Differences in the response to CME and CIR drivers of geomagnetic disturbances

Utilizing 1-minute resolution data on the geomagnetic indices SYM-H, AE, solar wind parameters (velocity Vsw and density Np), and z-component Bz of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) during solar cycles 23 and 24, we have statistically analyzed the correlations between geomagnetic activity (sto...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Solar-terrestrial physics 2023-01, Vol.9 (2), p.31-36
Hauptverfasser: Namuun, B., Tsegmed, Battuulai, Li, L.Y., Leghari, G.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 36
container_issue 2
container_start_page 31
container_title Solar-terrestrial physics
container_volume 9
creator Namuun, B.
Tsegmed, Battuulai
Li, L.Y.
Leghari, G.M.
description Utilizing 1-minute resolution data on the geomagnetic indices SYM-H, AE, solar wind parameters (velocity Vsw and density Np), and z-component Bz of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) during solar cycles 23 and 24, we have statistically analyzed the correlations between geomagnetic activity (storms and substorms), Vsw, Np, Bz, and energy coupling functions of solar wind and Earth’s magnetosphere. For the selected 131 CME-driven storms, SYM-H stronger depends on Vsw and B than other parameters, whereas the selected 161 CIR-driven storms have nearly the same dependence on the solar wind electric field, the rate of open magnetic flux dφ/dt, and the reconnection electric field Ekl. Thus, the solar wind electric field and the dayside magnetic reconnection are likely to have different contributions for storms of the two types. During storms of different types, the substorm intensity AE relies mainly on the IMF Bz, rate of open magnetic flux and reconnection electric field.
doi_str_mv 10.12737/stp-92202304
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_12737_stp_92202304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_12737_stp_92202304</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c232t-37888b8654b19e3e8528d8836b5f16418c143ffde6d414fcfb407984a7016f1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpN0E1LAzEUheEgCpbapfv8gWhukpmkSxmrFqqC6HrIx02N2JkhiYL_Xq0Krs5ZvYuHkFPgZyC01OelTmwpBBeSqwMyEw3njDeyOfz3j8milBfOuRAgNcCM3F2mGDHj4LHQNND6jDRjmcahIK0j7W5X1A6BdusHGnJ6x1zoGOkWx53dDliTpyGV-pad_U6ckKNoXwsufndOnq5Wj90N29xfr7uLDfNCisqkNsY40zbKwRIlmkaYYIxsXROhVWA8KBljwDYoUNFHp7heGmU1hzaCk3PCfro-j6VkjP2U087mjx54v_fovzz6Pw_5Cbv8Uko</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in the response to CME and CIR drivers of geomagnetic disturbances</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Namuun, B. ; Tsegmed, Battuulai ; Li, L.Y. ; Leghari, G.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Namuun, B. ; Tsegmed, Battuulai ; Li, L.Y. ; Leghari, G.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Utilizing 1-minute resolution data on the geomagnetic indices SYM-H, AE, solar wind parameters (velocity Vsw and density Np), and z-component Bz of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) during solar cycles 23 and 24, we have statistically analyzed the correlations between geomagnetic activity (storms and substorms), Vsw, Np, Bz, and energy coupling functions of solar wind and Earth’s magnetosphere. For the selected 131 CME-driven storms, SYM-H stronger depends on Vsw and B than other parameters, whereas the selected 161 CIR-driven storms have nearly the same dependence on the solar wind electric field, the rate of open magnetic flux dφ/dt, and the reconnection electric field Ekl. Thus, the solar wind electric field and the dayside magnetic reconnection are likely to have different contributions for storms of the two types. During storms of different types, the substorm intensity AE relies mainly on the IMF Bz, rate of open magnetic flux and reconnection electric field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2500-0535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2500-0535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12737/stp-92202304</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Solar-terrestrial physics, 2023-01, Vol.9 (2), p.31-36</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c232t-37888b8654b19e3e8528d8836b5f16418c143ffde6d414fcfb407984a7016f1b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Namuun, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsegmed, Battuulai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, L.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leghari, G.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in the response to CME and CIR drivers of geomagnetic disturbances</title><title>Solar-terrestrial physics</title><description>Utilizing 1-minute resolution data on the geomagnetic indices SYM-H, AE, solar wind parameters (velocity Vsw and density Np), and z-component Bz of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) during solar cycles 23 and 24, we have statistically analyzed the correlations between geomagnetic activity (storms and substorms), Vsw, Np, Bz, and energy coupling functions of solar wind and Earth’s magnetosphere. For the selected 131 CME-driven storms, SYM-H stronger depends on Vsw and B than other parameters, whereas the selected 161 CIR-driven storms have nearly the same dependence on the solar wind electric field, the rate of open magnetic flux dφ/dt, and the reconnection electric field Ekl. Thus, the solar wind electric field and the dayside magnetic reconnection are likely to have different contributions for storms of the two types. During storms of different types, the substorm intensity AE relies mainly on the IMF Bz, rate of open magnetic flux and reconnection electric field.</description><issn>2500-0535</issn><issn>2500-0535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpN0E1LAzEUheEgCpbapfv8gWhukpmkSxmrFqqC6HrIx02N2JkhiYL_Xq0Krs5ZvYuHkFPgZyC01OelTmwpBBeSqwMyEw3njDeyOfz3j8milBfOuRAgNcCM3F2mGDHj4LHQNND6jDRjmcahIK0j7W5X1A6BdusHGnJ6x1zoGOkWx53dDliTpyGV-pad_U6ckKNoXwsufndOnq5Wj90N29xfr7uLDfNCisqkNsY40zbKwRIlmkaYYIxsXROhVWA8KBljwDYoUNFHp7heGmU1hzaCk3PCfro-j6VkjP2U087mjx54v_fovzz6Pw_5Cbv8Uko</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Namuun, B.</creator><creator>Tsegmed, Battuulai</creator><creator>Li, L.Y.</creator><creator>Leghari, G.M.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Differences in the response to CME and CIR drivers of geomagnetic disturbances</title><author>Namuun, B. ; Tsegmed, Battuulai ; Li, L.Y. ; Leghari, G.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c232t-37888b8654b19e3e8528d8836b5f16418c143ffde6d414fcfb407984a7016f1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Namuun, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsegmed, Battuulai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, L.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leghari, G.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Solar-terrestrial physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Namuun, B.</au><au>Tsegmed, Battuulai</au><au>Li, L.Y.</au><au>Leghari, G.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in the response to CME and CIR drivers of geomagnetic disturbances</atitle><jtitle>Solar-terrestrial physics</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>31-36</pages><issn>2500-0535</issn><eissn>2500-0535</eissn><abstract>Utilizing 1-minute resolution data on the geomagnetic indices SYM-H, AE, solar wind parameters (velocity Vsw and density Np), and z-component Bz of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) during solar cycles 23 and 24, we have statistically analyzed the correlations between geomagnetic activity (storms and substorms), Vsw, Np, Bz, and energy coupling functions of solar wind and Earth’s magnetosphere. For the selected 131 CME-driven storms, SYM-H stronger depends on Vsw and B than other parameters, whereas the selected 161 CIR-driven storms have nearly the same dependence on the solar wind electric field, the rate of open magnetic flux dφ/dt, and the reconnection electric field Ekl. Thus, the solar wind electric field and the dayside magnetic reconnection are likely to have different contributions for storms of the two types. During storms of different types, the substorm intensity AE relies mainly on the IMF Bz, rate of open magnetic flux and reconnection electric field.</abstract><doi>10.12737/stp-92202304</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2500-0535
ispartof Solar-terrestrial physics, 2023-01, Vol.9 (2), p.31-36
issn 2500-0535
2500-0535
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_12737_stp_92202304
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
title Differences in the response to CME and CIR drivers of geomagnetic disturbances
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A17%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20the%20response%20to%20CME%20and%20CIR%20drivers%20of%20geomagnetic%20disturbances&rft.jtitle=Solar-terrestrial%20physics&rft.au=Namuun,%20B.&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=31-36&rft.issn=2500-0535&rft.eissn=2500-0535&rft_id=info:doi/10.12737/stp-92202304&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_12737_stp_92202304%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true