Does the ATAR Predict Pre-service Teacher Capacity for Inclusive Classroom Practice? Classroom Practice?
In this study, we examined whether the Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank (ATAR) predicted pre-service teachers' schema development for inclusive classroom teaching. Where previous studies have employed grade point average (GPA) as a criterion measure, this study employed a validated measure l...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Australian journal of teacher education 2021-04, Vol.46 (4), p.81-91 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 91 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 81 |
container_title | The Australian journal of teacher education |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Auhl, Greg Bain, Alan |
description | In this study, we examined whether the Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank (ATAR) predicted pre-service teachers' schema development for inclusive classroom teaching. Where previous studies have employed grade point average (GPA) as a criterion measure, this study employed a validated measure linked to standards-based classroom practice. The study was conducted in the final semester of the teacher education programs at three Australian universities. The results showed the explanatory power of the ATAR was close to zero for the students studied. The implications of the findings for teacher education and for using the ATAR as an indicator of teacher quality are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.14221/ajte.2021v46n4.5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_14221_ajte_2021v46n4_5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_14221_ajte_2021v46n4_5</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c855-53d533eb629a28cd01ec3db75d5b4dd07eaefe77159604c9aec3a506cd755bf53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1Kw0AUhQdRsFYfwN28QOL85GaSlYSotVBQJAt3YTJzQ1LSpszEQN_eqYq4cHUO93Auh4-QW85ingjB7_R2wlgwweck3ScxnJEFzyREwNX7-R9_Sa683zIWPIgF6R5G9HTqkBZV8UZfHdreTCeNPLq5N0gr1KZDR0t90KafjrQdHV3vzfDh-xlpOWjv3TjuQkmbKTTu_7tdk4tWDx5vfnRJqqfHqnyONi-rdVlsIpNBWCgtSIlNKnItMmMZRyNto8BCk1jLFGpsUSkOecoSk-sQa2CpsQqgaUEuCf9-a9wYJmBbH1y_0-5Yc1Z_kapPpOpfUjXIT7mDX0k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the ATAR Predict Pre-service Teacher Capacity for Inclusive Classroom Practice? Classroom Practice?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Auhl, Greg ; Bain, Alan</creator><creatorcontrib>Auhl, Greg ; Bain, Alan ; Charles Sturt University, Bathurst</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we examined whether the Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank (ATAR) predicted pre-service teachers' schema development for inclusive classroom teaching. Where previous studies have employed grade point average (GPA) as a criterion measure, this study employed a validated measure linked to standards-based classroom practice. The study was conducted in the final semester of the teacher education programs at three Australian universities. The results showed the explanatory power of the ATAR was close to zero for the students studied. The implications of the findings for teacher education and for using the ATAR as an indicator of teacher quality are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1835-517X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1835-517X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2021v46n4.5</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Australian journal of teacher education, 2021-04, Vol.46 (4), p.81-91</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Auhl, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bain, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles Sturt University, Bathurst</creatorcontrib><title>Does the ATAR Predict Pre-service Teacher Capacity for Inclusive Classroom Practice? Classroom Practice?</title><title>The Australian journal of teacher education</title><description>In this study, we examined whether the Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank (ATAR) predicted pre-service teachers' schema development for inclusive classroom teaching. Where previous studies have employed grade point average (GPA) as a criterion measure, this study employed a validated measure linked to standards-based classroom practice. The study was conducted in the final semester of the teacher education programs at three Australian universities. The results showed the explanatory power of the ATAR was close to zero for the students studied. The implications of the findings for teacher education and for using the ATAR as an indicator of teacher quality are discussed.</description><issn>1835-517X</issn><issn>1835-517X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM1Kw0AUhQdRsFYfwN28QOL85GaSlYSotVBQJAt3YTJzQ1LSpszEQN_eqYq4cHUO93Auh4-QW85ingjB7_R2wlgwweck3ScxnJEFzyREwNX7-R9_Sa683zIWPIgF6R5G9HTqkBZV8UZfHdreTCeNPLq5N0gr1KZDR0t90KafjrQdHV3vzfDh-xlpOWjv3TjuQkmbKTTu_7tdk4tWDx5vfnRJqqfHqnyONi-rdVlsIpNBWCgtSIlNKnItMmMZRyNto8BCk1jLFGpsUSkOecoSk-sQa2CpsQqgaUEuCf9-a9wYJmBbH1y_0-5Yc1Z_kapPpOpfUjXIT7mDX0k</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Auhl, Greg</creator><creator>Bain, Alan</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Does the ATAR Predict Pre-service Teacher Capacity for Inclusive Classroom Practice? Classroom Practice?</title><author>Auhl, Greg ; Bain, Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c855-53d533eb629a28cd01ec3db75d5b4dd07eaefe77159604c9aec3a506cd755bf53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Auhl, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bain, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles Sturt University, Bathurst</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of teacher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Auhl, Greg</au><au>Bain, Alan</au><aucorp>Charles Sturt University, Bathurst</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the ATAR Predict Pre-service Teacher Capacity for Inclusive Classroom Practice? Classroom Practice?</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of teacher education</jtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>81-91</pages><issn>1835-517X</issn><eissn>1835-517X</eissn><abstract>In this study, we examined whether the Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank (ATAR) predicted pre-service teachers' schema development for inclusive classroom teaching. Where previous studies have employed grade point average (GPA) as a criterion measure, this study employed a validated measure linked to standards-based classroom practice. The study was conducted in the final semester of the teacher education programs at three Australian universities. The results showed the explanatory power of the ATAR was close to zero for the students studied. The implications of the findings for teacher education and for using the ATAR as an indicator of teacher quality are discussed.</abstract><doi>10.14221/ajte.2021v46n4.5</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1835-517X |
ispartof | The Australian journal of teacher education, 2021-04, Vol.46 (4), p.81-91 |
issn | 1835-517X 1835-517X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_14221_ajte_2021v46n4_5 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Does the ATAR Predict Pre-service Teacher Capacity for Inclusive Classroom Practice? Classroom Practice? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T08%3A18%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20ATAR%20Predict%20Pre-service%20Teacher%20Capacity%20for%20Inclusive%20Classroom%20Practice?%20Classroom%20Practice?&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20teacher%20education&rft.au=Auhl,%20Greg&rft.aucorp=Charles%20Sturt%20University,%20Bathurst&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=81-91&rft.issn=1835-517X&rft.eissn=1835-517X&rft_id=info:doi/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n4.5&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_14221_ajte_2021v46n4_5%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |