Lung Function and Farm Size Predict Healthy Worker Effect in Swine Farmers
Background:Swine farmers are exposed to a number of airborne contaminants associated with respiratory ill health. Objectives:To examine the factors associated with healthy worker effect in the swine industry from a longitudinal follow-up of farmers at 4 years and 13 years. Design:A prospective study...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chest 2007-01, Vol.131 (1), p.245-254 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 254 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 245 |
container_title | Chest |
container_volume | 131 |
creator | Chénard, Liliane Senthilselvan, Ambikaipakan Grover, Vaneeta K. Kirychuk, Shelley P. Lawson, Joshua A. Hurst, Thomas S. Dosman, James A. |
description | Background:Swine farmers are exposed to a number of airborne contaminants associated with respiratory ill health.
Objectives:To examine the factors associated with healthy worker effect in the swine industry from a longitudinal follow-up of farmers at 4 years and 13 years.
Design:A prospective study of swine farmers and nonexposed rural residents was conducted using similar questionnaires and same spirometer at each time point.
Results:In the original observations in 1990/1991, we studied 302 swine farmers and 261 nonfarming control subjects. Four years later in 1994/1995, 217 swine farmers and 171 nonfarming control subjects of the original group participated again. In 2003/2004, 163 swine farmers and 118 control subjects were retested. Of the 163 swine farmers, 52 remained active swine farmers and 111 were no longer swine farming, thus providing the opportunity to evaluate work continuity in the industry. Among farmers studied in 2003/2004, mean values for percentage of predicted FEV1/FVC ratio and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC were lower in those who had quit swine farming compared to those still swine farming and nonfarming control subjects. The herd size in the barn at baseline in 1990/1991 and at interim follow-up in 1994/1995 was a significant predictor of quitting swine farming. In addition, percentage of predicted FEV1/FVC at the interim observation was a significant predictor of quitting swine farming.
Conclusions:There is a significant healthy worker effect among swine farmers. The continuation of work in the facilities may be predicted by herd size and interim lung function. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1378/chest.05-2238 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1378_chest_05_2238</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0012369215499076</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0012369215499076</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-67648ed89517fdf2af0cc5e8170afce2d92303ad584687b4b8cc306cdc6e371f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWqtHr5KLx23zsR_Zo0hrlYKCiseQJhMb3WYl2Vrqrze6hZ48DTM878zwIHRByYjySoz1EmI3IkXGGBcHaEBrTjNe5PwQDQihLONlzU7QaYzvJPW0Lo_RCa0YFYXgA3Q_X_s3PF173bnWY-UNnqqwwk_uG_BjAON0h2egmm65xa9t-ICAJ9ZCmjqPnzbOw18AQjxDR1Y1Ec53dYheppPnm1k2f7i9u7meZ5qzvMvKqswFGFEXtLLGMmWJ1gUIWhFlNTBTM064MoXIS1Et8oXQmpNSG10Cr6jlQ5T1e3VoYwxg5WdwKxW2khL560T-OZGkkL9OEn_Z85_rxQrMnt5JSMDVDlBRq8YG5bWLe07kOWG0TNy455bubblxAWRcqaZJa3l_8r1dB68ayqmkkuVFSlR9ApKPLwdBRu3A66Q1JIXStO6fp38AxgmOEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lung Function and Farm Size Predict Healthy Worker Effect in Swine Farmers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chénard, Liliane ; Senthilselvan, Ambikaipakan ; Grover, Vaneeta K. ; Kirychuk, Shelley P. ; Lawson, Joshua A. ; Hurst, Thomas S. ; Dosman, James A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chénard, Liliane ; Senthilselvan, Ambikaipakan ; Grover, Vaneeta K. ; Kirychuk, Shelley P. ; Lawson, Joshua A. ; Hurst, Thomas S. ; Dosman, James A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background:Swine farmers are exposed to a number of airborne contaminants associated with respiratory ill health.
Objectives:To examine the factors associated with healthy worker effect in the swine industry from a longitudinal follow-up of farmers at 4 years and 13 years.
Design:A prospective study of swine farmers and nonexposed rural residents was conducted using similar questionnaires and same spirometer at each time point.
Results:In the original observations in 1990/1991, we studied 302 swine farmers and 261 nonfarming control subjects. Four years later in 1994/1995, 217 swine farmers and 171 nonfarming control subjects of the original group participated again. In 2003/2004, 163 swine farmers and 118 control subjects were retested. Of the 163 swine farmers, 52 remained active swine farmers and 111 were no longer swine farming, thus providing the opportunity to evaluate work continuity in the industry. Among farmers studied in 2003/2004, mean values for percentage of predicted FEV1/FVC ratio and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC were lower in those who had quit swine farming compared to those still swine farming and nonfarming control subjects. The herd size in the barn at baseline in 1990/1991 and at interim follow-up in 1994/1995 was a significant predictor of quitting swine farming. In addition, percentage of predicted FEV1/FVC at the interim observation was a significant predictor of quitting swine farming.
Conclusions:There is a significant healthy worker effect among swine farmers. The continuation of work in the facilities may be predicted by herd size and interim lung function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1378/chest.05-2238</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17218583</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CHETBF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Northbrook, IL: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Agricultural Workers' Diseases - epidemiology ; Agricultural Workers' Diseases - physiopathology ; Air Pollutants, Occupational ; Animal Husbandry ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Chi-Square Distribution ; farm size ; Follow-Up Studies ; Healthy Worker Effect ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Longitudinal Studies ; longitudinal study ; lung function ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pneumology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Respiratory Function Tests ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Swine ; swine farmers</subject><ispartof>Chest, 2007-01, Vol.131 (1), p.245-254</ispartof><rights>2007 The American College of Chest Physicians</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-67648ed89517fdf2af0cc5e8170afce2d92303ad584687b4b8cc306cdc6e371f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-67648ed89517fdf2af0cc5e8170afce2d92303ad584687b4b8cc306cdc6e371f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4025,27928,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18440216$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17218583$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chénard, Liliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senthilselvan, Ambikaipakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grover, Vaneeta K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirychuk, Shelley P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Joshua A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurst, Thomas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dosman, James A.</creatorcontrib><title>Lung Function and Farm Size Predict Healthy Worker Effect in Swine Farmers</title><title>Chest</title><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><description>Background:Swine farmers are exposed to a number of airborne contaminants associated with respiratory ill health.
Objectives:To examine the factors associated with healthy worker effect in the swine industry from a longitudinal follow-up of farmers at 4 years and 13 years.
Design:A prospective study of swine farmers and nonexposed rural residents was conducted using similar questionnaires and same spirometer at each time point.
Results:In the original observations in 1990/1991, we studied 302 swine farmers and 261 nonfarming control subjects. Four years later in 1994/1995, 217 swine farmers and 171 nonfarming control subjects of the original group participated again. In 2003/2004, 163 swine farmers and 118 control subjects were retested. Of the 163 swine farmers, 52 remained active swine farmers and 111 were no longer swine farming, thus providing the opportunity to evaluate work continuity in the industry. Among farmers studied in 2003/2004, mean values for percentage of predicted FEV1/FVC ratio and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC were lower in those who had quit swine farming compared to those still swine farming and nonfarming control subjects. The herd size in the barn at baseline in 1990/1991 and at interim follow-up in 1994/1995 was a significant predictor of quitting swine farming. In addition, percentage of predicted FEV1/FVC at the interim observation was a significant predictor of quitting swine farming.
Conclusions:There is a significant healthy worker effect among swine farmers. The continuation of work in the facilities may be predicted by herd size and interim lung function.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Agricultural Workers' Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Agricultural Workers' Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Air Pollutants, Occupational</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>farm size</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Healthy Worker Effect</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>longitudinal study</subject><subject>lung function</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Respiratory Function Tests</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>swine farmers</subject><issn>0012-3692</issn><issn>1931-3543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWqtHr5KLx23zsR_Zo0hrlYKCiseQJhMb3WYl2Vrqrze6hZ48DTM878zwIHRByYjySoz1EmI3IkXGGBcHaEBrTjNe5PwQDQihLONlzU7QaYzvJPW0Lo_RCa0YFYXgA3Q_X_s3PF173bnWY-UNnqqwwk_uG_BjAON0h2egmm65xa9t-ICAJ9ZCmjqPnzbOw18AQjxDR1Y1Ec53dYheppPnm1k2f7i9u7meZ5qzvMvKqswFGFEXtLLGMmWJ1gUIWhFlNTBTM064MoXIS1Et8oXQmpNSG10Cr6jlQ5T1e3VoYwxg5WdwKxW2khL560T-OZGkkL9OEn_Z85_rxQrMnt5JSMDVDlBRq8YG5bWLe07kOWG0TNy455bubblxAWRcqaZJa3l_8r1dB68ayqmkkuVFSlR9ApKPLwdBRu3A66Q1JIXStO6fp38AxgmOEg</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>Chénard, Liliane</creator><creator>Senthilselvan, Ambikaipakan</creator><creator>Grover, Vaneeta K.</creator><creator>Kirychuk, Shelley P.</creator><creator>Lawson, Joshua A.</creator><creator>Hurst, Thomas S.</creator><creator>Dosman, James A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American College of Chest Physicians</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>Lung Function and Farm Size Predict Healthy Worker Effect in Swine Farmers</title><author>Chénard, Liliane ; Senthilselvan, Ambikaipakan ; Grover, Vaneeta K. ; Kirychuk, Shelley P. ; Lawson, Joshua A. ; Hurst, Thomas S. ; Dosman, James A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-67648ed89517fdf2af0cc5e8170afce2d92303ad584687b4b8cc306cdc6e371f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Agricultural Workers' Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Agricultural Workers' Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Air Pollutants, Occupational</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>farm size</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Healthy Worker Effect</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>longitudinal study</topic><topic>lung function</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Respiratory Function Tests</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>swine farmers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chénard, Liliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senthilselvan, Ambikaipakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grover, Vaneeta K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirychuk, Shelley P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Joshua A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurst, Thomas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dosman, James A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Chest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chénard, Liliane</au><au>Senthilselvan, Ambikaipakan</au><au>Grover, Vaneeta K.</au><au>Kirychuk, Shelley P.</au><au>Lawson, Joshua A.</au><au>Hurst, Thomas S.</au><au>Dosman, James A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lung Function and Farm Size Predict Healthy Worker Effect in Swine Farmers</atitle><jtitle>Chest</jtitle><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>254</epage><pages>245-254</pages><issn>0012-3692</issn><eissn>1931-3543</eissn><coden>CHETBF</coden><abstract>Background:Swine farmers are exposed to a number of airborne contaminants associated with respiratory ill health.
Objectives:To examine the factors associated with healthy worker effect in the swine industry from a longitudinal follow-up of farmers at 4 years and 13 years.
Design:A prospective study of swine farmers and nonexposed rural residents was conducted using similar questionnaires and same spirometer at each time point.
Results:In the original observations in 1990/1991, we studied 302 swine farmers and 261 nonfarming control subjects. Four years later in 1994/1995, 217 swine farmers and 171 nonfarming control subjects of the original group participated again. In 2003/2004, 163 swine farmers and 118 control subjects were retested. Of the 163 swine farmers, 52 remained active swine farmers and 111 were no longer swine farming, thus providing the opportunity to evaluate work continuity in the industry. Among farmers studied in 2003/2004, mean values for percentage of predicted FEV1/FVC ratio and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC were lower in those who had quit swine farming compared to those still swine farming and nonfarming control subjects. The herd size in the barn at baseline in 1990/1991 and at interim follow-up in 1994/1995 was a significant predictor of quitting swine farming. In addition, percentage of predicted FEV1/FVC at the interim observation was a significant predictor of quitting swine farming.
Conclusions:There is a significant healthy worker effect among swine farmers. The continuation of work in the facilities may be predicted by herd size and interim lung function.</abstract><cop>Northbrook, IL</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17218583</pmid><doi>10.1378/chest.05-2238</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-3692 |
ispartof | Chest, 2007-01, Vol.131 (1), p.245-254 |
issn | 0012-3692 1931-3543 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1378_chest_05_2238 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Agricultural Workers' Diseases - epidemiology Agricultural Workers' Diseases - physiopathology Air Pollutants, Occupational Animal Husbandry Animals Biological and medical sciences Cardiology. Vascular system Chi-Square Distribution farm size Follow-Up Studies Healthy Worker Effect Humans Logistic Models Longitudinal Studies longitudinal study lung function Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Pneumology Predictive Value of Tests Respiratory Function Tests Surveys and Questionnaires Swine swine farmers |
title | Lung Function and Farm Size Predict Healthy Worker Effect in Swine Farmers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T00%3A43%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lung%20Function%20and%20Farm%20Size%20Predict%20Healthy%20Worker%20Effect%20in%20Swine%20Farmers&rft.jtitle=Chest&rft.au=Ch%C3%A9nard,%20Liliane&rft.date=2007-01&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=254&rft.pages=245-254&rft.issn=0012-3692&rft.eissn=1931-3543&rft.coden=CHETBF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1378/chest.05-2238&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0012369215499076%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/17218583&rft_els_id=S0012369215499076&rfr_iscdi=true |