Extending the Age Range for Breast Screening in England: Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of Randomization

Objective To assess the feasibility and acceptability of randomizing the phased introduction of the extension of the invited age range in the National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programme in England from 50-70 to 47-73 years. Setting Six volunteer breast screening units (BSUs) in England....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical screening 2011-06, Vol.18 (2), p.96-102
Hauptverfasser: Moser, Kath, Sellars, Sarah, Wheaton, Margot, Cooke, Julie, Duncan, Alison, Maxwell, Anthony, Michell, Michael, Wilson, Mary, Beral, Valerie, Peto, Richard, Richards, Mike, Patnick, Julietta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102
container_issue 2
container_start_page 96
container_title Journal of medical screening
container_volume 18
creator Moser, Kath
Sellars, Sarah
Wheaton, Margot
Cooke, Julie
Duncan, Alison
Maxwell, Anthony
Michell, Michael
Wilson, Mary
Beral, Valerie
Peto, Richard
Richards, Mike
Patnick, Julietta
description Objective To assess the feasibility and acceptability of randomizing the phased introduction of the extension of the invited age range in the National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programme in England from 50-70 to 47-73 years. Setting Six volunteer breast screening units (BSUs) in England. Methods Cluster-randomized trial of invitation versus no invitation for breast screening. Study participants: women aged 47-49 and 71-73 years in screening batches randomized between 1 June 2009 and 31 May 2010. Outcomes: workload, screening uptake among women invited, self-referrals among women not invited, and screening outcomes among women invited. Results A total of 312 screening batches (clusters) were randomized including 60,708 women. Screening uptake was 63% in women aged 47-49 and 62% in women aged 71-73. Those who attended screening in the younger age group were more likely to be recalled for assessment than older attendees (7.5% vs. 3.0%) but less likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer (0.5% vs. 1.1%). Among women not invited, 0.2% of those aged 47-49 and 6.8% of those aged 71-73 self-referred for screening. Despite the extra workload BSUs largely coped although there was some slippage in round lengths and other targets. Conclusion No major problems of feasibility or acceptability of randomization were found. This pilot study has informed the randomized phasing-in of the age extension across the whole of England.
doi_str_mv 10.1258/jms.2011.011065
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1258_jms_2011_011065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1258_jms.2011.011065</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1258_jms.2011.011065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f945f232c02ce66d3704983434ea8067e894a035b237d98b4f8c6a4696693bda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwyAch4nRuDk9ezN8ALvxVlq81WVTkyUaX84NbWll6egCLHHe_OZSO715ABJ4fr9_eAC4xGiKSZzO1hs3JQjjaViIx0dgjFkSR3Ei6DEYI8FFhBmmI3Dm3BohRDFOT8GI4DQmCaJj8LX48MpU2jTQvyuYNQo-SxP2urPw1irpPHwprVKmR7SBC9O00lQ38Em3XXjzu2oPfQcz55RzPyXLkNKFbrXfw4DCrCzV1svDTVf3E6puoz-l1505Bye1bJ26OJwT8LZcvM7vo9Xj3cM8W0UlpdRHtWBxTSgpESkV5xVNEBMpZZQpmSKeqFQwiWhcEJpUIi1YnZZcMi44F7SoJJ2A2dBb2s45q-p8a_VG2n2OUd7LzIPMvJeZDzJD4mpIbHfFRlV__K-9AFwPgJONytfdzprwg3_7vgGt9H5f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extending the Age Range for Breast Screening in England: Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of Randomization</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Moser, Kath ; Sellars, Sarah ; Wheaton, Margot ; Cooke, Julie ; Duncan, Alison ; Maxwell, Anthony ; Michell, Michael ; Wilson, Mary ; Beral, Valerie ; Peto, Richard ; Richards, Mike ; Patnick, Julietta</creator><creatorcontrib>Moser, Kath ; Sellars, Sarah ; Wheaton, Margot ; Cooke, Julie ; Duncan, Alison ; Maxwell, Anthony ; Michell, Michael ; Wilson, Mary ; Beral, Valerie ; Peto, Richard ; Richards, Mike ; Patnick, Julietta</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To assess the feasibility and acceptability of randomizing the phased introduction of the extension of the invited age range in the National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programme in England from 50-70 to 47-73 years. Setting Six volunteer breast screening units (BSUs) in England. Methods Cluster-randomized trial of invitation versus no invitation for breast screening. Study participants: women aged 47-49 and 71-73 years in screening batches randomized between 1 June 2009 and 31 May 2010. Outcomes: workload, screening uptake among women invited, self-referrals among women not invited, and screening outcomes among women invited. Results A total of 312 screening batches (clusters) were randomized including 60,708 women. Screening uptake was 63% in women aged 47-49 and 62% in women aged 71-73. Those who attended screening in the younger age group were more likely to be recalled for assessment than older attendees (7.5% vs. 3.0%) but less likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer (0.5% vs. 1.1%). Among women not invited, 0.2% of those aged 47-49 and 6.8% of those aged 71-73 self-referred for screening. Despite the extra workload BSUs largely coped although there was some slippage in round lengths and other targets. Conclusion No major problems of feasibility or acceptability of randomization were found. This pilot study has informed the randomized phasing-in of the age extension across the whole of England.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-1413</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-5793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1258/jms.2011.011065</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21852703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; England ; Female ; Humans ; Mass Screening - utilization ; Middle Aged ; Pilot Projects</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical screening, 2011-06, Vol.18 (2), p.96-102</ispartof><rights>2011 Medical Screening Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f945f232c02ce66d3704983434ea8067e894a035b237d98b4f8c6a4696693bda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f945f232c02ce66d3704983434ea8067e894a035b237d98b4f8c6a4696693bda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21852703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moser, Kath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellars, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheaton, Margot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michell, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beral, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peto, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patnick, Julietta</creatorcontrib><title>Extending the Age Range for Breast Screening in England: Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of Randomization</title><title>Journal of medical screening</title><addtitle>J Med Screen</addtitle><description>Objective To assess the feasibility and acceptability of randomizing the phased introduction of the extension of the invited age range in the National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programme in England from 50-70 to 47-73 years. Setting Six volunteer breast screening units (BSUs) in England. Methods Cluster-randomized trial of invitation versus no invitation for breast screening. Study participants: women aged 47-49 and 71-73 years in screening batches randomized between 1 June 2009 and 31 May 2010. Outcomes: workload, screening uptake among women invited, self-referrals among women not invited, and screening outcomes among women invited. Results A total of 312 screening batches (clusters) were randomized including 60,708 women. Screening uptake was 63% in women aged 47-49 and 62% in women aged 71-73. Those who attended screening in the younger age group were more likely to be recalled for assessment than older attendees (7.5% vs. 3.0%) but less likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer (0.5% vs. 1.1%). Among women not invited, 0.2% of those aged 47-49 and 6.8% of those aged 71-73 self-referred for screening. Despite the extra workload BSUs largely coped although there was some slippage in round lengths and other targets. Conclusion No major problems of feasibility or acceptability of randomization were found. This pilot study has informed the randomized phasing-in of the age extension across the whole of England.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - utilization</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><issn>0969-1413</issn><issn>1475-5793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PwyAch4nRuDk9ezN8ALvxVlq81WVTkyUaX84NbWll6egCLHHe_OZSO715ABJ4fr9_eAC4xGiKSZzO1hs3JQjjaViIx0dgjFkSR3Ei6DEYI8FFhBmmI3Dm3BohRDFOT8GI4DQmCaJj8LX48MpU2jTQvyuYNQo-SxP2urPw1irpPHwprVKmR7SBC9O00lQ38Em3XXjzu2oPfQcz55RzPyXLkNKFbrXfw4DCrCzV1svDTVf3E6puoz-l1505Bye1bJ26OJwT8LZcvM7vo9Xj3cM8W0UlpdRHtWBxTSgpESkV5xVNEBMpZZQpmSKeqFQwiWhcEJpUIi1YnZZcMi44F7SoJJ2A2dBb2s45q-p8a_VG2n2OUd7LzIPMvJeZDzJD4mpIbHfFRlV__K-9AFwPgJONytfdzprwg3_7vgGt9H5f</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Moser, Kath</creator><creator>Sellars, Sarah</creator><creator>Wheaton, Margot</creator><creator>Cooke, Julie</creator><creator>Duncan, Alison</creator><creator>Maxwell, Anthony</creator><creator>Michell, Michael</creator><creator>Wilson, Mary</creator><creator>Beral, Valerie</creator><creator>Peto, Richard</creator><creator>Richards, Mike</creator><creator>Patnick, Julietta</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>Extending the Age Range for Breast Screening in England: Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of Randomization</title><author>Moser, Kath ; Sellars, Sarah ; Wheaton, Margot ; Cooke, Julie ; Duncan, Alison ; Maxwell, Anthony ; Michell, Michael ; Wilson, Mary ; Beral, Valerie ; Peto, Richard ; Richards, Mike ; Patnick, Julietta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f945f232c02ce66d3704983434ea8067e894a035b237d98b4f8c6a4696693bda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - utilization</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moser, Kath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellars, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheaton, Margot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michell, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beral, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peto, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patnick, Julietta</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical screening</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moser, Kath</au><au>Sellars, Sarah</au><au>Wheaton, Margot</au><au>Cooke, Julie</au><au>Duncan, Alison</au><au>Maxwell, Anthony</au><au>Michell, Michael</au><au>Wilson, Mary</au><au>Beral, Valerie</au><au>Peto, Richard</au><au>Richards, Mike</au><au>Patnick, Julietta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extending the Age Range for Breast Screening in England: Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of Randomization</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical screening</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Screen</addtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>96</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>96-102</pages><issn>0969-1413</issn><eissn>1475-5793</eissn><abstract>Objective To assess the feasibility and acceptability of randomizing the phased introduction of the extension of the invited age range in the National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programme in England from 50-70 to 47-73 years. Setting Six volunteer breast screening units (BSUs) in England. Methods Cluster-randomized trial of invitation versus no invitation for breast screening. Study participants: women aged 47-49 and 71-73 years in screening batches randomized between 1 June 2009 and 31 May 2010. Outcomes: workload, screening uptake among women invited, self-referrals among women not invited, and screening outcomes among women invited. Results A total of 312 screening batches (clusters) were randomized including 60,708 women. Screening uptake was 63% in women aged 47-49 and 62% in women aged 71-73. Those who attended screening in the younger age group were more likely to be recalled for assessment than older attendees (7.5% vs. 3.0%) but less likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer (0.5% vs. 1.1%). Among women not invited, 0.2% of those aged 47-49 and 6.8% of those aged 71-73 self-referred for screening. Despite the extra workload BSUs largely coped although there was some slippage in round lengths and other targets. Conclusion No major problems of feasibility or acceptability of randomization were found. This pilot study has informed the randomized phasing-in of the age extension across the whole of England.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21852703</pmid><doi>10.1258/jms.2011.011065</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0969-1413
ispartof Journal of medical screening, 2011-06, Vol.18 (2), p.96-102
issn 0969-1413
1475-5793
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1258_jms_2011_011065
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Aged
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
England
Female
Humans
Mass Screening - utilization
Middle Aged
Pilot Projects
title Extending the Age Range for Breast Screening in England: Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of Randomization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T23%3A42%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extending%20the%20Age%20Range%20for%20Breast%20Screening%20in%20England:%20Pilot%20Study%20to%20Assess%20the%20Feasibility%20and%20Acceptability%20of%20Randomization&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20screening&rft.au=Moser,%20Kath&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=96-102&rft.issn=0969-1413&rft.eissn=1475-5793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1258/jms.2011.011065&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1258_jms.2011.011065%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/21852703&rft_sage_id=10.1258_jms.2011.011065&rfr_iscdi=true