Concordance of Severity Ratings Provided in Four Drug Interaction Compendia
To evaluate the agreement among drug–drug interaction (DDI) compendia as to designation of interactions as having the greatest clinical importance (“major" DDIs). Cross-sectional, one-time evaluation. United States in fall 2001. Not applicable. Major DDIs involving prescription medications like...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 2004-03, Vol.44 (2), p.136-141 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 141 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 136 |
container_title | Journal of the American Pharmacists Association |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Abarca, Jacob Malone, Daniel C. Armstrong, Edward P. Grizzle, Amy J. Hansten, Philip D. Van Bergen, Robin C. Lipton, Richard B. |
description | To evaluate the agreement among drug–drug interaction (DDI) compendia as to designation of interactions as having the greatest clinical importance (“major" DDIs).
Cross-sectional, one-time evaluation.
United States in fall 2001.
Not applicable.
Major DDIs involving prescription medications likely to be dispensed in the community and ambulatory pharmacy settings were identified as listed in four compendia that provide specific, detailed information about DDIs (Drug Interaction Facts, Drug Interactions: Analysis and Management, Evaluations of Drug Interactions, and the MicroMedex DRUG-REAX program).
Level of agreement between DDI compendia as assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Overall, 406 major DDIs were listed in one or more of the four compendia. Only 9 (2.2%) of these major DDIs were listed in all four compendia; in fact, the majority of interactions were listed in only one compendium (291 DDIs, 71.7%), despite these interactions being considered of greatest clinical relevance by at least one compendium. The ICC among the compendia was −0.092, indicating low agreement on the classification of major DDIs.
Little agreement exists among commonly used drug interaction compendia for DDIs that were classified in fall 2001 as having the highest clinical relevance and importance. A concerted effort to identify DDIs of the highest clinical importance is needed to design effective strategies to avoid and manage them. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1331/154434504773062582 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1331_154434504773062582</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1544319118301146</els_id><sourcerecordid>15098847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3112-7cf607a8cef4cfb5495dd9fbeaf6bc2a309ccfa66a95bb498dbfdf6e50372f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoVqsv4ELyAqP5zwTcyGi1WFC0-yGT3JSInZTMtNC3d0orLgRX93A453D5ELqi5IZyTm-pFIILSYTWnCgmS3aEznZmsXOPfzQ1dITOu-6TEKaVKU_RiEpiylLoM_RSpdal7G3rAKeAP2ADOfZb_G772C46_JbTJnrwOLZ4ktYZP-T1Ak_bHrJ1fUwtrtJyBa2P9gKdBPvVweXhjtF88jivnovZ69O0up8VjlPKCu2CItqWDoJwoZHCSO9NaMAG1ThmOTHOBauUNbJphCl9E3xQIAnXLDA-Rmw_63LqugyhXuW4tHlbU1LvwNR_wQyl631ptW6W4H8rBxJD4G4fgOHzTYRcdy7CQMXHDK6vfYr_7X8DqY5x4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Concordance of Severity Ratings Provided in Four Drug Interaction Compendia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Abarca, Jacob ; Malone, Daniel C. ; Armstrong, Edward P. ; Grizzle, Amy J. ; Hansten, Philip D. ; Van Bergen, Robin C. ; Lipton, Richard B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abarca, Jacob ; Malone, Daniel C. ; Armstrong, Edward P. ; Grizzle, Amy J. ; Hansten, Philip D. ; Van Bergen, Robin C. ; Lipton, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the agreement among drug–drug interaction (DDI) compendia as to designation of interactions as having the greatest clinical importance (“major" DDIs).
Cross-sectional, one-time evaluation.
United States in fall 2001.
Not applicable.
Major DDIs involving prescription medications likely to be dispensed in the community and ambulatory pharmacy settings were identified as listed in four compendia that provide specific, detailed information about DDIs (Drug Interaction Facts, Drug Interactions: Analysis and Management, Evaluations of Drug Interactions, and the MicroMedex DRUG-REAX program).
Level of agreement between DDI compendia as assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Overall, 406 major DDIs were listed in one or more of the four compendia. Only 9 (2.2%) of these major DDIs were listed in all four compendia; in fact, the majority of interactions were listed in only one compendium (291 DDIs, 71.7%), despite these interactions being considered of greatest clinical relevance by at least one compendium. The ICC among the compendia was −0.092, indicating low agreement on the classification of major DDIs.
Little agreement exists among commonly used drug interaction compendia for DDIs that were classified in fall 2001 as having the highest clinical relevance and importance. A concerted effort to identify DDIs of the highest clinical importance is needed to design effective strategies to avoid and manage them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1544-3191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1544-3450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1331/154434504773062582</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15098847</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems ; Databases, Factual ; Drug Interactions ; Drug Utilization Review ; Drug–drug interactions ; Humans ; medication errors ; patient safety ; Reference Books, Medical ; Severity of Illness Index ; Statistics as Topic</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 2004-03, Vol.44 (2), p.136-141</ispartof><rights>2004 American Pharmacists Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3112-7cf607a8cef4cfb5495dd9fbeaf6bc2a309ccfa66a95bb498dbfdf6e50372f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3112-7cf607a8cef4cfb5495dd9fbeaf6bc2a309ccfa66a95bb498dbfdf6e50372f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15098847$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abarca, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malone, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Edward P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grizzle, Amy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansten, Philip D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Bergen, Robin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipton, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><title>Concordance of Severity Ratings Provided in Four Drug Interaction Compendia</title><title>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association</title><addtitle>J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)</addtitle><description>To evaluate the agreement among drug–drug interaction (DDI) compendia as to designation of interactions as having the greatest clinical importance (“major" DDIs).
Cross-sectional, one-time evaluation.
United States in fall 2001.
Not applicable.
Major DDIs involving prescription medications likely to be dispensed in the community and ambulatory pharmacy settings were identified as listed in four compendia that provide specific, detailed information about DDIs (Drug Interaction Facts, Drug Interactions: Analysis and Management, Evaluations of Drug Interactions, and the MicroMedex DRUG-REAX program).
Level of agreement between DDI compendia as assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Overall, 406 major DDIs were listed in one or more of the four compendia. Only 9 (2.2%) of these major DDIs were listed in all four compendia; in fact, the majority of interactions were listed in only one compendium (291 DDIs, 71.7%), despite these interactions being considered of greatest clinical relevance by at least one compendium. The ICC among the compendia was −0.092, indicating low agreement on the classification of major DDIs.
Little agreement exists among commonly used drug interaction compendia for DDIs that were classified in fall 2001 as having the highest clinical relevance and importance. A concerted effort to identify DDIs of the highest clinical importance is needed to design effective strategies to avoid and manage them.</description><subject>Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Drug Interactions</subject><subject>Drug Utilization Review</subject><subject>Drug–drug interactions</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>medication errors</subject><subject>patient safety</subject><subject>Reference Books, Medical</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><issn>1544-3191</issn><issn>1544-3450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoVqsv4ELyAqP5zwTcyGi1WFC0-yGT3JSInZTMtNC3d0orLgRX93A453D5ELqi5IZyTm-pFIILSYTWnCgmS3aEznZmsXOPfzQ1dITOu-6TEKaVKU_RiEpiylLoM_RSpdal7G3rAKeAP2ADOfZb_G772C46_JbTJnrwOLZ4ktYZP-T1Ak_bHrJ1fUwtrtJyBa2P9gKdBPvVweXhjtF88jivnovZ69O0up8VjlPKCu2CItqWDoJwoZHCSO9NaMAG1ThmOTHOBauUNbJphCl9E3xQIAnXLDA-Rmw_63LqugyhXuW4tHlbU1LvwNR_wQyl631ptW6W4H8rBxJD4G4fgOHzTYRcdy7CQMXHDK6vfYr_7X8DqY5x4A</recordid><startdate>200403</startdate><enddate>200403</enddate><creator>Abarca, Jacob</creator><creator>Malone, Daniel C.</creator><creator>Armstrong, Edward P.</creator><creator>Grizzle, Amy J.</creator><creator>Hansten, Philip D.</creator><creator>Van Bergen, Robin C.</creator><creator>Lipton, Richard B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200403</creationdate><title>Concordance of Severity Ratings Provided in Four Drug Interaction Compendia</title><author>Abarca, Jacob ; Malone, Daniel C. ; Armstrong, Edward P. ; Grizzle, Amy J. ; Hansten, Philip D. ; Van Bergen, Robin C. ; Lipton, Richard B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3112-7cf607a8cef4cfb5495dd9fbeaf6bc2a309ccfa66a95bb498dbfdf6e50372f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Drug Interactions</topic><topic>Drug Utilization Review</topic><topic>Drug–drug interactions</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>medication errors</topic><topic>patient safety</topic><topic>Reference Books, Medical</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abarca, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malone, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Edward P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grizzle, Amy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansten, Philip D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Bergen, Robin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipton, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abarca, Jacob</au><au>Malone, Daniel C.</au><au>Armstrong, Edward P.</au><au>Grizzle, Amy J.</au><au>Hansten, Philip D.</au><au>Van Bergen, Robin C.</au><au>Lipton, Richard B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Concordance of Severity Ratings Provided in Four Drug Interaction Compendia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)</addtitle><date>2004-03</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>136</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>136-141</pages><issn>1544-3191</issn><eissn>1544-3450</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the agreement among drug–drug interaction (DDI) compendia as to designation of interactions as having the greatest clinical importance (“major" DDIs).
Cross-sectional, one-time evaluation.
United States in fall 2001.
Not applicable.
Major DDIs involving prescription medications likely to be dispensed in the community and ambulatory pharmacy settings were identified as listed in four compendia that provide specific, detailed information about DDIs (Drug Interaction Facts, Drug Interactions: Analysis and Management, Evaluations of Drug Interactions, and the MicroMedex DRUG-REAX program).
Level of agreement between DDI compendia as assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Overall, 406 major DDIs were listed in one or more of the four compendia. Only 9 (2.2%) of these major DDIs were listed in all four compendia; in fact, the majority of interactions were listed in only one compendium (291 DDIs, 71.7%), despite these interactions being considered of greatest clinical relevance by at least one compendium. The ICC among the compendia was −0.092, indicating low agreement on the classification of major DDIs.
Little agreement exists among commonly used drug interaction compendia for DDIs that were classified in fall 2001 as having the highest clinical relevance and importance. A concerted effort to identify DDIs of the highest clinical importance is needed to design effective strategies to avoid and manage them.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15098847</pmid><doi>10.1331/154434504773062582</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1544-3191 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 2004-03, Vol.44 (2), p.136-141 |
issn | 1544-3191 1544-3450 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1331_154434504773062582 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems Databases, Factual Drug Interactions Drug Utilization Review Drug–drug interactions Humans medication errors patient safety Reference Books, Medical Severity of Illness Index Statistics as Topic |
title | Concordance of Severity Ratings Provided in Four Drug Interaction Compendia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T10%3A25%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concordance%20of%20Severity%20Ratings%20Provided%20in%20Four%20Drug%20Interaction%20Compendia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Pharmacists%20Association&rft.au=Abarca,%20Jacob&rft.date=2004-03&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=136&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=136-141&rft.issn=1544-3191&rft.eissn=1544-3450&rft_id=info:doi/10.1331/154434504773062582&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E15098847%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/15098847&rft_els_id=S1544319118301146&rfr_iscdi=true |