Treatment of Stage I and II Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Background The treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with good or low surgical risk is primarily surgical resection. However, this area is undergoing many changes. With a greater prevalence of CT imaging, many lung cancers are being found that are small or consti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chest 2013-05, Vol.143 (5), p.e278S-e313S
Hauptverfasser: Howington, John A., MD, FCCP, Blum, Matthew G., MD, FCCP, Chang, Andrew C., MD, FCCP, Balekian, Alex A., MD, MSHS, Murthy, Sudish C., MD, PhD, FCCP
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e313S
container_issue 5
container_start_page e278S
container_title Chest
container_volume 143
creator Howington, John A., MD, FCCP
Blum, Matthew G., MD, FCCP
Chang, Andrew C., MD, FCCP
Balekian, Alex A., MD, MSHS
Murthy, Sudish C., MD, PhD, FCCP
description Background The treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with good or low surgical risk is primarily surgical resection. However, this area is undergoing many changes. With a greater prevalence of CT imaging, many lung cancers are being found that are small or constitute primarily ground-glass opacities. Treatment such as sublobar resection and nonsurgical approaches such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are being explored. With the advent of minimally invasive resections, the criteria to classify a patient as too ill to undergo an anatomic lung resection are being redefined. Methods The writing panel selected topics for review based on clinical relevance to treatment of early-stage lung cancer and the amount and quality of data available for analysis and relative controversy on best approaches in stage I and II NSCLC: general surgical care vs specialist care; sublobar vs lobar surgical approaches to stage I lung cancer; video-assisted thoracic surgery vs open resection; mediastinal lymph node sampling vs lymphadenectomy at the time of surgical resection; the use of radiation therapy, with a focus on SBRT, for primary treatment of early-stage NSCLC in high-risk or medically inoperable patients as well as adjuvant radiation therapy in the sublobar and lobar resection settings; adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage NSCLC; and the impact of ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic status on lung cancer survival. Recommendations by the writing committee were based on an evidence-based review of the literature and in accordance with the approach described by the Guidelines Oversight Committee of the American College of Chest Physicians. Results Surgical resection remains the primary and preferred approach to the treatment of stage I and II NSCLC. Lobectomy or greater resection remains the preferred approach to T1b and larger tumors. The use of sublobar resection for T1a tumors and the application of adjuvant radiation therapy in this group are being actively studied in large clinical trials. Every patient should have systematic mediastinal lymph node sampling at the time of curative intent surgical resection, and mediastinal lymphadenectomy can be performed without increased morbidity. Perioperative morbidity and mortality are reduced and long-term survival is improved when surgical resection is performed by a board-certified thoracic surgeon. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II NSCLC is recommended and has show
doi_str_mv 10.1378/chest.12-2359
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1378_chest_12_2359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S001236921662127X</els_id><sourcerecordid>S001236921662127X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2249-f92798523956fe7317886edeeebd47b618ca0e6c3fba9c7ac622fa17eb552e793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouK4evecLdE0mbdJcBCn-KSx62BW8hTSdrl27qSRdYb-9retJ8DLDDO8N7zeEXHO24ELlN-4d47DgkIDI9AmZcS14IrJUnJIZY-NeSA3n5CLGLRtnruWMyHVAO-zQD7Rv6GqwG6Qltb6mZUmfe5_Ene06WuBYlnu_oYX1DsMlOWtsF_Hqt8_J68P9unhKli-PZXG3TBxAqpNGg9J5BkJnskEluMpziTUiVnWqKslzZxlKJ5rKaqeskwCN5QqrLANUWsxJcrzrQh9jwMZ8hnZnw8FwZiZo8wNtOJgJetSrox7HUF8tBhNdi2Piug3oBlP37b_O2z9O17W-dbb7wAPGbb8PfiQ13EQwzKymh07_5FICB_UmvgGlRnF1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of Stage I and II Non-small Cell Lung Cancer</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Howington, John A., MD, FCCP ; Blum, Matthew G., MD, FCCP ; Chang, Andrew C., MD, FCCP ; Balekian, Alex A., MD, MSHS ; Murthy, Sudish C., MD, PhD, FCCP</creator><creatorcontrib>Howington, John A., MD, FCCP ; Blum, Matthew G., MD, FCCP ; Chang, Andrew C., MD, FCCP ; Balekian, Alex A., MD, MSHS ; Murthy, Sudish C., MD, PhD, FCCP</creatorcontrib><description>Background The treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with good or low surgical risk is primarily surgical resection. However, this area is undergoing many changes. With a greater prevalence of CT imaging, many lung cancers are being found that are small or constitute primarily ground-glass opacities. Treatment such as sublobar resection and nonsurgical approaches such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are being explored. With the advent of minimally invasive resections, the criteria to classify a patient as too ill to undergo an anatomic lung resection are being redefined. Methods The writing panel selected topics for review based on clinical relevance to treatment of early-stage lung cancer and the amount and quality of data available for analysis and relative controversy on best approaches in stage I and II NSCLC: general surgical care vs specialist care; sublobar vs lobar surgical approaches to stage I lung cancer; video-assisted thoracic surgery vs open resection; mediastinal lymph node sampling vs lymphadenectomy at the time of surgical resection; the use of radiation therapy, with a focus on SBRT, for primary treatment of early-stage NSCLC in high-risk or medically inoperable patients as well as adjuvant radiation therapy in the sublobar and lobar resection settings; adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage NSCLC; and the impact of ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic status on lung cancer survival. Recommendations by the writing committee were based on an evidence-based review of the literature and in accordance with the approach described by the Guidelines Oversight Committee of the American College of Chest Physicians. Results Surgical resection remains the primary and preferred approach to the treatment of stage I and II NSCLC. Lobectomy or greater resection remains the preferred approach to T1b and larger tumors. The use of sublobar resection for T1a tumors and the application of adjuvant radiation therapy in this group are being actively studied in large clinical trials. Every patient should have systematic mediastinal lymph node sampling at the time of curative intent surgical resection, and mediastinal lymphadenectomy can be performed without increased morbidity. Perioperative morbidity and mortality are reduced and long-term survival is improved when surgical resection is performed by a board-certified thoracic surgeon. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II NSCLC is recommended and has shown benefit. The use of adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy for stage I NSCLC is of unproven benefit. Primary radiation therapy remains the primary curative intent approach for patients who refuse surgical resection or are determined by a multidisciplinary team to be inoperable. There is growing evidence that SBRT provides greater local control than standard radiation therapy for high-risk and medically inoperable patients with NSCLC. The role of ablative therapies in the treatment of high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC is evolving. Radiofrequency ablation, the most studied of the ablative modalities, has been used effectively in medically inoperable patients with small (&lt; 3 cm) peripheral NSCLC that are clinical stage I.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-2359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Pulmonary/Respiratory</subject><ispartof>Chest, 2013-05, Vol.143 (5), p.e278S-e313S</ispartof><rights>The American College of Chest Physicians</rights><rights>2013 The American College of Chest Physicians</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2249-f92798523956fe7317886edeeebd47b618ca0e6c3fba9c7ac622fa17eb552e793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2249-f92798523956fe7317886edeeebd47b618ca0e6c3fba9c7ac622fa17eb552e793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Howington, John A., MD, FCCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, Matthew G., MD, FCCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Andrew C., MD, FCCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balekian, Alex A., MD, MSHS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Sudish C., MD, PhD, FCCP</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of Stage I and II Non-small Cell Lung Cancer</title><title>Chest</title><description>Background The treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with good or low surgical risk is primarily surgical resection. However, this area is undergoing many changes. With a greater prevalence of CT imaging, many lung cancers are being found that are small or constitute primarily ground-glass opacities. Treatment such as sublobar resection and nonsurgical approaches such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are being explored. With the advent of minimally invasive resections, the criteria to classify a patient as too ill to undergo an anatomic lung resection are being redefined. Methods The writing panel selected topics for review based on clinical relevance to treatment of early-stage lung cancer and the amount and quality of data available for analysis and relative controversy on best approaches in stage I and II NSCLC: general surgical care vs specialist care; sublobar vs lobar surgical approaches to stage I lung cancer; video-assisted thoracic surgery vs open resection; mediastinal lymph node sampling vs lymphadenectomy at the time of surgical resection; the use of radiation therapy, with a focus on SBRT, for primary treatment of early-stage NSCLC in high-risk or medically inoperable patients as well as adjuvant radiation therapy in the sublobar and lobar resection settings; adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage NSCLC; and the impact of ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic status on lung cancer survival. Recommendations by the writing committee were based on an evidence-based review of the literature and in accordance with the approach described by the Guidelines Oversight Committee of the American College of Chest Physicians. Results Surgical resection remains the primary and preferred approach to the treatment of stage I and II NSCLC. Lobectomy or greater resection remains the preferred approach to T1b and larger tumors. The use of sublobar resection for T1a tumors and the application of adjuvant radiation therapy in this group are being actively studied in large clinical trials. Every patient should have systematic mediastinal lymph node sampling at the time of curative intent surgical resection, and mediastinal lymphadenectomy can be performed without increased morbidity. Perioperative morbidity and mortality are reduced and long-term survival is improved when surgical resection is performed by a board-certified thoracic surgeon. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II NSCLC is recommended and has shown benefit. The use of adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy for stage I NSCLC is of unproven benefit. Primary radiation therapy remains the primary curative intent approach for patients who refuse surgical resection or are determined by a multidisciplinary team to be inoperable. There is growing evidence that SBRT provides greater local control than standard radiation therapy for high-risk and medically inoperable patients with NSCLC. The role of ablative therapies in the treatment of high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC is evolving. Radiofrequency ablation, the most studied of the ablative modalities, has been used effectively in medically inoperable patients with small (&lt; 3 cm) peripheral NSCLC that are clinical stage I.</description><subject>Pulmonary/Respiratory</subject><issn>0012-3692</issn><issn>1931-3543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouK4evecLdE0mbdJcBCn-KSx62BW8hTSdrl27qSRdYb-9retJ8DLDDO8N7zeEXHO24ELlN-4d47DgkIDI9AmZcS14IrJUnJIZY-NeSA3n5CLGLRtnruWMyHVAO-zQD7Rv6GqwG6Qltb6mZUmfe5_Ene06WuBYlnu_oYX1DsMlOWtsF_Hqt8_J68P9unhKli-PZXG3TBxAqpNGg9J5BkJnskEluMpziTUiVnWqKslzZxlKJ5rKaqeskwCN5QqrLANUWsxJcrzrQh9jwMZ8hnZnw8FwZiZo8wNtOJgJetSrox7HUF8tBhNdi2Piug3oBlP37b_O2z9O17W-dbb7wAPGbb8PfiQ13EQwzKymh07_5FICB_UmvgGlRnF1</recordid><startdate>201305</startdate><enddate>201305</enddate><creator>Howington, John A., MD, FCCP</creator><creator>Blum, Matthew G., MD, FCCP</creator><creator>Chang, Andrew C., MD, FCCP</creator><creator>Balekian, Alex A., MD, MSHS</creator><creator>Murthy, Sudish C., MD, PhD, FCCP</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201305</creationdate><title>Treatment of Stage I and II Non-small Cell Lung Cancer</title><author>Howington, John A., MD, FCCP ; Blum, Matthew G., MD, FCCP ; Chang, Andrew C., MD, FCCP ; Balekian, Alex A., MD, MSHS ; Murthy, Sudish C., MD, PhD, FCCP</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2249-f92798523956fe7317886edeeebd47b618ca0e6c3fba9c7ac622fa17eb552e793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Pulmonary/Respiratory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Howington, John A., MD, FCCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, Matthew G., MD, FCCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Andrew C., MD, FCCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balekian, Alex A., MD, MSHS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Sudish C., MD, PhD, FCCP</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Chest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Howington, John A., MD, FCCP</au><au>Blum, Matthew G., MD, FCCP</au><au>Chang, Andrew C., MD, FCCP</au><au>Balekian, Alex A., MD, MSHS</au><au>Murthy, Sudish C., MD, PhD, FCCP</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of Stage I and II Non-small Cell Lung Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Chest</jtitle><date>2013-05</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e278S</spage><epage>e313S</epage><pages>e278S-e313S</pages><issn>0012-3692</issn><eissn>1931-3543</eissn><abstract>Background The treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with good or low surgical risk is primarily surgical resection. However, this area is undergoing many changes. With a greater prevalence of CT imaging, many lung cancers are being found that are small or constitute primarily ground-glass opacities. Treatment such as sublobar resection and nonsurgical approaches such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are being explored. With the advent of minimally invasive resections, the criteria to classify a patient as too ill to undergo an anatomic lung resection are being redefined. Methods The writing panel selected topics for review based on clinical relevance to treatment of early-stage lung cancer and the amount and quality of data available for analysis and relative controversy on best approaches in stage I and II NSCLC: general surgical care vs specialist care; sublobar vs lobar surgical approaches to stage I lung cancer; video-assisted thoracic surgery vs open resection; mediastinal lymph node sampling vs lymphadenectomy at the time of surgical resection; the use of radiation therapy, with a focus on SBRT, for primary treatment of early-stage NSCLC in high-risk or medically inoperable patients as well as adjuvant radiation therapy in the sublobar and lobar resection settings; adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage NSCLC; and the impact of ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic status on lung cancer survival. Recommendations by the writing committee were based on an evidence-based review of the literature and in accordance with the approach described by the Guidelines Oversight Committee of the American College of Chest Physicians. Results Surgical resection remains the primary and preferred approach to the treatment of stage I and II NSCLC. Lobectomy or greater resection remains the preferred approach to T1b and larger tumors. The use of sublobar resection for T1a tumors and the application of adjuvant radiation therapy in this group are being actively studied in large clinical trials. Every patient should have systematic mediastinal lymph node sampling at the time of curative intent surgical resection, and mediastinal lymphadenectomy can be performed without increased morbidity. Perioperative morbidity and mortality are reduced and long-term survival is improved when surgical resection is performed by a board-certified thoracic surgeon. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II NSCLC is recommended and has shown benefit. The use of adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy for stage I NSCLC is of unproven benefit. Primary radiation therapy remains the primary curative intent approach for patients who refuse surgical resection or are determined by a multidisciplinary team to be inoperable. There is growing evidence that SBRT provides greater local control than standard radiation therapy for high-risk and medically inoperable patients with NSCLC. The role of ablative therapies in the treatment of high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC is evolving. Radiofrequency ablation, the most studied of the ablative modalities, has been used effectively in medically inoperable patients with small (&lt; 3 cm) peripheral NSCLC that are clinical stage I.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1378/chest.12-2359</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-3692
ispartof Chest, 2013-05, Vol.143 (5), p.e278S-e313S
issn 0012-3692
1931-3543
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1378_chest_12_2359
source Alma/SFX Local Collection; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Pulmonary/Respiratory
title Treatment of Stage I and II Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A55%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20Stage%20I%20and%20II%20Non-small%20Cell%20Lung%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Chest&rft.au=Howington,%20John%20A.,%20MD,%20FCCP&rft.date=2013-05&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e278S&rft.epage=e313S&rft.pages=e278S-e313S&rft.issn=0012-3692&rft.eissn=1931-3543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1378/chest.12-2359&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES001236921662127X%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S001236921662127X&rfr_iscdi=true