Border Carbon Adjustments When Carbon Intensity Varies across Producers: Evidence from California
Governments taxing carbon emissions within their jurisdiction can impose a commensurate tax on emissions embodied in imports in order to mitigate emissions leakage. California offers a rare opportunity to investigate how such a border carbon adjustment (BCA) is working in practice. Experience to dat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | AEA papers and proceedings 2021-05, Vol.111, p.401-405 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 405 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 401 |
container_title | AEA papers and proceedings |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Fowlie, Meredith Petersen, Claire Reguant, Mar |
description | Governments taxing carbon emissions within their jurisdiction can impose a commensurate tax on emissions embodied in imports in order to mitigate emissions leakage. California offers a rare opportunity to investigate how such a border carbon adjustment (BCA) is working in practice. Experience to date highlights important tensions between greenhouse gas accounting accuracy, market efficiency, and concerns about trade protectionism. We simulate electricity market outcomes under BCA designs that differ in terms of how the carbon intensity of imports is assessed. Simulations suggest significant potential for leakage via resource shuffling. Realized emissions outcomes indicate that this potential has not been fully realized. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1257/pandp.20211073 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1257_pandp_20211073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27042339</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27042339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-775c5a24407c15c65e6ac12eeeaea4afc112f897fc3d8e62602e049094e063d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNRevQn7BxJnZ7-SYy3aFgp68OMY1s0EU-ym7KaH_ntja-tphpfnnYGHsVsBuUBt77cu1NscAYUAKy_YaAhVBtaay_Nuims2SWkNAAiyNAZHbP7QxZoin7n42QU-rde71G8o9Il_fFE45cvQU0htv-fvLraUuPOxS4m_xK7eeYrphl017jvR5G-O2dvT4-tska2e58vZdJV5LESfWau9dqgUWC-0N5qM8wKJyJFTrvFCYFOUtvGyLsigASRQJZSKwMhayzHLj3cP_yM11Ta2Gxf3lYDq10R1MFGdTAwFfiyQ70Kb_nFrBtzoAgbk7oisU9_FM4EWFEpZyh8y0WYO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Border Carbon Adjustments When Carbon Intensity Varies across Producers: Evidence from California</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>American Economic Association Web</source><creator>Fowlie, Meredith ; Petersen, Claire ; Reguant, Mar</creator><creatorcontrib>Fowlie, Meredith ; Petersen, Claire ; Reguant, Mar</creatorcontrib><description>Governments taxing carbon emissions within their jurisdiction can impose a commensurate tax on emissions embodied in imports in order to mitigate emissions leakage. California offers a rare opportunity to investigate how such a border carbon adjustment (BCA) is working in practice. Experience to date highlights important tensions between greenhouse gas accounting accuracy, market efficiency, and concerns about trade protectionism. We simulate electricity market outcomes under BCA designs that differ in terms of how the carbon intensity of imports is assessed. Simulations suggest significant potential for leakage via resource shuffling. Realized emissions outcomes indicate that this potential has not been fully realized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-0768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-0776</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20211073</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Economic Association</publisher><subject>ENERGY REGULATION: LEAKAGE, EMISSIONS, AND SPILLOVERS</subject><ispartof>AEA papers and proceedings, 2021-05, Vol.111, p.401-405</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-775c5a24407c15c65e6ac12eeeaea4afc112f897fc3d8e62602e049094e063d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-775c5a24407c15c65e6ac12eeeaea4afc112f897fc3d8e62602e049094e063d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27042339$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27042339$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,3748,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fowlie, Meredith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reguant, Mar</creatorcontrib><title>Border Carbon Adjustments When Carbon Intensity Varies across Producers: Evidence from California</title><title>AEA papers and proceedings</title><description>Governments taxing carbon emissions within their jurisdiction can impose a commensurate tax on emissions embodied in imports in order to mitigate emissions leakage. California offers a rare opportunity to investigate how such a border carbon adjustment (BCA) is working in practice. Experience to date highlights important tensions between greenhouse gas accounting accuracy, market efficiency, and concerns about trade protectionism. We simulate electricity market outcomes under BCA designs that differ in terms of how the carbon intensity of imports is assessed. Simulations suggest significant potential for leakage via resource shuffling. Realized emissions outcomes indicate that this potential has not been fully realized.</description><subject>ENERGY REGULATION: LEAKAGE, EMISSIONS, AND SPILLOVERS</subject><issn>2574-0768</issn><issn>2574-0776</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNRevQn7BxJnZ7-SYy3aFgp68OMY1s0EU-ym7KaH_ntja-tphpfnnYGHsVsBuUBt77cu1NscAYUAKy_YaAhVBtaay_Nuims2SWkNAAiyNAZHbP7QxZoin7n42QU-rde71G8o9Il_fFE45cvQU0htv-fvLraUuPOxS4m_xK7eeYrphl017jvR5G-O2dvT4-tska2e58vZdJV5LESfWau9dqgUWC-0N5qM8wKJyJFTrvFCYFOUtvGyLsigASRQJZSKwMhayzHLj3cP_yM11Ta2Gxf3lYDq10R1MFGdTAwFfiyQ70Kb_nFrBtzoAgbk7oisU9_FM4EWFEpZyh8y0WYO</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Fowlie, Meredith</creator><creator>Petersen, Claire</creator><creator>Reguant, Mar</creator><general>American Economic Association</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Border Carbon Adjustments When Carbon Intensity Varies across Producers</title><author>Fowlie, Meredith ; Petersen, Claire ; Reguant, Mar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-775c5a24407c15c65e6ac12eeeaea4afc112f897fc3d8e62602e049094e063d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>ENERGY REGULATION: LEAKAGE, EMISSIONS, AND SPILLOVERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fowlie, Meredith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reguant, Mar</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>AEA papers and proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fowlie, Meredith</au><au>Petersen, Claire</au><au>Reguant, Mar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Border Carbon Adjustments When Carbon Intensity Varies across Producers: Evidence from California</atitle><jtitle>AEA papers and proceedings</jtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>111</volume><spage>401</spage><epage>405</epage><pages>401-405</pages><issn>2574-0768</issn><eissn>2574-0776</eissn><abstract>Governments taxing carbon emissions within their jurisdiction can impose a commensurate tax on emissions embodied in imports in order to mitigate emissions leakage. California offers a rare opportunity to investigate how such a border carbon adjustment (BCA) is working in practice. Experience to date highlights important tensions between greenhouse gas accounting accuracy, market efficiency, and concerns about trade protectionism. We simulate electricity market outcomes under BCA designs that differ in terms of how the carbon intensity of imports is assessed. Simulations suggest significant potential for leakage via resource shuffling. Realized emissions outcomes indicate that this potential has not been fully realized.</abstract><pub>American Economic Association</pub><doi>10.1257/pandp.20211073</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2574-0768 |
ispartof | AEA papers and proceedings, 2021-05, Vol.111, p.401-405 |
issn | 2574-0768 2574-0776 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1257_pandp_20211073 |
source | Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; American Economic Association Web |
subjects | ENERGY REGULATION: LEAKAGE, EMISSIONS, AND SPILLOVERS |
title | Border Carbon Adjustments When Carbon Intensity Varies across Producers: Evidence from California |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A53%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Border%20Carbon%20Adjustments%20When%20Carbon%20Intensity%20Varies%20across%20Producers:%20Evidence%20from%20California&rft.jtitle=AEA%20papers%20and%20proceedings&rft.au=Fowlie,%20Meredith&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=111&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=405&rft.pages=401-405&rft.issn=2574-0768&rft.eissn=2574-0776&rft_id=info:doi/10.1257/pandp.20211073&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E27042339%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27042339&rfr_iscdi=true |