Mentoring and the Dynamics of Affirmative Action

We analyze the long-term workforce composition when the quality of mentoring available to majority and minority juniors depends on their representation in the workforce. A workforce with at least 50 percent majority workers invariably converges to one where the majority is overrepresented relative t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American economic journal. Economic policy 2022-05, Vol.14 (2), p.402-444
Hauptverfasser: Müller-Itten, Michèle, Öry, Aniko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 444
container_issue 2
container_start_page 402
container_title American economic journal. Economic policy
container_volume 14
creator Müller-Itten, Michèle
Öry, Aniko
description We analyze the long-term workforce composition when the quality of mentoring available to majority and minority juniors depends on their representation in the workforce. A workforce with at least 50 percent majority workers invariably converges to one where the majority is overrepresented relative to the population. To maximize welfare, persistent interventions, such as group-specific fellowships, are often needed, and the optimal workforce may include minority workers of lower innate talent than the marginal majority worker. We discuss the role of mentorship determinants, talent dispersion, the scope of short-term interventions, various policy instruments and contrast our results to the classic fairness narrative.
doi_str_mv 10.1257/pol.20190579
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1257_pol_20190579</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27154440</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27154440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2309-f0ec271bb3d12140e0173c947427268c410d0bbf518a2d47156eaae187f3dac93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFz01LxDAQgOEgCq6rN69CfoBdZ_LRNMeyfsKKFwVvJU0TzbKbLkkR9t9bqa7kMDk8DPMScomwQCbVza7fLBigBqn0EZmhFrJQSrwfH_4cT8lZzmuAko9vRuDZxaFPIX5QEzs6fDp6u49mG2ymvae19yFtzRC-HK3tEPp4Tk682WR38Tvn5O3-7nX5WKxeHp6W9aqwjIMuPDjLFLYt75ChAAeouNVCCaZYWVmB0EHbeomVYZ1QKEtnjMNKed4Zq_mcXE97bepzTs43uxS2Ju0bhOanthlrm7_akdOJO9vHkP9xBSWTiFCN5Goi6zwWH8R4pRRCAP8Gm5hanw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mentoring and the Dynamics of Affirmative Action</title><source>American Economic Association Web</source><creator>Müller-Itten, Michèle ; Öry, Aniko</creator><creatorcontrib>Müller-Itten, Michèle ; Öry, Aniko</creatorcontrib><description>We analyze the long-term workforce composition when the quality of mentoring available to majority and minority juniors depends on their representation in the workforce. A workforce with at least 50 percent majority workers invariably converges to one where the majority is overrepresented relative to the population. To maximize welfare, persistent interventions, such as group-specific fellowships, are often needed, and the optimal workforce may include minority workers of lower innate talent than the marginal majority worker. We discuss the role of mentorship determinants, talent dispersion, the scope of short-term interventions, various policy instruments and contrast our results to the classic fairness narrative.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1945-7731</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-774X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1257/pol.20190579</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Economic Association</publisher><subject>Antidiskriminierungsrecht ; Bildungsinvestition ; Coaching ; Erwerbstätigkeit ; Minderheit ; Overlapping Generations ; Theorie</subject><ispartof>American economic journal. Economic policy, 2022-05, Vol.14 (2), p.402-444</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2309-f0ec271bb3d12140e0173c947427268c410d0bbf518a2d47156eaae187f3dac93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2309-f0ec271bb3d12140e0173c947427268c410d0bbf518a2d47156eaae187f3dac93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3735,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Müller-Itten, Michèle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öry, Aniko</creatorcontrib><title>Mentoring and the Dynamics of Affirmative Action</title><title>American economic journal. Economic policy</title><description>We analyze the long-term workforce composition when the quality of mentoring available to majority and minority juniors depends on their representation in the workforce. A workforce with at least 50 percent majority workers invariably converges to one where the majority is overrepresented relative to the population. To maximize welfare, persistent interventions, such as group-specific fellowships, are often needed, and the optimal workforce may include minority workers of lower innate talent than the marginal majority worker. We discuss the role of mentorship determinants, talent dispersion, the scope of short-term interventions, various policy instruments and contrast our results to the classic fairness narrative.</description><subject>Antidiskriminierungsrecht</subject><subject>Bildungsinvestition</subject><subject>Coaching</subject><subject>Erwerbstätigkeit</subject><subject>Minderheit</subject><subject>Overlapping Generations</subject><subject>Theorie</subject><issn>1945-7731</issn><issn>1945-774X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFz01LxDAQgOEgCq6rN69CfoBdZ_LRNMeyfsKKFwVvJU0TzbKbLkkR9t9bqa7kMDk8DPMScomwQCbVza7fLBigBqn0EZmhFrJQSrwfH_4cT8lZzmuAko9vRuDZxaFPIX5QEzs6fDp6u49mG2ymvae19yFtzRC-HK3tEPp4Tk682WR38Tvn5O3-7nX5WKxeHp6W9aqwjIMuPDjLFLYt75ChAAeouNVCCaZYWVmB0EHbeomVYZ1QKEtnjMNKed4Zq_mcXE97bepzTs43uxS2Ju0bhOanthlrm7_akdOJO9vHkP9xBSWTiFCN5Goi6zwWH8R4pRRCAP8Gm5hanw</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Müller-Itten, Michèle</creator><creator>Öry, Aniko</creator><general>American Economic Association</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Mentoring and the Dynamics of Affirmative Action</title><author>Müller-Itten, Michèle ; Öry, Aniko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2309-f0ec271bb3d12140e0173c947427268c410d0bbf518a2d47156eaae187f3dac93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Antidiskriminierungsrecht</topic><topic>Bildungsinvestition</topic><topic>Coaching</topic><topic>Erwerbstätigkeit</topic><topic>Minderheit</topic><topic>Overlapping Generations</topic><topic>Theorie</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Müller-Itten, Michèle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öry, Aniko</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>American economic journal. Economic policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Müller-Itten, Michèle</au><au>Öry, Aniko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mentoring and the Dynamics of Affirmative Action</atitle><jtitle>American economic journal. Economic policy</jtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>402</spage><epage>444</epage><pages>402-444</pages><issn>1945-7731</issn><eissn>1945-774X</eissn><abstract>We analyze the long-term workforce composition when the quality of mentoring available to majority and minority juniors depends on their representation in the workforce. A workforce with at least 50 percent majority workers invariably converges to one where the majority is overrepresented relative to the population. To maximize welfare, persistent interventions, such as group-specific fellowships, are often needed, and the optimal workforce may include minority workers of lower innate talent than the marginal majority worker. We discuss the role of mentorship determinants, talent dispersion, the scope of short-term interventions, various policy instruments and contrast our results to the classic fairness narrative.</abstract><pub>American Economic Association</pub><doi>10.1257/pol.20190579</doi><tpages>43</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1945-7731
ispartof American economic journal. Economic policy, 2022-05, Vol.14 (2), p.402-444
issn 1945-7731
1945-774X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1257_pol_20190579
source American Economic Association Web
subjects Antidiskriminierungsrecht
Bildungsinvestition
Coaching
Erwerbstätigkeit
Minderheit
Overlapping Generations
Theorie
title Mentoring and the Dynamics of Affirmative Action
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T11%3A15%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mentoring%20and%20the%20Dynamics%20of%20Affirmative%20Action&rft.jtitle=American%20economic%20journal.%20Economic%20policy&rft.au=M%C3%BCller-Itten,%20Mich%C3%A8le&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=402&rft.epage=444&rft.pages=402-444&rft.issn=1945-7731&rft.eissn=1945-774X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1257/pol.20190579&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E27154440%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27154440&rfr_iscdi=true