The Returns to a Large Community College Program: Evidence from Admissions Lotteries

This paper estimates the labor market returns to the associate’s degree in nursing (ADN), which is one of the most popular community college programs. I use student-level academic and earnings records across two decades for all community college students in California. I leverage random variation fr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American economic journal. Economic policy 2020-02, Vol.12 (1), p.226-253
1. Verfasser: Grosz, Michel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 253
container_issue 1
container_start_page 226
container_title American economic journal. Economic policy
container_volume 12
creator Grosz, Michel
description This paper estimates the labor market returns to the associate’s degree in nursing (ADN), which is one of the most popular community college programs. I use student-level academic and earnings records across two decades for all community college students in California. I leverage random variation from admissions lotteries to produce causal estimates of the effect of the ADN on earnings and employment at a single large ADN program. Enrolling in the program increases earnings by 44 percent and the probability of working in the health care industry by 19 percentage points. These estimates are similar to ones in models that do not use the lottery variation but do control for individual fixed effects and individual-specific linear time trends, which I also estimate in a wider set of institutions where lottery estimates are not possible. In light of concerns about nursing shortages, I estimate that the economic benefit of expanding an ADN program by one seat far outweighs the costs.
doi_str_mv 10.1257/pol.20170506
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1257_pol_20170506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26888553</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26888553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-735c967fdd0600b69c17fd056648c935a75adaf90c7c52ce70929ceed4d275b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j8FKAzEQhoMoWKs3r8I-gFsnyU5mc5RFq7CgSAVvS5rN1pbdpiTbQ9_eSLXMYf5_-Bj4GLvlMOMC6WHn-5kAToCgztiE6wJzouLr_JQlv2RXMW4AlEwzYbD4dtmHG_dhG7PRZyarTVi5rPLDsN-ux0NKfe_S5T34VTDDNbvoTB_dzd-ess_np0X1ktdv89fqsc6tVDDmJNFqRV3bggJYKm15KoBKFaXVEg2haU2nwZJFYR2BFto61xatIFySnLL7418bfIzBdc0urAcTDg2H5te2SbbNv23C7474Jo4-nFihyrJElPIH7kRQwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Returns to a Large Community College Program: Evidence from Admissions Lotteries</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>American Economic Association Web</source><creator>Grosz, Michel</creator><creatorcontrib>Grosz, Michel</creatorcontrib><description>This paper estimates the labor market returns to the associate’s degree in nursing (ADN), which is one of the most popular community college programs. I use student-level academic and earnings records across two decades for all community college students in California. I leverage random variation from admissions lotteries to produce causal estimates of the effect of the ADN on earnings and employment at a single large ADN program. Enrolling in the program increases earnings by 44 percent and the probability of working in the health care industry by 19 percentage points. These estimates are similar to ones in models that do not use the lottery variation but do control for individual fixed effects and individual-specific linear time trends, which I also estimate in a wider set of institutions where lottery estimates are not possible. In light of concerns about nursing shortages, I estimate that the economic benefit of expanding an ADN program by one seat far outweighs the costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1945-7731</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-774X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1257/pol.20170506</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Economic Association</publisher><ispartof>American economic journal. Economic policy, 2020-02, Vol.12 (1), p.226-253</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-735c967fdd0600b69c17fd056648c935a75adaf90c7c52ce70929ceed4d275b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-735c967fdd0600b69c17fd056648c935a75adaf90c7c52ce70929ceed4d275b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26888553$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26888553$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3734,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grosz, Michel</creatorcontrib><title>The Returns to a Large Community College Program: Evidence from Admissions Lotteries</title><title>American economic journal. Economic policy</title><description>This paper estimates the labor market returns to the associate’s degree in nursing (ADN), which is one of the most popular community college programs. I use student-level academic and earnings records across two decades for all community college students in California. I leverage random variation from admissions lotteries to produce causal estimates of the effect of the ADN on earnings and employment at a single large ADN program. Enrolling in the program increases earnings by 44 percent and the probability of working in the health care industry by 19 percentage points. These estimates are similar to ones in models that do not use the lottery variation but do control for individual fixed effects and individual-specific linear time trends, which I also estimate in a wider set of institutions where lottery estimates are not possible. In light of concerns about nursing shortages, I estimate that the economic benefit of expanding an ADN program by one seat far outweighs the costs.</description><issn>1945-7731</issn><issn>1945-774X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j8FKAzEQhoMoWKs3r8I-gFsnyU5mc5RFq7CgSAVvS5rN1pbdpiTbQ9_eSLXMYf5_-Bj4GLvlMOMC6WHn-5kAToCgztiE6wJzouLr_JQlv2RXMW4AlEwzYbD4dtmHG_dhG7PRZyarTVi5rPLDsN-ux0NKfe_S5T34VTDDNbvoTB_dzd-ess_np0X1ktdv89fqsc6tVDDmJNFqRV3bggJYKm15KoBKFaXVEg2haU2nwZJFYR2BFto61xatIFySnLL7418bfIzBdc0urAcTDg2H5te2SbbNv23C7474Jo4-nFihyrJElPIH7kRQwA</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Grosz, Michel</creator><general>American Economic Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>The Returns to a Large Community College Program</title><author>Grosz, Michel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-735c967fdd0600b69c17fd056648c935a75adaf90c7c52ce70929ceed4d275b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grosz, Michel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>American economic journal. Economic policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grosz, Michel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Returns to a Large Community College Program: Evidence from Admissions Lotteries</atitle><jtitle>American economic journal. Economic policy</jtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>226-253</pages><issn>1945-7731</issn><eissn>1945-774X</eissn><abstract>This paper estimates the labor market returns to the associate’s degree in nursing (ADN), which is one of the most popular community college programs. I use student-level academic and earnings records across two decades for all community college students in California. I leverage random variation from admissions lotteries to produce causal estimates of the effect of the ADN on earnings and employment at a single large ADN program. Enrolling in the program increases earnings by 44 percent and the probability of working in the health care industry by 19 percentage points. These estimates are similar to ones in models that do not use the lottery variation but do control for individual fixed effects and individual-specific linear time trends, which I also estimate in a wider set of institutions where lottery estimates are not possible. In light of concerns about nursing shortages, I estimate that the economic benefit of expanding an ADN program by one seat far outweighs the costs.</abstract><pub>American Economic Association</pub><doi>10.1257/pol.20170506</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1945-7731
ispartof American economic journal. Economic policy, 2020-02, Vol.12 (1), p.226-253
issn 1945-7731
1945-774X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1257_pol_20170506
source Jstor Complete Legacy; American Economic Association Web
title The Returns to a Large Community College Program: Evidence from Admissions Lotteries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T03%3A40%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Returns%20to%20a%20Large%20Community%20College%20Program:%20Evidence%20from%20Admissions%20Lotteries&rft.jtitle=American%20economic%20journal.%20Economic%20policy&rft.au=Grosz,%20Michel&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=226-253&rft.issn=1945-7731&rft.eissn=1945-774X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1257/pol.20170506&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E26888553%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26888553&rfr_iscdi=true