Diagnostic accuracy for a plasma SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein method [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]

Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) releases nucleocapsid proteins (NP) into the blood circulation in infected patients. We investigated whether plasma NP analysis could be used for diagnosing an infection and used for nosocomial screening. Methods: We collec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:F1000 research 2022, Vol.11, p.732
Hauptverfasser: Kristiansen, Søren, Schmidt, Laura Emilie, Hillig, Ann-Britt Nygaard, Nielsen, Thyge Lynghøj, Pedersen, Thomas Ingemann, Kirkby, Nikolai Søren, Schiøler, Thomas, Hillig, Thore
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 732
container_title F1000 research
container_volume 11
creator Kristiansen, Søren
Schmidt, Laura Emilie
Hillig, Ann-Britt Nygaard
Nielsen, Thyge Lynghøj
Pedersen, Thomas Ingemann
Kirkby, Nikolai Søren
Schiøler, Thomas
Hillig, Thore
description Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) releases nucleocapsid proteins (NP) into the blood circulation in infected patients. We investigated whether plasma NP analysis could be used for diagnosing an infection and used for nosocomial screening. Methods: We collected blood samples from patients admitted to the hospital during a period with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) based-screening of patients for SARS-CoV-2. Retrospectively the SARS-CoV-2 NP plasma concentrations were measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method and used for an initial time course study to find the optimal time-point for sampling blood. Next, we estimated the diagnostic accuracy i.e. the clinical sensitivity and specificity at different plasma NP cut-off concentrations. Results: The time course study revealed profiles with rapid or more slow declines in NP titers after the RT-PCR result. Nevertheless, in the time interval 0 - 7 days after the RT-PCR result, the NP concentration was always above the level of detection at 1.66 pg/ml suggesting that the diagnosis could be established in the time interval of 0 - 7 days. The median time gap between the plasma NP and RT-PCR results was 0.0 days (n = 1957, interval: -26 to + 21 days). Reducing the time gap to seven days, the clinical sensitivity was 90.0% (n= 60, 95% CI, 82.4% to 97.6%) at a specificity of 95.9% (n=1876, 95% CI, 95.0% to 96.8%). Curve analysis by receiver operation characteristics identified a cut-off concentration of 1.87 pg/mL NP as optimal resulting in a positive predictive value of 41.2%, a negative predictive value of 99.7% and a prevalence of 3.1%. Conclusions: In conclusion, the NP method is acceptable for making the laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, and an intended use of plasma NP as a prospective nosocomial screening method is considered feasible.
doi_str_mv 10.12688/f1000research.122161.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>faculty1000_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_122161_1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_12688_f1000research_122161_1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1491-96d12ff8ef5878fbd5b93e5d302cafe038e8564b278aeb392c9f20ba35f31ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkNtKAzEQhoMoWLTPYF5gaw57yNqrUo9QVGzxRmSZzU5spG2WZLulNz67WyuoV17Nz_B9w_ATcsbZgItUqXPDGWMeA4LX824neMoH_ID0BIvTiMdMHP7Kx6QfwntnsDyXqch65OPSwtvKhcZqClqvPegtNc5ToPUCwhLodPQ0jcbuORL0fq0X6DTUwVb00bsG7YousZm7ir606IN1K8qHtEb01GNrcXNBOYW69q7Fim5sM6e7Z30LTceG11NyZGARsP89T8js-mo2vo0mDzd349Ek0jzOeZSnFRfGKDSJypQpq6TMJSaVZEKDQSYVqiSNS5EpwFLmQudGsBJkYiQ3Rp6QbH9WexeCR1PU3i7BbwvOiq8iiz9FFvsiC96Zw71pQK8XzXZHFT_YP_Yn5Rx9ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic accuracy for a plasma SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein method [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kristiansen, Søren ; Schmidt, Laura Emilie ; Hillig, Ann-Britt Nygaard ; Nielsen, Thyge Lynghøj ; Pedersen, Thomas Ingemann ; Kirkby, Nikolai Søren ; Schiøler, Thomas ; Hillig, Thore</creator><creatorcontrib>Kristiansen, Søren ; Schmidt, Laura Emilie ; Hillig, Ann-Britt Nygaard ; Nielsen, Thyge Lynghøj ; Pedersen, Thomas Ingemann ; Kirkby, Nikolai Søren ; Schiøler, Thomas ; Hillig, Thore</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) releases nucleocapsid proteins (NP) into the blood circulation in infected patients. We investigated whether plasma NP analysis could be used for diagnosing an infection and used for nosocomial screening. Methods: We collected blood samples from patients admitted to the hospital during a period with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) based-screening of patients for SARS-CoV-2. Retrospectively the SARS-CoV-2 NP plasma concentrations were measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method and used for an initial time course study to find the optimal time-point for sampling blood. Next, we estimated the diagnostic accuracy i.e. the clinical sensitivity and specificity at different plasma NP cut-off concentrations. Results: The time course study revealed profiles with rapid or more slow declines in NP titers after the RT-PCR result. Nevertheless, in the time interval 0 - 7 days after the RT-PCR result, the NP concentration was always above the level of detection at 1.66 pg/ml suggesting that the diagnosis could be established in the time interval of 0 - 7 days. The median time gap between the plasma NP and RT-PCR results was 0.0 days (n = 1957, interval: -26 to + 21 days). Reducing the time gap to seven days, the clinical sensitivity was 90.0% (n= 60, 95% CI, 82.4% to 97.6%) at a specificity of 95.9% (n=1876, 95% CI, 95.0% to 96.8%). Curve analysis by receiver operation characteristics identified a cut-off concentration of 1.87 pg/mL NP as optimal resulting in a positive predictive value of 41.2%, a negative predictive value of 99.7% and a prevalence of 3.1%. Conclusions: In conclusion, the NP method is acceptable for making the laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, and an intended use of plasma NP as a prospective nosocomial screening method is considered feasible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-1402</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-1402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.122161.1</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>F1000 research, 2022, Vol.11, p.732</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2022 Kristiansen S et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1491-96d12ff8ef5878fbd5b93e5d302cafe038e8564b278aeb392c9f20ba35f31ff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4132-053X ; 0000-0003-1851-5363</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kristiansen, Søren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Laura Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillig, Ann-Britt Nygaard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Thyge Lynghøj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, Thomas Ingemann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkby, Nikolai Søren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiøler, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillig, Thore</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic accuracy for a plasma SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein method [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]</title><title>F1000 research</title><description>Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) releases nucleocapsid proteins (NP) into the blood circulation in infected patients. We investigated whether plasma NP analysis could be used for diagnosing an infection and used for nosocomial screening. Methods: We collected blood samples from patients admitted to the hospital during a period with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) based-screening of patients for SARS-CoV-2. Retrospectively the SARS-CoV-2 NP plasma concentrations were measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method and used for an initial time course study to find the optimal time-point for sampling blood. Next, we estimated the diagnostic accuracy i.e. the clinical sensitivity and specificity at different plasma NP cut-off concentrations. Results: The time course study revealed profiles with rapid or more slow declines in NP titers after the RT-PCR result. Nevertheless, in the time interval 0 - 7 days after the RT-PCR result, the NP concentration was always above the level of detection at 1.66 pg/ml suggesting that the diagnosis could be established in the time interval of 0 - 7 days. The median time gap between the plasma NP and RT-PCR results was 0.0 days (n = 1957, interval: -26 to + 21 days). Reducing the time gap to seven days, the clinical sensitivity was 90.0% (n= 60, 95% CI, 82.4% to 97.6%) at a specificity of 95.9% (n=1876, 95% CI, 95.0% to 96.8%). Curve analysis by receiver operation characteristics identified a cut-off concentration of 1.87 pg/mL NP as optimal resulting in a positive predictive value of 41.2%, a negative predictive value of 99.7% and a prevalence of 3.1%. Conclusions: In conclusion, the NP method is acceptable for making the laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, and an intended use of plasma NP as a prospective nosocomial screening method is considered feasible.</description><issn>2046-1402</issn><issn>2046-1402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkNtKAzEQhoMoWLTPYF5gaw57yNqrUo9QVGzxRmSZzU5spG2WZLulNz67WyuoV17Nz_B9w_ATcsbZgItUqXPDGWMeA4LX824neMoH_ID0BIvTiMdMHP7Kx6QfwntnsDyXqch65OPSwtvKhcZqClqvPegtNc5ToPUCwhLodPQ0jcbuORL0fq0X6DTUwVb00bsG7YousZm7ir606IN1K8qHtEb01GNrcXNBOYW69q7Fim5sM6e7Z30LTceG11NyZGARsP89T8js-mo2vo0mDzd349Ek0jzOeZSnFRfGKDSJypQpq6TMJSaVZEKDQSYVqiSNS5EpwFLmQudGsBJkYiQ3Rp6QbH9WexeCR1PU3i7BbwvOiq8iiz9FFvsiC96Zw71pQK8XzXZHFT_YP_Yn5Rx9ig</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Kristiansen, Søren</creator><creator>Schmidt, Laura Emilie</creator><creator>Hillig, Ann-Britt Nygaard</creator><creator>Nielsen, Thyge Lynghøj</creator><creator>Pedersen, Thomas Ingemann</creator><creator>Kirkby, Nikolai Søren</creator><creator>Schiøler, Thomas</creator><creator>Hillig, Thore</creator><scope>C-E</scope><scope>CH4</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4132-053X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1851-5363</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Diagnostic accuracy for a plasma SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein method [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]</title><author>Kristiansen, Søren ; Schmidt, Laura Emilie ; Hillig, Ann-Britt Nygaard ; Nielsen, Thyge Lynghøj ; Pedersen, Thomas Ingemann ; Kirkby, Nikolai Søren ; Schiøler, Thomas ; Hillig, Thore</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1491-96d12ff8ef5878fbd5b93e5d302cafe038e8564b278aeb392c9f20ba35f31ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kristiansen, Søren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Laura Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillig, Ann-Britt Nygaard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Thyge Lynghøj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, Thomas Ingemann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkby, Nikolai Søren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiøler, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillig, Thore</creatorcontrib><collection>F1000Research</collection><collection>Faculty of 1000</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>F1000 research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kristiansen, Søren</au><au>Schmidt, Laura Emilie</au><au>Hillig, Ann-Britt Nygaard</au><au>Nielsen, Thyge Lynghøj</au><au>Pedersen, Thomas Ingemann</au><au>Kirkby, Nikolai Søren</au><au>Schiøler, Thomas</au><au>Hillig, Thore</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic accuracy for a plasma SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein method [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]</atitle><jtitle>F1000 research</jtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>732</spage><pages>732-</pages><issn>2046-1402</issn><eissn>2046-1402</eissn><abstract>Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) releases nucleocapsid proteins (NP) into the blood circulation in infected patients. We investigated whether plasma NP analysis could be used for diagnosing an infection and used for nosocomial screening. Methods: We collected blood samples from patients admitted to the hospital during a period with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) based-screening of patients for SARS-CoV-2. Retrospectively the SARS-CoV-2 NP plasma concentrations were measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method and used for an initial time course study to find the optimal time-point for sampling blood. Next, we estimated the diagnostic accuracy i.e. the clinical sensitivity and specificity at different plasma NP cut-off concentrations. Results: The time course study revealed profiles with rapid or more slow declines in NP titers after the RT-PCR result. Nevertheless, in the time interval 0 - 7 days after the RT-PCR result, the NP concentration was always above the level of detection at 1.66 pg/ml suggesting that the diagnosis could be established in the time interval of 0 - 7 days. The median time gap between the plasma NP and RT-PCR results was 0.0 days (n = 1957, interval: -26 to + 21 days). Reducing the time gap to seven days, the clinical sensitivity was 90.0% (n= 60, 95% CI, 82.4% to 97.6%) at a specificity of 95.9% (n=1876, 95% CI, 95.0% to 96.8%). Curve analysis by receiver operation characteristics identified a cut-off concentration of 1.87 pg/mL NP as optimal resulting in a positive predictive value of 41.2%, a negative predictive value of 99.7% and a prevalence of 3.1%. Conclusions: In conclusion, the NP method is acceptable for making the laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, and an intended use of plasma NP as a prospective nosocomial screening method is considered feasible.</abstract><doi>10.12688/f1000research.122161.1</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4132-053X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1851-5363</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2046-1402
ispartof F1000 research, 2022, Vol.11, p.732
issn 2046-1402
2046-1402
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_122161_1
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
title Diagnostic accuracy for a plasma SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein method [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A32%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-faculty1000_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20accuracy%20for%20a%20plasma%20SARS-CoV-2%20Nucleocapsid%20Protein%20method%20%5Bversion%201;%20peer%20review:%201%20approved%20with%20reservations%5D&rft.jtitle=F1000%20research&rft.au=Kristiansen,%20S%C3%B8ren&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=732&rft.pages=732-&rft.issn=2046-1402&rft.eissn=2046-1402&rft_id=info:doi/10.12688/f1000research.122161.1&rft_dat=%3Cfaculty1000_cross%3E10_12688_f1000research_122161_1%3C/faculty1000_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true