Salvia united: The greatest good for the greatest number
Previous molecular phylogenetic research, based on chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA data, has demonstrated that the large genus Salvia (Lamiaceae) is paraphyletic as traditionally circumscribed. However, neither relationships within Salvia s.l. nor within subtribe Salviinae have been evaluated...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Taxon 2017-02, Vol.66 (1), p.133-145 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 145 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 133 |
| container_title | Taxon |
| container_volume | 66 |
| creator | Drew, Bryan T. González-Gallegos, Jesús Guadalupe Xiang, Chun-Lei Kriebel, Ricardo Drummond, Chloe P. Walker, Jay B. Sytsma, Kenneth J. |
| description | Previous molecular phylogenetic research, based on chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA data, has demonstrated that the large genus Salvia (Lamiaceae) is paraphyletic as traditionally circumscribed. However, neither relationships within Salvia s.l. nor within subtribe Salviinae have been evaluated using low-copy nuclear gene regions. Here, we use two low-copy nuclear gene regions (PPR-AT3G09060, GBSSI) to further assess relationships of Salvia and related genera within Salviinae. Our results largely confirm results from previous studies based on chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA. Based upon the phylogenetic results presented here, previous phylogenetic studies, and taxonomic, morphological, and practical considerations, we conclude that the botanical community would be best served by maintaining a broadly defined Salvia, including the five small embedded genera Dorystaechas, Meriandra, Perovskia, Rosmarinus, and Zhumeria as Salvia species. We subsequently present an updated circumscription of Salvia. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.12705/661.7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_12705_661_7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>90010915</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>90010915</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2817-df7cef5e89b15d1120faebb846082a40a48308de8c81d9921baa3002e2fd495f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1z81KAzEUBeAgCo61voHgyo2k3pv_LEuxKhRcWMFdyEwSmDJaSarStzc64s7VvYuPcziEnCHMkGmQ10rhTB-QBq1V1KCWh6QBEECBKXZMTkrZADDUljdk-uiHj95fvL_2uxhOyVHyQ4nT3zshT8ub9eKOrh5u7xfzFe1YzaMh6S4mGY1tUQZEBsnHtjVCgWFegBeGgwnRdAaDtQxb73mtjCwFYWXiE3I55nZ5W0qOyb3l_sXnvUNwPyNcHeF0hVcj_OyHuP9HufX8uT7f-nzUm7Lb5j9tARAsSv4FDONNfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Salvia united: The greatest good for the greatest number</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Drew, Bryan T. ; González-Gallegos, Jesús Guadalupe ; Xiang, Chun-Lei ; Kriebel, Ricardo ; Drummond, Chloe P. ; Walker, Jay B. ; Sytsma, Kenneth J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Drew, Bryan T. ; González-Gallegos, Jesús Guadalupe ; Xiang, Chun-Lei ; Kriebel, Ricardo ; Drummond, Chloe P. ; Walker, Jay B. ; Sytsma, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous molecular phylogenetic research, based on chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA data, has demonstrated that the large genus Salvia (Lamiaceae) is paraphyletic as traditionally circumscribed. However, neither relationships within Salvia s.l. nor within subtribe Salviinae have been evaluated using low-copy nuclear gene regions. Here, we use two low-copy nuclear gene regions (PPR-AT3G09060, GBSSI) to further assess relationships of Salvia and related genera within Salviinae. Our results largely confirm results from previous studies based on chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA. Based upon the phylogenetic results presented here, previous phylogenetic studies, and taxonomic, morphological, and practical considerations, we conclude that the botanical community would be best served by maintaining a broadly defined Salvia, including the five small embedded genera Dorystaechas, Meriandra, Perovskia, Rosmarinus, and Zhumeria as Salvia species. We subsequently present an updated circumscription of Salvia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-0262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-8175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12705/661.7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT)</publisher><subject>Dorystaechas ; Lamiaceae ; Meriandra ; Perovskia ; Rosmarinus ; SYSTEMATICS AND PHYLOGENY ; Zhumeria</subject><ispartof>Taxon, 2017-02, Vol.66 (1), p.133-145</ispartof><rights>2017 by the International Association for Plant Taxonomy</rights><rights>2017 International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) all rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2817-df7cef5e89b15d1120faebb846082a40a48308de8c81d9921baa3002e2fd495f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2817-df7cef5e89b15d1120faebb846082a40a48308de8c81d9921baa3002e2fd495f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/90010915$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/90010915$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Drew, Bryan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Gallegos, Jesús Guadalupe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiang, Chun-Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kriebel, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drummond, Chloe P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Jay B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sytsma, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><title>Salvia united: The greatest good for the greatest number</title><title>Taxon</title><description>Previous molecular phylogenetic research, based on chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA data, has demonstrated that the large genus Salvia (Lamiaceae) is paraphyletic as traditionally circumscribed. However, neither relationships within Salvia s.l. nor within subtribe Salviinae have been evaluated using low-copy nuclear gene regions. Here, we use two low-copy nuclear gene regions (PPR-AT3G09060, GBSSI) to further assess relationships of Salvia and related genera within Salviinae. Our results largely confirm results from previous studies based on chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA. Based upon the phylogenetic results presented here, previous phylogenetic studies, and taxonomic, morphological, and practical considerations, we conclude that the botanical community would be best served by maintaining a broadly defined Salvia, including the five small embedded genera Dorystaechas, Meriandra, Perovskia, Rosmarinus, and Zhumeria as Salvia species. We subsequently present an updated circumscription of Salvia.</description><subject>Dorystaechas</subject><subject>Lamiaceae</subject><subject>Meriandra</subject><subject>Perovskia</subject><subject>Rosmarinus</subject><subject>SYSTEMATICS AND PHYLOGENY</subject><subject>Zhumeria</subject><issn>0040-0262</issn><issn>1996-8175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1z81KAzEUBeAgCo61voHgyo2k3pv_LEuxKhRcWMFdyEwSmDJaSarStzc64s7VvYuPcziEnCHMkGmQ10rhTB-QBq1V1KCWh6QBEECBKXZMTkrZADDUljdk-uiHj95fvL_2uxhOyVHyQ4nT3zshT8ub9eKOrh5u7xfzFe1YzaMh6S4mGY1tUQZEBsnHtjVCgWFegBeGgwnRdAaDtQxb73mtjCwFYWXiE3I55nZ5W0qOyb3l_sXnvUNwPyNcHeF0hVcj_OyHuP9HufX8uT7f-nzUm7Lb5j9tARAsSv4FDONNfA</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Drew, Bryan T.</creator><creator>González-Gallegos, Jesús Guadalupe</creator><creator>Xiang, Chun-Lei</creator><creator>Kriebel, Ricardo</creator><creator>Drummond, Chloe P.</creator><creator>Walker, Jay B.</creator><creator>Sytsma, Kenneth J.</creator><general>International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Salvia united</title><author>Drew, Bryan T. ; González-Gallegos, Jesús Guadalupe ; Xiang, Chun-Lei ; Kriebel, Ricardo ; Drummond, Chloe P. ; Walker, Jay B. ; Sytsma, Kenneth J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2817-df7cef5e89b15d1120faebb846082a40a48308de8c81d9921baa3002e2fd495f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Dorystaechas</topic><topic>Lamiaceae</topic><topic>Meriandra</topic><topic>Perovskia</topic><topic>Rosmarinus</topic><topic>SYSTEMATICS AND PHYLOGENY</topic><topic>Zhumeria</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Drew, Bryan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Gallegos, Jesús Guadalupe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiang, Chun-Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kriebel, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drummond, Chloe P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Jay B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sytsma, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Taxon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Drew, Bryan T.</au><au>González-Gallegos, Jesús Guadalupe</au><au>Xiang, Chun-Lei</au><au>Kriebel, Ricardo</au><au>Drummond, Chloe P.</au><au>Walker, Jay B.</au><au>Sytsma, Kenneth J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Salvia united: The greatest good for the greatest number</atitle><jtitle>Taxon</jtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>133-145</pages><issn>0040-0262</issn><eissn>1996-8175</eissn><abstract>Previous molecular phylogenetic research, based on chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA data, has demonstrated that the large genus Salvia (Lamiaceae) is paraphyletic as traditionally circumscribed. However, neither relationships within Salvia s.l. nor within subtribe Salviinae have been evaluated using low-copy nuclear gene regions. Here, we use two low-copy nuclear gene regions (PPR-AT3G09060, GBSSI) to further assess relationships of Salvia and related genera within Salviinae. Our results largely confirm results from previous studies based on chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA. Based upon the phylogenetic results presented here, previous phylogenetic studies, and taxonomic, morphological, and practical considerations, we conclude that the botanical community would be best served by maintaining a broadly defined Salvia, including the five small embedded genera Dorystaechas, Meriandra, Perovskia, Rosmarinus, and Zhumeria as Salvia species. We subsequently present an updated circumscription of Salvia.</abstract><pub>International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT)</pub><doi>10.12705/661.7</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0040-0262 |
| ispartof | Taxon, 2017-02, Vol.66 (1), p.133-145 |
| issn | 0040-0262 1996-8175 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_12705_661_7 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Dorystaechas Lamiaceae Meriandra Perovskia Rosmarinus SYSTEMATICS AND PHYLOGENY Zhumeria |
| title | Salvia united: The greatest good for the greatest number |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A25%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Salvia%20united:%20The%20greatest%20good%20for%20the%20greatest%20number&rft.jtitle=Taxon&rft.au=Drew,%20Bryan%20T.&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=133-145&rft.issn=0040-0262&rft.eissn=1996-8175&rft_id=info:doi/10.12705/661.7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E90010915%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=90010915&rfr_iscdi=true |