Thy Neighbor’s Misfortune: Peer Effect on Consumption

Using a large, representative sample of credit and debit card transactions in Singapore, this paper studies the consumption response of individuals whose same- building neighbors experienced personal bankruptcy. The unique bankruptcy rules in Singapore suggest liquidity shocks drive personal bankrup...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American economic journal. Economic policy 2021-05, Vol.13 (2), p.1-25
Hauptverfasser: Agarwal, Sumit, Qian, Wenlan, Zou, Xin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 25
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1
container_title American economic journal. Economic policy
container_volume 13
creator Agarwal, Sumit
Qian, Wenlan
Zou, Xin
description Using a large, representative sample of credit and debit card transactions in Singapore, this paper studies the consumption response of individuals whose same- building neighbors experienced personal bankruptcy. The unique bankruptcy rules in Singapore suggest liquidity shocks drive personal bankruptcy decisions, leading to a substantial drop in consumption for the bankrupt. Peers’ monthly card consumption decreases by 3.4 percent over the 1- year postbankruptcy period. There exists no consumption decrease among individuals in immediately adjacent buildings nor for consumers with diminished postevent social ties with the bankrupt. The findings imply a significant social multiplier effect of 2.8 times the original consumption shock.
doi_str_mv 10.1257/pol.20170634
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1257_pol_20170634</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27028659</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27028659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a69c249ae300e51dfc40aa40bc1de228434a1cadc640b8a54ab6c39aeed7a3593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFz81KAzEQB_AgCtbqzZsI-wBunUmyye5Ril9Q9VLBW5jNZu2W2pRkPfTma_h6PomR1cocZhh-zPBn7BRhgrzQlxu_mnBADUrIPTbCSha51vJlfzcLPGRHMS4hkVQjdjZfbLNH170uah--Pj5j9tDF1of-fe2O2UFLq-hOfvuYPd9cz6d3-ezp9n56NcutkLrPSVWWy4qcAHAFNq2VQCShttg4zkspJKGlxqq0K6mQVCsrkneNJlFUYswuhrs2-BiDa80mdG8UtgbB_AQzKZj5C5Z4NnBn_bqL_1grRFGB0ImcD2QZex92gmvgpUofvwG5mVVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thy Neighbor’s Misfortune: Peer Effect on Consumption</title><source>American Economic Association</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Agarwal, Sumit ; Qian, Wenlan ; Zou, Xin</creator><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Sumit ; Qian, Wenlan ; Zou, Xin</creatorcontrib><description>Using a large, representative sample of credit and debit card transactions in Singapore, this paper studies the consumption response of individuals whose same- building neighbors experienced personal bankruptcy. The unique bankruptcy rules in Singapore suggest liquidity shocks drive personal bankruptcy decisions, leading to a substantial drop in consumption for the bankrupt. Peers’ monthly card consumption decreases by 3.4 percent over the 1- year postbankruptcy period. There exists no consumption decrease among individuals in immediately adjacent buildings nor for consumers with diminished postevent social ties with the bankrupt. The findings imply a significant social multiplier effect of 2.8 times the original consumption shock.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1945-7731</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-774X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1257/pol.20170634</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Economic Association</publisher><ispartof>American economic journal. Economic policy, 2021-05, Vol.13 (2), p.1-25</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a69c249ae300e51dfc40aa40bc1de228434a1cadc640b8a54ab6c39aeed7a3593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a69c249ae300e51dfc40aa40bc1de228434a1cadc640b8a54ab6c39aeed7a3593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27028659$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27028659$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,3746,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Sumit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Wenlan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Xin</creatorcontrib><title>Thy Neighbor’s Misfortune: Peer Effect on Consumption</title><title>American economic journal. Economic policy</title><description>Using a large, representative sample of credit and debit card transactions in Singapore, this paper studies the consumption response of individuals whose same- building neighbors experienced personal bankruptcy. The unique bankruptcy rules in Singapore suggest liquidity shocks drive personal bankruptcy decisions, leading to a substantial drop in consumption for the bankrupt. Peers’ monthly card consumption decreases by 3.4 percent over the 1- year postbankruptcy period. There exists no consumption decrease among individuals in immediately adjacent buildings nor for consumers with diminished postevent social ties with the bankrupt. The findings imply a significant social multiplier effect of 2.8 times the original consumption shock.</description><issn>1945-7731</issn><issn>1945-774X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFz81KAzEQB_AgCtbqzZsI-wBunUmyye5Ril9Q9VLBW5jNZu2W2pRkPfTma_h6PomR1cocZhh-zPBn7BRhgrzQlxu_mnBADUrIPTbCSha51vJlfzcLPGRHMS4hkVQjdjZfbLNH170uah--Pj5j9tDF1of-fe2O2UFLq-hOfvuYPd9cz6d3-ezp9n56NcutkLrPSVWWy4qcAHAFNq2VQCShttg4zkspJKGlxqq0K6mQVCsrkneNJlFUYswuhrs2-BiDa80mdG8UtgbB_AQzKZj5C5Z4NnBn_bqL_1grRFGB0ImcD2QZex92gmvgpUofvwG5mVVg</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Agarwal, Sumit</creator><creator>Qian, Wenlan</creator><creator>Zou, Xin</creator><general>American Economic Association</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Thy Neighbor’s Misfortune</title><author>Agarwal, Sumit ; Qian, Wenlan ; Zou, Xin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a69c249ae300e51dfc40aa40bc1de228434a1cadc640b8a54ab6c39aeed7a3593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Sumit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Wenlan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Xin</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>American economic journal. Economic policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Agarwal, Sumit</au><au>Qian, Wenlan</au><au>Zou, Xin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thy Neighbor’s Misfortune: Peer Effect on Consumption</atitle><jtitle>American economic journal. Economic policy</jtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>1-25</pages><issn>1945-7731</issn><eissn>1945-774X</eissn><abstract>Using a large, representative sample of credit and debit card transactions in Singapore, this paper studies the consumption response of individuals whose same- building neighbors experienced personal bankruptcy. The unique bankruptcy rules in Singapore suggest liquidity shocks drive personal bankruptcy decisions, leading to a substantial drop in consumption for the bankrupt. Peers’ monthly card consumption decreases by 3.4 percent over the 1- year postbankruptcy period. There exists no consumption decrease among individuals in immediately adjacent buildings nor for consumers with diminished postevent social ties with the bankrupt. The findings imply a significant social multiplier effect of 2.8 times the original consumption shock.</abstract><pub>American Economic Association</pub><doi>10.1257/pol.20170634</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1945-7731
ispartof American economic journal. Economic policy, 2021-05, Vol.13 (2), p.1-25
issn 1945-7731
1945-774X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1257_pol_20170634
source American Economic Association; JSTOR
title Thy Neighbor’s Misfortune: Peer Effect on Consumption
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T18%3A44%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thy%20Neighbor%E2%80%99s%20Misfortune:%20Peer%20Effect%20on%20Consumption&rft.jtitle=American%20economic%20journal.%20Economic%20policy&rft.au=Agarwal,%20Sumit&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=1-25&rft.issn=1945-7731&rft.eissn=1945-774X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1257/pol.20170634&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E27028659%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27028659&rfr_iscdi=true