An Evaluation of Remifentanil Propofol Response Surfaces for Loss of Responsiveness, Loss of Response to Surrogates of Painful Stimuli and Laryngoscopy in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery
In this study, we explored how a set of remifentanil-propofol response surface interaction models developed from data collected in volunteers would predict responses to events in patients undergoing elective surgery. Our hypotheses were that these models would predict a patient population's los...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anesthesia and analgesia 2008-02, Vol.106 (2), p.471-479 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 479 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 471 |
container_title | Anesthesia and analgesia |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Johnson, Ken B. Syroid, Noah D. Gupta, Dhanesh K. Manyam, Sandeep C. Egan, Talmage D. Huntington, Jeremy White, Julia L. Tyler, Diane Westenskow, Dwayne R. |
description | In this study, we explored how a set of remifentanil-propofol response surface interaction models developed from data collected in volunteers would predict responses to events in patients undergoing elective surgery. Our hypotheses were that these models would predict a patient population's loss and return of responsiveness and the presence or absence of a response to laryngoscopy and the response to pain after surgery.
Twenty-one patients were enrolled. Anesthesia consisted of remifentanil and propofol infusions and fentanyl boluses. Loss and return of responsiveness, responses to laryngoscopy, and responses to postoperative pain were assessed in each patient. Model predictions were compared with observed responses.
The loss of responsiveness model predicted that patients would become unresponsive 2.4 +/- 2.6 min earlier than observed. At the time of laryngoscopy, the laryngoscopy model predicted an 89% probability of no response to laryngoscopy and 81% did not respond. During emergence, the loss of responsiveness model predicted return of responsiveness 0.6 +/- 5.1 min before responsiveness was observed. The mean probability of no response to pressure algometry was 23% +/- 35% when patients required fentanyl for pain control.
This preliminary assessment of a series of remifentanil-propofol interaction models demonstrated that these models predicted responses to selected pertinent events during elective surgery. However, significant model error was evident during rapid changes in predicted effect-site propofol-remifentanil concentration pairs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181606c62 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1213_ane_0b013e3181606c62</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18227302</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4928-72c06db51eeb62a774e971b7cd063a2ccab5ee628e2e811d342fa079e8947cef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdtu1DAQhi0EokvhDRDyDXek-JDYzmVVLQdpJSpKryPHGacGrx3ZSat9Ol4Np7uiUufGmpn_mxnrR-g9JReUUf5ZB7ggPaEcOFVUEGEEe4E2tGGikk2rXqINIYRXrG3bM_Qm598lpUSJ1-iMKsYkJ2yD_l4GvL3XftGziwFHi3_C3lkIsw7O4-sUp2ijL9U8xZAB3yzJagMZ25jwLuZ8ZB677h4C5PzpeR3wHFcwxVHP8Ni51i7YxeOb2e0X77AOA97pdAhjzCZOB-xC0cyuHJLxbRggjdGFEW89mLnsWceNkA5v0SurfYZ3p_cc3X7Z_rr6Vu1-fP1-dbmrTN0yVUlmiBj6hgL0gmkpa2gl7aUZiOCaGaP7BkAwBQwUpQOvmdVEtqDaWhqw_BzVx7kmlb8lsN2U3L4c3FHSrX50xY_uuR8F-3DEpqXfw_AEnQwogo8ngc5Ge5t0MC7_1zFCGKmpeNr_EP0MKf_xywOk7g60n-86skbD26roVSEIqVazFf8H2xOpVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Evaluation of Remifentanil Propofol Response Surfaces for Loss of Responsiveness, Loss of Response to Surrogates of Painful Stimuli and Laryngoscopy in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Johnson, Ken B. ; Syroid, Noah D. ; Gupta, Dhanesh K. ; Manyam, Sandeep C. ; Egan, Talmage D. ; Huntington, Jeremy ; White, Julia L. ; Tyler, Diane ; Westenskow, Dwayne R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Ken B. ; Syroid, Noah D. ; Gupta, Dhanesh K. ; Manyam, Sandeep C. ; Egan, Talmage D. ; Huntington, Jeremy ; White, Julia L. ; Tyler, Diane ; Westenskow, Dwayne R.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we explored how a set of remifentanil-propofol response surface interaction models developed from data collected in volunteers would predict responses to events in patients undergoing elective surgery. Our hypotheses were that these models would predict a patient population's loss and return of responsiveness and the presence or absence of a response to laryngoscopy and the response to pain after surgery.
Twenty-one patients were enrolled. Anesthesia consisted of remifentanil and propofol infusions and fentanyl boluses. Loss and return of responsiveness, responses to laryngoscopy, and responses to postoperative pain were assessed in each patient. Model predictions were compared with observed responses.
The loss of responsiveness model predicted that patients would become unresponsive 2.4 +/- 2.6 min earlier than observed. At the time of laryngoscopy, the laryngoscopy model predicted an 89% probability of no response to laryngoscopy and 81% did not respond. During emergence, the loss of responsiveness model predicted return of responsiveness 0.6 +/- 5.1 min before responsiveness was observed. The mean probability of no response to pressure algometry was 23% +/- 35% when patients required fentanyl for pain control.
This preliminary assessment of a series of remifentanil-propofol interaction models demonstrated that these models predicted responses to selected pertinent events during elective surgery. However, significant model error was evident during rapid changes in predicted effect-site propofol-remifentanil concentration pairs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181606c62</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18227302</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AACRAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Elective Surgical Procedures ; Female ; Humans ; Laryngoscopy - adverse effects ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Models, Biological ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Pain, Postoperative - metabolism ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control ; Piperidines - pharmacokinetics ; Piperidines - therapeutic use ; Propofol - pharmacokinetics ; Propofol - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2008-02, Vol.106 (2), p.471-479</ispartof><rights>International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4928-72c06db51eeb62a774e971b7cd063a2ccab5ee628e2e811d342fa079e8947cef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4928-72c06db51eeb62a774e971b7cd063a2ccab5ee628e2e811d342fa079e8947cef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf><![CDATA[$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&PDF=y&D=ovft&AN=00000539-200802000-00018$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H]]></linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00000539-200802000-00018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,4613,27933,27934,64675,65470</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20020416$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18227302$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Ken B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syroid, Noah D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Dhanesh K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manyam, Sandeep C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egan, Talmage D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntington, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Julia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westenskow, Dwayne R.</creatorcontrib><title>An Evaluation of Remifentanil Propofol Response Surfaces for Loss of Responsiveness, Loss of Response to Surrogates of Painful Stimuli and Laryngoscopy in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>In this study, we explored how a set of remifentanil-propofol response surface interaction models developed from data collected in volunteers would predict responses to events in patients undergoing elective surgery. Our hypotheses were that these models would predict a patient population's loss and return of responsiveness and the presence or absence of a response to laryngoscopy and the response to pain after surgery.
Twenty-one patients were enrolled. Anesthesia consisted of remifentanil and propofol infusions and fentanyl boluses. Loss and return of responsiveness, responses to laryngoscopy, and responses to postoperative pain were assessed in each patient. Model predictions were compared with observed responses.
The loss of responsiveness model predicted that patients would become unresponsive 2.4 +/- 2.6 min earlier than observed. At the time of laryngoscopy, the laryngoscopy model predicted an 89% probability of no response to laryngoscopy and 81% did not respond. During emergence, the loss of responsiveness model predicted return of responsiveness 0.6 +/- 5.1 min before responsiveness was observed. The mean probability of no response to pressure algometry was 23% +/- 35% when patients required fentanyl for pain control.
This preliminary assessment of a series of remifentanil-propofol interaction models demonstrated that these models predicted responses to selected pertinent events during elective surgery. However, significant model error was evident during rapid changes in predicted effect-site propofol-remifentanil concentration pairs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laryngoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - metabolism</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control</subject><subject>Piperidines - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Piperidines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Propofol - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Propofol - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdtu1DAQhi0EokvhDRDyDXek-JDYzmVVLQdpJSpKryPHGacGrx3ZSat9Ol4Np7uiUufGmpn_mxnrR-g9JReUUf5ZB7ggPaEcOFVUEGEEe4E2tGGikk2rXqINIYRXrG3bM_Qm598lpUSJ1-iMKsYkJ2yD_l4GvL3XftGziwFHi3_C3lkIsw7O4-sUp2ijL9U8xZAB3yzJagMZ25jwLuZ8ZB677h4C5PzpeR3wHFcwxVHP8Ni51i7YxeOb2e0X77AOA97pdAhjzCZOB-xC0cyuHJLxbRggjdGFEW89mLnsWceNkA5v0SurfYZ3p_cc3X7Z_rr6Vu1-fP1-dbmrTN0yVUlmiBj6hgL0gmkpa2gl7aUZiOCaGaP7BkAwBQwUpQOvmdVEtqDaWhqw_BzVx7kmlb8lsN2U3L4c3FHSrX50xY_uuR8F-3DEpqXfw_AEnQwogo8ngc5Ge5t0MC7_1zFCGKmpeNr_EP0MKf_xywOk7g60n-86skbD26roVSEIqVazFf8H2xOpVA</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Johnson, Ken B.</creator><creator>Syroid, Noah D.</creator><creator>Gupta, Dhanesh K.</creator><creator>Manyam, Sandeep C.</creator><creator>Egan, Talmage D.</creator><creator>Huntington, Jeremy</creator><creator>White, Julia L.</creator><creator>Tyler, Diane</creator><creator>Westenskow, Dwayne R.</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>An Evaluation of Remifentanil Propofol Response Surfaces for Loss of Responsiveness, Loss of Response to Surrogates of Painful Stimuli and Laryngoscopy in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery</title><author>Johnson, Ken B. ; Syroid, Noah D. ; Gupta, Dhanesh K. ; Manyam, Sandeep C. ; Egan, Talmage D. ; Huntington, Jeremy ; White, Julia L. ; Tyler, Diane ; Westenskow, Dwayne R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4928-72c06db51eeb62a774e971b7cd063a2ccab5ee628e2e811d342fa079e8947cef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laryngoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - metabolism</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control</topic><topic>Piperidines - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Piperidines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Propofol - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Propofol - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Ken B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syroid, Noah D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Dhanesh K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manyam, Sandeep C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egan, Talmage D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntington, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Julia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westenskow, Dwayne R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Ken B.</au><au>Syroid, Noah D.</au><au>Gupta, Dhanesh K.</au><au>Manyam, Sandeep C.</au><au>Egan, Talmage D.</au><au>Huntington, Jeremy</au><au>White, Julia L.</au><au>Tyler, Diane</au><au>Westenskow, Dwayne R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Evaluation of Remifentanil Propofol Response Surfaces for Loss of Responsiveness, Loss of Response to Surrogates of Painful Stimuli and Laryngoscopy in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>471</spage><epage>479</epage><pages>471-479</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><coden>AACRAT</coden><abstract>In this study, we explored how a set of remifentanil-propofol response surface interaction models developed from data collected in volunteers would predict responses to events in patients undergoing elective surgery. Our hypotheses were that these models would predict a patient population's loss and return of responsiveness and the presence or absence of a response to laryngoscopy and the response to pain after surgery.
Twenty-one patients were enrolled. Anesthesia consisted of remifentanil and propofol infusions and fentanyl boluses. Loss and return of responsiveness, responses to laryngoscopy, and responses to postoperative pain were assessed in each patient. Model predictions were compared with observed responses.
The loss of responsiveness model predicted that patients would become unresponsive 2.4 +/- 2.6 min earlier than observed. At the time of laryngoscopy, the laryngoscopy model predicted an 89% probability of no response to laryngoscopy and 81% did not respond. During emergence, the loss of responsiveness model predicted return of responsiveness 0.6 +/- 5.1 min before responsiveness was observed. The mean probability of no response to pressure algometry was 23% +/- 35% when patients required fentanyl for pain control.
This preliminary assessment of a series of remifentanil-propofol interaction models demonstrated that these models predicted responses to selected pertinent events during elective surgery. However, significant model error was evident during rapid changes in predicted effect-site propofol-remifentanil concentration pairs.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>18227302</pmid><doi>10.1213/ane.0b013e3181606c62</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-2999 |
ispartof | Anesthesia and analgesia, 2008-02, Vol.106 (2), p.471-479 |
issn | 0003-2999 1526-7598 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1213_ane_0b013e3181606c62 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adult Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences Elective Surgical Procedures Female Humans Laryngoscopy - adverse effects Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Models, Biological Pain Measurement - methods Pain, Postoperative - metabolism Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control Piperidines - pharmacokinetics Piperidines - therapeutic use Propofol - pharmacokinetics Propofol - therapeutic use |
title | An Evaluation of Remifentanil Propofol Response Surfaces for Loss of Responsiveness, Loss of Response to Surrogates of Painful Stimuli and Laryngoscopy in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T17%3A39%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Evaluation%20of%20Remifentanil%20Propofol%20Response%20Surfaces%20for%20Loss%20of%20Responsiveness,%20Loss%20of%20Response%20to%20Surrogates%20of%20Painful%20Stimuli%20and%20Laryngoscopy%20in%20Patients%20Undergoing%20Elective%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Johnson,%20Ken%20B.&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=471&rft.epage=479&rft.pages=471-479&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft.coden=AACRAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181606c62&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E18227302%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/18227302&rfr_iscdi=true |