a much lesser extent. Such facets include the systematic integration of a temporal dimension (e.g., rhythms of scale- or policy-making) as well as the consideration of digital/data space-times. Equally, topology reminds us that policy itself is increasingly becoming topological—that is to say, policy-making is increasingly ruled by movement spaces, logics of connectedness, and capacities for change, instead of formal authority, position, or transmission. Integrating these different dimensions into a heuristic framework, we illuminate what we see differently when applying a topological lens to policy mobility analysis in federal education systems, using the example of German education policies since the 2000s, particularly transformations induced by the ongoing pandemic, as a case study.</abstract><doi>10.14507/epaa.31.7316</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8424-8263</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8618-4837</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1068-2341
ispartof Education policy analysis archives, 2023-01, Vol.31
issn 1068-2341
1068-2341
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_14507_epaa_31_7316
source Education Source; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Analyzing (and comparing) policy mobilities in federal education systems: Potentials of a topological lens
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T06%3A58%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analyzing%20(and%20comparing)%20policy%20mobilities%20in%20federal%20education%20systems:%20Potentials%20of%20a%20topological%20lens&rft.jtitle=Education%20policy%20analysis%20archives&rft.au=Hartong,%20Sigrid&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issn=1068-2341&rft.eissn=1068-2341&rft_id=info:doi/10.14507/epaa.31.7316&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_14507_epaa_31_7316%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true