Manual Versus Target-Controlled Infusion Remifentanil Administration in Spontaneously Breathing Patients
The combination of propofol-remifentanil for procedural deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients is characterized by the frequent incidence of side effects, especially respiratory depression. These side effects may be due to either the drug combination or the drug delivery technique. Target...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anesthesia and analgesia 2009-03, Vol.108 (3), p.828-834 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 834 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 828 |
container_title | Anesthesia and analgesia |
container_volume | 108 |
creator | Moerman, Annelies T. Herregods, Luc L. De Vos, Martine M. Mortier, Eric P. Struys, Michel M. R. F. |
description | The combination of propofol-remifentanil for procedural deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients is characterized by the frequent incidence of side effects, especially respiratory depression. These side effects may be due to either the drug combination or the drug delivery technique. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) might optimize drug delivery. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy, we thus tried to answer two questions: first, if adding remifentanil to propofol surpasses the disadvantages of the combination of these two products, and second, if administration of remifentanil via TCI decreases the incidence of side effects, compared to manually controlled administration.
Patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil via manually controlled continuous infusion (MCI) (0.125 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 2 min followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), TCI remifentanil (1 ng/mL), or placebo (normal saline either as TCI or manual infusion of equivalent rate). All patients received TCI propofol, adjusted to a target concentration level that provided deep sedation in which patients were not responsive to verbal commands, but maintained spontaneous ventilation without assistance.
Significantly more patients in the placebo group showed movement, cough and hiccup, which transiently interfered with the examination. There were no clinically significant differences in hemodynamic or recovery variables among all groups. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol requirements. The incidence of hypopnea and apnea was less frequent when remifentanil was administered via TCI compared to MCI (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P < 0.05).
The combination of remifentanil and propofol for deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients, offered better conditions for colonoscopy than propofol used as a single drug. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol dosing and in a lower incidence in apnea and respiratory depression (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P < 0.05), compared to manually controlled administration of remifentanil. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1213/ane.0b013e318198f6dc |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1213_ane_0b013e318198f6dc</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19224790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-6efcba013442e4d0cb30972129361a0ba0f5f8ea0460a99135aba3381bfa5de93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUF1P3DAQtKqicqX9BxXKSx9Dd-3EFz_CqQUkEIjSvkabZM0ZfM7JToT49_jEqUhdabVazcx-jBDfEE5QovpBgU-gA1SssEHTWD30H8QCa6nLZW2aj2IBAKqUxphD8Tmlx9wiNPqTOEQjZbU0sBDrawoz-eIvxzSn4p7iA0_lagxTHL3nobgMdk5uDMUdb5zlMFFwvjgdNi64NEWadpgLxe_tuMN4nJN_Kc4i07R24aG4zYysSl_EgSWf-Ou-Hok_v37ery7Kq5vzy9XpVdlXUutSs-07yl9VleRqgL5TYJYSpVEaCTJka9swQaWBjEFVU0dKNdhZqgc26khUb3P7OKYU2bbb6DYUX1qEdmdcm49s_zcuy47fZNu52_DwLto7lQnf9wRKPXkbKfQu_eNJxKUCxPf9z6OfsqlPfn7m2K6Z_LRuYRe1MqUEyENzU-aUWr0C5OSJ-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Manual Versus Target-Controlled Infusion Remifentanil Administration in Spontaneously Breathing Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Moerman, Annelies T. ; Herregods, Luc L. ; De Vos, Martine M. ; Mortier, Eric P. ; Struys, Michel M. R. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moerman, Annelies T. ; Herregods, Luc L. ; De Vos, Martine M. ; Mortier, Eric P. ; Struys, Michel M. R. F.</creatorcontrib><description>The combination of propofol-remifentanil for procedural deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients is characterized by the frequent incidence of side effects, especially respiratory depression. These side effects may be due to either the drug combination or the drug delivery technique. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) might optimize drug delivery. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy, we thus tried to answer two questions: first, if adding remifentanil to propofol surpasses the disadvantages of the combination of these two products, and second, if administration of remifentanil via TCI decreases the incidence of side effects, compared to manually controlled administration.
Patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil via manually controlled continuous infusion (MCI) (0.125 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 2 min followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), TCI remifentanil (1 ng/mL), or placebo (normal saline either as TCI or manual infusion of equivalent rate). All patients received TCI propofol, adjusted to a target concentration level that provided deep sedation in which patients were not responsive to verbal commands, but maintained spontaneous ventilation without assistance.
Significantly more patients in the placebo group showed movement, cough and hiccup, which transiently interfered with the examination. There were no clinically significant differences in hemodynamic or recovery variables among all groups. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol requirements. The incidence of hypopnea and apnea was less frequent when remifentanil was administered via TCI compared to MCI (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P < 0.05).
The combination of remifentanil and propofol for deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients, offered better conditions for colonoscopy than propofol used as a single drug. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol dosing and in a lower incidence in apnea and respiratory depression (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P < 0.05), compared to manually controlled administration of remifentanil.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318198f6dc</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19224790</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AACRAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colonoscopy ; Deep Sedation ; Electroencephalography - drug effects ; Female ; Hemodynamics - physiology ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - pharmacokinetics ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Piperidines - administration & dosage ; Piperidines - adverse effects ; Piperidines - pharmacokinetics ; Preanesthetic Medication ; Propofol ; Respiratory Mechanics ; Unconsciousness ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2009-03, Vol.108 (3), p.828-834</ispartof><rights>International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-6efcba013442e4d0cb30972129361a0ba0f5f8ea0460a99135aba3381bfa5de93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-6efcba013442e4d0cb30972129361a0ba0f5f8ea0460a99135aba3381bfa5de93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf><![CDATA[$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&PDF=y&D=ovft&AN=00000539-200903000-00026$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H]]></linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00000539-200903000-00026$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,4611,27931,27932,64673,65468</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21173011$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19224790$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moerman, Annelies T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herregods, Luc L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vos, Martine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortier, Eric P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Struys, Michel M. R. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Manual Versus Target-Controlled Infusion Remifentanil Administration in Spontaneously Breathing Patients</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>The combination of propofol-remifentanil for procedural deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients is characterized by the frequent incidence of side effects, especially respiratory depression. These side effects may be due to either the drug combination or the drug delivery technique. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) might optimize drug delivery. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy, we thus tried to answer two questions: first, if adding remifentanil to propofol surpasses the disadvantages of the combination of these two products, and second, if administration of remifentanil via TCI decreases the incidence of side effects, compared to manually controlled administration.
Patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil via manually controlled continuous infusion (MCI) (0.125 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 2 min followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), TCI remifentanil (1 ng/mL), or placebo (normal saline either as TCI or manual infusion of equivalent rate). All patients received TCI propofol, adjusted to a target concentration level that provided deep sedation in which patients were not responsive to verbal commands, but maintained spontaneous ventilation without assistance.
Significantly more patients in the placebo group showed movement, cough and hiccup, which transiently interfered with the examination. There were no clinically significant differences in hemodynamic or recovery variables among all groups. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol requirements. The incidence of hypopnea and apnea was less frequent when remifentanil was administered via TCI compared to MCI (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P < 0.05).
The combination of remifentanil and propofol for deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients, offered better conditions for colonoscopy than propofol used as a single drug. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol dosing and in a lower incidence in apnea and respiratory depression (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P < 0.05), compared to manually controlled administration of remifentanil.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Deep Sedation</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - drug effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemodynamics - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Infusions, Intravenous</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Piperidines - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Piperidines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Piperidines - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Preanesthetic Medication</subject><subject>Propofol</subject><subject>Respiratory Mechanics</subject><subject>Unconsciousness</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUF1P3DAQtKqicqX9BxXKSx9Dd-3EFz_CqQUkEIjSvkabZM0ZfM7JToT49_jEqUhdabVazcx-jBDfEE5QovpBgU-gA1SssEHTWD30H8QCa6nLZW2aj2IBAKqUxphD8Tmlx9wiNPqTOEQjZbU0sBDrawoz-eIvxzSn4p7iA0_lagxTHL3nobgMdk5uDMUdb5zlMFFwvjgdNi64NEWadpgLxe_tuMN4nJN_Kc4i07R24aG4zYysSl_EgSWf-Ou-Hok_v37ery7Kq5vzy9XpVdlXUutSs-07yl9VleRqgL5TYJYSpVEaCTJka9swQaWBjEFVU0dKNdhZqgc26khUb3P7OKYU2bbb6DYUX1qEdmdcm49s_zcuy47fZNu52_DwLto7lQnf9wRKPXkbKfQu_eNJxKUCxPf9z6OfsqlPfn7m2K6Z_LRuYRe1MqUEyENzU-aUWr0C5OSJ-g</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Moerman, Annelies T.</creator><creator>Herregods, Luc L.</creator><creator>De Vos, Martine M.</creator><creator>Mortier, Eric P.</creator><creator>Struys, Michel M. R. F.</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>Manual Versus Target-Controlled Infusion Remifentanil Administration in Spontaneously Breathing Patients</title><author>Moerman, Annelies T. ; Herregods, Luc L. ; De Vos, Martine M. ; Mortier, Eric P. ; Struys, Michel M. R. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-6efcba013442e4d0cb30972129361a0ba0f5f8ea0460a99135aba3381bfa5de93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Deep Sedation</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - drug effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemodynamics - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Infusions, Intravenous</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Piperidines - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Piperidines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Piperidines - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Preanesthetic Medication</topic><topic>Propofol</topic><topic>Respiratory Mechanics</topic><topic>Unconsciousness</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moerman, Annelies T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herregods, Luc L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vos, Martine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortier, Eric P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Struys, Michel M. R. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moerman, Annelies T.</au><au>Herregods, Luc L.</au><au>De Vos, Martine M.</au><au>Mortier, Eric P.</au><au>Struys, Michel M. R. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Manual Versus Target-Controlled Infusion Remifentanil Administration in Spontaneously Breathing Patients</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>828</spage><epage>834</epage><pages>828-834</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><coden>AACRAT</coden><abstract>The combination of propofol-remifentanil for procedural deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients is characterized by the frequent incidence of side effects, especially respiratory depression. These side effects may be due to either the drug combination or the drug delivery technique. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) might optimize drug delivery. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy, we thus tried to answer two questions: first, if adding remifentanil to propofol surpasses the disadvantages of the combination of these two products, and second, if administration of remifentanil via TCI decreases the incidence of side effects, compared to manually controlled administration.
Patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil via manually controlled continuous infusion (MCI) (0.125 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 2 min followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), TCI remifentanil (1 ng/mL), or placebo (normal saline either as TCI or manual infusion of equivalent rate). All patients received TCI propofol, adjusted to a target concentration level that provided deep sedation in which patients were not responsive to verbal commands, but maintained spontaneous ventilation without assistance.
Significantly more patients in the placebo group showed movement, cough and hiccup, which transiently interfered with the examination. There were no clinically significant differences in hemodynamic or recovery variables among all groups. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol requirements. The incidence of hypopnea and apnea was less frequent when remifentanil was administered via TCI compared to MCI (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P < 0.05).
The combination of remifentanil and propofol for deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients, offered better conditions for colonoscopy than propofol used as a single drug. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol dosing and in a lower incidence in apnea and respiratory depression (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P < 0.05), compared to manually controlled administration of remifentanil.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>19224790</pmid><doi>10.1213/ane.0b013e318198f6dc</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-2999 |
ispartof | Anesthesia and analgesia, 2009-03, Vol.108 (3), p.828-834 |
issn | 0003-2999 1526-7598 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1213_ane_0b013e318198f6dc |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences Colonoscopy Deep Sedation Electroencephalography - drug effects Female Hemodynamics - physiology Humans Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects Hypnotics and Sedatives - pharmacokinetics Infusions, Intravenous Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Piperidines - administration & dosage Piperidines - adverse effects Piperidines - pharmacokinetics Preanesthetic Medication Propofol Respiratory Mechanics Unconsciousness Young Adult |
title | Manual Versus Target-Controlled Infusion Remifentanil Administration in Spontaneously Breathing Patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T12%3A00%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Manual%20Versus%20Target-Controlled%20Infusion%20Remifentanil%20Administration%20in%20Spontaneously%20Breathing%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Moerman,%20Annelies%20T.&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=828&rft.epage=834&rft.pages=828-834&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft.coden=AACRAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e318198f6dc&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E19224790%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/19224790&rfr_iscdi=true |