The Uncomfortable Meeting Grounds of Different Vulnerabilities: Disability and the Political Asylum Process

Political asylum is based on a discourse of rescue that corresponds in part to discussions of precarity, interdependence, and mutual vulnerabilities in transnational feminist work. Although political asylum can be seen as a response to a human rights solicitation, this solicitation is often refused,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Feminist formations 2016-04, Vol.28 (1), p.121-145
Hauptverfasser: Shuman, Amy, Bohmer, Carol
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 145
container_issue 1
container_start_page 121
container_title Feminist formations
container_volume 28
creator Shuman, Amy
Bohmer, Carol
description Political asylum is based on a discourse of rescue that corresponds in part to discussions of precarity, interdependence, and mutual vulnerabilities in transnational feminist work. Although political asylum can be seen as a response to a human rights solicitation, this solicitation is often refused, resulting in deportation rather than asylum for most applicants. Individuals who claim persecution on account of disability face additional obstacles and are caught between conflicting discourses of rescue, exacerbated by their being both invisible and hypervisible within the political asylum system. Building on our earlier work on discourses of refusal within the political asylum process, we examine how, consistent with disability rights discourses, the refused individuals themselves refuse the narratives and subject positions assigned to them. Further, we consider how the refusal of rescue itself participates in the maintenance of asymmetrical transnational power relations.
doi_str_mv 10.1353/ff.2016.0018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1353_ff_2016_0018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44508116</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44508116</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1550-e7cb512dd0545f1e5213ddace9e0c0a8cc083bd67754dde2f1121807a3747dc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFOwzAMhisEEtPYjQfIhRsbcdM0HbdpwEAaYhIb1yhNHGhpmylpD3t7WhUhfLEt__5tfVF0DXQBjLM7axcxhXRBKWRn0SQGDnPBBJz_1Sm7jGYhlLQPxoBmfBJ977-QHBrtaut8q_IKyStiWzSfZONd15hAnCUPhbXosWnJR1c16FVeVEVbYLjvR2HsTkQ1hrS93c4NQ60qsgqnqqvJzjuNIVxFF1ZVAWe_eRodnh736-f59m3zsl5t5xo4p3MUOucQG0N5wi0gj4EZozQukWqqMq1pxnKTCsETYzC2ADFkVCgmEmF0wqbR7eirvQvBo5VHX9TKnyRQObCS1sqBlRxY9fJklB-9K1G3dRdQlq7zTf-kTONluuTyfWA44IQUenwp7dduxrUytM7_PxEzKmSScJr1avYDhUN5Iw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Uncomfortable Meeting Grounds of Different Vulnerabilities: Disability and the Political Asylum Process</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Shuman, Amy ; Bohmer, Carol</creator><creatorcontrib>Shuman, Amy ; Bohmer, Carol</creatorcontrib><description>Political asylum is based on a discourse of rescue that corresponds in part to discussions of precarity, interdependence, and mutual vulnerabilities in transnational feminist work. Although political asylum can be seen as a response to a human rights solicitation, this solicitation is often refused, resulting in deportation rather than asylum for most applicants. Individuals who claim persecution on account of disability face additional obstacles and are caught between conflicting discourses of rescue, exacerbated by their being both invisible and hypervisible within the political asylum system. Building on our earlier work on discourses of refusal within the political asylum process, we examine how, consistent with disability rights discourses, the refused individuals themselves refuse the narratives and subject positions assigned to them. Further, we consider how the refusal of rescue itself participates in the maintenance of asymmetrical transnational power relations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2151-7363</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2151-7371</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-7371</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/ff.2016.0018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Johns Hopkins University Press</publisher><subject>Feature</subject><ispartof>Feminist formations, 2016-04, Vol.28 (1), p.121-145</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Feminist Formations</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1550-e7cb512dd0545f1e5213ddace9e0c0a8cc083bd67754dde2f1121807a3747dc43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44508116$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44508116$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shuman, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohmer, Carol</creatorcontrib><title>The Uncomfortable Meeting Grounds of Different Vulnerabilities: Disability and the Political Asylum Process</title><title>Feminist formations</title><description>Political asylum is based on a discourse of rescue that corresponds in part to discussions of precarity, interdependence, and mutual vulnerabilities in transnational feminist work. Although political asylum can be seen as a response to a human rights solicitation, this solicitation is often refused, resulting in deportation rather than asylum for most applicants. Individuals who claim persecution on account of disability face additional obstacles and are caught between conflicting discourses of rescue, exacerbated by their being both invisible and hypervisible within the political asylum system. Building on our earlier work on discourses of refusal within the political asylum process, we examine how, consistent with disability rights discourses, the refused individuals themselves refuse the narratives and subject positions assigned to them. Further, we consider how the refusal of rescue itself participates in the maintenance of asymmetrical transnational power relations.</description><subject>Feature</subject><issn>2151-7363</issn><issn>2151-7371</issn><issn>2151-7371</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkMFOwzAMhisEEtPYjQfIhRsbcdM0HbdpwEAaYhIb1yhNHGhpmylpD3t7WhUhfLEt__5tfVF0DXQBjLM7axcxhXRBKWRn0SQGDnPBBJz_1Sm7jGYhlLQPxoBmfBJ977-QHBrtaut8q_IKyStiWzSfZONd15hAnCUPhbXosWnJR1c16FVeVEVbYLjvR2HsTkQ1hrS93c4NQ60qsgqnqqvJzjuNIVxFF1ZVAWe_eRodnh736-f59m3zsl5t5xo4p3MUOucQG0N5wi0gj4EZozQukWqqMq1pxnKTCsETYzC2ADFkVCgmEmF0wqbR7eirvQvBo5VHX9TKnyRQObCS1sqBlRxY9fJklB-9K1G3dRdQlq7zTf-kTONluuTyfWA44IQUenwp7dduxrUytM7_PxEzKmSScJr1avYDhUN5Iw</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Shuman, Amy</creator><creator>Bohmer, Carol</creator><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>The Uncomfortable Meeting Grounds of Different Vulnerabilities: Disability and the Political Asylum Process</title><author>Shuman, Amy ; Bohmer, Carol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1550-e7cb512dd0545f1e5213ddace9e0c0a8cc083bd67754dde2f1121807a3747dc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Feature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shuman, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohmer, Carol</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Feminist formations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shuman, Amy</au><au>Bohmer, Carol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Uncomfortable Meeting Grounds of Different Vulnerabilities: Disability and the Political Asylum Process</atitle><jtitle>Feminist formations</jtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>121-145</pages><issn>2151-7363</issn><issn>2151-7371</issn><eissn>2151-7371</eissn><abstract>Political asylum is based on a discourse of rescue that corresponds in part to discussions of precarity, interdependence, and mutual vulnerabilities in transnational feminist work. Although political asylum can be seen as a response to a human rights solicitation, this solicitation is often refused, resulting in deportation rather than asylum for most applicants. Individuals who claim persecution on account of disability face additional obstacles and are caught between conflicting discourses of rescue, exacerbated by their being both invisible and hypervisible within the political asylum system. Building on our earlier work on discourses of refusal within the political asylum process, we examine how, consistent with disability rights discourses, the refused individuals themselves refuse the narratives and subject positions assigned to them. Further, we consider how the refusal of rescue itself participates in the maintenance of asymmetrical transnational power relations.</abstract><pub>Johns Hopkins University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/ff.2016.0018</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2151-7363
ispartof Feminist formations, 2016-04, Vol.28 (1), p.121-145
issn 2151-7363
2151-7371
2151-7371
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1353_ff_2016_0018
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Feature
title The Uncomfortable Meeting Grounds of Different Vulnerabilities: Disability and the Political Asylum Process
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A34%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Uncomfortable%20Meeting%20Grounds%20of%20Different%20Vulnerabilities:%20Disability%20and%20the%20Political%20Asylum%20Process&rft.jtitle=Feminist%20formations&rft.au=Shuman,%20Amy&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=121-145&rft.issn=2151-7363&rft.eissn=2151-7371&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/ff.2016.0018&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E44508116%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44508116&rfr_iscdi=true