Pixel reassignment in image scanning microscopy: a re-evaluation

Image scanning microscopy is a technique based on confocal microscopy, in which the confocal pinhole is replaced by a detector array, and the resulting image is reconstructed, usually by the process of pixel reassignment. The detector array collects most of the fluorescent light, so the signal-to-no...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision Optics, image science, and vision, 2020-01, Vol.37 (1), p.154
Hauptverfasser: Sheppard, Colin J R, Castello, Marco, Tortarolo, Giorgio, Deguchi, Takahiro, Koho, Sami V, Vicidomini, Giuseppe, Diaspro, Alberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 154
container_title Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision
container_volume 37
creator Sheppard, Colin J R
Castello, Marco
Tortarolo, Giorgio
Deguchi, Takahiro
Koho, Sami V
Vicidomini, Giuseppe
Diaspro, Alberto
description Image scanning microscopy is a technique based on confocal microscopy, in which the confocal pinhole is replaced by a detector array, and the resulting image is reconstructed, usually by the process of pixel reassignment. The detector array collects most of the fluorescent light, so the signal-to-noise ratio is much improved compared with confocal microscopy with a small pinhole, while the resolution is improved compared with conventional (wide-field) microscopy. In previous studies, it has usually been assumed that pixels should be reassigned by a constant factor, to a point midway between the illumination and detection spots. Here it is shown that the peak intensity of the effective point spread function (PSF) can be further increased by 4% by a new choice of the pixel reassignment factor. For an array of two Airy units, the peak of the effective PSF is 1.90 times that of a conventional microscope, and the transverse resolution is 1.53 times better. It is confirmed that image scanning microscopy gives optical sectioning strength identical to that of a confocal microscope with a pinhole equal to the size of the detector array. However, it is shown that image scanning microscopy exhibits axial resolution superior to a confocal microscope with a pinhole the same size as the detector array. For a two-Airy-unit array, the axial resolution is 1.34 times better than in a conventional microscope for the standard reassignment factor, and 1.28 times better for the new reassignment factor. The axial resolution of a confocal microscope with a two-Airy-unit pinhole is only 1.04 times better than conventional microscopy. We also examine the signal-to-noise ratio of a point object in a uniform background (called the detectability), and show that it is 1.6 times higher than in a confocal microscope.
doi_str_mv 10.1364/JOSAA.37.000154
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1364_JOSAA_37_000154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>32118893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-2a4e6f6e91b026ba97d3dac3236b8d761a14c82d44444fba9798266617ca348e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFtLxDAQhYMo7rr67Jv0D6SbW5PUJ8uy3lhYQX0OaZqWSJuWpivuv7e16rzMwJwznPkAuMYoxpSz9fP-NctiKmKEEE7YCVjihCAoE0pOxxlJBkVC0gW4COFj1DAuxTlYUIKxlCldgrsX92XrqLc6BFf5xvohcj5yja5sFIz23vkqapzp22Da7ngb6VEM7aeuD3pwrb8EZ6Wug7367Svwfr992zzC3f7haZPtoCGcDZBoZnnJbYpzRHiuU1HQQhtKKM9lITjWmBlJCjZVOe1TSTjnWBhNmbR0Bdbz3SlJ6G2pun5M2R8VRmpioX5YKCrUzGJ03MyO7pA3tvjX_z1PvwGYIlm6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pixel reassignment in image scanning microscopy: a re-evaluation</title><source>Optica Publishing Group Journals</source><creator>Sheppard, Colin J R ; Castello, Marco ; Tortarolo, Giorgio ; Deguchi, Takahiro ; Koho, Sami V ; Vicidomini, Giuseppe ; Diaspro, Alberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Sheppard, Colin J R ; Castello, Marco ; Tortarolo, Giorgio ; Deguchi, Takahiro ; Koho, Sami V ; Vicidomini, Giuseppe ; Diaspro, Alberto</creatorcontrib><description>Image scanning microscopy is a technique based on confocal microscopy, in which the confocal pinhole is replaced by a detector array, and the resulting image is reconstructed, usually by the process of pixel reassignment. The detector array collects most of the fluorescent light, so the signal-to-noise ratio is much improved compared with confocal microscopy with a small pinhole, while the resolution is improved compared with conventional (wide-field) microscopy. In previous studies, it has usually been assumed that pixels should be reassigned by a constant factor, to a point midway between the illumination and detection spots. Here it is shown that the peak intensity of the effective point spread function (PSF) can be further increased by 4% by a new choice of the pixel reassignment factor. For an array of two Airy units, the peak of the effective PSF is 1.90 times that of a conventional microscope, and the transverse resolution is 1.53 times better. It is confirmed that image scanning microscopy gives optical sectioning strength identical to that of a confocal microscope with a pinhole equal to the size of the detector array. However, it is shown that image scanning microscopy exhibits axial resolution superior to a confocal microscope with a pinhole the same size as the detector array. For a two-Airy-unit array, the axial resolution is 1.34 times better than in a conventional microscope for the standard reassignment factor, and 1.28 times better for the new reassignment factor. The axial resolution of a confocal microscope with a two-Airy-unit pinhole is only 1.04 times better than conventional microscopy. We also examine the signal-to-noise ratio of a point object in a uniform background (called the detectability), and show that it is 1.6 times higher than in a confocal microscope.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1084-7529</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8532</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.37.000154</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32118893</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision, 2020-01, Vol.37 (1), p.154</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-2a4e6f6e91b026ba97d3dac3236b8d761a14c82d44444fba9798266617ca348e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-2a4e6f6e91b026ba97d3dac3236b8d761a14c82d44444fba9798266617ca348e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1182-2478 ; 0000-0002-3085-730X ; 0000-0003-3927-1687 ; 0000-0002-4916-5928 ; 0000-0002-0792-4607</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3247,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32118893$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sheppard, Colin J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castello, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tortarolo, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deguchi, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koho, Sami V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicidomini, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaspro, Alberto</creatorcontrib><title>Pixel reassignment in image scanning microscopy: a re-evaluation</title><title>Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision</title><addtitle>J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis</addtitle><description>Image scanning microscopy is a technique based on confocal microscopy, in which the confocal pinhole is replaced by a detector array, and the resulting image is reconstructed, usually by the process of pixel reassignment. The detector array collects most of the fluorescent light, so the signal-to-noise ratio is much improved compared with confocal microscopy with a small pinhole, while the resolution is improved compared with conventional (wide-field) microscopy. In previous studies, it has usually been assumed that pixels should be reassigned by a constant factor, to a point midway between the illumination and detection spots. Here it is shown that the peak intensity of the effective point spread function (PSF) can be further increased by 4% by a new choice of the pixel reassignment factor. For an array of two Airy units, the peak of the effective PSF is 1.90 times that of a conventional microscope, and the transverse resolution is 1.53 times better. It is confirmed that image scanning microscopy gives optical sectioning strength identical to that of a confocal microscope with a pinhole equal to the size of the detector array. However, it is shown that image scanning microscopy exhibits axial resolution superior to a confocal microscope with a pinhole the same size as the detector array. For a two-Airy-unit array, the axial resolution is 1.34 times better than in a conventional microscope for the standard reassignment factor, and 1.28 times better for the new reassignment factor. The axial resolution of a confocal microscope with a two-Airy-unit pinhole is only 1.04 times better than conventional microscopy. We also examine the signal-to-noise ratio of a point object in a uniform background (called the detectability), and show that it is 1.6 times higher than in a confocal microscope.</description><issn>1084-7529</issn><issn>1520-8532</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kFtLxDAQhYMo7rr67Jv0D6SbW5PUJ8uy3lhYQX0OaZqWSJuWpivuv7e16rzMwJwznPkAuMYoxpSz9fP-NctiKmKEEE7YCVjihCAoE0pOxxlJBkVC0gW4COFj1DAuxTlYUIKxlCldgrsX92XrqLc6BFf5xvohcj5yja5sFIz23vkqapzp22Da7ngb6VEM7aeuD3pwrb8EZ6Wug7367Svwfr992zzC3f7haZPtoCGcDZBoZnnJbYpzRHiuU1HQQhtKKM9lITjWmBlJCjZVOe1TSTjnWBhNmbR0Bdbz3SlJ6G2pun5M2R8VRmpioX5YKCrUzGJ03MyO7pA3tvjX_z1PvwGYIlm6</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Sheppard, Colin J R</creator><creator>Castello, Marco</creator><creator>Tortarolo, Giorgio</creator><creator>Deguchi, Takahiro</creator><creator>Koho, Sami V</creator><creator>Vicidomini, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Diaspro, Alberto</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1182-2478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3085-730X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3927-1687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4916-5928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0792-4607</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Pixel reassignment in image scanning microscopy: a re-evaluation</title><author>Sheppard, Colin J R ; Castello, Marco ; Tortarolo, Giorgio ; Deguchi, Takahiro ; Koho, Sami V ; Vicidomini, Giuseppe ; Diaspro, Alberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-2a4e6f6e91b026ba97d3dac3236b8d761a14c82d44444fba9798266617ca348e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sheppard, Colin J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castello, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tortarolo, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deguchi, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koho, Sami V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicidomini, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaspro, Alberto</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sheppard, Colin J R</au><au>Castello, Marco</au><au>Tortarolo, Giorgio</au><au>Deguchi, Takahiro</au><au>Koho, Sami V</au><au>Vicidomini, Giuseppe</au><au>Diaspro, Alberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pixel reassignment in image scanning microscopy: a re-evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision</jtitle><addtitle>J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>154</spage><pages>154-</pages><issn>1084-7529</issn><eissn>1520-8532</eissn><abstract>Image scanning microscopy is a technique based on confocal microscopy, in which the confocal pinhole is replaced by a detector array, and the resulting image is reconstructed, usually by the process of pixel reassignment. The detector array collects most of the fluorescent light, so the signal-to-noise ratio is much improved compared with confocal microscopy with a small pinhole, while the resolution is improved compared with conventional (wide-field) microscopy. In previous studies, it has usually been assumed that pixels should be reassigned by a constant factor, to a point midway between the illumination and detection spots. Here it is shown that the peak intensity of the effective point spread function (PSF) can be further increased by 4% by a new choice of the pixel reassignment factor. For an array of two Airy units, the peak of the effective PSF is 1.90 times that of a conventional microscope, and the transverse resolution is 1.53 times better. It is confirmed that image scanning microscopy gives optical sectioning strength identical to that of a confocal microscope with a pinhole equal to the size of the detector array. However, it is shown that image scanning microscopy exhibits axial resolution superior to a confocal microscope with a pinhole the same size as the detector array. For a two-Airy-unit array, the axial resolution is 1.34 times better than in a conventional microscope for the standard reassignment factor, and 1.28 times better for the new reassignment factor. The axial resolution of a confocal microscope with a two-Airy-unit pinhole is only 1.04 times better than conventional microscopy. We also examine the signal-to-noise ratio of a point object in a uniform background (called the detectability), and show that it is 1.6 times higher than in a confocal microscope.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>32118893</pmid><doi>10.1364/JOSAA.37.000154</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1182-2478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3085-730X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3927-1687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4916-5928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0792-4607</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1084-7529
ispartof Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision, 2020-01, Vol.37 (1), p.154
issn 1084-7529
1520-8532
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1364_JOSAA_37_000154
source Optica Publishing Group Journals
title Pixel reassignment in image scanning microscopy: a re-evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T17%3A11%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pixel%20reassignment%20in%20image%20scanning%20microscopy:%20a%20re-evaluation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Optical%20Society%20of%20America.%20A,%20Optics,%20image%20science,%20and%20vision&rft.au=Sheppard,%20Colin%20J%20R&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=154&rft.pages=154-&rft.issn=1084-7529&rft.eissn=1520-8532&rft_id=info:doi/10.1364/JOSAA.37.000154&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E32118893%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32118893&rfr_iscdi=true