Interscalene Brachial Plexus Anesthesia and Analgesia for Open Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Comparison Between Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine

We compared the onset time and quality of interscalene brachial plexus block produced with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in 50 patients undergoing open shoulder surgery randomly allocated to receive 30 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine (n = 25) or 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 25) injected through a 20-gauge cat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 2003-01, Vol.96 (1), p.253-259
Hauptverfasser: Casati, Andrea, Borghi, Battista, Fanelli, Guido, Montone, Nicoletta, Rotini, Roberto, Fraschini, Gianfranco, Vinciguerra, Federico, Torri, Giorgio, Chelly, Jacques
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 259
container_issue 1
container_start_page 253
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 96
creator Casati, Andrea
Borghi, Battista
Fanelli, Guido
Montone, Nicoletta
Rotini, Roberto
Fraschini, Gianfranco
Vinciguerra, Federico
Torri, Giorgio
Chelly, Jacques
description We compared the onset time and quality of interscalene brachial plexus block produced with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in 50 patients undergoing open shoulder surgery randomly allocated to receive 30 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine (n = 25) or 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 25) injected through a 20-gauge catheter placed into the interscalene sheath using a 18-gauge insulated and stimulating Tuohy introducer. The block was also prolonged after surgery using a patient-controlled interscalene analgesia with 0.125% levobupivacaine or 0.2% ropivacaine, respectively (basal infusion rate, 6 mL/h; bolus, 2 mL; lockout period, 15 min; maximum boluses per hour, three). Three patients (two with levobupivacaine [8%] and one with ropivacaine [4%]) failed to achieve surgical block within 45 min after the injection and were excluded. The onset time of surgical block was 20 min (10–40 min) with levobupivacaine and 20 min (5–45 min) with ropivacaine (P = 0.53). Rescue intraoperative analgesia (0.1 mg of fentanyl IV) was required in eight patients in each group (34%) (P = 0.99). Forty-two patients completed the 24-h postoperative infusion (22 with levobupivacaine and 20 with ropivacaine). Postoperative analgesia was similarly effective in both groups. Total consumption of local anesthetic infused during the first 24 h was 147 mL (144–196 mL) with levobupivacaine and 162 mL (144–248 mL) with ropivacaine (P = 0.019), with a ratio between boluses received and requested of 0.8 (0.4–1.0) and 0.7 (0.4–1.0), respectively (P = 0.004). The degree of motor block of the operated limb was deeper with levobupivacaine than ropivacaine when starting postoperative analgesia; however, no further differences in degree of motor function were observed between the two groups. We conclude that 30 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% induces an interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia of similar onset and intensity as the one produced by the same volume and concentration of ropivacaine. Postoperative interscalene analgesia with 0.125% levobupivacaine results in similar pain relief and recovery of motor function with less volume of local anesthetic than with 0.2% ropivacaine.
doi_str_mv 10.1213/00000539-200301000-00051
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wolterskluwer_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1213_00000539_200301000_00051</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>00000539-200301000-00051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2651-71e987f27a34af7ce63ea30023e0b1e8add50ea1dfeab437e05af42473b33ad83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd1OwjAYhnegiYjeQy_AabtubPMM8I-EBAN63Hxbv7FpWZd2A_FqvFQ7UM_syZun6feTp55HGL1mAeM3tD8RT_2AUk6ZA7-_YCfewCX3gzRNz7xza98cMpqMBt7XrG7R2BwU1kgmBvKyAkWeFX50loxrtG2JtgICtXQIan2gQhuyaLAmq1J3SqIhq86s0exvyZgs3Vu9qT5RXpE73WUK_YmqaomSTPWmAVNZXZMJtjt0Hea41VnXVFvIoXI79IOW-o8vvNMClMXLnxx6rw_3L9Mnf754nE3Hcz8PRhHzY4ZpEhdBDDyEIs5xxBE4pQFHmjFMQMqIIjBZIGQhj5FGUIRBGPOMc5AJH3rJsW9utLUGC9GYagNmLxgVvV3xa1f82RUHu640PJbutOplvqtuh0aUCKotxX-fwr8BeZiCIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interscalene Brachial Plexus Anesthesia and Analgesia for Open Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Comparison Between Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine</title><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Casati, Andrea ; Borghi, Battista ; Fanelli, Guido ; Montone, Nicoletta ; Rotini, Roberto ; Fraschini, Gianfranco ; Vinciguerra, Federico ; Torri, Giorgio ; Chelly, Jacques</creator><creatorcontrib>Casati, Andrea ; Borghi, Battista ; Fanelli, Guido ; Montone, Nicoletta ; Rotini, Roberto ; Fraschini, Gianfranco ; Vinciguerra, Federico ; Torri, Giorgio ; Chelly, Jacques</creatorcontrib><description>We compared the onset time and quality of interscalene brachial plexus block produced with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in 50 patients undergoing open shoulder surgery randomly allocated to receive 30 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine (n = 25) or 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 25) injected through a 20-gauge catheter placed into the interscalene sheath using a 18-gauge insulated and stimulating Tuohy introducer. The block was also prolonged after surgery using a patient-controlled interscalene analgesia with 0.125% levobupivacaine or 0.2% ropivacaine, respectively (basal infusion rate, 6 mL/h; bolus, 2 mL; lockout period, 15 min; maximum boluses per hour, three). Three patients (two with levobupivacaine [8%] and one with ropivacaine [4%]) failed to achieve surgical block within 45 min after the injection and were excluded. The onset time of surgical block was 20 min (10–40 min) with levobupivacaine and 20 min (5–45 min) with ropivacaine (P = 0.53). Rescue intraoperative analgesia (0.1 mg of fentanyl IV) was required in eight patients in each group (34%) (P = 0.99). Forty-two patients completed the 24-h postoperative infusion (22 with levobupivacaine and 20 with ropivacaine). Postoperative analgesia was similarly effective in both groups. Total consumption of local anesthetic infused during the first 24 h was 147 mL (144–196 mL) with levobupivacaine and 162 mL (144–248 mL) with ropivacaine (P = 0.019), with a ratio between boluses received and requested of 0.8 (0.4–1.0) and 0.7 (0.4–1.0), respectively (P = 0.004). The degree of motor block of the operated limb was deeper with levobupivacaine than ropivacaine when starting postoperative analgesia; however, no further differences in degree of motor function were observed between the two groups. We conclude that 30 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% induces an interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia of similar onset and intensity as the one produced by the same volume and concentration of ropivacaine. Postoperative interscalene analgesia with 0.125% levobupivacaine results in similar pain relief and recovery of motor function with less volume of local anesthetic than with 0.2% ropivacaine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/00000539-200301000-00051</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2003-01, Vol.96 (1), p.253-259</ispartof><rights>International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2651-71e987f27a34af7ce63ea30023e0b1e8add50ea1dfeab437e05af42473b33ad83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2651-71e987f27a34af7ce63ea30023e0b1e8add50ea1dfeab437e05af42473b33ad83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00000539-200301000-00051$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4594,27903,27904,65209</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Casati, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borghi, Battista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanelli, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montone, Nicoletta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotini, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraschini, Gianfranco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vinciguerra, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torri, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chelly, Jacques</creatorcontrib><title>Interscalene Brachial Plexus Anesthesia and Analgesia for Open Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Comparison Between Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><description>We compared the onset time and quality of interscalene brachial plexus block produced with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in 50 patients undergoing open shoulder surgery randomly allocated to receive 30 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine (n = 25) or 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 25) injected through a 20-gauge catheter placed into the interscalene sheath using a 18-gauge insulated and stimulating Tuohy introducer. The block was also prolonged after surgery using a patient-controlled interscalene analgesia with 0.125% levobupivacaine or 0.2% ropivacaine, respectively (basal infusion rate, 6 mL/h; bolus, 2 mL; lockout period, 15 min; maximum boluses per hour, three). Three patients (two with levobupivacaine [8%] and one with ropivacaine [4%]) failed to achieve surgical block within 45 min after the injection and were excluded. The onset time of surgical block was 20 min (10–40 min) with levobupivacaine and 20 min (5–45 min) with ropivacaine (P = 0.53). Rescue intraoperative analgesia (0.1 mg of fentanyl IV) was required in eight patients in each group (34%) (P = 0.99). Forty-two patients completed the 24-h postoperative infusion (22 with levobupivacaine and 20 with ropivacaine). Postoperative analgesia was similarly effective in both groups. Total consumption of local anesthetic infused during the first 24 h was 147 mL (144–196 mL) with levobupivacaine and 162 mL (144–248 mL) with ropivacaine (P = 0.019), with a ratio between boluses received and requested of 0.8 (0.4–1.0) and 0.7 (0.4–1.0), respectively (P = 0.004). The degree of motor block of the operated limb was deeper with levobupivacaine than ropivacaine when starting postoperative analgesia; however, no further differences in degree of motor function were observed between the two groups. We conclude that 30 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% induces an interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia of similar onset and intensity as the one produced by the same volume and concentration of ropivacaine. Postoperative interscalene analgesia with 0.125% levobupivacaine results in similar pain relief and recovery of motor function with less volume of local anesthetic than with 0.2% ropivacaine.</description><issn>0003-2999</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kd1OwjAYhnegiYjeQy_AabtubPMM8I-EBAN63Hxbv7FpWZd2A_FqvFQ7UM_syZun6feTp55HGL1mAeM3tD8RT_2AUk6ZA7-_YCfewCX3gzRNz7xza98cMpqMBt7XrG7R2BwU1kgmBvKyAkWeFX50loxrtG2JtgICtXQIan2gQhuyaLAmq1J3SqIhq86s0exvyZgs3Vu9qT5RXpE73WUK_YmqaomSTPWmAVNZXZMJtjt0Hea41VnXVFvIoXI79IOW-o8vvNMClMXLnxx6rw_3L9Mnf754nE3Hcz8PRhHzY4ZpEhdBDDyEIs5xxBE4pQFHmjFMQMqIIjBZIGQhj5FGUIRBGPOMc5AJH3rJsW9utLUGC9GYagNmLxgVvV3xa1f82RUHu640PJbutOplvqtuh0aUCKotxX-fwr8BeZiCIQ</recordid><startdate>20030101</startdate><enddate>20030101</enddate><creator>Casati, Andrea</creator><creator>Borghi, Battista</creator><creator>Fanelli, Guido</creator><creator>Montone, Nicoletta</creator><creator>Rotini, Roberto</creator><creator>Fraschini, Gianfranco</creator><creator>Vinciguerra, Federico</creator><creator>Torri, Giorgio</creator><creator>Chelly, Jacques</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030101</creationdate><title>Interscalene Brachial Plexus Anesthesia and Analgesia for Open Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Comparison Between Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine</title><author>Casati, Andrea ; Borghi, Battista ; Fanelli, Guido ; Montone, Nicoletta ; Rotini, Roberto ; Fraschini, Gianfranco ; Vinciguerra, Federico ; Torri, Giorgio ; Chelly, Jacques</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2651-71e987f27a34af7ce63ea30023e0b1e8add50ea1dfeab437e05af42473b33ad83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casati, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borghi, Battista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanelli, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montone, Nicoletta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotini, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraschini, Gianfranco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vinciguerra, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torri, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chelly, Jacques</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casati, Andrea</au><au>Borghi, Battista</au><au>Fanelli, Guido</au><au>Montone, Nicoletta</au><au>Rotini, Roberto</au><au>Fraschini, Gianfranco</au><au>Vinciguerra, Federico</au><au>Torri, Giorgio</au><au>Chelly, Jacques</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interscalene Brachial Plexus Anesthesia and Analgesia for Open Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Comparison Between Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><date>2003-01-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>253-259</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><abstract>We compared the onset time and quality of interscalene brachial plexus block produced with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in 50 patients undergoing open shoulder surgery randomly allocated to receive 30 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine (n = 25) or 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 25) injected through a 20-gauge catheter placed into the interscalene sheath using a 18-gauge insulated and stimulating Tuohy introducer. The block was also prolonged after surgery using a patient-controlled interscalene analgesia with 0.125% levobupivacaine or 0.2% ropivacaine, respectively (basal infusion rate, 6 mL/h; bolus, 2 mL; lockout period, 15 min; maximum boluses per hour, three). Three patients (two with levobupivacaine [8%] and one with ropivacaine [4%]) failed to achieve surgical block within 45 min after the injection and were excluded. The onset time of surgical block was 20 min (10–40 min) with levobupivacaine and 20 min (5–45 min) with ropivacaine (P = 0.53). Rescue intraoperative analgesia (0.1 mg of fentanyl IV) was required in eight patients in each group (34%) (P = 0.99). Forty-two patients completed the 24-h postoperative infusion (22 with levobupivacaine and 20 with ropivacaine). Postoperative analgesia was similarly effective in both groups. Total consumption of local anesthetic infused during the first 24 h was 147 mL (144–196 mL) with levobupivacaine and 162 mL (144–248 mL) with ropivacaine (P = 0.019), with a ratio between boluses received and requested of 0.8 (0.4–1.0) and 0.7 (0.4–1.0), respectively (P = 0.004). The degree of motor block of the operated limb was deeper with levobupivacaine than ropivacaine when starting postoperative analgesia; however, no further differences in degree of motor function were observed between the two groups. We conclude that 30 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% induces an interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia of similar onset and intensity as the one produced by the same volume and concentration of ropivacaine. Postoperative interscalene analgesia with 0.125% levobupivacaine results in similar pain relief and recovery of motor function with less volume of local anesthetic than with 0.2% ropivacaine.</abstract><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><doi>10.1213/00000539-200301000-00051</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 2003-01, Vol.96 (1), p.253-259
issn 0003-2999
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1213_00000539_200301000_00051
source Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
title Interscalene Brachial Plexus Anesthesia and Analgesia for Open Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Comparison Between Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T17%3A21%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wolterskluwer_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interscalene%20Brachial%20Plexus%20Anesthesia%20and%20Analgesia%20for%20Open%20Shoulder%20Surgery:%20A%20Randomized,%20Double-Blinded%20Comparison%20Between%20Levobupivacaine%20and%20Ropivacaine&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Casati,%20Andrea&rft.date=2003-01-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=253-259&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/00000539-200301000-00051&rft_dat=%3Cwolterskluwer_cross%3E00000539-200301000-00051%3C/wolterskluwer_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true