Extending the Age Range for Breast Screening in England: Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of Randomization
Objective To assess the feasibility and acceptability of randomizing the phased introduction of the extension of the invited age range in the National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programme in England from 50-70 to 47-73 years. Setting Six volunteer breast screening units (BSUs) in England....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical screening 2011-06, Vol.18 (2), p.96-102 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 102 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 96 |
container_title | Journal of medical screening |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Moser, Kath Sellars, Sarah Wheaton, Margot Cooke, Julie Duncan, Alison Maxwell, Anthony Michell, Michael Wilson, Mary Beral, Valerie Peto, Richard Richards, Mike Patnick, Julietta |
description | Objective
To assess the feasibility and acceptability of randomizing the phased introduction of the extension of the invited age range in the National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programme in England from 50-70 to 47-73 years.
Setting
Six volunteer breast screening units (BSUs) in England.
Methods
Cluster-randomized trial of invitation versus no invitation for breast screening. Study participants: women aged 47-49 and 71-73 years in screening batches randomized between 1 June 2009 and 31 May 2010. Outcomes: workload, screening uptake among women invited, self-referrals among women not invited, and screening outcomes among women invited.
Results
A total of 312 screening batches (clusters) were randomized including 60,708 women. Screening uptake was 63% in women aged 47-49 and 62% in women aged 71-73. Those who attended screening in the younger age group were more likely to be recalled for assessment than older attendees (7.5% vs. 3.0%) but less likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer (0.5% vs. 1.1%). Among women not invited, 0.2% of those aged 47-49 and 6.8% of those aged 71-73 self-referred for screening. Despite the extra workload BSUs largely coped although there was some slippage in round lengths and other targets.
Conclusion
No major problems of feasibility or acceptability of randomization were found. This pilot study has informed the randomized phasing-in of the age extension across the whole of England. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1258/jms.2011.011065 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1258_jms_2011_011065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1258_jms.2011.011065</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1258_jms.2011.011065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f945f232c02ce66d3704983434ea8067e894a035b237d98b4f8c6a4696693bda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwyAch4nRuDk9ezN8ALvxVlq81WVTkyUaX84NbWll6egCLHHe_OZSO715ABJ4fr9_eAC4xGiKSZzO1hs3JQjjaViIx0dgjFkSR3Ei6DEYI8FFhBmmI3Dm3BohRDFOT8GI4DQmCaJj8LX48MpU2jTQvyuYNQo-SxP2urPw1irpPHwprVKmR7SBC9O00lQ38Em3XXjzu2oPfQcz55RzPyXLkNKFbrXfw4DCrCzV1svDTVf3E6puoz-l1505Bye1bJ26OJwT8LZcvM7vo9Xj3cM8W0UlpdRHtWBxTSgpESkV5xVNEBMpZZQpmSKeqFQwiWhcEJpUIi1YnZZcMi44F7SoJJ2A2dBb2s45q-p8a_VG2n2OUd7LzIPMvJeZDzJD4mpIbHfFRlV__K-9AFwPgJONytfdzprwg3_7vgGt9H5f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extending the Age Range for Breast Screening in England: Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of Randomization</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Moser, Kath ; Sellars, Sarah ; Wheaton, Margot ; Cooke, Julie ; Duncan, Alison ; Maxwell, Anthony ; Michell, Michael ; Wilson, Mary ; Beral, Valerie ; Peto, Richard ; Richards, Mike ; Patnick, Julietta</creator><creatorcontrib>Moser, Kath ; Sellars, Sarah ; Wheaton, Margot ; Cooke, Julie ; Duncan, Alison ; Maxwell, Anthony ; Michell, Michael ; Wilson, Mary ; Beral, Valerie ; Peto, Richard ; Richards, Mike ; Patnick, Julietta</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To assess the feasibility and acceptability of randomizing the phased introduction of the extension of the invited age range in the National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programme in England from 50-70 to 47-73 years.
Setting
Six volunteer breast screening units (BSUs) in England.
Methods
Cluster-randomized trial of invitation versus no invitation for breast screening. Study participants: women aged 47-49 and 71-73 years in screening batches randomized between 1 June 2009 and 31 May 2010. Outcomes: workload, screening uptake among women invited, self-referrals among women not invited, and screening outcomes among women invited.
Results
A total of 312 screening batches (clusters) were randomized including 60,708 women. Screening uptake was 63% in women aged 47-49 and 62% in women aged 71-73. Those who attended screening in the younger age group were more likely to be recalled for assessment than older attendees (7.5% vs. 3.0%) but less likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer (0.5% vs. 1.1%). Among women not invited, 0.2% of those aged 47-49 and 6.8% of those aged 71-73 self-referred for screening. Despite the extra workload BSUs largely coped although there was some slippage in round lengths and other targets.
Conclusion
No major problems of feasibility or acceptability of randomization were found. This pilot study has informed the randomized phasing-in of the age extension across the whole of England.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-1413</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-5793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1258/jms.2011.011065</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21852703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; England ; Female ; Humans ; Mass Screening - utilization ; Middle Aged ; Pilot Projects</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical screening, 2011-06, Vol.18 (2), p.96-102</ispartof><rights>2011 Medical Screening Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f945f232c02ce66d3704983434ea8067e894a035b237d98b4f8c6a4696693bda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f945f232c02ce66d3704983434ea8067e894a035b237d98b4f8c6a4696693bda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21852703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moser, Kath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellars, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheaton, Margot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michell, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beral, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peto, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patnick, Julietta</creatorcontrib><title>Extending the Age Range for Breast Screening in England: Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of Randomization</title><title>Journal of medical screening</title><addtitle>J Med Screen</addtitle><description>Objective
To assess the feasibility and acceptability of randomizing the phased introduction of the extension of the invited age range in the National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programme in England from 50-70 to 47-73 years.
Setting
Six volunteer breast screening units (BSUs) in England.
Methods
Cluster-randomized trial of invitation versus no invitation for breast screening. Study participants: women aged 47-49 and 71-73 years in screening batches randomized between 1 June 2009 and 31 May 2010. Outcomes: workload, screening uptake among women invited, self-referrals among women not invited, and screening outcomes among women invited.
Results
A total of 312 screening batches (clusters) were randomized including 60,708 women. Screening uptake was 63% in women aged 47-49 and 62% in women aged 71-73. Those who attended screening in the younger age group were more likely to be recalled for assessment than older attendees (7.5% vs. 3.0%) but less likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer (0.5% vs. 1.1%). Among women not invited, 0.2% of those aged 47-49 and 6.8% of those aged 71-73 self-referred for screening. Despite the extra workload BSUs largely coped although there was some slippage in round lengths and other targets.
Conclusion
No major problems of feasibility or acceptability of randomization were found. This pilot study has informed the randomized phasing-in of the age extension across the whole of England.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - utilization</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><issn>0969-1413</issn><issn>1475-5793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PwyAch4nRuDk9ezN8ALvxVlq81WVTkyUaX84NbWll6egCLHHe_OZSO715ABJ4fr9_eAC4xGiKSZzO1hs3JQjjaViIx0dgjFkSR3Ei6DEYI8FFhBmmI3Dm3BohRDFOT8GI4DQmCaJj8LX48MpU2jTQvyuYNQo-SxP2urPw1irpPHwprVKmR7SBC9O00lQ38Em3XXjzu2oPfQcz55RzPyXLkNKFbrXfw4DCrCzV1svDTVf3E6puoz-l1505Bye1bJ26OJwT8LZcvM7vo9Xj3cM8W0UlpdRHtWBxTSgpESkV5xVNEBMpZZQpmSKeqFQwiWhcEJpUIi1YnZZcMi44F7SoJJ2A2dBb2s45q-p8a_VG2n2OUd7LzIPMvJeZDzJD4mpIbHfFRlV__K-9AFwPgJONytfdzprwg3_7vgGt9H5f</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Moser, Kath</creator><creator>Sellars, Sarah</creator><creator>Wheaton, Margot</creator><creator>Cooke, Julie</creator><creator>Duncan, Alison</creator><creator>Maxwell, Anthony</creator><creator>Michell, Michael</creator><creator>Wilson, Mary</creator><creator>Beral, Valerie</creator><creator>Peto, Richard</creator><creator>Richards, Mike</creator><creator>Patnick, Julietta</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>Extending the Age Range for Breast Screening in England: Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of Randomization</title><author>Moser, Kath ; Sellars, Sarah ; Wheaton, Margot ; Cooke, Julie ; Duncan, Alison ; Maxwell, Anthony ; Michell, Michael ; Wilson, Mary ; Beral, Valerie ; Peto, Richard ; Richards, Mike ; Patnick, Julietta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f945f232c02ce66d3704983434ea8067e894a035b237d98b4f8c6a4696693bda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - utilization</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moser, Kath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellars, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheaton, Margot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michell, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beral, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peto, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patnick, Julietta</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical screening</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moser, Kath</au><au>Sellars, Sarah</au><au>Wheaton, Margot</au><au>Cooke, Julie</au><au>Duncan, Alison</au><au>Maxwell, Anthony</au><au>Michell, Michael</au><au>Wilson, Mary</au><au>Beral, Valerie</au><au>Peto, Richard</au><au>Richards, Mike</au><au>Patnick, Julietta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extending the Age Range for Breast Screening in England: Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of Randomization</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical screening</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Screen</addtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>96</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>96-102</pages><issn>0969-1413</issn><eissn>1475-5793</eissn><abstract>Objective
To assess the feasibility and acceptability of randomizing the phased introduction of the extension of the invited age range in the National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programme in England from 50-70 to 47-73 years.
Setting
Six volunteer breast screening units (BSUs) in England.
Methods
Cluster-randomized trial of invitation versus no invitation for breast screening. Study participants: women aged 47-49 and 71-73 years in screening batches randomized between 1 June 2009 and 31 May 2010. Outcomes: workload, screening uptake among women invited, self-referrals among women not invited, and screening outcomes among women invited.
Results
A total of 312 screening batches (clusters) were randomized including 60,708 women. Screening uptake was 63% in women aged 47-49 and 62% in women aged 71-73. Those who attended screening in the younger age group were more likely to be recalled for assessment than older attendees (7.5% vs. 3.0%) but less likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer (0.5% vs. 1.1%). Among women not invited, 0.2% of those aged 47-49 and 6.8% of those aged 71-73 self-referred for screening. Despite the extra workload BSUs largely coped although there was some slippage in round lengths and other targets.
Conclusion
No major problems of feasibility or acceptability of randomization were found. This pilot study has informed the randomized phasing-in of the age extension across the whole of England.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21852703</pmid><doi>10.1258/jms.2011.011065</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0969-1413 |
ispartof | Journal of medical screening, 2011-06, Vol.18 (2), p.96-102 |
issn | 0969-1413 1475-5793 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1258_jms_2011_011065 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Aged Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis England Female Humans Mass Screening - utilization Middle Aged Pilot Projects |
title | Extending the Age Range for Breast Screening in England: Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of Randomization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T23%3A42%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extending%20the%20Age%20Range%20for%20Breast%20Screening%20in%20England:%20Pilot%20Study%20to%20Assess%20the%20Feasibility%20and%20Acceptability%20of%20Randomization&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20screening&rft.au=Moser,%20Kath&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=96-102&rft.issn=0969-1413&rft.eissn=1475-5793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1258/jms.2011.011065&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1258_jms.2011.011065%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/21852703&rft_sage_id=10.1258_jms.2011.011065&rfr_iscdi=true |