Does the ATAR Predict Pre-service Teacher Capacity for Inclusive Classroom Practice? Classroom Practice?

In this study, we examined whether the Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank (ATAR) predicted pre-service teachers' schema development for inclusive classroom teaching. Where previous studies have employed grade point average (GPA) as a criterion measure, this study employed a validated measure l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Australian journal of teacher education 2021-04, Vol.46 (4), p.81-91
Hauptverfasser: Auhl, Greg, Bain, Alan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 91
container_issue 4
container_start_page 81
container_title The Australian journal of teacher education
container_volume 46
creator Auhl, Greg
Bain, Alan
description In this study, we examined whether the Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank (ATAR) predicted pre-service teachers' schema development for inclusive classroom teaching. Where previous studies have employed grade point average (GPA) as a criterion measure, this study employed a validated measure linked to standards-based classroom practice. The study was conducted in the final semester of the teacher education programs at three Australian universities. The results showed the explanatory power of the ATAR was close to zero for the students studied. The implications of the findings for teacher education and for using the ATAR as an indicator of teacher quality are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.14221/ajte.2021v46n4.5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_14221_ajte_2021v46n4_5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_14221_ajte_2021v46n4_5</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c855-53d533eb629a28cd01ec3db75d5b4dd07eaefe77159604c9aec3a506cd755bf53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1Kw0AUhQdRsFYfwN28QOL85GaSlYSotVBQJAt3YTJzQ1LSpszEQN_eqYq4cHUO93Auh4-QW85ingjB7_R2wlgwweck3ScxnJEFzyREwNX7-R9_Sa683zIWPIgF6R5G9HTqkBZV8UZfHdreTCeNPLq5N0gr1KZDR0t90KafjrQdHV3vzfDh-xlpOWjv3TjuQkmbKTTu_7tdk4tWDx5vfnRJqqfHqnyONi-rdVlsIpNBWCgtSIlNKnItMmMZRyNto8BCk1jLFGpsUSkOecoSk-sQa2CpsQqgaUEuCf9-a9wYJmBbH1y_0-5Yc1Z_kapPpOpfUjXIT7mDX0k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the ATAR Predict Pre-service Teacher Capacity for Inclusive Classroom Practice? Classroom Practice?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Auhl, Greg ; Bain, Alan</creator><creatorcontrib>Auhl, Greg ; Bain, Alan ; Charles Sturt University, Bathurst</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we examined whether the Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank (ATAR) predicted pre-service teachers' schema development for inclusive classroom teaching. Where previous studies have employed grade point average (GPA) as a criterion measure, this study employed a validated measure linked to standards-based classroom practice. The study was conducted in the final semester of the teacher education programs at three Australian universities. The results showed the explanatory power of the ATAR was close to zero for the students studied. The implications of the findings for teacher education and for using the ATAR as an indicator of teacher quality are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1835-517X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1835-517X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2021v46n4.5</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Australian journal of teacher education, 2021-04, Vol.46 (4), p.81-91</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Auhl, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bain, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles Sturt University, Bathurst</creatorcontrib><title>Does the ATAR Predict Pre-service Teacher Capacity for Inclusive Classroom Practice? Classroom Practice?</title><title>The Australian journal of teacher education</title><description>In this study, we examined whether the Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank (ATAR) predicted pre-service teachers' schema development for inclusive classroom teaching. Where previous studies have employed grade point average (GPA) as a criterion measure, this study employed a validated measure linked to standards-based classroom practice. The study was conducted in the final semester of the teacher education programs at three Australian universities. The results showed the explanatory power of the ATAR was close to zero for the students studied. The implications of the findings for teacher education and for using the ATAR as an indicator of teacher quality are discussed.</description><issn>1835-517X</issn><issn>1835-517X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM1Kw0AUhQdRsFYfwN28QOL85GaSlYSotVBQJAt3YTJzQ1LSpszEQN_eqYq4cHUO93Auh4-QW85ingjB7_R2wlgwweck3ScxnJEFzyREwNX7-R9_Sa683zIWPIgF6R5G9HTqkBZV8UZfHdreTCeNPLq5N0gr1KZDR0t90KafjrQdHV3vzfDh-xlpOWjv3TjuQkmbKTTu_7tdk4tWDx5vfnRJqqfHqnyONi-rdVlsIpNBWCgtSIlNKnItMmMZRyNto8BCk1jLFGpsUSkOecoSk-sQa2CpsQqgaUEuCf9-a9wYJmBbH1y_0-5Yc1Z_kapPpOpfUjXIT7mDX0k</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Auhl, Greg</creator><creator>Bain, Alan</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Does the ATAR Predict Pre-service Teacher Capacity for Inclusive Classroom Practice? Classroom Practice?</title><author>Auhl, Greg ; Bain, Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c855-53d533eb629a28cd01ec3db75d5b4dd07eaefe77159604c9aec3a506cd755bf53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Auhl, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bain, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles Sturt University, Bathurst</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of teacher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Auhl, Greg</au><au>Bain, Alan</au><aucorp>Charles Sturt University, Bathurst</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the ATAR Predict Pre-service Teacher Capacity for Inclusive Classroom Practice? Classroom Practice?</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of teacher education</jtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>81-91</pages><issn>1835-517X</issn><eissn>1835-517X</eissn><abstract>In this study, we examined whether the Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank (ATAR) predicted pre-service teachers' schema development for inclusive classroom teaching. Where previous studies have employed grade point average (GPA) as a criterion measure, this study employed a validated measure linked to standards-based classroom practice. The study was conducted in the final semester of the teacher education programs at three Australian universities. The results showed the explanatory power of the ATAR was close to zero for the students studied. The implications of the findings for teacher education and for using the ATAR as an indicator of teacher quality are discussed.</abstract><doi>10.14221/ajte.2021v46n4.5</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1835-517X
ispartof The Australian journal of teacher education, 2021-04, Vol.46 (4), p.81-91
issn 1835-517X
1835-517X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_14221_ajte_2021v46n4_5
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Does the ATAR Predict Pre-service Teacher Capacity for Inclusive Classroom Practice? Classroom Practice?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T08%3A18%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20ATAR%20Predict%20Pre-service%20Teacher%20Capacity%20for%20Inclusive%20Classroom%20Practice?%20Classroom%20Practice?&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20teacher%20education&rft.au=Auhl,%20Greg&rft.aucorp=Charles%20Sturt%20University,%20Bathurst&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=81-91&rft.issn=1835-517X&rft.eissn=1835-517X&rft_id=info:doi/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n4.5&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_14221_ajte_2021v46n4_5%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true