Factors affecting compliance in faecal occult blood testing: a cluster randomized study of the faecal immunochemical test versus the guaiac faecal occult test
Objective To compare the uptake of faecal immunochemical occult blood test (FIT) with guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) in a screening programme, with specific attention to the demographic and socioeconomic factors that might affect test uptake. Setting The Clalit Health Service screening prog...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical screening 2011-09, Vol.18 (3), p.135-141 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 141 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 135 |
container_title | Journal of medical screening |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Birkenfeld, Shlomo Belfer, Rachel Gingold Chared, Miri Vilkin, Alex Barchana, Micha Lifshitz, Irena Fruchter, Dana Aronski, Dina Balicer, Ran Niv, Yaron Levi, Zohar |
description | Objective
To compare the uptake of faecal immunochemical occult blood test (FIT) with guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) in a screening programme, with specific attention to the demographic and socioeconomic factors that might affect test uptake.
Setting
The Clalit Health Service screening programme, Israel.
Methods
Average-risk individuals aged 50–75 years were randomized into a FIT arm or gFOBT arm using a programme based on the socioeconomic status (SES) of their primary care clinics. G-FOBT was performed with Hemoccult SENSA™ (3 evacuations) and FIT with the OC- MICRO™ (3 evacuations, refrigerating mandated). The GLIMMIX model was used.
Results
There were 5,464 and 10,668 eligible participants in the FIT and gFOBT arms respectively. Compliance in taking the kits was better (but not statistically significantly better) with gFOBT (37.8% vs. 29.3%; odds ratio [OR] 1.43 [95% CI 0.73–2.80]; P = 0.227). Kit return was higher in the FIT arm (65.0% vs. 78.9%; OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.24–0.83], P = 0.021). Overall test uptake was affected by age, gender, being immigrant and SES (determined by whether or not the participant paid national insurance tax, and the SES of the primary care clinic). The overall uptake of gFOBT and FIT was comparable (OR 0.996 [95% CI 0.46–2.17], P = 0.99).
Conclusions
Overall compliance for test uptake was comparable between the two methods despite the more demanding procedure in the FIT arm. Sociodemographic parameters were the major determinants of compliance. An educational programme, with emphasis on the sociodemographic characteristics of the target population, should be instigated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1258/jms.2011.010147 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1258_jms_2011_010147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1258_jms.2011.010147</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1258_jms.2011.010147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-237e79b378d0b89a6a53a202c56c3248d209bad583675feabc3ec50ca2a33c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRbK2u3ck8gGnnksnFnRSrQsFN9-HkZNKmZDJlJhHqw_isJsa6ENzMYeD7_8P5CLnlbM6FShZ74-eCcT5nnPEwPiPT_lWBilN5TqYsjdKAh1xOyJX3e8aY5Dy5JBMhWKgSIabkcwXYWucplKXGtmq2FK051BU0qGnV0BI0Qk0tYle3NK-tLWir_UA-UKBYd77VjjpoCmuqD11Q33bFkdqStjt9ilfGdI3FnTbV8B0K6Lt2vvPf1LaDCvDPrgG6Jhcl1F7f_MwZ2ayeNsuXYP32_Lp8XAcopWwDIWMdp7mMk4LlSQoRKAmCCVQRShEmhWBpDoVKZBSrUkOOUqNiCAKkxFjOyGKsRWe9d7rMDq4y4I4ZZ9kgOutFZ4PobBTdJ-7GxKHLjS5--ZPZHrgfAQ9bne1t55r-gH_7vgAKGose</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors affecting compliance in faecal occult blood testing: a cluster randomized study of the faecal immunochemical test versus the guaiac faecal occult test</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Birkenfeld, Shlomo ; Belfer, Rachel Gingold ; Chared, Miri ; Vilkin, Alex ; Barchana, Micha ; Lifshitz, Irena ; Fruchter, Dana ; Aronski, Dina ; Balicer, Ran ; Niv, Yaron ; Levi, Zohar</creator><creatorcontrib>Birkenfeld, Shlomo ; Belfer, Rachel Gingold ; Chared, Miri ; Vilkin, Alex ; Barchana, Micha ; Lifshitz, Irena ; Fruchter, Dana ; Aronski, Dina ; Balicer, Ran ; Niv, Yaron ; Levi, Zohar</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To compare the uptake of faecal immunochemical occult blood test (FIT) with guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) in a screening programme, with specific attention to the demographic and socioeconomic factors that might affect test uptake.
Setting
The Clalit Health Service screening programme, Israel.
Methods
Average-risk individuals aged 50–75 years were randomized into a FIT arm or gFOBT arm using a programme based on the socioeconomic status (SES) of their primary care clinics. G-FOBT was performed with Hemoccult SENSA™ (3 evacuations) and FIT with the OC- MICRO™ (3 evacuations, refrigerating mandated). The GLIMMIX model was used.
Results
There were 5,464 and 10,668 eligible participants in the FIT and gFOBT arms respectively. Compliance in taking the kits was better (but not statistically significantly better) with gFOBT (37.8% vs. 29.3%; odds ratio [OR] 1.43 [95% CI 0.73–2.80]; P = 0.227). Kit return was higher in the FIT arm (65.0% vs. 78.9%; OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.24–0.83], P = 0.021). Overall test uptake was affected by age, gender, being immigrant and SES (determined by whether or not the participant paid national insurance tax, and the SES of the primary care clinic). The overall uptake of gFOBT and FIT was comparable (OR 0.996 [95% CI 0.46–2.17], P = 0.99).
Conclusions
Overall compliance for test uptake was comparable between the two methods despite the more demanding procedure in the FIT arm. Sociodemographic parameters were the major determinants of compliance. An educational programme, with emphasis on the sociodemographic characteristics of the target population, should be instigated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-1413</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-5793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1258/jms.2011.010147</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22045822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Algorithms ; Carcinoma - diagnosis ; Carcinoma - epidemiology ; Carcinoma - immunology ; Carcinoma - pathology ; Causality ; Cluster Analysis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - immunology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Early Detection of Cancer - psychology ; Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data ; Feces - chemistry ; Female ; Humans ; Immunochemistry - methods ; Immunochemistry - statistics & numerical data ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - diagnosis ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - immunology ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Occult Blood ; Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical screening, 2011-09, Vol.18 (3), p.135-141</ispartof><rights>2011 Medical Screening Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-237e79b378d0b89a6a53a202c56c3248d209bad583675feabc3ec50ca2a33c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-237e79b378d0b89a6a53a202c56c3248d209bad583675feabc3ec50ca2a33c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22045822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Birkenfeld, Shlomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belfer, Rachel Gingold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chared, Miri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilkin, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barchana, Micha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lifshitz, Irena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fruchter, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronski, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balicer, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niv, Yaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Zohar</creatorcontrib><title>Factors affecting compliance in faecal occult blood testing: a cluster randomized study of the faecal immunochemical test versus the guaiac faecal occult test</title><title>Journal of medical screening</title><addtitle>J Med Screen</addtitle><description>Objective
To compare the uptake of faecal immunochemical occult blood test (FIT) with guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) in a screening programme, with specific attention to the demographic and socioeconomic factors that might affect test uptake.
Setting
The Clalit Health Service screening programme, Israel.
Methods
Average-risk individuals aged 50–75 years were randomized into a FIT arm or gFOBT arm using a programme based on the socioeconomic status (SES) of their primary care clinics. G-FOBT was performed with Hemoccult SENSA™ (3 evacuations) and FIT with the OC- MICRO™ (3 evacuations, refrigerating mandated). The GLIMMIX model was used.
Results
There were 5,464 and 10,668 eligible participants in the FIT and gFOBT arms respectively. Compliance in taking the kits was better (but not statistically significantly better) with gFOBT (37.8% vs. 29.3%; odds ratio [OR] 1.43 [95% CI 0.73–2.80]; P = 0.227). Kit return was higher in the FIT arm (65.0% vs. 78.9%; OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.24–0.83], P = 0.021). Overall test uptake was affected by age, gender, being immigrant and SES (determined by whether or not the participant paid national insurance tax, and the SES of the primary care clinic). The overall uptake of gFOBT and FIT was comparable (OR 0.996 [95% CI 0.46–2.17], P = 0.99).
Conclusions
Overall compliance for test uptake was comparable between the two methods despite the more demanding procedure in the FIT arm. Sociodemographic parameters were the major determinants of compliance. An educational programme, with emphasis on the sociodemographic characteristics of the target population, should be instigated.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Carcinoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Carcinoma - immunology</subject><subject>Carcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - immunology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - psychology</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Feces - chemistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunochemistry - methods</subject><subject>Immunochemistry - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - immunology</subject><subject>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occult Blood</subject><subject>Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>0969-1413</issn><issn>1475-5793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRbK2u3ck8gGnnksnFnRSrQsFN9-HkZNKmZDJlJhHqw_isJsa6ENzMYeD7_8P5CLnlbM6FShZ74-eCcT5nnPEwPiPT_lWBilN5TqYsjdKAh1xOyJX3e8aY5Dy5JBMhWKgSIabkcwXYWucplKXGtmq2FK051BU0qGnV0BI0Qk0tYle3NK-tLWir_UA-UKBYd77VjjpoCmuqD11Q33bFkdqStjt9ilfGdI3FnTbV8B0K6Lt2vvPf1LaDCvDPrgG6Jhcl1F7f_MwZ2ayeNsuXYP32_Lp8XAcopWwDIWMdp7mMk4LlSQoRKAmCCVQRShEmhWBpDoVKZBSrUkOOUqNiCAKkxFjOyGKsRWe9d7rMDq4y4I4ZZ9kgOutFZ4PobBTdJ-7GxKHLjS5--ZPZHrgfAQ9bne1t55r-gH_7vgAKGose</recordid><startdate>201109</startdate><enddate>201109</enddate><creator>Birkenfeld, Shlomo</creator><creator>Belfer, Rachel Gingold</creator><creator>Chared, Miri</creator><creator>Vilkin, Alex</creator><creator>Barchana, Micha</creator><creator>Lifshitz, Irena</creator><creator>Fruchter, Dana</creator><creator>Aronski, Dina</creator><creator>Balicer, Ran</creator><creator>Niv, Yaron</creator><creator>Levi, Zohar</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201109</creationdate><title>Factors affecting compliance in faecal occult blood testing: a cluster randomized study of the faecal immunochemical test versus the guaiac faecal occult test</title><author>Birkenfeld, Shlomo ; Belfer, Rachel Gingold ; Chared, Miri ; Vilkin, Alex ; Barchana, Micha ; Lifshitz, Irena ; Fruchter, Dana ; Aronski, Dina ; Balicer, Ran ; Niv, Yaron ; Levi, Zohar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-237e79b378d0b89a6a53a202c56c3248d209bad583675feabc3ec50ca2a33c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Carcinoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Carcinoma - immunology</topic><topic>Carcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - immunology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - psychology</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Feces - chemistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunochemistry - methods</topic><topic>Immunochemistry - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - immunology</topic><topic>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occult Blood</topic><topic>Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Birkenfeld, Shlomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belfer, Rachel Gingold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chared, Miri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilkin, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barchana, Micha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lifshitz, Irena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fruchter, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronski, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balicer, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niv, Yaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Zohar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical screening</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Birkenfeld, Shlomo</au><au>Belfer, Rachel Gingold</au><au>Chared, Miri</au><au>Vilkin, Alex</au><au>Barchana, Micha</au><au>Lifshitz, Irena</au><au>Fruchter, Dana</au><au>Aronski, Dina</au><au>Balicer, Ran</au><au>Niv, Yaron</au><au>Levi, Zohar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors affecting compliance in faecal occult blood testing: a cluster randomized study of the faecal immunochemical test versus the guaiac faecal occult test</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical screening</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Screen</addtitle><date>2011-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>135-141</pages><issn>0969-1413</issn><eissn>1475-5793</eissn><abstract>Objective
To compare the uptake of faecal immunochemical occult blood test (FIT) with guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) in a screening programme, with specific attention to the demographic and socioeconomic factors that might affect test uptake.
Setting
The Clalit Health Service screening programme, Israel.
Methods
Average-risk individuals aged 50–75 years were randomized into a FIT arm or gFOBT arm using a programme based on the socioeconomic status (SES) of their primary care clinics. G-FOBT was performed with Hemoccult SENSA™ (3 evacuations) and FIT with the OC- MICRO™ (3 evacuations, refrigerating mandated). The GLIMMIX model was used.
Results
There were 5,464 and 10,668 eligible participants in the FIT and gFOBT arms respectively. Compliance in taking the kits was better (but not statistically significantly better) with gFOBT (37.8% vs. 29.3%; odds ratio [OR] 1.43 [95% CI 0.73–2.80]; P = 0.227). Kit return was higher in the FIT arm (65.0% vs. 78.9%; OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.24–0.83], P = 0.021). Overall test uptake was affected by age, gender, being immigrant and SES (determined by whether or not the participant paid national insurance tax, and the SES of the primary care clinic). The overall uptake of gFOBT and FIT was comparable (OR 0.996 [95% CI 0.46–2.17], P = 0.99).
Conclusions
Overall compliance for test uptake was comparable between the two methods despite the more demanding procedure in the FIT arm. Sociodemographic parameters were the major determinants of compliance. An educational programme, with emphasis on the sociodemographic characteristics of the target population, should be instigated.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>22045822</pmid><doi>10.1258/jms.2011.010147</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0969-1413 |
ispartof | Journal of medical screening, 2011-09, Vol.18 (3), p.135-141 |
issn | 0969-1413 1475-5793 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1258_jms_2011_010147 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Aged Algorithms Carcinoma - diagnosis Carcinoma - epidemiology Carcinoma - immunology Carcinoma - pathology Causality Cluster Analysis Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology Colorectal Neoplasms - immunology Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology Early Detection of Cancer - methods Early Detection of Cancer - psychology Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data Feces - chemistry Female Humans Immunochemistry - methods Immunochemistry - statistics & numerical data Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - diagnosis Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - immunology Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - pathology Male Middle Aged Occult Blood Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data |
title | Factors affecting compliance in faecal occult blood testing: a cluster randomized study of the faecal immunochemical test versus the guaiac faecal occult test |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T09%3A37%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20affecting%20compliance%20in%20faecal%20occult%20blood%20testing:%20a%20cluster%20randomized%20study%20of%20the%20faecal%20immunochemical%20test%20versus%20the%20guaiac%20faecal%20occult%20test&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20screening&rft.au=Birkenfeld,%20Shlomo&rft.date=2011-09&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=135-141&rft.issn=0969-1413&rft.eissn=1475-5793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1258/jms.2011.010147&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1258_jms.2011.010147%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/22045822&rft_sage_id=10.1258_jms.2011.010147&rfr_iscdi=true |