Assessment of Misclassification in a Binary Response: Recovering Information on Clinically Significant Cataract Prevalence from Cataract Surgery Data in Atomic-bomb Survivors

Cataract surgery results when a patient decides to undergo lens surgery following a diagnosis of a clinically significant cataract (CSC)νll. Because the presence of a CSC is generally latent and unobserved, a person might not receive cataract surgery even if the person has a CSCνll. This misclassifi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JOURNAL OF THE JAPAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY 2011/08/19, Vol.41(1), pp.017-031
Hauptverfasser: Nakashima, Eiji, Fujii, Yoshinori, Neriishi, Kazuo, Minamoto, Atsushi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 031
container_issue 1
container_start_page 017
container_title JOURNAL OF THE JAPAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY
container_volume 41
creator Nakashima, Eiji
Fujii, Yoshinori
Neriishi, Kazuo
Minamoto, Atsushi
description Cataract surgery results when a patient decides to undergo lens surgery following a diagnosis of a clinically significant cataract (CSC)νll. Because the presence of a CSC is generally latent and unobserved, a person might not receive cataract surgery even if the person has a CSCνll. This misclassification needs to be adjusted in the statistical analysis of CSC so as to reduce the bias in the parameter estimation. Following Magder and Hughes (1997) and using the cataract surgery data on atomic-bomb survivors at the Radiation Effects Research Foundation, we used this method for estimating the prevalence of CSC in a linear logistic dose response model taking account of the sensitivity and/or specificity of the decision for lens surgery. The estimated sensitivity was 0.385 (95% CI: 0.268, 0.517) and the estimated specificity was perfect. The odds ratio estimate for the radiation dose response changed from 1.39 (95% CI: 1.24, 1.55) to 1.58 (95% CI: 1.26, 1.98) when allowing for the imperfect sensitivity. A large sample simulation study with a continuous covariate was conducted, assuming either imperfect sensitivity or imperfect specificity, to investigate the performance of the method. Results indicated that the parameter estimates are almost correct. We calculated the asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) for a simple logistic regression slope estimate and showed that the ARE depends only on the values of slope and intercept parameters.
doi_str_mv 10.14490/jjss.41.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_14490_jjss_41_017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>article_jjss_41_1_41_1_017_article_char_en</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3247-ced1052f7cc49bec7988dad122527adb8cd515b2722a1fc952e4eb0d0d779723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkN9KwzAUxosoOKd3PkAewM4kTZfWK-f8N5gobvclTU9nRpuMnFrYS_mMZptMCCeH8_3Od-CLomtGR0yInN6u14gjwUaUyZNowBKRxeNknJ6GPst4zGUqzqMLxDWlSZKOxSD6mSACYgu2I64mbwZ1oxBNbbTqjLPEWKLIg7HKb8kn4MZZhLvQadeDN3ZFZrZ2vj3A4U0bY8Nu02zJwqzs3ih4T1WnvNId-fDQqwasBlJ71_4Li2-_gnDkMQx2Vyeda42OS9eWO603vfN4GZ3VqkG4-vuH0fL5aTl9jefvL7PpZB7rhAsZa6gYTXkttRZ5CVrmWVapinGecqmqMtNVytKSS84Vq3WechBQ0opWUuaSJ8Po5mCrvUP0UBcbb9oQQcFosY-62EVdCFaEqAN-f8DX2KkVHGHlO6MbOLLsUMLKUdJfyhdgk183KY6p</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Misclassification in a Binary Response: Recovering Information on Clinically Significant Cataract Prevalence from Cataract Surgery Data in Atomic-bomb Survivors</title><source>J-STAGE日本語サイト (Free Access)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Nakashima, Eiji ; Fujii, Yoshinori ; Neriishi, Kazuo ; Minamoto, Atsushi</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakashima, Eiji ; Fujii, Yoshinori ; Neriishi, Kazuo ; Minamoto, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><description>Cataract surgery results when a patient decides to undergo lens surgery following a diagnosis of a clinically significant cataract (CSC)νll. Because the presence of a CSC is generally latent and unobserved, a person might not receive cataract surgery even if the person has a CSCνll. This misclassification needs to be adjusted in the statistical analysis of CSC so as to reduce the bias in the parameter estimation. Following Magder and Hughes (1997) and using the cataract surgery data on atomic-bomb survivors at the Radiation Effects Research Foundation, we used this method for estimating the prevalence of CSC in a linear logistic dose response model taking account of the sensitivity and/or specificity of the decision for lens surgery. The estimated sensitivity was 0.385 (95% CI: 0.268, 0.517) and the estimated specificity was perfect. The odds ratio estimate for the radiation dose response changed from 1.39 (95% CI: 1.24, 1.55) to 1.58 (95% CI: 1.26, 1.98) when allowing for the imperfect sensitivity. A large sample simulation study with a continuous covariate was conducted, assuming either imperfect sensitivity or imperfect specificity, to investigate the performance of the method. Results indicated that the parameter estimates are almost correct. We calculated the asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) for a simple logistic regression slope estimate and showed that the ARE depends only on the values of slope and intercept parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1882-2754</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1348-6365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14490/jjss.41.017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>THE JAPAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY</publisher><subject>Atomic bomb ; cataract ; EM algorithm ; misclassification ; sensitivity ; specificity</subject><ispartof>JOURNAL OF THE JAPAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY, 2011/08/19, Vol.41(1), pp.017-031</ispartof><rights>2011 Japan Statistical Society</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3247-ced1052f7cc49bec7988dad122527adb8cd515b2722a1fc952e4eb0d0d779723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3247-ced1052f7cc49bec7988dad122527adb8cd515b2722a1fc952e4eb0d0d779723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1883,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakashima, Eiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Yoshinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neriishi, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minamoto, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Misclassification in a Binary Response: Recovering Information on Clinically Significant Cataract Prevalence from Cataract Surgery Data in Atomic-bomb Survivors</title><title>JOURNAL OF THE JAPAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY</title><addtitle>JOURNAL OF THE JAPAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY</addtitle><description>Cataract surgery results when a patient decides to undergo lens surgery following a diagnosis of a clinically significant cataract (CSC)νll. Because the presence of a CSC is generally latent and unobserved, a person might not receive cataract surgery even if the person has a CSCνll. This misclassification needs to be adjusted in the statistical analysis of CSC so as to reduce the bias in the parameter estimation. Following Magder and Hughes (1997) and using the cataract surgery data on atomic-bomb survivors at the Radiation Effects Research Foundation, we used this method for estimating the prevalence of CSC in a linear logistic dose response model taking account of the sensitivity and/or specificity of the decision for lens surgery. The estimated sensitivity was 0.385 (95% CI: 0.268, 0.517) and the estimated specificity was perfect. The odds ratio estimate for the radiation dose response changed from 1.39 (95% CI: 1.24, 1.55) to 1.58 (95% CI: 1.26, 1.98) when allowing for the imperfect sensitivity. A large sample simulation study with a continuous covariate was conducted, assuming either imperfect sensitivity or imperfect specificity, to investigate the performance of the method. Results indicated that the parameter estimates are almost correct. We calculated the asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) for a simple logistic regression slope estimate and showed that the ARE depends only on the values of slope and intercept parameters.</description><subject>Atomic bomb</subject><subject>cataract</subject><subject>EM algorithm</subject><subject>misclassification</subject><subject>sensitivity</subject><subject>specificity</subject><issn>1882-2754</issn><issn>1348-6365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkN9KwzAUxosoOKd3PkAewM4kTZfWK-f8N5gobvclTU9nRpuMnFrYS_mMZptMCCeH8_3Od-CLomtGR0yInN6u14gjwUaUyZNowBKRxeNknJ6GPst4zGUqzqMLxDWlSZKOxSD6mSACYgu2I64mbwZ1oxBNbbTqjLPEWKLIg7HKb8kn4MZZhLvQadeDN3ZFZrZ2vj3A4U0bY8Nu02zJwqzs3ih4T1WnvNId-fDQqwasBlJ71_4Li2-_gnDkMQx2Vyeda42OS9eWO603vfN4GZ3VqkG4-vuH0fL5aTl9jefvL7PpZB7rhAsZa6gYTXkttRZ5CVrmWVapinGecqmqMtNVytKSS84Vq3WechBQ0opWUuaSJ8Po5mCrvUP0UBcbb9oQQcFosY-62EVdCFaEqAN-f8DX2KkVHGHlO6MbOLLsUMLKUdJfyhdgk183KY6p</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Nakashima, Eiji</creator><creator>Fujii, Yoshinori</creator><creator>Neriishi, Kazuo</creator><creator>Minamoto, Atsushi</creator><general>THE JAPAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Assessment of Misclassification in a Binary Response: Recovering Information on Clinically Significant Cataract Prevalence from Cataract Surgery Data in Atomic-bomb Survivors</title><author>Nakashima, Eiji ; Fujii, Yoshinori ; Neriishi, Kazuo ; Minamoto, Atsushi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3247-ced1052f7cc49bec7988dad122527adb8cd515b2722a1fc952e4eb0d0d779723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Atomic bomb</topic><topic>cataract</topic><topic>EM algorithm</topic><topic>misclassification</topic><topic>sensitivity</topic><topic>specificity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakashima, Eiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Yoshinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neriishi, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minamoto, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>JOURNAL OF THE JAPAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakashima, Eiji</au><au>Fujii, Yoshinori</au><au>Neriishi, Kazuo</au><au>Minamoto, Atsushi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of Misclassification in a Binary Response: Recovering Information on Clinically Significant Cataract Prevalence from Cataract Surgery Data in Atomic-bomb Survivors</atitle><jtitle>JOURNAL OF THE JAPAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY</jtitle><addtitle>JOURNAL OF THE JAPAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>017</spage><epage>031</epage><pages>017-031</pages><issn>1882-2754</issn><eissn>1348-6365</eissn><abstract>Cataract surgery results when a patient decides to undergo lens surgery following a diagnosis of a clinically significant cataract (CSC)νll. Because the presence of a CSC is generally latent and unobserved, a person might not receive cataract surgery even if the person has a CSCνll. This misclassification needs to be adjusted in the statistical analysis of CSC so as to reduce the bias in the parameter estimation. Following Magder and Hughes (1997) and using the cataract surgery data on atomic-bomb survivors at the Radiation Effects Research Foundation, we used this method for estimating the prevalence of CSC in a linear logistic dose response model taking account of the sensitivity and/or specificity of the decision for lens surgery. The estimated sensitivity was 0.385 (95% CI: 0.268, 0.517) and the estimated specificity was perfect. The odds ratio estimate for the radiation dose response changed from 1.39 (95% CI: 1.24, 1.55) to 1.58 (95% CI: 1.26, 1.98) when allowing for the imperfect sensitivity. A large sample simulation study with a continuous covariate was conducted, assuming either imperfect sensitivity or imperfect specificity, to investigate the performance of the method. Results indicated that the parameter estimates are almost correct. We calculated the asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) for a simple logistic regression slope estimate and showed that the ARE depends only on the values of slope and intercept parameters.</abstract><pub>THE JAPAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY</pub><doi>10.14490/jjss.41.017</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1882-2754
ispartof JOURNAL OF THE JAPAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY, 2011/08/19, Vol.41(1), pp.017-031
issn 1882-2754
1348-6365
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_14490_jjss_41_017
source J-STAGE日本語サイト (Free Access); EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Atomic bomb
cataract
EM algorithm
misclassification
sensitivity
specificity
title Assessment of Misclassification in a Binary Response: Recovering Information on Clinically Significant Cataract Prevalence from Cataract Surgery Data in Atomic-bomb Survivors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A42%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Misclassification%20in%20a%20Binary%20Response:%20Recovering%20Information%20on%20Clinically%20Significant%20Cataract%20Prevalence%20from%20Cataract%20Surgery%20Data%20in%20Atomic-bomb%20Survivors&rft.jtitle=JOURNAL%20OF%20THE%20JAPAN%20STATISTICAL%20SOCIETY&rft.au=Nakashima,%20Eiji&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=017&rft.epage=031&rft.pages=017-031&rft.issn=1882-2754&rft.eissn=1348-6365&rft_id=info:doi/10.14490/jjss.41.017&rft_dat=%3Cjstage_cross%3Earticle_jjss_41_1_41_1_017_article_char_en%3C/jstage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true