Comparison of Eltanolone and Propofol in Anesthesia for Termination of Pregnancy

A randomized study was designed to compare eltanolone (pregnanolone) and propofol anesthesia in 60 unpremedicated women undergoing outpatient termination of pregnancy. The initial doses for induction of anesthesia were 0.8 mg/kg for eltanolone and 2 mg/kg for propofol followed by an additional 25% i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 1994-09, Vol.79 (3), p.512-516
Hauptverfasser: Kallela, Heidi, Haasio, Juhani, Korttila, Kari
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 516
container_issue 3
container_start_page 512
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 79
creator Kallela, Heidi
Haasio, Juhani
Korttila, Kari
description A randomized study was designed to compare eltanolone (pregnanolone) and propofol anesthesia in 60 unpremedicated women undergoing outpatient termination of pregnancy. The initial doses for induction of anesthesia were 0.8 mg/kg for eltanolone and 2 mg/kg for propofol followed by an additional 25% increment if necessary. The doses required for successful induction were 0.82 ± 0.06 and 2.1 ± 0.3 (mean ± SD) mg/kg for eltanolone and propofol, respectively. Discomfort or pain on injection occurred in none of the patients given eltanolone and in 20% of those receiving propofol (P < 0.05). To maintain satisfactory anesthesia, 29% of the patients given eltanolone and 70% of the patients given propofol needed extra bolus doses of the study drug (P < 0.01). Excitation (twitching of extremities or slight hypertonus) occurred in 29% of the patients in the eltanolone group compared to none in the propofol group (P < 0.05). Both clinical (opening eyes, orientation, walking, tolerating oral fluids, voiding) and psychomotor recovery (Maddox Wing test and Digit Symbol Substitution test) returned to baseline more slowly after eltanolone than after propofol. Overall home readiness was achieved later in the eltanolone group [median 57 min (range 41–190 min)] compared to the propofol [37 (32–100 min)] group. We conclude that recovery from anesthesia is more rapid from propofol as compared to eltanolone anesthesia.
doi_str_mv 10.1213/00000539-199409000-00019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1213_00000539_199409000_00019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>8067557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3849-d4f49b76ef5ced91c6d2e89fa1e25380f827d048f8f1e0c59b58ea5237659ff23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMotVZ_gpCF29E8Z5JlKfUBBbuo65DO3NjRmaQkU0r_vVOndmcghHvPORfuF4QwJY-UUf5EjkdynVGtBdF9kfWX6gs0ppLlWSG1ukTjvsczprW-RjcpfR0tROUjNFIkL6Qsxmg5C-3WxjoFj4PD86azPjTBA7a-wssYtsGFBtceTz2kbgOpttiFiFcQ29rbrh6Cywif3vrycIuunG0S3J3eCfp4nq9mr9ni_eVtNl1kJVdCZ5VwQq-LHJwsodK0zCsGSjtLgUmuiFOsqIhQTjkKpJR6LRVYyXiRS-0c4xOkhrllDClFcGYb69bGg6HEHBmZP0bmzMj8Muqj90N0u1u3UJ2DJyi9_nDSbSpt42K_V53ONsFyIZTobWKw7UPTQUzfzW4P0WzANt3G_PdD_AeaTH5y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Eltanolone and Propofol in Anesthesia for Termination of Pregnancy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Kallela, Heidi ; Haasio, Juhani ; Korttila, Kari</creator><creatorcontrib>Kallela, Heidi ; Haasio, Juhani ; Korttila, Kari</creatorcontrib><description>A randomized study was designed to compare eltanolone (pregnanolone) and propofol anesthesia in 60 unpremedicated women undergoing outpatient termination of pregnancy. The initial doses for induction of anesthesia were 0.8 mg/kg for eltanolone and 2 mg/kg for propofol followed by an additional 25% increment if necessary. The doses required for successful induction were 0.82 ± 0.06 and 2.1 ± 0.3 (mean ± SD) mg/kg for eltanolone and propofol, respectively. Discomfort or pain on injection occurred in none of the patients given eltanolone and in 20% of those receiving propofol (P &lt; 0.05). To maintain satisfactory anesthesia, 29% of the patients given eltanolone and 70% of the patients given propofol needed extra bolus doses of the study drug (P &lt; 0.01). Excitation (twitching of extremities or slight hypertonus) occurred in 29% of the patients in the eltanolone group compared to none in the propofol group (P &lt; 0.05). Both clinical (opening eyes, orientation, walking, tolerating oral fluids, voiding) and psychomotor recovery (Maddox Wing test and Digit Symbol Substitution test) returned to baseline more slowly after eltanolone than after propofol. Overall home readiness was achieved later in the eltanolone group [median 57 min (range 41–190 min)] compared to the propofol [37 (32–100 min)] group. We conclude that recovery from anesthesia is more rapid from propofol as compared to eltanolone anesthesia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199409000-00019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8067557</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AACRAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Abortion, Induced ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Anesthesia, Obstetrical ; Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neuropharmacology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pregnancy ; Pregnanolone - adverse effects ; Pregnanolone - pharmacology ; Propofol - adverse effects ; Propofol - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 1994-09, Vol.79 (3), p.512-516</ispartof><rights>1994 International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3849-d4f49b76ef5ced91c6d2e89fa1e25380f827d048f8f1e0c59b58ea5237659ff23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00000539-199409000-00019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4595,27901,27902,65206</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4264484$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8067557$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kallela, Heidi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haasio, Juhani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korttila, Kari</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Eltanolone and Propofol in Anesthesia for Termination of Pregnancy</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>A randomized study was designed to compare eltanolone (pregnanolone) and propofol anesthesia in 60 unpremedicated women undergoing outpatient termination of pregnancy. The initial doses for induction of anesthesia were 0.8 mg/kg for eltanolone and 2 mg/kg for propofol followed by an additional 25% increment if necessary. The doses required for successful induction were 0.82 ± 0.06 and 2.1 ± 0.3 (mean ± SD) mg/kg for eltanolone and propofol, respectively. Discomfort or pain on injection occurred in none of the patients given eltanolone and in 20% of those receiving propofol (P &lt; 0.05). To maintain satisfactory anesthesia, 29% of the patients given eltanolone and 70% of the patients given propofol needed extra bolus doses of the study drug (P &lt; 0.01). Excitation (twitching of extremities or slight hypertonus) occurred in 29% of the patients in the eltanolone group compared to none in the propofol group (P &lt; 0.05). Both clinical (opening eyes, orientation, walking, tolerating oral fluids, voiding) and psychomotor recovery (Maddox Wing test and Digit Symbol Substitution test) returned to baseline more slowly after eltanolone than after propofol. Overall home readiness was achieved later in the eltanolone group [median 57 min (range 41–190 min)] compared to the propofol [37 (32–100 min)] group. We conclude that recovery from anesthesia is more rapid from propofol as compared to eltanolone anesthesia.</description><subject>Abortion, Induced</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Obstetrical</subject><subject>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnanolone - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pregnanolone - pharmacology</subject><subject>Propofol - adverse effects</subject><subject>Propofol - pharmacology</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMotVZ_gpCF29E8Z5JlKfUBBbuo65DO3NjRmaQkU0r_vVOndmcghHvPORfuF4QwJY-UUf5EjkdynVGtBdF9kfWX6gs0ppLlWSG1ukTjvsczprW-RjcpfR0tROUjNFIkL6Qsxmg5C-3WxjoFj4PD86azPjTBA7a-wssYtsGFBtceTz2kbgOpttiFiFcQ29rbrh6Cywif3vrycIuunG0S3J3eCfp4nq9mr9ni_eVtNl1kJVdCZ5VwQq-LHJwsodK0zCsGSjtLgUmuiFOsqIhQTjkKpJR6LRVYyXiRS-0c4xOkhrllDClFcGYb69bGg6HEHBmZP0bmzMj8Muqj90N0u1u3UJ2DJyi9_nDSbSpt42K_V53ONsFyIZTobWKw7UPTQUzfzW4P0WzANt3G_PdD_AeaTH5y</recordid><startdate>199409</startdate><enddate>199409</enddate><creator>Kallela, Heidi</creator><creator>Haasio, Juhani</creator><creator>Korttila, Kari</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199409</creationdate><title>Comparison of Eltanolone and Propofol in Anesthesia for Termination of Pregnancy</title><author>Kallela, Heidi ; Haasio, Juhani ; Korttila, Kari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3849-d4f49b76ef5ced91c6d2e89fa1e25380f827d048f8f1e0c59b58ea5237659ff23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Abortion, Induced</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Obstetrical</topic><topic>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnanolone - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pregnanolone - pharmacology</topic><topic>Propofol - adverse effects</topic><topic>Propofol - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kallela, Heidi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haasio, Juhani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korttila, Kari</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kallela, Heidi</au><au>Haasio, Juhani</au><au>Korttila, Kari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Eltanolone and Propofol in Anesthesia for Termination of Pregnancy</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>1994-09</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>512</spage><epage>516</epage><pages>512-516</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><coden>AACRAT</coden><abstract>A randomized study was designed to compare eltanolone (pregnanolone) and propofol anesthesia in 60 unpremedicated women undergoing outpatient termination of pregnancy. The initial doses for induction of anesthesia were 0.8 mg/kg for eltanolone and 2 mg/kg for propofol followed by an additional 25% increment if necessary. The doses required for successful induction were 0.82 ± 0.06 and 2.1 ± 0.3 (mean ± SD) mg/kg for eltanolone and propofol, respectively. Discomfort or pain on injection occurred in none of the patients given eltanolone and in 20% of those receiving propofol (P &lt; 0.05). To maintain satisfactory anesthesia, 29% of the patients given eltanolone and 70% of the patients given propofol needed extra bolus doses of the study drug (P &lt; 0.01). Excitation (twitching of extremities or slight hypertonus) occurred in 29% of the patients in the eltanolone group compared to none in the propofol group (P &lt; 0.05). Both clinical (opening eyes, orientation, walking, tolerating oral fluids, voiding) and psychomotor recovery (Maddox Wing test and Digit Symbol Substitution test) returned to baseline more slowly after eltanolone than after propofol. Overall home readiness was achieved later in the eltanolone group [median 57 min (range 41–190 min)] compared to the propofol [37 (32–100 min)] group. We conclude that recovery from anesthesia is more rapid from propofol as compared to eltanolone anesthesia.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>8067557</pmid><doi>10.1213/00000539-199409000-00019</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 1994-09, Vol.79 (3), p.512-516
issn 0003-2999
1526-7598
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1213_00000539_199409000_00019
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Abortion, Induced
Adolescent
Adult
Anesthesia, Obstetrical
Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Humans
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neuropharmacology
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Pregnancy
Pregnanolone - adverse effects
Pregnanolone - pharmacology
Propofol - adverse effects
Propofol - pharmacology
title Comparison of Eltanolone and Propofol in Anesthesia for Termination of Pregnancy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T12%3A02%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Eltanolone%20and%20Propofol%20in%20Anesthesia%20for%20Termination%20of%20Pregnancy&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Kallela,%20Heidi&rft.date=1994-09&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=512&rft.epage=516&rft.pages=512-516&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft.coden=AACRAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/00000539-199409000-00019&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E8067557%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/8067557&rfr_iscdi=true