The effect of preservation methods on plant morphology
Application of conventional (plant pressing followed by air drying) and Schweinfurth drying techniques to different plant taxa is shown to result in both significant contraction and, occasionally, significant expansion of plant organs. The results are taxon dependent. The Schweinfurth drying process...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Taxon 2013-12, Vol.62 (6), p.1259-1265 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1265 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1259 |
| container_title | Taxon |
| container_volume | 62 |
| creator | Parnell, John Rich, Tim McVeigh, Andrew Lim, Astrid Quigley, Sean Morris, David Wong, Zeno |
| description | Application of conventional (plant pressing followed by air drying) and Schweinfurth drying techniques to different plant taxa is shown to result in both significant contraction and, occasionally, significant expansion of plant organs. The results are taxon dependent. The Schweinfurth drying process usually results in greater shrinkage than conventional drying. Herbarium specimens are shown to exhibit significant differences in the dimensions of plant organs as compared to fresh material. Organ accessibility and availability can also have an impact on the dimensions recorded and, as with the drying process, an impact on the correct recognition of taxa. The lack of discussion of these important differences, their impact on other taxonomic processes and suggestions for further investigation, for example the use of spirit preserved material and rehydration of herbarium material, are highlighted. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.12705/626.3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_12705_626_3</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>taxon.62.6.1259</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>taxon.62.6.1259</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3203-2ae5189256f3e5b208d57f34e37ff20de3553df3436b5fb87fc348892aff68553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1z01LxDAQBuAgCq6r_oYexIt0TTJN2h6XxS9Y8LKCt5C2M7ZLd1OSou6_N1rx5mleZp4ZGMYuBV8ImXN1q6VewBGbibLUaSFydcxmnGc85VLLU3YWwpZzKfISZkxvWkyQCOsxcZQMHgP6dzt2bp_scGxdE5IYh97ux2Tn_NC63r0dztkJ2T7gxW-ds5f7u83qMV0_Pzytluu0BskhlRaVKEqpNAGqSvKiUTlBhpATSd4gKAVNbICuFFVFTjVkRVywRLqIszm7nu7W3oXgkczgu531ByO4-fnWxG8NRHgzwY-ux8M_ymyWrzF866tJb8Po_J8e7afbR2p03FIlfAGHFl-6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of preservation methods on plant morphology</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Parnell, John ; Rich, Tim ; McVeigh, Andrew ; Lim, Astrid ; Quigley, Sean ; Morris, David ; Wong, Zeno</creator><creatorcontrib>Parnell, John ; Rich, Tim ; McVeigh, Andrew ; Lim, Astrid ; Quigley, Sean ; Morris, David ; Wong, Zeno</creatorcontrib><description>Application of conventional (plant pressing followed by air drying) and Schweinfurth drying techniques to different plant taxa is shown to result in both significant contraction and, occasionally, significant expansion of plant organs. The results are taxon dependent. The Schweinfurth drying process usually results in greater shrinkage than conventional drying. Herbarium specimens are shown to exhibit significant differences in the dimensions of plant organs as compared to fresh material. Organ accessibility and availability can also have an impact on the dimensions recorded and, as with the drying process, an impact on the correct recognition of taxa. The lack of discussion of these important differences, their impact on other taxonomic processes and suggestions for further investigation, for example the use of spirit preserved material and rehydration of herbarium material, are highlighted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-0262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-8175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12705/626.3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT)</publisher><subject>Alcohols ; Calyx ; Drying ; Floras ; Herbaria ; herbarium specimens ; keys ; Leaves ; METHODS AND TECHNIQUES ; morphology ; organ dimensions ; organ measurements ; Petals ; Plant morphology ; Plant products ; Plants ; preservation ; Schweinfurth ; Taxa</subject><ispartof>Taxon, 2013-12, Vol.62 (6), p.1259-1265</ispartof><rights>2013 International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT)</rights><rights>2013 International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) all rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3203-2ae5189256f3e5b208d57f34e37ff20de3553df3436b5fb87fc348892aff68553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3203-2ae5189256f3e5b208d57f34e37ff20de3553df3436b5fb87fc348892aff68553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/taxon.62.6.1259$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/taxon.62.6.1259$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parnell, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rich, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McVeigh, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quigley, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Zeno</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of preservation methods on plant morphology</title><title>Taxon</title><description>Application of conventional (plant pressing followed by air drying) and Schweinfurth drying techniques to different plant taxa is shown to result in both significant contraction and, occasionally, significant expansion of plant organs. The results are taxon dependent. The Schweinfurth drying process usually results in greater shrinkage than conventional drying. Herbarium specimens are shown to exhibit significant differences in the dimensions of plant organs as compared to fresh material. Organ accessibility and availability can also have an impact on the dimensions recorded and, as with the drying process, an impact on the correct recognition of taxa. The lack of discussion of these important differences, their impact on other taxonomic processes and suggestions for further investigation, for example the use of spirit preserved material and rehydration of herbarium material, are highlighted.</description><subject>Alcohols</subject><subject>Calyx</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>Floras</subject><subject>Herbaria</subject><subject>herbarium specimens</subject><subject>keys</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>METHODS AND TECHNIQUES</subject><subject>morphology</subject><subject>organ dimensions</subject><subject>organ measurements</subject><subject>Petals</subject><subject>Plant morphology</subject><subject>Plant products</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>preservation</subject><subject>Schweinfurth</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><issn>0040-0262</issn><issn>1996-8175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1z01LxDAQBuAgCq6r_oYexIt0TTJN2h6XxS9Y8LKCt5C2M7ZLd1OSou6_N1rx5mleZp4ZGMYuBV8ImXN1q6VewBGbibLUaSFydcxmnGc85VLLU3YWwpZzKfISZkxvWkyQCOsxcZQMHgP6dzt2bp_scGxdE5IYh97ux2Tn_NC63r0dztkJ2T7gxW-ds5f7u83qMV0_Pzytluu0BskhlRaVKEqpNAGqSvKiUTlBhpATSd4gKAVNbICuFFVFTjVkRVywRLqIszm7nu7W3oXgkczgu531ByO4-fnWxG8NRHgzwY-ux8M_ymyWrzF866tJb8Po_J8e7afbR2p03FIlfAGHFl-6</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>Parnell, John</creator><creator>Rich, Tim</creator><creator>McVeigh, Andrew</creator><creator>Lim, Astrid</creator><creator>Quigley, Sean</creator><creator>Morris, David</creator><creator>Wong, Zeno</creator><general>International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT)</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>The effect of preservation methods on plant morphology</title><author>Parnell, John ; Rich, Tim ; McVeigh, Andrew ; Lim, Astrid ; Quigley, Sean ; Morris, David ; Wong, Zeno</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3203-2ae5189256f3e5b208d57f34e37ff20de3553df3436b5fb87fc348892aff68553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Alcohols</topic><topic>Calyx</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>Floras</topic><topic>Herbaria</topic><topic>herbarium specimens</topic><topic>keys</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>METHODS AND TECHNIQUES</topic><topic>morphology</topic><topic>organ dimensions</topic><topic>organ measurements</topic><topic>Petals</topic><topic>Plant morphology</topic><topic>Plant products</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>preservation</topic><topic>Schweinfurth</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parnell, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rich, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McVeigh, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quigley, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Zeno</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Taxon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parnell, John</au><au>Rich, Tim</au><au>McVeigh, Andrew</au><au>Lim, Astrid</au><au>Quigley, Sean</au><au>Morris, David</au><au>Wong, Zeno</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of preservation methods on plant morphology</atitle><jtitle>Taxon</jtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1259</spage><epage>1265</epage><pages>1259-1265</pages><issn>0040-0262</issn><eissn>1996-8175</eissn><abstract>Application of conventional (plant pressing followed by air drying) and Schweinfurth drying techniques to different plant taxa is shown to result in both significant contraction and, occasionally, significant expansion of plant organs. The results are taxon dependent. The Schweinfurth drying process usually results in greater shrinkage than conventional drying. Herbarium specimens are shown to exhibit significant differences in the dimensions of plant organs as compared to fresh material. Organ accessibility and availability can also have an impact on the dimensions recorded and, as with the drying process, an impact on the correct recognition of taxa. The lack of discussion of these important differences, their impact on other taxonomic processes and suggestions for further investigation, for example the use of spirit preserved material and rehydration of herbarium material, are highlighted.</abstract><pub>International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT)</pub><doi>10.12705/626.3</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0040-0262 |
| ispartof | Taxon, 2013-12, Vol.62 (6), p.1259-1265 |
| issn | 0040-0262 1996-8175 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_12705_626_3 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Alcohols Calyx Drying Floras Herbaria herbarium specimens keys Leaves METHODS AND TECHNIQUES morphology organ dimensions organ measurements Petals Plant morphology Plant products Plants preservation Schweinfurth Taxa |
| title | The effect of preservation methods on plant morphology |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T21%3A54%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20preservation%20methods%20on%20plant%20morphology&rft.jtitle=Taxon&rft.au=Parnell,%20John&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1259&rft.epage=1265&rft.pages=1259-1265&rft.issn=0040-0262&rft.eissn=1996-8175&rft_id=info:doi/10.12705/626.3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3Etaxon.62.6.1259%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=taxon.62.6.1259&rfr_iscdi=true |