Manual Versus Target-Controlled Infusion Remifentanil Administration in Spontaneously Breathing Patients

The combination of propofol-remifentanil for procedural deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients is characterized by the frequent incidence of side effects, especially respiratory depression. These side effects may be due to either the drug combination or the drug delivery technique. Target...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 2009-03, Vol.108 (3), p.828-834
Hauptverfasser: Moerman, Annelies T., Herregods, Luc L., De Vos, Martine M., Mortier, Eric P., Struys, Michel M. R. F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 834
container_issue 3
container_start_page 828
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 108
creator Moerman, Annelies T.
Herregods, Luc L.
De Vos, Martine M.
Mortier, Eric P.
Struys, Michel M. R. F.
description The combination of propofol-remifentanil for procedural deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients is characterized by the frequent incidence of side effects, especially respiratory depression. These side effects may be due to either the drug combination or the drug delivery technique. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) might optimize drug delivery. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy, we thus tried to answer two questions: first, if adding remifentanil to propofol surpasses the disadvantages of the combination of these two products, and second, if administration of remifentanil via TCI decreases the incidence of side effects, compared to manually controlled administration. Patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil via manually controlled continuous infusion (MCI) (0.125 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 2 min followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), TCI remifentanil (1 ng/mL), or placebo (normal saline either as TCI or manual infusion of equivalent rate). All patients received TCI propofol, adjusted to a target concentration level that provided deep sedation in which patients were not responsive to verbal commands, but maintained spontaneous ventilation without assistance. Significantly more patients in the placebo group showed movement, cough and hiccup, which transiently interfered with the examination. There were no clinically significant differences in hemodynamic or recovery variables among all groups. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol requirements. The incidence of hypopnea and apnea was less frequent when remifentanil was administered via TCI compared to MCI (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P < 0.05). The combination of remifentanil and propofol for deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients, offered better conditions for colonoscopy than propofol used as a single drug. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol dosing and in a lower incidence in apnea and respiratory depression (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P < 0.05), compared to manually controlled administration of remifentanil.
doi_str_mv 10.1213/ane.0b013e318198f6dc
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1213_ane_0b013e318198f6dc</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19224790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-6efcba013442e4d0cb30972129361a0ba0f5f8ea0460a99135aba3381bfa5de93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUF1P3DAQtKqicqX9BxXKSx9Dd-3EFz_CqQUkEIjSvkabZM0ZfM7JToT49_jEqUhdabVazcx-jBDfEE5QovpBgU-gA1SssEHTWD30H8QCa6nLZW2aj2IBAKqUxphD8Tmlx9wiNPqTOEQjZbU0sBDrawoz-eIvxzSn4p7iA0_lagxTHL3nobgMdk5uDMUdb5zlMFFwvjgdNi64NEWadpgLxe_tuMN4nJN_Kc4i07R24aG4zYysSl_EgSWf-Ou-Hok_v37ery7Kq5vzy9XpVdlXUutSs-07yl9VleRqgL5TYJYSpVEaCTJka9swQaWBjEFVU0dKNdhZqgc26khUb3P7OKYU2bbb6DYUX1qEdmdcm49s_zcuy47fZNu52_DwLto7lQnf9wRKPXkbKfQu_eNJxKUCxPf9z6OfsqlPfn7m2K6Z_LRuYRe1MqUEyENzU-aUWr0C5OSJ-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Manual Versus Target-Controlled Infusion Remifentanil Administration in Spontaneously Breathing Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Moerman, Annelies T. ; Herregods, Luc L. ; De Vos, Martine M. ; Mortier, Eric P. ; Struys, Michel M. R. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moerman, Annelies T. ; Herregods, Luc L. ; De Vos, Martine M. ; Mortier, Eric P. ; Struys, Michel M. R. F.</creatorcontrib><description>The combination of propofol-remifentanil for procedural deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients is characterized by the frequent incidence of side effects, especially respiratory depression. These side effects may be due to either the drug combination or the drug delivery technique. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) might optimize drug delivery. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy, we thus tried to answer two questions: first, if adding remifentanil to propofol surpasses the disadvantages of the combination of these two products, and second, if administration of remifentanil via TCI decreases the incidence of side effects, compared to manually controlled administration. Patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil via manually controlled continuous infusion (MCI) (0.125 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 2 min followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), TCI remifentanil (1 ng/mL), or placebo (normal saline either as TCI or manual infusion of equivalent rate). All patients received TCI propofol, adjusted to a target concentration level that provided deep sedation in which patients were not responsive to verbal commands, but maintained spontaneous ventilation without assistance. Significantly more patients in the placebo group showed movement, cough and hiccup, which transiently interfered with the examination. There were no clinically significant differences in hemodynamic or recovery variables among all groups. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol requirements. The incidence of hypopnea and apnea was less frequent when remifentanil was administered via TCI compared to MCI (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P &lt; 0.05). The combination of remifentanil and propofol for deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients, offered better conditions for colonoscopy than propofol used as a single drug. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol dosing and in a lower incidence in apnea and respiratory depression (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P &lt; 0.05), compared to manually controlled administration of remifentanil.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318198f6dc</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19224790</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AACRAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colonoscopy ; Deep Sedation ; Electroencephalography - drug effects ; Female ; Hemodynamics - physiology ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration &amp; dosage ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - pharmacokinetics ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Piperidines - administration &amp; dosage ; Piperidines - adverse effects ; Piperidines - pharmacokinetics ; Preanesthetic Medication ; Propofol ; Respiratory Mechanics ; Unconsciousness ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2009-03, Vol.108 (3), p.828-834</ispartof><rights>International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-6efcba013442e4d0cb30972129361a0ba0f5f8ea0460a99135aba3381bfa5de93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-6efcba013442e4d0cb30972129361a0ba0f5f8ea0460a99135aba3381bfa5de93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf><![CDATA[$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&PDF=y&D=ovft&AN=00000539-200903000-00026$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H]]></linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00000539-200903000-00026$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,4611,27931,27932,64673,65468</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21173011$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19224790$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moerman, Annelies T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herregods, Luc L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vos, Martine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortier, Eric P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Struys, Michel M. R. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Manual Versus Target-Controlled Infusion Remifentanil Administration in Spontaneously Breathing Patients</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>The combination of propofol-remifentanil for procedural deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients is characterized by the frequent incidence of side effects, especially respiratory depression. These side effects may be due to either the drug combination or the drug delivery technique. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) might optimize drug delivery. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy, we thus tried to answer two questions: first, if adding remifentanil to propofol surpasses the disadvantages of the combination of these two products, and second, if administration of remifentanil via TCI decreases the incidence of side effects, compared to manually controlled administration. Patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil via manually controlled continuous infusion (MCI) (0.125 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 2 min followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), TCI remifentanil (1 ng/mL), or placebo (normal saline either as TCI or manual infusion of equivalent rate). All patients received TCI propofol, adjusted to a target concentration level that provided deep sedation in which patients were not responsive to verbal commands, but maintained spontaneous ventilation without assistance. Significantly more patients in the placebo group showed movement, cough and hiccup, which transiently interfered with the examination. There were no clinically significant differences in hemodynamic or recovery variables among all groups. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol requirements. The incidence of hypopnea and apnea was less frequent when remifentanil was administered via TCI compared to MCI (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P &lt; 0.05). The combination of remifentanil and propofol for deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients, offered better conditions for colonoscopy than propofol used as a single drug. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol dosing and in a lower incidence in apnea and respiratory depression (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P &lt; 0.05), compared to manually controlled administration of remifentanil.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Deep Sedation</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - drug effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemodynamics - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Infusions, Intravenous</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Piperidines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Piperidines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Piperidines - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Preanesthetic Medication</subject><subject>Propofol</subject><subject>Respiratory Mechanics</subject><subject>Unconsciousness</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUF1P3DAQtKqicqX9BxXKSx9Dd-3EFz_CqQUkEIjSvkabZM0ZfM7JToT49_jEqUhdabVazcx-jBDfEE5QovpBgU-gA1SssEHTWD30H8QCa6nLZW2aj2IBAKqUxphD8Tmlx9wiNPqTOEQjZbU0sBDrawoz-eIvxzSn4p7iA0_lagxTHL3nobgMdk5uDMUdb5zlMFFwvjgdNi64NEWadpgLxe_tuMN4nJN_Kc4i07R24aG4zYysSl_EgSWf-Ou-Hok_v37ery7Kq5vzy9XpVdlXUutSs-07yl9VleRqgL5TYJYSpVEaCTJka9swQaWBjEFVU0dKNdhZqgc26khUb3P7OKYU2bbb6DYUX1qEdmdcm49s_zcuy47fZNu52_DwLto7lQnf9wRKPXkbKfQu_eNJxKUCxPf9z6OfsqlPfn7m2K6Z_LRuYRe1MqUEyENzU-aUWr0C5OSJ-g</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Moerman, Annelies T.</creator><creator>Herregods, Luc L.</creator><creator>De Vos, Martine M.</creator><creator>Mortier, Eric P.</creator><creator>Struys, Michel M. R. F.</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>Manual Versus Target-Controlled Infusion Remifentanil Administration in Spontaneously Breathing Patients</title><author>Moerman, Annelies T. ; Herregods, Luc L. ; De Vos, Martine M. ; Mortier, Eric P. ; Struys, Michel M. R. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-6efcba013442e4d0cb30972129361a0ba0f5f8ea0460a99135aba3381bfa5de93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Deep Sedation</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - drug effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemodynamics - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Infusions, Intravenous</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Piperidines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Piperidines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Piperidines - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Preanesthetic Medication</topic><topic>Propofol</topic><topic>Respiratory Mechanics</topic><topic>Unconsciousness</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moerman, Annelies T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herregods, Luc L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vos, Martine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortier, Eric P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Struys, Michel M. R. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moerman, Annelies T.</au><au>Herregods, Luc L.</au><au>De Vos, Martine M.</au><au>Mortier, Eric P.</au><au>Struys, Michel M. R. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Manual Versus Target-Controlled Infusion Remifentanil Administration in Spontaneously Breathing Patients</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>828</spage><epage>834</epage><pages>828-834</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><coden>AACRAT</coden><abstract>The combination of propofol-remifentanil for procedural deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients is characterized by the frequent incidence of side effects, especially respiratory depression. These side effects may be due to either the drug combination or the drug delivery technique. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) might optimize drug delivery. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy, we thus tried to answer two questions: first, if adding remifentanil to propofol surpasses the disadvantages of the combination of these two products, and second, if administration of remifentanil via TCI decreases the incidence of side effects, compared to manually controlled administration. Patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil via manually controlled continuous infusion (MCI) (0.125 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 2 min followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), TCI remifentanil (1 ng/mL), or placebo (normal saline either as TCI or manual infusion of equivalent rate). All patients received TCI propofol, adjusted to a target concentration level that provided deep sedation in which patients were not responsive to verbal commands, but maintained spontaneous ventilation without assistance. Significantly more patients in the placebo group showed movement, cough and hiccup, which transiently interfered with the examination. There were no clinically significant differences in hemodynamic or recovery variables among all groups. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol requirements. The incidence of hypopnea and apnea was less frequent when remifentanil was administered via TCI compared to MCI (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P &lt; 0.05). The combination of remifentanil and propofol for deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients, offered better conditions for colonoscopy than propofol used as a single drug. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol dosing and in a lower incidence in apnea and respiratory depression (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P &lt; 0.05), compared to manually controlled administration of remifentanil.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>19224790</pmid><doi>10.1213/ane.0b013e318198f6dc</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 2009-03, Vol.108 (3), p.828-834
issn 0003-2999
1526-7598
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1213_ane_0b013e318198f6dc
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Colonoscopy
Deep Sedation
Electroencephalography - drug effects
Female
Hemodynamics - physiology
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage
Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects
Hypnotics and Sedatives - pharmacokinetics
Infusions, Intravenous
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Piperidines - administration & dosage
Piperidines - adverse effects
Piperidines - pharmacokinetics
Preanesthetic Medication
Propofol
Respiratory Mechanics
Unconsciousness
Young Adult
title Manual Versus Target-Controlled Infusion Remifentanil Administration in Spontaneously Breathing Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T12%3A00%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Manual%20Versus%20Target-Controlled%20Infusion%20Remifentanil%20Administration%20in%20Spontaneously%20Breathing%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Moerman,%20Annelies%20T.&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=828&rft.epage=834&rft.pages=828-834&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft.coden=AACRAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e318198f6dc&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E19224790%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/19224790&rfr_iscdi=true