Factors affecting compliance in faecal occult blood testing: a cluster randomized study of the faecal immunochemical test versus the guaiac faecal occult test

Objective To compare the uptake of faecal immunochemical occult blood test (FIT) with guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) in a screening programme, with specific attention to the demographic and socioeconomic factors that might affect test uptake. Setting The Clalit Health Service screening prog...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical screening 2011-09, Vol.18 (3), p.135-141
Hauptverfasser: Birkenfeld, Shlomo, Belfer, Rachel Gingold, Chared, Miri, Vilkin, Alex, Barchana, Micha, Lifshitz, Irena, Fruchter, Dana, Aronski, Dina, Balicer, Ran, Niv, Yaron, Levi, Zohar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 141
container_issue 3
container_start_page 135
container_title Journal of medical screening
container_volume 18
creator Birkenfeld, Shlomo
Belfer, Rachel Gingold
Chared, Miri
Vilkin, Alex
Barchana, Micha
Lifshitz, Irena
Fruchter, Dana
Aronski, Dina
Balicer, Ran
Niv, Yaron
Levi, Zohar
description Objective To compare the uptake of faecal immunochemical occult blood test (FIT) with guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) in a screening programme, with specific attention to the demographic and socioeconomic factors that might affect test uptake. Setting The Clalit Health Service screening programme, Israel. Methods Average-risk individuals aged 50–75 years were randomized into a FIT arm or gFOBT arm using a programme based on the socioeconomic status (SES) of their primary care clinics. G-FOBT was performed with Hemoccult SENSA™ (3 evacuations) and FIT with the OC- MICRO™ (3 evacuations, refrigerating mandated). The GLIMMIX model was used. Results There were 5,464 and 10,668 eligible participants in the FIT and gFOBT arms respectively. Compliance in taking the kits was better (but not statistically significantly better) with gFOBT (37.8% vs. 29.3%; odds ratio [OR] 1.43 [95% CI 0.73–2.80]; P = 0.227). Kit return was higher in the FIT arm (65.0% vs. 78.9%; OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.24–0.83], P = 0.021). Overall test uptake was affected by age, gender, being immigrant and SES (determined by whether or not the participant paid national insurance tax, and the SES of the primary care clinic). The overall uptake of gFOBT and FIT was comparable (OR 0.996 [95% CI 0.46–2.17], P = 0.99). Conclusions Overall compliance for test uptake was comparable between the two methods despite the more demanding procedure in the FIT arm. Sociodemographic parameters were the major determinants of compliance. An educational programme, with emphasis on the sociodemographic characteristics of the target population, should be instigated.
doi_str_mv 10.1258/jms.2011.010147
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1258_jms_2011_010147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1258_jms.2011.010147</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1258_jms.2011.010147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-237e79b378d0b89a6a53a202c56c3248d209bad583675feabc3ec50ca2a33c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRbK2u3ck8gGnnksnFnRSrQsFN9-HkZNKmZDJlJhHqw_isJsa6ENzMYeD7_8P5CLnlbM6FShZ74-eCcT5nnPEwPiPT_lWBilN5TqYsjdKAh1xOyJX3e8aY5Dy5JBMhWKgSIabkcwXYWucplKXGtmq2FK051BU0qGnV0BI0Qk0tYle3NK-tLWir_UA-UKBYd77VjjpoCmuqD11Q33bFkdqStjt9ilfGdI3FnTbV8B0K6Lt2vvPf1LaDCvDPrgG6Jhcl1F7f_MwZ2ayeNsuXYP32_Lp8XAcopWwDIWMdp7mMk4LlSQoRKAmCCVQRShEmhWBpDoVKZBSrUkOOUqNiCAKkxFjOyGKsRWe9d7rMDq4y4I4ZZ9kgOutFZ4PobBTdJ-7GxKHLjS5--ZPZHrgfAQ9bne1t55r-gH_7vgAKGose</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors affecting compliance in faecal occult blood testing: a cluster randomized study of the faecal immunochemical test versus the guaiac faecal occult test</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Birkenfeld, Shlomo ; Belfer, Rachel Gingold ; Chared, Miri ; Vilkin, Alex ; Barchana, Micha ; Lifshitz, Irena ; Fruchter, Dana ; Aronski, Dina ; Balicer, Ran ; Niv, Yaron ; Levi, Zohar</creator><creatorcontrib>Birkenfeld, Shlomo ; Belfer, Rachel Gingold ; Chared, Miri ; Vilkin, Alex ; Barchana, Micha ; Lifshitz, Irena ; Fruchter, Dana ; Aronski, Dina ; Balicer, Ran ; Niv, Yaron ; Levi, Zohar</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To compare the uptake of faecal immunochemical occult blood test (FIT) with guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) in a screening programme, with specific attention to the demographic and socioeconomic factors that might affect test uptake. Setting The Clalit Health Service screening programme, Israel. Methods Average-risk individuals aged 50–75 years were randomized into a FIT arm or gFOBT arm using a programme based on the socioeconomic status (SES) of their primary care clinics. G-FOBT was performed with Hemoccult SENSA™ (3 evacuations) and FIT with the OC- MICRO™ (3 evacuations, refrigerating mandated). The GLIMMIX model was used. Results There were 5,464 and 10,668 eligible participants in the FIT and gFOBT arms respectively. Compliance in taking the kits was better (but not statistically significantly better) with gFOBT (37.8% vs. 29.3%; odds ratio [OR] 1.43 [95% CI 0.73–2.80]; P = 0.227). Kit return was higher in the FIT arm (65.0% vs. 78.9%; OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.24–0.83], P = 0.021). Overall test uptake was affected by age, gender, being immigrant and SES (determined by whether or not the participant paid national insurance tax, and the SES of the primary care clinic). The overall uptake of gFOBT and FIT was comparable (OR 0.996 [95% CI 0.46–2.17], P = 0.99). Conclusions Overall compliance for test uptake was comparable between the two methods despite the more demanding procedure in the FIT arm. Sociodemographic parameters were the major determinants of compliance. An educational programme, with emphasis on the sociodemographic characteristics of the target population, should be instigated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-1413</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-5793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1258/jms.2011.010147</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22045822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Algorithms ; Carcinoma - diagnosis ; Carcinoma - epidemiology ; Carcinoma - immunology ; Carcinoma - pathology ; Causality ; Cluster Analysis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - immunology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Early Detection of Cancer - psychology ; Early Detection of Cancer - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Feces - chemistry ; Female ; Humans ; Immunochemistry - methods ; Immunochemistry - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - diagnosis ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - immunology ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Occult Blood ; Patient Compliance - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical screening, 2011-09, Vol.18 (3), p.135-141</ispartof><rights>2011 Medical Screening Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-237e79b378d0b89a6a53a202c56c3248d209bad583675feabc3ec50ca2a33c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-237e79b378d0b89a6a53a202c56c3248d209bad583675feabc3ec50ca2a33c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22045822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Birkenfeld, Shlomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belfer, Rachel Gingold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chared, Miri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilkin, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barchana, Micha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lifshitz, Irena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fruchter, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronski, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balicer, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niv, Yaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Zohar</creatorcontrib><title>Factors affecting compliance in faecal occult blood testing: a cluster randomized study of the faecal immunochemical test versus the guaiac faecal occult test</title><title>Journal of medical screening</title><addtitle>J Med Screen</addtitle><description>Objective To compare the uptake of faecal immunochemical occult blood test (FIT) with guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) in a screening programme, with specific attention to the demographic and socioeconomic factors that might affect test uptake. Setting The Clalit Health Service screening programme, Israel. Methods Average-risk individuals aged 50–75 years were randomized into a FIT arm or gFOBT arm using a programme based on the socioeconomic status (SES) of their primary care clinics. G-FOBT was performed with Hemoccult SENSA™ (3 evacuations) and FIT with the OC- MICRO™ (3 evacuations, refrigerating mandated). The GLIMMIX model was used. Results There were 5,464 and 10,668 eligible participants in the FIT and gFOBT arms respectively. Compliance in taking the kits was better (but not statistically significantly better) with gFOBT (37.8% vs. 29.3%; odds ratio [OR] 1.43 [95% CI 0.73–2.80]; P = 0.227). Kit return was higher in the FIT arm (65.0% vs. 78.9%; OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.24–0.83], P = 0.021). Overall test uptake was affected by age, gender, being immigrant and SES (determined by whether or not the participant paid national insurance tax, and the SES of the primary care clinic). The overall uptake of gFOBT and FIT was comparable (OR 0.996 [95% CI 0.46–2.17], P = 0.99). Conclusions Overall compliance for test uptake was comparable between the two methods despite the more demanding procedure in the FIT arm. Sociodemographic parameters were the major determinants of compliance. An educational programme, with emphasis on the sociodemographic characteristics of the target population, should be instigated.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Carcinoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Carcinoma - immunology</subject><subject>Carcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - immunology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - psychology</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Feces - chemistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunochemistry - methods</subject><subject>Immunochemistry - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - immunology</subject><subject>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occult Blood</subject><subject>Patient Compliance - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>0969-1413</issn><issn>1475-5793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRbK2u3ck8gGnnksnFnRSrQsFN9-HkZNKmZDJlJhHqw_isJsa6ENzMYeD7_8P5CLnlbM6FShZ74-eCcT5nnPEwPiPT_lWBilN5TqYsjdKAh1xOyJX3e8aY5Dy5JBMhWKgSIabkcwXYWucplKXGtmq2FK051BU0qGnV0BI0Qk0tYle3NK-tLWir_UA-UKBYd77VjjpoCmuqD11Q33bFkdqStjt9ilfGdI3FnTbV8B0K6Lt2vvPf1LaDCvDPrgG6Jhcl1F7f_MwZ2ayeNsuXYP32_Lp8XAcopWwDIWMdp7mMk4LlSQoRKAmCCVQRShEmhWBpDoVKZBSrUkOOUqNiCAKkxFjOyGKsRWe9d7rMDq4y4I4ZZ9kgOutFZ4PobBTdJ-7GxKHLjS5--ZPZHrgfAQ9bne1t55r-gH_7vgAKGose</recordid><startdate>201109</startdate><enddate>201109</enddate><creator>Birkenfeld, Shlomo</creator><creator>Belfer, Rachel Gingold</creator><creator>Chared, Miri</creator><creator>Vilkin, Alex</creator><creator>Barchana, Micha</creator><creator>Lifshitz, Irena</creator><creator>Fruchter, Dana</creator><creator>Aronski, Dina</creator><creator>Balicer, Ran</creator><creator>Niv, Yaron</creator><creator>Levi, Zohar</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201109</creationdate><title>Factors affecting compliance in faecal occult blood testing: a cluster randomized study of the faecal immunochemical test versus the guaiac faecal occult test</title><author>Birkenfeld, Shlomo ; Belfer, Rachel Gingold ; Chared, Miri ; Vilkin, Alex ; Barchana, Micha ; Lifshitz, Irena ; Fruchter, Dana ; Aronski, Dina ; Balicer, Ran ; Niv, Yaron ; Levi, Zohar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-237e79b378d0b89a6a53a202c56c3248d209bad583675feabc3ec50ca2a33c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Carcinoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Carcinoma - immunology</topic><topic>Carcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - immunology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - psychology</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Feces - chemistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunochemistry - methods</topic><topic>Immunochemistry - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - immunology</topic><topic>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occult Blood</topic><topic>Patient Compliance - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Birkenfeld, Shlomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belfer, Rachel Gingold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chared, Miri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilkin, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barchana, Micha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lifshitz, Irena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fruchter, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronski, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balicer, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niv, Yaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Zohar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical screening</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Birkenfeld, Shlomo</au><au>Belfer, Rachel Gingold</au><au>Chared, Miri</au><au>Vilkin, Alex</au><au>Barchana, Micha</au><au>Lifshitz, Irena</au><au>Fruchter, Dana</au><au>Aronski, Dina</au><au>Balicer, Ran</au><au>Niv, Yaron</au><au>Levi, Zohar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors affecting compliance in faecal occult blood testing: a cluster randomized study of the faecal immunochemical test versus the guaiac faecal occult test</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical screening</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Screen</addtitle><date>2011-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>135-141</pages><issn>0969-1413</issn><eissn>1475-5793</eissn><abstract>Objective To compare the uptake of faecal immunochemical occult blood test (FIT) with guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) in a screening programme, with specific attention to the demographic and socioeconomic factors that might affect test uptake. Setting The Clalit Health Service screening programme, Israel. Methods Average-risk individuals aged 50–75 years were randomized into a FIT arm or gFOBT arm using a programme based on the socioeconomic status (SES) of their primary care clinics. G-FOBT was performed with Hemoccult SENSA™ (3 evacuations) and FIT with the OC- MICRO™ (3 evacuations, refrigerating mandated). The GLIMMIX model was used. Results There were 5,464 and 10,668 eligible participants in the FIT and gFOBT arms respectively. Compliance in taking the kits was better (but not statistically significantly better) with gFOBT (37.8% vs. 29.3%; odds ratio [OR] 1.43 [95% CI 0.73–2.80]; P = 0.227). Kit return was higher in the FIT arm (65.0% vs. 78.9%; OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.24–0.83], P = 0.021). Overall test uptake was affected by age, gender, being immigrant and SES (determined by whether or not the participant paid national insurance tax, and the SES of the primary care clinic). The overall uptake of gFOBT and FIT was comparable (OR 0.996 [95% CI 0.46–2.17], P = 0.99). Conclusions Overall compliance for test uptake was comparable between the two methods despite the more demanding procedure in the FIT arm. Sociodemographic parameters were the major determinants of compliance. An educational programme, with emphasis on the sociodemographic characteristics of the target population, should be instigated.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>22045822</pmid><doi>10.1258/jms.2011.010147</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0969-1413
ispartof Journal of medical screening, 2011-09, Vol.18 (3), p.135-141
issn 0969-1413
1475-5793
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1258_jms_2011_010147
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Aged
Algorithms
Carcinoma - diagnosis
Carcinoma - epidemiology
Carcinoma - immunology
Carcinoma - pathology
Causality
Cluster Analysis
Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology
Colorectal Neoplasms - immunology
Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Early Detection of Cancer - psychology
Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data
Feces - chemistry
Female
Humans
Immunochemistry - methods
Immunochemistry - statistics & numerical data
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - diagnosis
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - immunology
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - pathology
Male
Middle Aged
Occult Blood
Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data
title Factors affecting compliance in faecal occult blood testing: a cluster randomized study of the faecal immunochemical test versus the guaiac faecal occult test
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T09%3A37%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20affecting%20compliance%20in%20faecal%20occult%20blood%20testing:%20a%20cluster%20randomized%20study%20of%20the%20faecal%20immunochemical%20test%20versus%20the%20guaiac%20faecal%20occult%20test&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20screening&rft.au=Birkenfeld,%20Shlomo&rft.date=2011-09&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=135-141&rft.issn=0969-1413&rft.eissn=1475-5793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1258/jms.2011.010147&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1258_jms.2011.010147%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/22045822&rft_sage_id=10.1258_jms.2011.010147&rfr_iscdi=true