Concordance of Severity Ratings Provided in Four Drug Interaction Compendia

To evaluate the agreement among drug–drug interaction (DDI) compendia as to designation of interactions as having the greatest clinical importance (“major" DDIs). Cross-sectional, one-time evaluation. United States in fall 2001. Not applicable. Major DDIs involving prescription medications like...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 2004-03, Vol.44 (2), p.136-141
Hauptverfasser: Abarca, Jacob, Malone, Daniel C., Armstrong, Edward P., Grizzle, Amy J., Hansten, Philip D., Van Bergen, Robin C., Lipton, Richard B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 141
container_issue 2
container_start_page 136
container_title Journal of the American Pharmacists Association
container_volume 44
creator Abarca, Jacob
Malone, Daniel C.
Armstrong, Edward P.
Grizzle, Amy J.
Hansten, Philip D.
Van Bergen, Robin C.
Lipton, Richard B.
description To evaluate the agreement among drug–drug interaction (DDI) compendia as to designation of interactions as having the greatest clinical importance (“major" DDIs). Cross-sectional, one-time evaluation. United States in fall 2001. Not applicable. Major DDIs involving prescription medications likely to be dispensed in the community and ambulatory pharmacy settings were identified as listed in four compendia that provide specific, detailed information about DDIs (Drug Interaction Facts, Drug Interactions: Analysis and Management, Evaluations of Drug Interactions, and the MicroMedex DRUG-REAX program). Level of agreement between DDI compendia as assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Overall, 406 major DDIs were listed in one or more of the four compendia. Only 9 (2.2%) of these major DDIs were listed in all four compendia; in fact, the majority of interactions were listed in only one compendium (291 DDIs, 71.7%), despite these interactions being considered of greatest clinical relevance by at least one compendium. The ICC among the compendia was −0.092, indicating low agreement on the classification of major DDIs. Little agreement exists among commonly used drug interaction compendia for DDIs that were classified in fall 2001 as having the highest clinical relevance and importance. A concerted effort to identify DDIs of the highest clinical importance is needed to design effective strategies to avoid and manage them.
doi_str_mv 10.1331/154434504773062582
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1331_154434504773062582</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1544319118301146</els_id><sourcerecordid>15098847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3112-7cf607a8cef4cfb5495dd9fbeaf6bc2a309ccfa66a95bb498dbfdf6e50372f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoVqsv4ELyAqP5zwTcyGi1WFC0-yGT3JSInZTMtNC3d0orLgRX93A453D5ELqi5IZyTm-pFIILSYTWnCgmS3aEznZmsXOPfzQ1dITOu-6TEKaVKU_RiEpiylLoM_RSpdal7G3rAKeAP2ADOfZb_G772C46_JbTJnrwOLZ4ktYZP-T1Ak_bHrJ1fUwtrtJyBa2P9gKdBPvVweXhjtF88jivnovZ69O0up8VjlPKCu2CItqWDoJwoZHCSO9NaMAG1ThmOTHOBauUNbJphCl9E3xQIAnXLDA-Rmw_63LqugyhXuW4tHlbU1LvwNR_wQyl631ptW6W4H8rBxJD4G4fgOHzTYRcdy7CQMXHDK6vfYr_7X8DqY5x4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Concordance of Severity Ratings Provided in Four Drug Interaction Compendia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Abarca, Jacob ; Malone, Daniel C. ; Armstrong, Edward P. ; Grizzle, Amy J. ; Hansten, Philip D. ; Van Bergen, Robin C. ; Lipton, Richard B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abarca, Jacob ; Malone, Daniel C. ; Armstrong, Edward P. ; Grizzle, Amy J. ; Hansten, Philip D. ; Van Bergen, Robin C. ; Lipton, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the agreement among drug–drug interaction (DDI) compendia as to designation of interactions as having the greatest clinical importance (“major" DDIs). Cross-sectional, one-time evaluation. United States in fall 2001. Not applicable. Major DDIs involving prescription medications likely to be dispensed in the community and ambulatory pharmacy settings were identified as listed in four compendia that provide specific, detailed information about DDIs (Drug Interaction Facts, Drug Interactions: Analysis and Management, Evaluations of Drug Interactions, and the MicroMedex DRUG-REAX program). Level of agreement between DDI compendia as assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Overall, 406 major DDIs were listed in one or more of the four compendia. Only 9 (2.2%) of these major DDIs were listed in all four compendia; in fact, the majority of interactions were listed in only one compendium (291 DDIs, 71.7%), despite these interactions being considered of greatest clinical relevance by at least one compendium. The ICC among the compendia was −0.092, indicating low agreement on the classification of major DDIs. Little agreement exists among commonly used drug interaction compendia for DDIs that were classified in fall 2001 as having the highest clinical relevance and importance. A concerted effort to identify DDIs of the highest clinical importance is needed to design effective strategies to avoid and manage them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1544-3191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1544-3450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1331/154434504773062582</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15098847</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems ; Databases, Factual ; Drug Interactions ; Drug Utilization Review ; Drug–drug interactions ; Humans ; medication errors ; patient safety ; Reference Books, Medical ; Severity of Illness Index ; Statistics as Topic</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 2004-03, Vol.44 (2), p.136-141</ispartof><rights>2004 American Pharmacists Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3112-7cf607a8cef4cfb5495dd9fbeaf6bc2a309ccfa66a95bb498dbfdf6e50372f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3112-7cf607a8cef4cfb5495dd9fbeaf6bc2a309ccfa66a95bb498dbfdf6e50372f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15098847$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abarca, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malone, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Edward P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grizzle, Amy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansten, Philip D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Bergen, Robin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipton, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><title>Concordance of Severity Ratings Provided in Four Drug Interaction Compendia</title><title>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association</title><addtitle>J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)</addtitle><description>To evaluate the agreement among drug–drug interaction (DDI) compendia as to designation of interactions as having the greatest clinical importance (“major" DDIs). Cross-sectional, one-time evaluation. United States in fall 2001. Not applicable. Major DDIs involving prescription medications likely to be dispensed in the community and ambulatory pharmacy settings were identified as listed in four compendia that provide specific, detailed information about DDIs (Drug Interaction Facts, Drug Interactions: Analysis and Management, Evaluations of Drug Interactions, and the MicroMedex DRUG-REAX program). Level of agreement between DDI compendia as assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Overall, 406 major DDIs were listed in one or more of the four compendia. Only 9 (2.2%) of these major DDIs were listed in all four compendia; in fact, the majority of interactions were listed in only one compendium (291 DDIs, 71.7%), despite these interactions being considered of greatest clinical relevance by at least one compendium. The ICC among the compendia was −0.092, indicating low agreement on the classification of major DDIs. Little agreement exists among commonly used drug interaction compendia for DDIs that were classified in fall 2001 as having the highest clinical relevance and importance. A concerted effort to identify DDIs of the highest clinical importance is needed to design effective strategies to avoid and manage them.</description><subject>Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Drug Interactions</subject><subject>Drug Utilization Review</subject><subject>Drug–drug interactions</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>medication errors</subject><subject>patient safety</subject><subject>Reference Books, Medical</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><issn>1544-3191</issn><issn>1544-3450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoVqsv4ELyAqP5zwTcyGi1WFC0-yGT3JSInZTMtNC3d0orLgRX93A453D5ELqi5IZyTm-pFIILSYTWnCgmS3aEznZmsXOPfzQ1dITOu-6TEKaVKU_RiEpiylLoM_RSpdal7G3rAKeAP2ADOfZb_G772C46_JbTJnrwOLZ4ktYZP-T1Ak_bHrJ1fUwtrtJyBa2P9gKdBPvVweXhjtF88jivnovZ69O0up8VjlPKCu2CItqWDoJwoZHCSO9NaMAG1ThmOTHOBauUNbJphCl9E3xQIAnXLDA-Rmw_63LqugyhXuW4tHlbU1LvwNR_wQyl631ptW6W4H8rBxJD4G4fgOHzTYRcdy7CQMXHDK6vfYr_7X8DqY5x4A</recordid><startdate>200403</startdate><enddate>200403</enddate><creator>Abarca, Jacob</creator><creator>Malone, Daniel C.</creator><creator>Armstrong, Edward P.</creator><creator>Grizzle, Amy J.</creator><creator>Hansten, Philip D.</creator><creator>Van Bergen, Robin C.</creator><creator>Lipton, Richard B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200403</creationdate><title>Concordance of Severity Ratings Provided in Four Drug Interaction Compendia</title><author>Abarca, Jacob ; Malone, Daniel C. ; Armstrong, Edward P. ; Grizzle, Amy J. ; Hansten, Philip D. ; Van Bergen, Robin C. ; Lipton, Richard B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3112-7cf607a8cef4cfb5495dd9fbeaf6bc2a309ccfa66a95bb498dbfdf6e50372f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Drug Interactions</topic><topic>Drug Utilization Review</topic><topic>Drug–drug interactions</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>medication errors</topic><topic>patient safety</topic><topic>Reference Books, Medical</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abarca, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malone, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Edward P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grizzle, Amy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansten, Philip D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Bergen, Robin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipton, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abarca, Jacob</au><au>Malone, Daniel C.</au><au>Armstrong, Edward P.</au><au>Grizzle, Amy J.</au><au>Hansten, Philip D.</au><au>Van Bergen, Robin C.</au><au>Lipton, Richard B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Concordance of Severity Ratings Provided in Four Drug Interaction Compendia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)</addtitle><date>2004-03</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>136</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>136-141</pages><issn>1544-3191</issn><eissn>1544-3450</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the agreement among drug–drug interaction (DDI) compendia as to designation of interactions as having the greatest clinical importance (“major" DDIs). Cross-sectional, one-time evaluation. United States in fall 2001. Not applicable. Major DDIs involving prescription medications likely to be dispensed in the community and ambulatory pharmacy settings were identified as listed in four compendia that provide specific, detailed information about DDIs (Drug Interaction Facts, Drug Interactions: Analysis and Management, Evaluations of Drug Interactions, and the MicroMedex DRUG-REAX program). Level of agreement between DDI compendia as assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Overall, 406 major DDIs were listed in one or more of the four compendia. Only 9 (2.2%) of these major DDIs were listed in all four compendia; in fact, the majority of interactions were listed in only one compendium (291 DDIs, 71.7%), despite these interactions being considered of greatest clinical relevance by at least one compendium. The ICC among the compendia was −0.092, indicating low agreement on the classification of major DDIs. Little agreement exists among commonly used drug interaction compendia for DDIs that were classified in fall 2001 as having the highest clinical relevance and importance. A concerted effort to identify DDIs of the highest clinical importance is needed to design effective strategies to avoid and manage them.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15098847</pmid><doi>10.1331/154434504773062582</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1544-3191
ispartof Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 2004-03, Vol.44 (2), p.136-141
issn 1544-3191
1544-3450
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1331_154434504773062582
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems
Databases, Factual
Drug Interactions
Drug Utilization Review
Drug–drug interactions
Humans
medication errors
patient safety
Reference Books, Medical
Severity of Illness Index
Statistics as Topic
title Concordance of Severity Ratings Provided in Four Drug Interaction Compendia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T10%3A25%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concordance%20of%20Severity%20Ratings%20Provided%20in%20Four%20Drug%20Interaction%20Compendia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Pharmacists%20Association&rft.au=Abarca,%20Jacob&rft.date=2004-03&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=136&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=136-141&rft.issn=1544-3191&rft.eissn=1544-3450&rft_id=info:doi/10.1331/154434504773062582&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E15098847%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/15098847&rft_els_id=S1544319118301146&rfr_iscdi=true