Factors Associated With Risk of Neurologic Complications After Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Systematic Review

The onset of neurologic complications after regional anesthesia is a complex process and may result from an interaction of host, agent, and environmental risk factors. The purpose of this systematic review was examine the qualitative evidence relating to various risk factors implicated in neurologic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 2017-02, Vol.124 (2), p.645-660
Hauptverfasser: Sondekoppam, Rakesh V., Tsui, Ban C. H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 660
container_issue 2
container_start_page 645
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 124
creator Sondekoppam, Rakesh V.
Tsui, Ban C. H.
description The onset of neurologic complications after regional anesthesia is a complex process and may result from an interaction of host, agent, and environmental risk factors. The purpose of this systematic review was examine the qualitative evidence relating to various risk factors implicated in neurologic dysfunction after peripheral nerve block (PNB). The MEDLINE, OVID, and EMBASE databases were primary sources for literature. Cochrane, LILACS, DARE, IndMed, ERIC, NHS, and HTA via Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD; York University) databases were searched for additional unique results. Randomized controlled studies, case–control studies, cohort studies, retrospective reviews, and case reports/case series reporting neurologic outcomes after PNB were included. Relevant, good-quality systematic reviews were also eligible. Human and animal studies evaluating factors important for neurologic outcomes were assessed separately. Information on study design, outcomes, and quality was extracted and reviewed independently by the 2 review authors. An overall rating of the quality of evidence was assigned using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. Relevant full-text articles were separated based on type (prospective, retrospective, and nonhuman studies). Strengths of association were defined as high, moderate, inconclusive, or inadequate based on study quality and direction of association. The evidence from 77 human studies was reviewed to assess various host, agent, and environmental factors that have been implicated as possible risks. Most of the available evidence regarding the injurious effects of the 3 cardinal agents of mechanical insult, pressure, and neurotoxicity was extracted from animal studies (42 studies). Among the risk factors investigated in humans, block type had a strong association with neurologic outcome. Intraneural injection, which seems to occur commonly with PNBs, showed an inconsistent direction of association. Measures meant to increase precision and ostensibly reduce the occurrence of complications such as currently available guidance techniques showed little effect on the incidence of neurologic complications. Recovery from neurologic injury appears to be worse in patients with pre-existing risk factors. Categorization and definition of neurologic complication varied among studies, making synthesis of evidence difficult. Also, a significant portion of the evidence surrounding neurologic injur
doi_str_mv 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001804
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000001804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28067709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4014-819a34c344714a440cfec590112d3a2e8d353d6f7677fa85e98eea1c4e0e350b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN9KwzAUh4Mobv55A5G8QGfSpG3iXR2bCmPKVLwsWXrq4lozkm5jb2_mVMQLDRzCOXzfgfND6IySHo0pu8jHgx758aggfA91aRKnUZZIsY-6YcqiWErZQUfev24hItJD1IkFSbOMyC6aD5VurfM4995qo1oo8bNpZ3hi_BzbCo9h6WxtX4zGfdssaqNVa-xbEKoWHL4HZxYzcKoOpFsBvqqtnvtLnOOHjW-hCbTGE1gZWJ-gg0rVHk4__2P0NBw89m-i0d31bT8fRZoTyiNBpWJcM84zyhXnRFegE0kojUumYhAlS1iZVlk4oVIiASkAFNUcCLCETNkx4ru92lnvHVTFwplGuU1BSbHNrgjZFb-zC9r5Tlsspw2U39JXWAEQO2Bt63C7n9fLNbhiBqpuZ__t5n-oH1zCZBQTmpE4NFEoTtg7CkCKqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors Associated With Risk of Neurologic Complications After Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sondekoppam, Rakesh V. ; Tsui, Ban C. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sondekoppam, Rakesh V. ; Tsui, Ban C. H.</creatorcontrib><description>The onset of neurologic complications after regional anesthesia is a complex process and may result from an interaction of host, agent, and environmental risk factors. The purpose of this systematic review was examine the qualitative evidence relating to various risk factors implicated in neurologic dysfunction after peripheral nerve block (PNB). The MEDLINE, OVID, and EMBASE databases were primary sources for literature. Cochrane, LILACS, DARE, IndMed, ERIC, NHS, and HTA via Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD; York University) databases were searched for additional unique results. Randomized controlled studies, case–control studies, cohort studies, retrospective reviews, and case reports/case series reporting neurologic outcomes after PNB were included. Relevant, good-quality systematic reviews were also eligible. Human and animal studies evaluating factors important for neurologic outcomes were assessed separately. Information on study design, outcomes, and quality was extracted and reviewed independently by the 2 review authors. An overall rating of the quality of evidence was assigned using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. Relevant full-text articles were separated based on type (prospective, retrospective, and nonhuman studies). Strengths of association were defined as high, moderate, inconclusive, or inadequate based on study quality and direction of association. The evidence from 77 human studies was reviewed to assess various host, agent, and environmental factors that have been implicated as possible risks. Most of the available evidence regarding the injurious effects of the 3 cardinal agents of mechanical insult, pressure, and neurotoxicity was extracted from animal studies (42 studies). Among the risk factors investigated in humans, block type had a strong association with neurologic outcome. Intraneural injection, which seems to occur commonly with PNBs, showed an inconsistent direction of association. Measures meant to increase precision and ostensibly reduce the occurrence of complications such as currently available guidance techniques showed little effect on the incidence of neurologic complications. Recovery from neurologic injury appears to be worse in patients with pre-existing risk factors. Categorization and definition of neurologic complication varied among studies, making synthesis of evidence difficult. Also, a significant portion of the evidence surrounding neurologic injury associated with PNB comes from animal or laboratory studies, the results of which are difficult to translate to clinical scenarios. Of the human studies, few had an a priori design to test associations between a specific risk factor exposure and resultant neurologic sequelae. A few risk factor associations were identified in human studies, but overall quality of evidence was low. Much of the evidence for risk factors comes from animal models and case reports. The final neurologic outcome seems to represent the complex interaction of the host, agent, and the environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001804</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28067709</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Humans ; Nerve Block - adverse effects ; Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology ; Nervous System Diseases - etiology ; Peripheral Nerves ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2017-02, Vol.124 (2), p.645-660</ispartof><rights>International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><rights>2017 International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4014-819a34c344714a440cfec590112d3a2e8d353d6f7677fa85e98eea1c4e0e350b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4014-819a34c344714a440cfec590112d3a2e8d353d6f7677fa85e98eea1c4e0e350b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf><![CDATA[$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&PDF=y&D=ovft&AN=00000539-201702000-00040$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H]]></linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00000539-201702000-00040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4609,27924,27925,64666,65461</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28067709$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sondekoppam, Rakesh V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsui, Ban C. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Factors Associated With Risk of Neurologic Complications After Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Systematic Review</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>The onset of neurologic complications after regional anesthesia is a complex process and may result from an interaction of host, agent, and environmental risk factors. The purpose of this systematic review was examine the qualitative evidence relating to various risk factors implicated in neurologic dysfunction after peripheral nerve block (PNB). The MEDLINE, OVID, and EMBASE databases were primary sources for literature. Cochrane, LILACS, DARE, IndMed, ERIC, NHS, and HTA via Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD; York University) databases were searched for additional unique results. Randomized controlled studies, case–control studies, cohort studies, retrospective reviews, and case reports/case series reporting neurologic outcomes after PNB were included. Relevant, good-quality systematic reviews were also eligible. Human and animal studies evaluating factors important for neurologic outcomes were assessed separately. Information on study design, outcomes, and quality was extracted and reviewed independently by the 2 review authors. An overall rating of the quality of evidence was assigned using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. Relevant full-text articles were separated based on type (prospective, retrospective, and nonhuman studies). Strengths of association were defined as high, moderate, inconclusive, or inadequate based on study quality and direction of association. The evidence from 77 human studies was reviewed to assess various host, agent, and environmental factors that have been implicated as possible risks. Most of the available evidence regarding the injurious effects of the 3 cardinal agents of mechanical insult, pressure, and neurotoxicity was extracted from animal studies (42 studies). Among the risk factors investigated in humans, block type had a strong association with neurologic outcome. Intraneural injection, which seems to occur commonly with PNBs, showed an inconsistent direction of association. Measures meant to increase precision and ostensibly reduce the occurrence of complications such as currently available guidance techniques showed little effect on the incidence of neurologic complications. Recovery from neurologic injury appears to be worse in patients with pre-existing risk factors. Categorization and definition of neurologic complication varied among studies, making synthesis of evidence difficult. Also, a significant portion of the evidence surrounding neurologic injury associated with PNB comes from animal or laboratory studies, the results of which are difficult to translate to clinical scenarios. Of the human studies, few had an a priori design to test associations between a specific risk factor exposure and resultant neurologic sequelae. A few risk factor associations were identified in human studies, but overall quality of evidence was low. Much of the evidence for risk factors comes from animal models and case reports. The final neurologic outcome seems to represent the complex interaction of the host, agent, and the environment.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nerve Block - adverse effects</subject><subject>Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Nervous System Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Peripheral Nerves</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkN9KwzAUh4Mobv55A5G8QGfSpG3iXR2bCmPKVLwsWXrq4lozkm5jb2_mVMQLDRzCOXzfgfND6IySHo0pu8jHgx758aggfA91aRKnUZZIsY-6YcqiWErZQUfev24hItJD1IkFSbOMyC6aD5VurfM4995qo1oo8bNpZ3hi_BzbCo9h6WxtX4zGfdssaqNVa-xbEKoWHL4HZxYzcKoOpFsBvqqtnvtLnOOHjW-hCbTGE1gZWJ-gg0rVHk4__2P0NBw89m-i0d31bT8fRZoTyiNBpWJcM84zyhXnRFegE0kojUumYhAlS1iZVlk4oVIiASkAFNUcCLCETNkx4ru92lnvHVTFwplGuU1BSbHNrgjZFb-zC9r5Tlsspw2U39JXWAEQO2Bt63C7n9fLNbhiBqpuZ__t5n-oH1zCZBQTmpE4NFEoTtg7CkCKqg</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Sondekoppam, Rakesh V.</creator><creator>Tsui, Ban C. H.</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Factors Associated With Risk of Neurologic Complications After Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Systematic Review</title><author>Sondekoppam, Rakesh V. ; Tsui, Ban C. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4014-819a34c344714a440cfec590112d3a2e8d353d6f7677fa85e98eea1c4e0e350b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nerve Block - adverse effects</topic><topic>Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Nervous System Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Peripheral Nerves</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sondekoppam, Rakesh V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsui, Ban C. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sondekoppam, Rakesh V.</au><au>Tsui, Ban C. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors Associated With Risk of Neurologic Complications After Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>645</spage><epage>660</epage><pages>645-660</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><abstract>The onset of neurologic complications after regional anesthesia is a complex process and may result from an interaction of host, agent, and environmental risk factors. The purpose of this systematic review was examine the qualitative evidence relating to various risk factors implicated in neurologic dysfunction after peripheral nerve block (PNB). The MEDLINE, OVID, and EMBASE databases were primary sources for literature. Cochrane, LILACS, DARE, IndMed, ERIC, NHS, and HTA via Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD; York University) databases were searched for additional unique results. Randomized controlled studies, case–control studies, cohort studies, retrospective reviews, and case reports/case series reporting neurologic outcomes after PNB were included. Relevant, good-quality systematic reviews were also eligible. Human and animal studies evaluating factors important for neurologic outcomes were assessed separately. Information on study design, outcomes, and quality was extracted and reviewed independently by the 2 review authors. An overall rating of the quality of evidence was assigned using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. Relevant full-text articles were separated based on type (prospective, retrospective, and nonhuman studies). Strengths of association were defined as high, moderate, inconclusive, or inadequate based on study quality and direction of association. The evidence from 77 human studies was reviewed to assess various host, agent, and environmental factors that have been implicated as possible risks. Most of the available evidence regarding the injurious effects of the 3 cardinal agents of mechanical insult, pressure, and neurotoxicity was extracted from animal studies (42 studies). Among the risk factors investigated in humans, block type had a strong association with neurologic outcome. Intraneural injection, which seems to occur commonly with PNBs, showed an inconsistent direction of association. Measures meant to increase precision and ostensibly reduce the occurrence of complications such as currently available guidance techniques showed little effect on the incidence of neurologic complications. Recovery from neurologic injury appears to be worse in patients with pre-existing risk factors. Categorization and definition of neurologic complication varied among studies, making synthesis of evidence difficult. Also, a significant portion of the evidence surrounding neurologic injury associated with PNB comes from animal or laboratory studies, the results of which are difficult to translate to clinical scenarios. Of the human studies, few had an a priori design to test associations between a specific risk factor exposure and resultant neurologic sequelae. A few risk factor associations were identified in human studies, but overall quality of evidence was low. Much of the evidence for risk factors comes from animal models and case reports. The final neurologic outcome seems to represent the complex interaction of the host, agent, and the environment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>28067709</pmid><doi>10.1213/ANE.0000000000001804</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 2017-02, Vol.124 (2), p.645-660
issn 0003-2999
1526-7598
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000001804
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animals
Humans
Nerve Block - adverse effects
Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology
Nervous System Diseases - etiology
Peripheral Nerves
Risk Factors
title Factors Associated With Risk of Neurologic Complications After Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A56%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20Associated%20With%20Risk%20of%20Neurologic%20Complications%20After%20Peripheral%20Nerve%20Blocks:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Sondekoppam,%20Rakesh%20V.&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=645&rft.epage=660&rft.pages=645-660&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001804&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E28067709%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/28067709&rfr_iscdi=true