Mentoring and the Dynamics of Affirmative Action
We analyze the long-term workforce composition when the quality of mentoring available to majority and minority juniors depends on their representation in the workforce. A workforce with at least 50 percent majority workers invariably converges to one where the majority is overrepresented relative t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American economic journal. Economic policy 2022-05, Vol.14 (2), p.402-444 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 444 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 402 |
container_title | American economic journal. Economic policy |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Müller-Itten, Michèle Öry, Aniko |
description | We analyze the long-term workforce composition when the quality of mentoring available to majority and minority juniors depends on their representation in the workforce. A workforce with at least 50 percent majority workers invariably converges to one where the majority is overrepresented relative to the population. To maximize welfare, persistent interventions, such as group-specific fellowships, are often needed, and the optimal workforce may include minority workers of lower innate talent than the marginal majority worker. We discuss the role of mentorship determinants, talent dispersion, the scope of short-term interventions, various policy instruments and contrast our results to the classic fairness narrative. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1257/pol.20190579 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1257_pol_20190579</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27154440</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27154440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2309-f0ec271bb3d12140e0173c947427268c410d0bbf518a2d47156eaae187f3dac93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFz01LxDAQgOEgCq6rN69CfoBdZ_LRNMeyfsKKFwVvJU0TzbKbLkkR9t9bqa7kMDk8DPMScomwQCbVza7fLBigBqn0EZmhFrJQSrwfH_4cT8lZzmuAko9vRuDZxaFPIX5QEzs6fDp6u49mG2ymvae19yFtzRC-HK3tEPp4Tk682WR38Tvn5O3-7nX5WKxeHp6W9aqwjIMuPDjLFLYt75ChAAeouNVCCaZYWVmB0EHbeomVYZ1QKEtnjMNKed4Zq_mcXE97bepzTs43uxS2Ju0bhOanthlrm7_akdOJO9vHkP9xBSWTiFCN5Goi6zwWH8R4pRRCAP8Gm5hanw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mentoring and the Dynamics of Affirmative Action</title><source>American Economic Association Web</source><creator>Müller-Itten, Michèle ; Öry, Aniko</creator><creatorcontrib>Müller-Itten, Michèle ; Öry, Aniko</creatorcontrib><description>We analyze the long-term workforce composition when the quality of mentoring available to majority and minority juniors depends on their representation in the workforce. A workforce with at least 50 percent majority workers invariably converges to one where the majority is overrepresented relative to the population. To maximize welfare, persistent interventions, such as group-specific fellowships, are often needed, and the optimal workforce may include minority workers of lower innate talent than the marginal majority worker. We discuss the role of mentorship determinants, talent dispersion, the scope of short-term interventions, various policy instruments and contrast our results to the classic fairness narrative.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1945-7731</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-774X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1257/pol.20190579</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Economic Association</publisher><subject>Antidiskriminierungsrecht ; Bildungsinvestition ; Coaching ; Erwerbstätigkeit ; Minderheit ; Overlapping Generations ; Theorie</subject><ispartof>American economic journal. Economic policy, 2022-05, Vol.14 (2), p.402-444</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2309-f0ec271bb3d12140e0173c947427268c410d0bbf518a2d47156eaae187f3dac93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2309-f0ec271bb3d12140e0173c947427268c410d0bbf518a2d47156eaae187f3dac93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3735,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Müller-Itten, Michèle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öry, Aniko</creatorcontrib><title>Mentoring and the Dynamics of Affirmative Action</title><title>American economic journal. Economic policy</title><description>We analyze the long-term workforce composition when the quality of mentoring available to majority and minority juniors depends on their representation in the workforce. A workforce with at least 50 percent majority workers invariably converges to one where the majority is overrepresented relative to the population. To maximize welfare, persistent interventions, such as group-specific fellowships, are often needed, and the optimal workforce may include minority workers of lower innate talent than the marginal majority worker. We discuss the role of mentorship determinants, talent dispersion, the scope of short-term interventions, various policy instruments and contrast our results to the classic fairness narrative.</description><subject>Antidiskriminierungsrecht</subject><subject>Bildungsinvestition</subject><subject>Coaching</subject><subject>Erwerbstätigkeit</subject><subject>Minderheit</subject><subject>Overlapping Generations</subject><subject>Theorie</subject><issn>1945-7731</issn><issn>1945-774X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFz01LxDAQgOEgCq6rN69CfoBdZ_LRNMeyfsKKFwVvJU0TzbKbLkkR9t9bqa7kMDk8DPMScomwQCbVza7fLBigBqn0EZmhFrJQSrwfH_4cT8lZzmuAko9vRuDZxaFPIX5QEzs6fDp6u49mG2ymvae19yFtzRC-HK3tEPp4Tk682WR38Tvn5O3-7nX5WKxeHp6W9aqwjIMuPDjLFLYt75ChAAeouNVCCaZYWVmB0EHbeomVYZ1QKEtnjMNKed4Zq_mcXE97bepzTs43uxS2Ju0bhOanthlrm7_akdOJO9vHkP9xBSWTiFCN5Goi6zwWH8R4pRRCAP8Gm5hanw</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Müller-Itten, Michèle</creator><creator>Öry, Aniko</creator><general>American Economic Association</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Mentoring and the Dynamics of Affirmative Action</title><author>Müller-Itten, Michèle ; Öry, Aniko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2309-f0ec271bb3d12140e0173c947427268c410d0bbf518a2d47156eaae187f3dac93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Antidiskriminierungsrecht</topic><topic>Bildungsinvestition</topic><topic>Coaching</topic><topic>Erwerbstätigkeit</topic><topic>Minderheit</topic><topic>Overlapping Generations</topic><topic>Theorie</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Müller-Itten, Michèle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öry, Aniko</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>American economic journal. Economic policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Müller-Itten, Michèle</au><au>Öry, Aniko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mentoring and the Dynamics of Affirmative Action</atitle><jtitle>American economic journal. Economic policy</jtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>402</spage><epage>444</epage><pages>402-444</pages><issn>1945-7731</issn><eissn>1945-774X</eissn><abstract>We analyze the long-term workforce composition when the quality of mentoring available to majority and minority juniors depends on their representation in the workforce. A workforce with at least 50 percent majority workers invariably converges to one where the majority is overrepresented relative to the population. To maximize welfare, persistent interventions, such as group-specific fellowships, are often needed, and the optimal workforce may include minority workers of lower innate talent than the marginal majority worker. We discuss the role of mentorship determinants, talent dispersion, the scope of short-term interventions, various policy instruments and contrast our results to the classic fairness narrative.</abstract><pub>American Economic Association</pub><doi>10.1257/pol.20190579</doi><tpages>43</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1945-7731 |
ispartof | American economic journal. Economic policy, 2022-05, Vol.14 (2), p.402-444 |
issn | 1945-7731 1945-774X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1257_pol_20190579 |
source | American Economic Association Web |
subjects | Antidiskriminierungsrecht Bildungsinvestition Coaching Erwerbstätigkeit Minderheit Overlapping Generations Theorie |
title | Mentoring and the Dynamics of Affirmative Action |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T11%3A15%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mentoring%20and%20the%20Dynamics%20of%20Affirmative%20Action&rft.jtitle=American%20economic%20journal.%20Economic%20policy&rft.au=M%C3%BCller-Itten,%20Mich%C3%A8le&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=402&rft.epage=444&rft.pages=402-444&rft.issn=1945-7731&rft.eissn=1945-774X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1257/pol.20190579&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E27154440%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27154440&rfr_iscdi=true |